Decreases in trainees' working hours, coupled with evidence of worse outcomes when hip arthroscopies are performed by inexperienced surgeons, mandate the development of additional means of arthroscopic training. Though virtual reality simulation training has been adopted by other surgical specialities, its slow uptake in arthroscopic training is due to a lack of evidence as to its benefits. These benefits can be demonstrated through learning curves associated with simulator training – with practice reflecting measurable increases in validated performance metrics. Twenty-five medical students completed seven simulated arthroscopies of a healthy virtual hip joint in the supine position on a simulator previously shown to have construct validity. Twelve targets had to be visualised within the central compartment; six via the anterior portal, three via the anterolateral portal and three via the posterolateral portal. Eight students proceeded to complete seven probe examinations of a healthy virtual hip joint. Eight targets were probed via the anterolateral portal. Task duration, number of collisions with soft tissue and bone, and distance travelled by arthroscope were measured by the simulator for every session.Introduction
Materials & Methods
To quantify the risk posed to the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) during Total Hip Arthroplasty using the Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach (MIAA), and during placement of the Anterior Portal (AP) in Supine Hip Arthroscopy (SHA). Forty-five hemipelves from thirty-nine cadavers were dissected. The LFCN was identified proximal to the inguinal ligament (IL), and its path in the thigh identified. The positions of the nerve and its branches in relation to the MIAA incision and the site for AP placement were measured using Vernier Callipers. 44% of nerves crossed the incision line used in the MIAA, at an average distance of 47 ± 28mm from the proximal end of the incision. Of those that did not cross the incision line, the average minimum distance between the nerve and incision was 14.4 ± 7.4mm, occurring on average 74.0 ± 37.3mm from the proximal end of the incision. In addition, the AP was placed in the path of the nerve on 38% of occasions. The nerve took an oblique path, and when found not to intersect with the AP portal, was located 5.7 ± 4.5mm from the portal's edge. We found a reduction in risk if the portal is moved medially or laterally by 15mm from its current location. The LFCN is at high risk of injury during both THA using the MIAA and SHA using the AP. Our study emphasises the need for meticulous dissection during these procedures, and thorough explanation of these risk whilst consenting patients. We suggest that relocation of the AP 15mm more laterally or medially will reduce the risk posed to the LFCN.
