Background: Extra-articular fractures of the distal radius in children are most often treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate long term (> 12 years follow-up) objective and subjective outcomes in a consecutive series of pediatric patients treated with closed reduction with standardized outcome instruments. We hypothesized that children treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization have little or no objective functional impairment in later life and therefore subjective factors are the strongest determinants of outcome.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients with an average age at time of injury of 9 years (range, five to sixteen years) were evaluated at an average of twenty-one years (range, twelve to twenty seven years) after injury (patients aged 21 to 39) after closed reduction of an extra-articular distal radius fracture. Patients were evaluated using 2 physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS, and the Sarmiento modification of the Gartland and Werley score; MGWS) and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Radiographic measurements were also made. Multivariable analysis of variance and multiple linear regression modelling were used to identify the degree to which various factors affect variability in the scores derived with these measures.

Results: All fractures had healed without significant loss of alignment. Final functional results according to the MGWS were rated as excellent or good in all patients. The average MMWS score was 90 points, and the median DASH score was 0 points. Twenty patients (74%) considered themselves pain free. Bivariate analysis revealed pain -as rated according to scales used in the MMWS- and age at time of injury to be correlated with DASH scores, with pain as the only independent predictor of patient-based outcome in multivariable analysis. This explains almost three quarters of the variability in DASH scores. Pain, range of motion, and radiographic measurement of radial length correlated with the physician based scoring system MMWS;

Conclusions: Twenty-one years after injury 96% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings and patient-based DASH scores. It is remarkable that pain explained 74% of the variation in DASH scores. Perhaps when there is very little impairment, subjective factors are more important determinants of disability.

Background: It is well established that unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius may require operative treatment to restore alignment and that failure to restore alignment often leads to wrist and forearm dysfunction. There is ongoing debate in the literature whether or not there is a strict relationship between the quality of anatomical reconstruction and functional outcome. We hypothesize that there is no difference in objective- and subjective functional outcome between patients with AO type B versus more complex AO type C fractures.

Methods: Ninety-four patients with an average age of 42 years (range, 20 to 78 years) at the time of injury were evaluated an average of 20 years (range, 8 to 32 years) after treatment of an intra-articular distal radius fracture. At long-term follow-up patients were evaluated using a physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Objective and subjective functional outcome of patients with AO Type B and AO Type C fractures were compared.

Results: An average of 20 years after injury (average age 62 years, range 35 to 90), all fractures healed without significant loss of alignment. There was no difference in physician based outcome measure according to the Mayo score between 17 patients with 18 AO type B fractures (average, 80,3 points; range 45 to 100) and 27 patients with 31 AO type C fractures (average, 75.9 points; range 10 to 95, p=0.42). Differences in subjective DASH scores were not statistically significant either (p = 0.47); average 13 points for Type B patients (range, 0 to 58 points) and an average of 16 points for Type C patients (range, 0 to 71 points).

Groups were statistically comparable. No statistical differences were found in flexion extension arc (average 103 degrees, range 10 to 145 degrees), pronation supination arc (average 150 degrees, range 0 to 180 degrees) or radial ulnar deviation (average 52 degrees, range 0 to 85 degrees), as well as grip strength and osteoarthritis (all p> 0.05)

Conclusions: Twenty years after injury 67% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings. There is no difference in functional long term outcome between patient with more extensive intra-articular comminution (type C fractures) and AO type B fractures. This is consistent with previous long term outcome studies with similar methodology; when more complex injuries are not correlated with decreased long term functional outcome, other (subjective) factors are more important determinants of disability.