Purpose of the study: We describe a surgery navigation system based on virtual fluoroscopy images established with a 3D optic localizer. The purpose of this work was to check the accuracy of the system for posterior spinal implants in comparison with conventional surgery. Duration of radiation and duration of surgery were compared.

Material and methods: A 3D optic localizer was used to monitor the position of the instruments in the operative field, as well as the fluoroscopy receptor. The surgeon took two views, ap and lateral, with a total exposure of two seconds. The C arm was then removed. After image correction, the ap and lateral views were displayed on the work station screen where the computer superimposed to tools on each image. Twenty osteosynthesis procedures for implantation of pedicular screws via a posterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine were performed with this virtual fluoroscopy technique (20 patients, 68 screws). During the same study period, twenty other procedures were performed with the conventional technique (ap and lateral x-ray with the C-arm after drilling the pedicle, 20 patients, 72 screws). The position of the spinal implants was compared between the two series on the ap and lateral views and postoperative CT. Similarly time of exposure to x-rays and duration of the surgical procedure were recorded.

Results: The rate of strictly intrapedicular implantation was less than 8% (5/68 screws) in the virtual fluoroscopy series versus 15% (11/72 screws) in the conventional series. Time of exposure to radiation was significantly lower in the virtual fluoroscopy series with a 1 to 3 improvement (3.5 s versus 11.5 s on average) over the conventional method. With training, this method is not more time consuming (10 min per screw for the conventional method versus 11.25 min for virtual fluoroscopy).

Discussion and conclusion: Compared with conventional fluoroscopy, the virtual technique enables real time navigation while significantly reducing the dose of radiation, both for the patient and the surgery team. There are two types of advantages of virtual fluoroscopy over CT-based systems: first virtual fluoroscopy is immediately available without specific preoperative imaging and secondly it provides real non-magnified images acquired once during the procedure, after which the C-arm is removed. 3D virtual fluoroscopy is probably the next step but requires further experience.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to compare the precision and reliability of screw fixation using two different guiding systems. The first system was based on computed tomography (CT) imaging and the second on digitalized fluoroscopic imaging.

Material and methods: Between 1998 and 2000, 88 patients underwent spinal fixation for diverse disease states (idiopathic scoliosis in 43, and fracture, spondylolisthesis or instability in 45). Pedicular screws (n = 223) were inserted in levels T4 to S1. The passive CT navigation system was used for 73 patients (177 pedicular screws) and the fluoroscopic navigation system for 15 (46 pedicular screws). An independent observer identified the position of the pedicular screws on the postoperative CT.

Results: Among the 73 patients who underwent a CT-guided procedure (177 pedicular screws) the rate of incorrect screw position was 6.2% (11/117) with = 2 mm penetration of the cortical. Among the 15 patients who underwent a fluoroscopy-guided procedure (46 pedicular screws), the rate of incorrect screw position was 17% (8/46) again with = 2 mm penetration of the cortical. For scoliosis patients, the rate of erroneous screw insertion was 6% for CT navigation and 28% for fluoroscopic navigation. For fractures and degenerative instability, the rates were 6% and 11% respectively.

Discussion: The passive nature of the two navigation systems used do not induce any peroperative constraint on the surgeon. With the CT system, landmarks have to be collected peroperatively on the posterior arch of the operated vertebra, a step that is not needed for the fluoroscopic system. The two techniques appear to be reliable for insertion of pedicular screws. We did not have any neurological disorders in this series. It can be recalled that the conventional method produces a 15 to 40% rate of erroneous insertion. The CT system provides better results for all types of diseases; the improvement is about 6%.

Conclusion: With CT-navigation, a large portion of the per-operative radiographs are no longer necessary. Operative time is slightly longer than for the classical procedure due to the collection of the 3D information, particularly important for scoliosis. With the fluoroscopy system, no special preoperative imaging is required. Two or three peroperative radiographs are sufficient, limiting irradiation during insertion of the pedicular screws. The fluoroscopic system does not however provide 3D images.