The management of open lower limb fractures in the United Kingdom
has evolved over the last ten years with the introduction of major
trauma networks (MTNs), the publication of standards of care and
the wide acceptance of a combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical approach
to management. The aims of this study were to report recent changes
in outcome of open tibial fractures following the implementation
of these changes. Data on all patients with an open tibial fracture presenting
to a major trauma centre between 2011 and 2012 were collected prospectively.
The treatment and outcomes of the 65 Gustilo Anderson Grade III
B tibial fractures were compared with historical data from the same
unit. Aims
Patients and Methods
Injury to the ACL is a significant problem and can cause further damage to the internal structures of the knee. ACL injury is associated with injuries to other structures in the knee such as the meniscus and chondral cartilage. Such intra articular injuries pre-dispose the knee to develop arthritis. This injury is usually seen in young and active people usually related to sporting injuries. There is a paucity of literature on the influence of anthropometric features on the hamstring graft obtained in ACL reconstruction, although there are studies on the sex based differences affecting the hamstring graft. This study was undertaken to assess the influence of anthropometric measurements on the graft thickness obtained at ACL reconstruction surgery within the UK population. This study was undertaken to assess the influence of anthropometric measurements (body mass index (BMI), height and weight) on the graft thickness obtained at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.Background
Objective
Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) have inconsistent and variable survivorships reported in the literature. It has been suggested that many are revised for ongoing pain with no other mode of failure identified. Using a medial UKR with an all-polyethylene non-congruent tibial component from 2004–7, we noted a revision rate of 9/98 cases (9.2%) at a mean of 39 months. Subchondral sclerosis was noted under the tibial component in 3/9 revisions with well fixed implants, and the aim of this study was to investigate this as a mode of failure. 89 UKRs in 77 patients were investigated radiographically (at mean 50 months) and with SF-12 and Oxford Knee scores at mean follow up 55 months. Subjectively 23/89 cases (25%) had sclerosis under the tibial component. We describe a method of quantifying this sclerosis as a greyscale ratio (GSR), which was significantly correlated with presence/absence of sclerosis (p<0.001). Significant predictors of elevated GSR (increasing sclerosis) were female sex (p<0.001) and elevated BMI (P=0.010) on both univariate and multivariate analysis. In turn, elevated GSR was significantly associated with poorer improvement in OKS (p<0.05) at the time of final follow up. We hypothesise that this sclerosis results from repetitive microfracture and adaptive remodelling in the proximal tibia due to increased strain. Finite element analysis is required to investigate this further, but we suggest caution should be employed when considering all polyethylene UKR implants in older women and in those with BMI >35.
Our study was undertaken to assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of the classification system of Sanders for calcaneal fractures. Five consultant orthopaedic surgeons with different subspecialty interests classified CT scans of 28 calcaneal fractures using this classification system. After six months, they reclassified the scans. Kappa statistics were used to analyse the two groups. The interobserver variability of the classification system was 0.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.38). The subclasses were then combined and assessment of agreement between the general classes as a whole gave a kappa value of 0.33 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.41). The mean kappa value for intra-observer variability of the classification system was 0.42 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.62). When the subclasses were combined, it was 0.45 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.65). Our results show that, despite its popularity, the classification system of Sanders has only fair agreement among users.