Previous fluoroscopic analyses of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) determined that the femoral head slides within the acetabular cup, leading to separation of certain aspects of the articular geometries. Although separation has been well documented, it has not been correlated to clinical complications or a more indepth understanding of the cause and effect. Surgical technique is one of the important clinical factors when considering THA procedures, and it is hypothesized, that it could affect the magnitude and occurrence of femoral head separation (sliding) in THAs. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine and compare in-vivo THA kinematics for subjects implanted with a THA using two different surgical approaches.

Thirty seven subjects, each implanted with one of two types of THA were analysed under in vivo, weight-bearing conditions using video fluoroscopy while performing a sit-to-stand activity. Ten subjects were implanted by Surgeon 1 using a long incision postero-lateral approach (G1); while a further 10 subjects were implanted by the same surgeon using a short incision posterolateral approach (G2). The remaining 17 subjects were implanted using the anterolateral approach; 10 by Surgeon 2 (G3) and seven by Surgeon 3 (G4). All patients with excellent clinical results, without pain or functional deficits were invited to participate in the study (HHS > 90). 3D kinematics of the hip joint was determined, with the help of a previously published 2D-to-3D registration technique. From a completely seated position to the standing position, four frames of the fluoroscopy video were analysed.

Subjects in all groups experienced some degree of femoral head separation at all increments of the sit-to-stand activity that were analysed. The magnitude and frequency of separation greater than 1.0mm varied between each surgeon group, between incision types, between incision lengths and between the two types of THA that were analysed. The average maximum separation was 1.3, 1.1, 1.3 and 1.4mm for G1, G2, G3 and G4 respectively. Though there was no difference in the average maximum separation values for the 4 groups, the maimum separation varied significantly. While the maximum separation in G2 was 1.8mm, the maximum separation in G4 was 3.0mm. G1 and G3 had maximum separation values of 2.3mm and 2.4mm respectively.

This study suggests that there may be a correlation between incision lengths and surgical approach with femoral head separation in THAs. The maximum separation that was seen among all groups was a subject with a traditional long incision, while the short incision group had less incidence of separation. Results from this study may give researchers and implant developers a better understanding of kinematics around the hip joint and how they vary with respect to different surgical techniques. Further analysis is being conducted on the subjects before definitive conclusions can be made.