Current policy and practice aimed at tackling work disability due to low back pain is largely aligned with the Psychosocial Flags Framework, which focuses on addressing individual beliefs and behaviours (yellow and blue flags). However, our understanding of the systemic and contextual factors (black flags) that are also proposed to act as obstacles within this Framework is under-represented, resulting in a disproportionate evidence base and suboptimal interventions. A ‘best-evidence’ synthesis was conducted to collate the evidence on those ‘black flags’ proposed to be the most important: compensatory systems (worker's compensation and disability benefits), healthcare provider systems and ‘significant others’ (spouse/partner/close family members). A systematic search of scientific and grey literature databases was performed, and the validity and merit of the available evidence was assessed using a system adapted from previous large-scale policy reviews conducted in this field.Background
Methods
The prevalence estimates of LBP are so far well documented. However, only few longitudinal studies have described the variability of LBP in the same population over time. Therefore, little is known about the course of LBP at the individual level. The aim of this study was to describe changes in low back pain (LBP) reporting over an eight-year period in a cohort of adult Danes.Background
Purpose
