We present a novel use for an adult proximal humeral locking plate. In our case an 18-year-old female with cerebral palsy sustained a peri-prosthetic fracture of a blade plate previously inserted for a femoral osteotomy. Treatment was revision using a long proximal humeral locking plate. She had a successful outcome. We present the history and operative management. The female had a history of quadriplegic cerebral palsy, asthma, diabetes mellitus and congenital heart disease. She had a gastrostomy tube for enteral feeding. She was on nutritional supplements, baclofen, Omeprazole and movicol. She is looked after by her parents and requires a wheelchair for mobility. She is unable to communicate. Surgical History: Right adductor tenotomy, aged 11. Femoral Derotation Osteotomy & Dega Acetabular Osteotomy, aged 13. Right distal hamstring and knee capsule release, aged 14. Admitted to A&E (aged 18); unwitnessed fall. Painful, swollen, deformed thigh with crepitus. Xrays demonstrated peri- prosthetic fracture below blade plate. No specific equipment available to revise. Decision made to use PHILOS (Synthes, UK). GA, antibiotics, supine on table. Lateral approach. Plate removed after excising overgrown bone. Reduced and held. 10hole PHILOS applied. Near anatomical reduction. Secure fixation with locking screws proximally away from blade plate defect. Blood loss 800ml. 5 days in hospital. Sequential fracture clinic review. Wound healed well. Fracture healed on Xray at 11 months and discharged. To our knowledge this is the first reported use of a PHILOS plate for this specific fracture. The complexity of this case and underlying neurological disorder deemed long blade plate revision unsuitable. Fracture rates after femoral derotation osteotomies rare. 5/157 and 1/58 in the two largest studies to date. Conservative measures were the main recommendation. We have demonstrated a straightforward method for revision fixation with an excellent outcome. It would be recommended as an alternative to other surgeons in this position.
The Exeter Stem (Howmedica, UK) has been in use for over 35 years. Over the years it has undergone several modifications with the most recent being a highly polished, tapered stem in 1986. The manufacturers quote a rate of 0.0006%. In the current literature there are 16 (or less) instances of fractures of the Orthinox stem. We present a case of fracture of an Orthinox Exeter Stem 9 years after insertion. Our patient, BB, presented, aged 62, with symptoms & signs consistent with OA right hip. THR was performed through a lateral approach utilising a trochanteric osteotomy. A size 0 37.5 stem was inserted. Radiographs were very satisfactory. She suffered a post operative DVT/PTE from which she recovered uneventfully. She was independently mobile at 6 month review and was discharged at the 2 year stage pain free. Aged 71, BB presented to outpatient clinic with a several month history of generalised groin pain. She had a Trendelenberg gait. Considerable pain was experienced on axial compression of the limb. Radiographs revealed a midstem fracture with cement loosening proximally. No trauma was reported. She underwent revision surgery through a posterior approach. Acetabular component was rigidly fixed. This was revised to a pressfit Trident (Zimmer, UK) cup with screws & polyethylene liner. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was used to remove the broken stem. An uncemented Restoration (Stryker, UK) stem was inserted with a 28mm head. Post-operative recovery was unremarkable and at 6 months osteotomy has healed. The stem was sent to Stryker UK Laboratories for analysis. They reported the stem broke in fatigue with the origin on the antero-lateral surface. No material or manufacturing defects seen. Dimensionally correct. Fracture may be due to abnormal bending stresses secondary to proximal loosening and firm distal fixation. Our case demonstrates a set of circumstances that led to inevitable fatigue and stem fracture. The method of failure should reinforce the radiograph appearances that may cause concern or be acted upon.
We compared the postoperative wound discharge rates and 3 months clinical results of three types of wound closure and dressing – 2-octylcyanoacrylate with Opstie (G+O), 2-octylcyanoacrylate with Tegaderm (G+T), and Opsite without 2-octylcyanoacrylate (O) in patients having primary total hip arthroplasty. We randomised 141 patients scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty into 3 arms of this study- G+O, G+T, or O. The extent of wound discharge was recorded on a diagrammatic representation of the dressing in situ on paper and graded each day. Dressings were left in-situ provided the extent of wound discharge allowed for this. The patient was clinically reviewed at 3 months to assess their scar length, cosmesis, scar discomfort, and evidence of superficial or deep wound sepsis. A greater number of patients dressings remained dry on day 1 postoperatively in the two groups with 2-octylcyanoacrylate compared to the no glue group In patients who have had primary total hip arthroplasty, usage of 2-octylcyanoacrylate for wound closure along with Tegaderm dressing reduces wound discharge. The same effect is not noted in glue with Opsite group. Whilst dressing changes required in the non-glue group compared from the two glue groups did not reach statistical significance, this may have clinical relevance for patients and nursing staff. No effect on postoperative length of stay, or wound complications was noted.
