We aimed to determine whether acute periprosthetic bone loss at 1 year following THA may be predicted by early changes in markers of bone turnover, and prevented by a single 90 mg dose of pamidronate in a randomized trial of 46 men and women undergoing primary THA.

Femoral BMD was measured at postoperative baseline, and 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks later using an Hologic 4500-A densitometer. Markers of bone turnover were measured at preoperative baseline and at 1, 6, 12, and 26 weeks.

Patients in the placebo group lost significantly more periprosthetic bone than those in the pamidronate group. The mean (±95% CI) difference in proximal femoral BMD (area under BMD change.time curve) between those receiving pamidronate and those receiving placebo was 1.84 (±1.29) g.weeks/cm² (P=0.02). A transient increase in all markers of bone turnover was seen in the placebo group, with peaks in osteoclast activity at 6 weeks, and peaks in osteoblast activity 12 weeks. Pamidronate therapy was associated with suppression of all markers of bone turnover with the exception of the resorption marker iFDpd (P< 0.05).

Using a multiple regression analysis model the AUC changes in bone markers predicted 42% of proximal femoral BMD change at 1 year (P=0.006). Using only change in 2 of the markers (PINP and iFDpd) at 6 weeks 28% of proximal femoral BMD change at 1 year could be predicted (P=0.01).

THA is associated with a transient increase in bone remodelling units and bone loss. The relationship between femoral bone loss and turnover markers in the placebo group suggests that the transient increase in these markers reflects local changes in BMD, and that pamidronate reduces bone loss by preventing increased local bone turnover.

We aimed to determine whether development of heterotopic ossification (HO) following THA might be predicted by early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover.

The study cohort consisted of 21 men and women taking part in a randomised trial of the bisphosphonate pamidronate in the prevention of bone loss following THA. All had under gone unilateral THA using the same design of implant and all were assigned to placebo in the trial. The osteoblast activity markers bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bAP), osteocalcin (Oc), and N-terminal propeptide of type-I procollagen (PINP); and the osteoclast activity markers deoxypyridinoline (iFDpd) and N-telopeptide of type-I collagen (NTx) were measured at baseline, and at 1, 6, 12, and 26 weeks following unilateral THA. The presence of HO was assessed using the Brooker grading by a musculoskeletal radiologist from plain AP radiographs of the hip taken at week 26.

A transient increase in all turnover markers occurred following surgery, with peaks in iFDpd, NTx, and PINP at 6 weeks, and peaks in bAP and Oc at 12 weeks. 10 subjects had HO at week 26 (all Brooker grade 1 or 2). Subjects with HO had higher mean peak rises (SEM) in PINP and Oc than those without HO (PINP 81% (10) versus 43% (10), P=0.01; Oc 26% (5) versus 9% (6), P=0.04). Using area under the curve ‘ROC’ analysis, PINP and Oc were equally discriminatory in predicting HO formation (P< 0.05). The optimal cut-off peak rise of > 57% in PINP at 6 weeks following THA had a sensitivity and specificity of 90 and 82, respectively for predicting the development of HO.

An increase in PINP of more than 57% 6 weeks following THA is predictive of the development of HO at 26 weeks. This early prediction might allow identification of patients in whom early therapeutic measures could be taken.