The aim of this study was to analyse a group of patients with
non-metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma at presentation and identify prognostic
factors affecting the development of local recurrence, in order
to assess the role of radiotherapy. A retrospective review of all patients with a Ewing’s sarcoma
treated between 1980 and 2012 was carried out. Only those treated
with chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy were included.
Patients were grouped according to site (central or limb) for further
analysis of the prognostic factors.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to review a large cohort of patients
and further assess the correlation between the histological response
to chemotherapy in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma with the overall
(OS) and event-free survival (EFS). All patients treated for Ewing’s sarcoma between 1980 and 2012
were reviewed. Of these, 293 patients without metastases at the
time of diagnosis and treated with chemotherapy and surgery were
included. Patients were grouped according to the percentage of necrosis
after chemotherapy: Group I: 0% to 50%, Group II: 51% to 99% and Group
III: 100%.Aims
Patients and Methods
A poor response to chemotherapy (≤ 90% necrosis)
for osteosarcomas leads to poorer survival and an increased risk of
local recurrence, particularly if there is a close margin of excision.
We evaluated whether amputation confers any survival benefit over
limb salvage surgery (LSS) with narrow margins in patients who respond
poorly to chemotherapy. We only analysed patients with an osteosarcoma of the limb, a
poor response to chemotherapy and close margins on LSS (marginal/intralesional)
or primary amputation: 360 patients (36 LSS (intralesional margins),
197 LSS (marginal margins) and 127 amputations) were included. Local
recurrence developed in 13 (36%) following LSS with intralesional
margins, and 39 (20%) following LSS with marginal margins. There
was no local recurrence in patients who underwent amputation. The
five-year survival for all patients was 41% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 35 to 46), but for those treated by LSS with marginal margins
was 46.2% (95% CI 38 to 53), 36.3% (95% CI 27 to 45) for those treated
by amputation, and 28% (95 CI 14 to 44) for those treated by LSS
with intralesional margins. Patients who had LSS and then developed
local recurrence as a first event had the same survival as those
who had primary amputation without local recurrence. Prophylactic
adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 40 patients but had no discernible
effect in preventing local recurrence. Although amputation offered better local control, it conferred
no clear survival benefit over LSS with marginal margins in these
patients with a poor overall prognosis. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional
and oncological outcome of extracorporeally irradiated autografts
used to reconstruct the pelvis after a P1/2 internal hemipelvectomy. The study included 18 patients with a primary malignant bone
tumour of the pelvis. There were 13 males and five females with
a mean age of 24.8 years (8 to 62). Of these, seven had an osteogenic
sarcoma, six a Ewing’s sarcoma, and five a chondrosarcoma. At a
mean follow-up of 51.6 months (4 to 185), nine patients had died
with metastatic disease while nine were free from disease. Local
recurrence occurred in three patients all of whom eventually died of
their disease. Deep infection occurred in three patients and required
removal of their graft in two while the third underwent a hindquarter
amputation for extensive flap necrosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score of the
16 patients who could be followed-up for at least 12 months was
77% (50 to 90). Those 15 patients who completed the Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score questionnaire had a mean score of 71% (53 to 85). Extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone is a valid
method of reconstruction after an internal hemipelvectomy. It has
an acceptable morbidity and a functional outcome that compares favourably
with other available reconstructive techniques. Cite this article:
We retrospectively compared the outcome after
the treatment of giant cell tumours of bone either with curettage alone
or with adjuvant cementation. Between 1975 and 2008, 330 patients
with a giant cell tumour were treated primarily by intralesional
curettage, with 84 (25%) receiving adjuvant bone cement in the cavity.
The local recurrence rate for curettage alone was 29.7% (73 of 246)
compared with 14.3% (12 of 84) for curettage and cementation (p
= 0.001). On multivariate analysis both the stage of disease and
use of cement were independent significant factors associated with
local recurrence. The use of cement was associated with a higher
risk of the subsequent need for joint replacement. In patients without
local recurrence, 18.1% (13 of 72) of those with cement needed a
subsequent joint replacement compared to 2.3% (4 of 173) of those
without cement (p = 0.001). In patients who developed local recurrence,
75.0% (9 of 12) of those with previous cementation required a joint
replacement, compared with 45.2% (33 of 73) of those without cement
(p = 0.044).
LR arose in 11 patients (17.5%) at a mean of 38 months and was related to surgical margins. There were no LR in the 26 wide resections, but the risk of LR was 20% in those with a marginal and 46% in those with an intralesional excision. LR appeared as a higher grade than the primary tumor in 3 patients (27%). 9 (14.3%) patients developed metastases at a median of 22 months (6 – 123). Five patients developed both LR and metastases. Seven patients died from the tumor, 2 patients are alive with metastatic disease. None of the patients with a low grade tumor and wide or marginal margins died of tumor, but 2 patients (18%) operated intralesional died of tumor.
Pathological fractures due to metastasis with destruction of the acetabulum and central dislocation of the hip present a difficult surgical challenge. We describe a series using a single technique in which a stable and long-lasting reconstruction was obtained using standard primary hip replacement implants augmented by strong, fully-threaded steel rods with cement and steel mesh, where required. Between 1997 and 2006, 19 patients with a mean age of 66 years (48 to 83) were treated using a modified Harrington technique. Acetabular destruction was graded as Harrington class II in six cases and class III in 13. Reconstruction was achieved using three 6.5 mm rods inserted through a separate incision in the iliac crest followed by augmentation with cement and a conventional cemented Charnley or Exeter primary hip replacement. There were no peri-operative deaths. At the final follow-up (mean 25 months (5 to 110)) one rod had fractured and one construct required revision. Of the 18 patients who did not require revision, 13 had died. The mean time to death was 16 months (5 to 55). The mean follow-up of the five survivors was 31 months (18 to 47). There were no cases of dislocation, deep infection or injury to a nerve, the blood vessels or the bladder.
We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered the outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia following resection of a tumour. Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures have been documented using a prospective database. A total of 194 patients underwent a proximal tibial replacement, with 95 having a fixed-hinge design and 99 a rotating-hinge with a hydroxyapatite collar; their median age was 21.5 years (10 to 74). At a mean follow-up of 14.7 years (5 to 29), 115 patients remain alive. The risk of revision for any reason in the fixed-hinge group was 32% at five years, 61% at ten years and 75% at 15 and 20 years, and in the rotating-hinge group 12% at five years, 25% at ten years and 30% at 15 years. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed-hinge knees, fracture of the implant in the early design of rotating hinges and infection in the current version. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed-hinge knees was 46% at ten years. This was reduced to 3% in the rotating-hinge knee with a hydroxyapatite collar. The cemented, rotating hinge design currently offers the best chance of long-term survival of the prosthesis.
We investigated whether improvements in design have altered the outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur after resection of a tumour. Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures have been documented using a prospective database, review of the design of the implant and case records. In total, 335 patients underwent a distal femoral replacement, 162 having a fixed-hinge design and 173 a rotating-hinge. The median age of the patients was 24 years (interquartile range 17 to 48). A total of 192 patients remained alive with a mean follow-up of 12 years (5 to 30). The risk of revision for any reason was 17% at five years, 33% at ten years and 58% at 20 years. Aseptic loosening was the main reason for revision of the fixed-hinge knees while infection and fracture of the stem were the most common for the rotating-hinge implant. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening was 35% at ten years with the fixed-hinge knee, which has, however, been replaced by the rotating-hinge knee with a hydroxyapatite collar. The overall risk of revision for any reason fell by 52% when the rotating-hinge implant was used. Improvements in the design of distal femoral endoprostheses have significantly decreased the need for revision operations, but infection remains a serious problem. We believe that a cemented, rotating-hinge prosthesis with a hydroxyapatite collar offers the best chance of long-term survival of the prosthesis.