The primary aim of this trial was to compare the subsidence of two similar hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components from different manufacturers. Secondary aims were to compare rotational migration (anteversion/retroversion and varus/valgus tilt) and patient-reported outcome measures between both femoral components. Patients were randomized to receive one of the two femoral components (Avenir or Corail) during their primary total hip arthroplasty between August 2018 and September 2020. Radiostereometric analysis examinations at six, 12, and 24 months were used to assess the migration of each implanted femoral component compared to a baseline assessment. Patient-reported outcome measures were also recorded for these same timepoints. Overall, 50 patients were enrolled (62% male (n = 31), with a mean age of 65.7 years (SD 7.3), and mean BMI of 30.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.2)).Aims
Methods
Instability is a common cause of failure after total hip arthroplasty. A novel reverse total hip has been developed, with a femoral cup and acetabular ball, creating enhanced mechanical stability. The purpose of this study was to assess the implant fixation using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and the clinical safety and efficacy of this novel design. Patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective cohort at a single centre. The cohort consisted of 11 females and 11 males with mean age of 70.6 years (SD 3.5) and BMI of 31.0 kg/m2 (SD 5.7). Implant fixation was evaluated using RSA as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 38-item Short Form survey, and EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores at two-year follow-up. At least one acetabular screw was used in all cases. RSA markers were inserted into the innominate bone and proximal femur with imaging at six weeks (baseline) and six, 12, and 24 months. Independent-samples Aims
Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of multimorbidity
on improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following
total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using data from a regional joint registry for 14 573 patients,
HRQoL was measured prior and one year following surgery using the
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the 12-Item
Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summary scores
(PCS and MCS, respectively). Multimorbidity was defined as the concurrence
of two or more self-reported chronic conditions. A linear mixed-effects
model was used to test the effects of multimorbidity and the number
of chronic conditions on improvements in HRQoL.Aims
Patients and Methods
This review considers the surgical treatment
of displaced fractures involving the knee in elderly, osteoporotic patients.
The goals of treatment include pain control, early mobilisation,
avoidance of complications and minimising the need for further surgery.
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) frequently results in
loss of reduction, which can result in post-traumatic arthritis
and the occasional conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). TKR
after failed internal fixation is challenging, with modest functional
outcomes and high complication rates. TKR undertaken as treatment
of the initial fracture has better results to late TKR, but does
not match the outcome of primary TKR without complications. Given
the relatively infrequent need for late TKR following failed fixation,
ORIF is the preferred management for most cases. Early TKR can be
considered for those patients with pre-existing arthritis, bicondylar
femoral fractures, those who would be unable to comply with weight-bearing restrictions,
or where a single definitive procedure is required.
Despite being matched by age, gender and modified Charnley classification, there were significant differences in post-operative functional scores. The revision TKR group’s mean WOMAC score was 73 (SD 17), compared to the primary group’s mean score of 84 (SD 14), p=0.002. Similarly, the revision group’s mean SF-12 PCS score was 35 (SD 8) compared to the primary group’s superior score of 44 (SD 10), p<
0.0001. There was no differences detected in post-operative SF-12 mental component scores; 49 (SD 12) for the revision group compared to 53 (SD 10) for the primary group, p=0.11.
