Introduction

Following National patient safety alert on cement use in hip fracture surgery, we investigated the incidence and pattern of 72 hours peri-operative mortality after hip fracture surgery in a District General Hospital.

Introduction

There is uncertainty about the relationship between improvement in range of motion (ROM) and functional outcome or patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Using data from a prospective multi-centre study we investigated this relationship.

We examined data from a large prospectively collected dataset which followed up patients after Exeter total hip replacement (THR) - the Exeter Primary Outcome Study. We studied 78 patients who had total hip replacement for osteoarthritis on a morphologically normal hip, and in whom the other hip was also morphologically normal for comparison. All selected patients had complete patient outcome data at 1 and 5 years, and x-rays at 1 year were available.

We measured accuracy of reconstruction on AP Pelvis radiographs. The parameters measured were difference in height of lesser trochanter from horizontal pelvic line (LLD); length from ASIS to greater trochanter (indicating abductor length, AL); length from symphysis to centre of femoral head (SFH); length from centre of head to axis of femur (offset). We examined clinical outcomes including gain of Oxford Hip Score (DOHS) at 1 and 5 years, absolute OHS at 1 and 5 years, and absolute SF-36 Physical Functioning and Role Physical scores at 1 and 5 years.

Examining the ratios of AL, SFH, Offset, Offset to SFH ratio and LLD between side of THR and unaffected side all showed marked variation. Thus the ratio of SFH varied from 0.85 to 1.11. For further analysis we divided the patients into 3 groups on the basis of variability of the ratio from 1; we examined whether the clinical scores above varied between these 3 groups. 1 way ANOVA demonstrated no significant difference for any of the clinical outcomes for any of the 5 grouped x-ray variables.

Accuracy of reconstruction has been shown to affect the risk of dislocation after THR. Our results indicate that clinical outcomes of total hip replacement appear resilient to some degree of surgical inaccuracy. Future trials of navigation should be designed to demonstrate not only improved accuracy but also improved clinical outcome.

Introduction

Acetabular cup lucency predicts cup survival. The relationship of subchondral plate removal and cup survival is unclear. Using data from a prospective study conducted between January 1999 and January 2002 we investigated the role of subchondral plate removal in cemented acetabular cup survival at five years.

Introduction: More than 140,000 joint replacements are carried out in England and Wales per annum costing from £4000 to £7000 each (1, 2). Implant costs are relatively fixed but there are considerable variations in length of stay [LOS] following surgery. The National Audit office estimated that a reduction of two days per patient could save the NHS £15.5 million per year (2).

A specialist orthopaedic ward for elective arthroplasty was opened in Bangor in 2008 in an attempt to address these issues. The staff per bed ratio remained the same as in the general orthopaedic wards but beds were “ring fenced” and strict infection control measures protocols were implemented. This audit aimed to assess the effect of the specialist ward on LOS following arthroplasty.

Method: Retrospective data on length of stay, demographics and surgical site infections [SSI] were collected for the six months before and six months after the specialist ward was opened. Only primary lower limb arthroplasty data was evaluated and LOS was calculated from day of operation to the day of discharge. Statistical analysis was performed on the length of stay with SPSS software using the two-sample t-test and Mann-Whitley U test.

Results: Patients were managed by the same surgical teams in the same theatres but nursed in different ward settings. Group 1 included 222 patients managed in general orthopaedic wards and group 2 included 191 patients, managed in the ring fenced ward. The mean age for total hip replacements was 70.8 in group 1 and 71.2 years in group 2. The mean age for total knee replacements was 70.9 years in group 1 and 69.2 years in group 2. The overall mean LOS for both procedures was 7.61 days (95% CI: 7.14 – 8.07) in group 1 compared with 5.67 days (95% CI: 5.28 – 6.06) group 2. This was statistically significant (p< 0.001). The mode was 7 days in group 1 compared with 4 days in group 2. Three SSIs were noted in group 1 and zero in group 2.

Conclusions: This audit demonstrates a two day reduction in LOS for patients managed in a ring fenced ward. The reasons for the reduction are multi factorial but include a trend for reduced SSI. Overall reduced stay frees up resources for other use and may reduce costs. Other units may benefit from similar dedicated wards in response to growing demand for arthroplasty within a system of fixed resources.

Introduction: Various surgical approaches have been described for the hip joint but the optimal surgical approach for total hip replacement remains controversial. The lateral approach & the posterior approach are the most commonly used approaches.

Various scoring systems are in use to assess the outcome of total hip replacement. Since its introduction in 1996, Oxford hip score (OHS) has been validated in several studies. Total hip replacement has been shown to improve the OHS in several studies but we could not find any studies on effect of the surgical approach on OHS.

AIM: To find out the affect of surgical approach on oxford hip score.

Methods: Exeter Primary Outcomes Study was a prospective non-randomised multicentre study involving six centres across the UK. Ethical committee approval was taken and the study was conducted over a period of five years. 1610 patients were included in the study. All the patients underwent primary hip replacement with Exeter stem AND were followed up in the clinics for pre-operative assessment and then at three months, year one, year two and year five post-operatively. Oxford hip score was noted at pre-operative assessment and postoperatively at three months, year one, two, three, four and five, either in the clinics or by post. All data was analysed in conjunction with a statistician using SPSS.

Results: We had 1587 patients with regular follow-up. Lateral approach was the most common surgical approach (n=1143) compared to posterior approach (n=436). Sex ratio for each surgical approach was comparable. Oxford hip scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05) up to four years, with both the surgical approaches. The posterior approach gave a better improvement in OHS compared to the lateral approach for all the four years. The absolute oxford hip scores improved significantly with the posterior approach for the first 12 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION: Posterior approach gives greater patient perceived clinical benefit in the first year after surgery which could help in early rehabilitation compared to lateral approach. This should be considered when assessing the best approach for the patients.

We present an independent multi-centre follow-up of metal-metal resurfacing from district regional hospitals (DGHs) in a series of ‘young’ patients with implants from a single manufacturer.

Between November 1995 and November 2002, two hundred and thirteen primary total hip resurfacings were performed in six centres. Two hundred and ten patients were followed up with none lost to follow-up. The average age of the patient group was 52.9 years range (21.9–71.3 years). Of these 210 patients 119 were male and 91 were female. There were three bilaterals and five revisions recorded with a revision rate of 2.3% at seven years. The maximum duration of follow-up was 84 months, the minimum was 3 months and the mean follow-up was 43.5 months.

The average Harris Hip score at the latest follow-up review was 78.15 (range 23–100). The Kaplan-Meier Survivorship of Cormet was 95% at 7 years and a survivorship of 97.38% at three years. These results indicate that metal-metal resurfacing meets the NICE guidelines for suvivorship at the three year benchmark in DGHs with local patients and is on course to meet the 10 year benchmark despite the extremely demanding patient group.

This study was performed to evaluate the pre-operative concerns of patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement surgery.

A cross-sectional study of 370 patients was performed. The patients completed a postal questionnaire on 29 concerns, each rated on a scale of 1 (not concerned) to 4 (very concerned). SF-12 and Oxford knee or hip scores were also calculated. Analysis was carried out using chi-squared test.

217 questionnaires were returned. The results showed that the greatest concern for patients was cancellation of their operation. This was followed by failure of the operation to reduce pain, loss of a limb and joint infection. Concerns regarding scar problems, nursing care and preoperative tests were the lowest.

Women showed statistically significant greater concerns in 9 areas. Younger patients (age< 65) showed increased concerns in 8 areas. Patients who had previously undergone joint replacement were less concerned than those who had not had previous lower limb joint replacements for 6 responses. They showed increased concern in 2 areas, nursing care and hospital food. Those undergoing total hip replacement were more concerned about dislocation, dressing and returning to work (all p< 0.05). The mean Oxford Knee or Hip Score was 42.96 and 45.12 respectively (scale 12–60, 60 being most severe symptoms). The mean SF-12 scores were 41.14 for the mental component and 28.70 for the physical component score (scale 0–100, 100 representing greatest level of good health).

The mean level of concern is low at 1.9 (scale 1 to 4). It is encouraging that patients who have had a previous joint replacement are generally less concerned. Possible reasons for increased concerns amongst women and younger patients are discussed. SF-12 and Oxford Knee/Hip Scores are comparable with other studies.

In conclusion, this study provides useful information for the preoperative counselling of patients and the production of pre-operative literature.

This study was performed to evaluate the pre-operative concerns of patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement surgery.

A cross-sectional study of 370 patients was performed. The patients completed a postal questionnaire on 29 concerns, each rated on a scale of 1 (not concerned) to 4 (very concerned). SF-12 and Oxford knee or hip scores were also calculated. Analysis was carried out using chi-squared tests on SPSS.

217 questionnaires were returned. The results showed that the greatest concern for patients was cancellation of their operation. This was followed by failure of the operation to reduce pain, loss of a limb and joint infection. Concerns regarding scar problems, nursing care and preoperative tests were the lowest.

Women showed statistically significant greater concerns in 9 areas. Younger patients (age< 65) showed increased concerns in 8 areas. Patients who had previously undergone joint replacement were less concerned than those who had not had previous lower limb joint replacements for 6 responses. They showed increased concern in 2 areas, nursing care and hospital food. Those undergoing total hip replacement were more concerned about dislocation, dressing and returning to work (all p< 0.05). The mean Oxford Knee or Hip Score was 42.96 and 45.12 respectively (scale 12–60, 60 being most severe symptoms). The mean SF-12 scores were 41.14 for the mental component and 28.70 for the physical component score (scale 0–100, 100 representing greatest level of good health).

The mean level of concern is low at 1.9 (scale 1 to 4). It is encouraging that patients who have had a previous joint replacement are generally less concerned. Possible reasons for increased concerns amongst women and younger patients are discussed. SF-12 and Oxford Knee/Hip Scores are comparable with other studies.

In conclusion, this study provides useful information for the preoperative counselling of patients, production of preoperative literature and for improving the service we offer to our patients.