The demands placed upon joint surgeons are perhaps greatest when treating the revision arthroplasty patient, who present with complications demanding skill in diagnosis and evaluation, interpersonal communication and the technical aspects of the revision procedure. However, little information exists identifying which specific tasks in revision arthroplasty are most difficult for surgeons to master, and whether the greatest challenges arise from clinical, cognitive or technical facets of patient treatment. This study was undertaken to identify which tasks associated with revision total knee replacement (TKR) are perceived as most challenging to young surgeons and trainees to guide future efforts in surgical training and curriculum development. We developed an online survey instrument consisting of 69 items encompassing pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative tasks that preliminary studies identified as the essential components of revision TKR. These tasks encompassed 4 domains: clinical decision-making skills (n=9), interpersonal assessment and communication (n=7), surgical decision-making (n=35) and procedural surgical tasks (n=18). Respondents rated the difficulty of each item on a 5-level Likert scale, with an ordinal score ranging from 1 (“very easy”) to 5 (“very difficult”. The survey instrument was administered to a cohort of 109 US surgeons: 31 trainees enrolled in a joint fellowship program (Fellows) and 78 surgeons who had graduated from a joint fellowship program within the previous 10 years (Joint Surgeons). Using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests, the responses were analyzed to examine the variation of reported difficulty of each of the 69 items, in addition to the nature of the task (cognitive, surgical, clinical and interpersonal), and differences between Fellows and Surgeons.Introduction
Methods
We studied 57 patients with isolated lunotriquetral injuries treated by arthrodesis, direct ligament repair, or ligament reconstruction. The outcomes were compared by using written questionnaires, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, range of movement, strength, morbidity and rates of reoperation. Isolated lunotriquetral injury was confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The mean age of the patients was 30.7 years (15.4 to 53.7) and the injuries were subacute or chronic in 98.2%. Eight patients underwent lunotriquetral reconstruction using a distally-based strip of the tendon of extensor carpi ulnaris, 27 had lunotriquetral repair and 22 had lunotriquetral arthrodesis. The mean follow-up was 9.5 years (2 to 22). The probability of remaining free from complications at five years was 68.6% for reconstruction, 13.5% for repair, and less than 1% for arthrodesis. Of the lunotriquetral arthrodeses, 40.9% developed nonunion and 22.7% developed ulnocarpal impaction. The probability of not requiring further surgery at five years was 68.6% for reconstruction, 23.3% for repair and 21.8% for arthrodesis. The DASH scores for each group were not significantly different. Objective improvements in strength and movement, subjective indicators of pain relief and satisfaction were significantly higher in the lunotriquetral repair and reconstruction groups than in those undergoing arthrodesis.
