The advent of ambulatory total joint replacements has called for measures to reduce postoperative length of stay, while improving patient function and postoperative satisfaction. This prospective, randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of one-on-one preoperative physical therapy (PT) education with a supplemental web-based PT web-portal on discharge disposition, postoperative function and patient satisfaction after total joint replacement. Between February and June 2015, 126 patients underwent unilateral total knee (n=63) or total hip arthroplasty (n=63). All patients attended a group preoperative education (preopEd) class [standard of care] and were subsequently randomized into two groups. One group received no further education as per the standard of care [control; TKA= 31; THA=32] and the other received an in-person one-on-one preoperative PT education session (preopPTEd) as well as access to a web-portal during the postoperative period [experimental; TKA=32; THA=31]. Discharge disposition was attained from hospital records. Patient satisfaction and WOMAC scores were evaluated by a series of patient administered questionnaires.Introduction
Materials & Methods
Several studies have shown that functional outcomes are similar regardless of being discharged directly to home or to a rehabilitation center after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, we sought to determine if there is a difference in patient care or patient satisfaction for patients discharged to in-patient rehabilitation or home-based rehabilitation. Between February and May of 2015, one hundred and seventy one consecutive patients were prospective identified after undergoing TKA by one of three surgeons. At an average of six-weeks post TKA, all patients were asked a patient administered questionnaire to determine if diagnostic testing (ultrasounds, or x-rays) or blood transfusions were performed during the first-six weeks at either home (n=86) or a rehab (n=85) facility.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Computer-assisted navigation is an established tool in hip and knee arthroplasty. This technology was introduced with the goals of greater precision in bone preparation and implant placement, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes. Various navigation protocols exist, many of which require placement of temporary percutaneous pins in the operative field. Risks of pin placement have not been described. We conducted a retrospective review of 352 consecutive patients undergoing elective hip and knee surgery using computer-assisted navigation between January 2013 and December 2015, all with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Navigation pins were placed using a standardized protocol into the iliac crest for hip arthroplasty or into the femoral and tibial diaphysis for knee arthroplasty. Postoperatively, all patients were allowed to weight bear as tolerated. Patient records were reviewed for operative details and clinical outcomes. Outcome measures included any pin site complications including direct neurovascular damage, fracture through a pin site, and pin site infection.Introduction
Methods
Patellar mobilisation methods used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been debated in the literature, with some proponents of minimally invasive TKA suggesting that laterally retracting, rather than everting the patella may be beneficial. It was our hypothesis that by using randomised, prospective, blinded study methods, there would be no significant difference in clinical outcome measures based solely on eversion of the patella during total knee arthroplasty. After an Introduction
Methods
