Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) is complex and challenging. The Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems are the most commonly used. However, neither encompasses the whole spectrum of disease and deformity and therefore does not guide modern surgical options.

We present a new classification system which aims to guide surgical strategy by focusing on the three main areas of disease and deformity: Cup defect; De-rotation of femoral neck ante-version; Height of femoral subluxation. Each component is graded from 1–3 based on the severity of deformity and the potential surgical strategy required (with 3 being the most severe). A total numerical score will reflect the overall degree of difficulty which may be used when assessing surgical outcomes.

The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of this new adult CDH classification system in the setting of THA.

To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of single and multiple level Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement (ACDR) using Peek-on-peek system. We present the largest series of POPCDR at a single centre.

Thirty-one patients with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by disc generation who did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS (Visual Analogue Score) for neck (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP). Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires were completed. Disc height and segmental angular correction (SAC) were measured on radiographs pre- and postoperatively.

Seven patients had one-level, fifteen had two-level, seven had three-level and two had four-level ACDR. Sixty-six discs were replaced. Average follow-up was six months.

Mean VAS-NP improved from 7.27 to 3.93 and VAS-AP from 7.27 to 3.4. Mean SF-36 improved from 32.21 to 40.22. There was functional improvement for NDI in all patients.

There was an improvement in SAC from 5.4^° to 8.0^° for one-level, 3.1^° to 7.5^° for two level, 8.4^° to 9.4^° for three-level and 5.8^° to 26.7^° for four-level ACDR.

Post-operative anterior disc height increased by 152% for lower and 55% for higher levels. Similar improvements were noted for posterior disc heights.

Early results show that POPCDR is safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. The clinical and radiological outcomes are similar to other types of ACDR reported in literature. POPCDR also allows safe use of MRI during follow-up with fewer artifacts giving it an edge over other systems.

Background: Resurfacing cups may produce significant clinical problems when placed at the extremes of version, including increased production of metal debris and psoas tendonitis.

Methods: We obtained the femoral and acetabular components of two unused ASR (Articular Surface Replacement) and BHR (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing) devices. The components were placed in moulds at varying degrees of inclination and anteversion in a grid to simulate pelvic landmarks and AP radiographic images were captured. The true radiological anteversion was determined by rotating the x-ray beam so that it was perpendicular to the acetabular axis and measuring the angle subtended by the cup rim and the vertical axis.

Five blinded orthopaedic registrars then used EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Inns-bruck, Austria) software to determine the radiological anteversion from the AP films. Twenty-five ASR and twenty-five BHR images were analysed.

At the same time each observer was asked to grade the cups as “1” (< 10°) “2” (10–20°) “3” (20–30°) or “4” (> 30°) depending on the appearances of the cup vertices.

Results: Mean error for each observer was −0.7 (minimum) to 1.6° (maximum). The range of standard deviations of error for each observer was +/− 2.2 (minimum) to 3.5° (maximum). Retroverted cups were not identified in the majority of cases.

Cups graded as “1” or “4” showed high sensitivity and specificity for the true grade as determined on the lateral radiographs.

Conclusions: EBRA software can be used to calculate the anteversion of resurfacing cups to a clinically acceptable degree. The clinician must be aware of the limitations of the software most notably the difficulty in identifying a retroverted cup and errors arising from poor quality radiographs in terms of pelvic rotation. The presented clinical grading system can be used as a rapid assessment tool to identify cups at the extremes of anteversion.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 6 patients had radiotherapy alone while 26 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.

Aim: To identify tumour and treatment factors significant for both local control and survival for patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.

Method: The features of all patients with non metastatic chondrosarcoma of the pelvis treated at a tertiary treatment centre between 1971 and 2001 with more than 2 years of follow-up were analyzed.

Results: There were 106 patients with a median age of 44. There were equal numbers of male and female patients in the group. The median size of the tumours was 12cm. 47 tumours were grade 1, 37 were grade 2 and 22 were grade 3. Treatment involved hindquarter amputation in 33 and excision with or without reconstruction in 73. Clear margins (wide or better) were achieved in 34 cases. The excision was marginal in 30 cases and intralesional or contaminated in 37. Local recurrence arose in 39 patients and was related to adequate margins of excision (p=0.03) and grade (p=0.01). Overall survival was 72% at 5 years, 56% at 10 years and 46% at 15 years. Survival was strongly related to grade (p=0.08) but survival beyond 5 years was most strongly related to the adequacy of the excision margins.

Conclusion: Tumour grade is the most important prognostic factor for chondrosarcoma of the pelvis but the ability to obtain clear margins of excision influences both local control and the prospects for long term survival.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 7 patients had radiotherapy alone while 25 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.