There has been speculation as to whether the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is as successful as primary TKA, this study was designed to compare the outcomes of primary and revision TKA in order to address this question.

The study collected data prospectively from patients operated upon by one surgeon using one prosthesis design in each group. All patients undergoing revision TKA between 1997 and 2000 were included in the study. 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA between 1997 and 1999 were included in the study. All surgery was performed by the senior author.

Patients completed SF-12 and WOMAC questionnaires pre-operatively and at six and twelve months post-operatively. Mean scores were calculated for the different areas within both outcome measures (WOMAC pain, stiffness and function; SF-12 – physical constant score [PCS] and mental constant score [MCS])

The results were entered into a database and analysed using a combination of two way and simple repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests. Only if the result of the ANOVA was significant were post-hoc adjusted t-tests performed on the data values.

WOMAC scores did not differ between the two groups pre-operatively. Both patient groups showed a significant improvement in WOMAC scores at six months (P< 0.0005). In the primary group the pain and function scores improved significantly between six and twelve months (P=0.0258 and P=0.0019 respectively). This was not the case in revision patients.

SF-12 PCS scores were significantly better in the primary patients pre-operatively (P< 0.0005). Both groups showed a significant improvement at six months assessment (P< 0.0005). Neither group demonstrated an improvement between six and twelve months. SF-12 MCS scores did not show any difference between the two groups pre-operatively. No significant change in MCS score occurred during the study in either the primary or revision patients.

The SF-12 and WOMAC health questionnaires are valid, reliable and responsive outcome measures. The study has collected data prospectively from patients operated upon by one surgeon using one prosthesis design in each group. These findings support the concept that revision TKA leads to a comparable improvement in patient perceived outcomes of physical parameters as does primary TKA in both generic health outcome measures and disease specific outcome measures.

There has been speculation as to how the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compares with that of primary TKA. We have collected data prospectively from patients operated on by one surgeon using one prosthesis in each group. One hundred patients underwent primary TKA and 60 revision TKA. They completed SF-12 and WOMAC questionnaires before and at six and 12 months after operation.

The improvements in the SF-12 physical scores and WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores in both primary and revision TKA patients were highly statistically significant at six months. There was no statistically significant difference in the size of the improvement in the SF-12 physical and WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores between the primary and revision patients at six months after surgery. The SF-12 mental scores of patients in both groups showed no statistically significant difference after surgery at the six- and 12-month assessments.

Our findings show that primary and revision TKA lead to a comparable improvement in patient-perceived outcomes of physical variables in both generic and disease-specific health measures at follow-up at one year.