Pedicle Subtraction osteotomy (PRO) in correction of severe spinal deformities is well established. Prospective analysis of its efficacy in complex spinal deformities is sparse in literature. To assess the role of PRO in correction of uniplanar and multiplanar spinal deformity and to assess the role of revision PRO in failed corrections.Introduction
Aims and objectives
Anterior reconstruction has the advantage of conferring immediate stability to the cervico-thoracic junction Assess clinical and radiological outcome in cervico-thoracic kyphosis treated with anterior reconstruction.Introduction
Aims and objectives
To identify radiological patterns of compression (POC) of the spinal cord To develop a surgical protocol based on POC and determine its efficacy. To identify parameters predicting outcome of surgery
Pattern I – predominant one/two level compression in normal/narrow canal Pattern II – anterior &
posterior compression at one/ two levels (pincer cord) Pattern III – Three or more levels of predominant anterior compression with a normal canal Pattern III(A) – Pattern III in a patient with multiple medical co-morbidities Pattern IV – Three/more levels of anterior compression in narrow canal +/− posterior compression (beaded cord) Pattern IV(A) – Pattern IV with one/two level severe compression amongst the multiple anterior compressions. Mean follow-up was 3 yrs (2–8). ACDF was performed for patterns I, II &
III and posterior decompression for pattern IV and III(A). For pattern IV(A), a two stage primary posterior decompression followed by targeted ACDF at the site of maximal compression was performed. The clinical outcome was measured by modified JOA (mJOA) score, Hirayabashi Recovery Rate (HRR) and functional outcome by modified Neck Disability Index (NDI).