There are several different ways of preparing the femoral canal prior to cementing a hip prosthesis. This study investigated the mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface of four different types of preparation determined by the maximum tensile force required to separate a cemented prosthesis from its cancellous bone origin.

Forty-eight fresh-frozen ox femora were prepared for hip arthroplasty, In a four-way comparison, groups of eleven femora were prepared by irrigation using

syringe injected normal saline;

Specimens were secured to a Material-test System (MTS), and the femoral implant pulled from the femur uni-axially at a rate of 5mm/min. The ‘pull-out strength’ was defined as the maximum tension recorded by the MTS during separation. Cement interdigitation was also inspected for each technique by microscopy of eight bone-implant transverse sections taken from prepared specimens.

Following an analysis of variance and pair-wise Fisher comparison, the average pull-out strength of the cemented prosthesis was significantly higher (P< 0.001) using pulse-lavage brushing (mean 8049.2 N), and pulse-lavage brushing in combination with hydrogen-peroxide soaked gauze (mean 8489.1 N), than with normal saline irrigation (mean 947.1 N) or hydrogen-peroxide soaked gauze preparation (mean 1832.6 N). Prosthesis pull-out strength following pulse-lavage brushing in combination with hydrogen-peroxide soaked gauze was not significantly different (P> 0.05) than preparing with pulse-lavage brushing alone. Low and high power microscopy of specimen transverse sections revealed the greatest levels of cement penetration in specimens prepared using pulse-lavage brushing.

This study demonstrated that one of the most effective preparations of the femoral canal for optimal mechanical fixation between cement and cancellous bone is pulse- lavage brushing. The use of hydrogen-peroxide soaked gauze in femoral canal preparation, either alone or in combination with pulse-lavage brushing, may not significantly improve prosthesis fixation.

We describe a new method for the accurate measurement of the angle of anteversion of an acetabular cup from standard anteroposterior radiographs, and provide the conversion tables required. The effect of the centering of the radiograph is discussed and a method of distinguishing between anteversion and retroversion by using a caudally directed x-ray beam is described.