The results clinically & statistically of a 14 year longitudinal study comparing the traditional ‘stretch & strap’ method (1994-2002) with the Ponseti technique (2002-2008) A 14 year prospective longitudinal comparative study was undertaken into management and outcome of CTEV. There were 114 feet (80 patients), 64 feet (45 patients) treated traditionally and 50 feet (35 Patients) with the Ponseti technique. Patient demographics, the Harold & Walker Classification, and associated risk factors for CTEV were analysed. If conservative treatment failed a radical sub-talar release operation (RSR) was undertaken. The incidence of fixed CTEV was 1.6 per 1000 live births with a male to female ratio of 2.8 to 1. Idiopathic CTEV was present in 77.5% of patients, (22.5% with a primary aetiology). Mean time to RSR was comparable: 37.43 weeks (CI: 33.65 to 41.21) and 46 weeks (CI: 39.18 to 52.82) for the traditional and Ponseti groups respectively. In the traditional group 65.6% (CI: 53.4 to 76.1%) of feet underwent RSR surgery compared to just 25.5% (CI: 15.8 to 38.3%) in the Ponseti group, When idiopathic CTEV was analysed separately these rates reduce to 56.5% (CI: 42.3 to 69.8%) and 15.8% (CI: 7.4 to 30.4%) respectively. The Relative Risk of requiring RSR surgery in traditional compared to Ponseti groups was 2.58 (CI: 1.59 to 4.19) for all patients and 3.58 (CI: 1.65 to 7.78) for idiopathic CTEV (statistically significant). The results of the Ponseti method improved with time suggesting a learning curve.Purpose of study
Methods & Results