Introduction. The risk factors for new adjacent vertebral compression fracture (NAVCF) after Vertebroplasty (VP) or Kyphoplasty (KP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) were investigated. Materials and methods. The authors retrospectively analyzed the incidence of NAVCFs in 135 patients treated with VP or KP for osteoporotic VCFs. Study period was from 2004 to 2008 with minimum follow-up of 2 years. Possible risk factors were documented: age, gender, body mass index, bone mineral density (BMD), co-morbidities, location of treated vertebra, treatment modality and amount of bone cement injected. Anterior-posterior vertebral body height ratio, intra-discal cement leakage into the disc space and pattern of cement distribution of the initial VCF and adjacent vertebral bodies were assessed on lateral thoracolumbar radiographs by 2 independent assessors. Results. 21 patients (15.6%) had subsequent symptomatic NAVCFs with a median time to new fracture was of 125 days. There was no difference in incidence of NAVCF between VP and KP groups (P>0.05). Significant differences were found between patients with and without NAVCF in terms of age, BMD, and the proportion of cement leakage into the disc space (P < 0.05). Greater age, intra-discal cement leakage and low BMD were found in patients with NAVCF. Conclusion. The most important risk factors affecting NAVCFs were age, osteoporosis and intra-discal cement leakage

Introduction. This study compares outcomes of vertebroplasty(VP) and kyphoplasty(KP) in 125 consecutive female Asian patients above 65 years with L1 osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods. 57 and 68 patients underwent VP and KP respectively from 2004 to 2008. Outcomes were measured prospectively at pre-operation, 1 month, 6 months and 2 years post-operation by blinded assessors. Radiographic outcome: Anterior, middle and posterior vertebral heights of the L1 vertebral body Functional outcome: Short-Form 36(SF-36) score, Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score for back pain. Results. There was greater improvement of anterior and middle vertebral heights immediately post-surgery for the KP group as compared to the VP group(P<0.001). At 2 years post-surgery, the KP group had better maintenance of L1 vertebral body height with percentage loss of 16.4%, 17.3% and 8.84% of anterior, middle and posterior vertebral height respectively as compared to the VP group who had a greater loss of 29.2%, 42.3% and 17% respectively(p<0.001). Back pain improved post-operatively in both groups with no significant difference in VAS back pain score between the two groups at each follow-up time point(P>0.05). SF-36 score improved post-operatively in both groups (P=0.001). At 2 years post-surgery, the physical functioning domain of SF-36 was better in the KP group (P=0.01). Conclusion. KP provides better restoration and maintenance of anterior and middle vertebral heights with better physical function outcome”

Objective. Comparison of clinical outcome after Percutaneous Vertebro Plasty (PVP) for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCFs) between patients with and without Intra Vertebral Clefts (IVCs). Background. PVP is a common treatment modality for painful OVCFs. Patients presenting with OVCFs with an IVC, also described as avascular necrosis of the vertebral body or intravertebral pseuadoarthrosis, are thought to represent a specific subgroup: filling the cleft might result in immediate and possibly superior pain relief due to stabilization of the excessive mobility associated with an IVC and the risk for cement leakage might be decreased due to its cavitational nature. Methods. 102 patients with 197 OVCFs were prospectively recruited for follow-up using a 0–10 Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quality of Life questionnaire before PVP and at 7 days (PI-NRS only), 1, 3 and 12 months after PVP. Cement leakage was assessed on direct post-operative CT-scanning. At 6 and 52 weeks and at suspicion, patients were analyzed for new fractures. From blinded data two experienced musculoskeletal interventional radiologists retrospectively assessed all treated OVCFs for the presence of an IVC, defined as an abnormal, well-demarcated, linear or cystic hypointensity on MRI T1-weighted sequences and/or hyperintensity on MRI T2 STIR-sequences and/or the evident cleft filling on post-PVP CT-scanning. Outcome of patients with and without IVCs was compared using multivariate analysis correcting for confounders. For the purpose of comparison, a subgroup of all patients with PVP in isolated OVCFs was assessed as well. Results. In 48 OVCFs in 48 of 102 patients an IVC was identified (47.1%). Outcome regarding PI-NRS and SF-36 was comparable between both groups. In 42 patients who received PVP in only one OVCF, 21 clefts were detected. Despite similar baseline values, average back pain after PVP was significantly higher over time in patients with an IVC (1.1 point, p=0.03) but ultimately comparably lower at 12 months (4.4 and 4.3 points, p < 0.001). Outcome regarding SF-36 was comparable, as was occurrence of new OVCFs after PVP. The presence of an IVC was identified as a strong risk factor (OR 4.3, p=0.004) for occurrence of cortical (intradiscal) cement leakage. Conclusion. In patients with long-standing OVCFs, an IVC is a common entity. Patients with OVCFs with an IVC benefit from PVP, but do not comprehend a superior treatment indication. Overall benefit from PVP was comparable to patients without an IVC. In patients with treated isolated OVCFs with an IVC, average back pain is higher over the first year after PVP but ultimately comparable. Furthermore, an IVC is associated with an increased risk for cortical (intradiscal) cement leakage

Introduction. Significant access morbidity with intercostal neuralgia and post-thoracotomy pain syndrome was reported in case that an anterior approach for spondylodesis of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine was used. We describe our experience with thoracoscopical fusion from anterior as a less invasive approach. Patients. Between 02/2007 and 09/2008 in a series of 32 patients (18 male; mean age 43, 17–74yrs) with fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (level Th11: n = 2, level Th12: n = 12, level L1: n = 18; fracture types: A3.1.1: n = 15, A3.2.1: n = 11, A3.3.1: n = 3, B2.1: n = 1 and B2.3: n = 2) thoracoscopical fracture stabilization was performed. A less invasive approach with three portals without an assistant was used facilitated by a new retractor system. In 16 patients fracture stabilization from anterior was supported by an additional spondylodesis using an dorsal approach. For reconstruction of the anterior column a VLIFT-system (n = 19), a Synex- (n = 11) or a Harms-Cage (n = 2) in combination with a MACS-TL (n = 16) or a Arcofix-system (n = 2) were used. Results. Thoracoscopical fusion from anterior was performed about 8 days after the injury (1–73 days), monosegmental in 11 and bisegmental in 21 out of 32 cases. The mean overall operating time was 201min (range 105–380min). The mean overall blood loss was 780ml, in 3/32 patients blood transfusions were required. In one patient epidural bleeding and in another a screw cut-out of the MACS system of the first lumbar vertebral body occurred intraoperatively. Revision surgery was necessary due to failure of the hardware (n = 2) or occurrence of hematothorax (n = 1). In the further follow up period no wound healing disorders, failure of the implants nor intercostal neuralgia were noted. Discussion. The endoscopic view is two-dimensional and may disorientate the less experienced surgeon, and thus, prolong operation time. However, the use of a retractor system allowed for bimanual operation increasing the depth perception, provided an optimal illuminated, and permanent and stable operation field, and was economic as an assistant was not required. Conclusion. The presented technique is a high demanding approach for anterior fusion of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, however, with the potential to reduce the surgical access trauma to a minimum with an operation time comparable to open surgery. Patients might benefit from a shortened rehabilitation and a early reintegration into professional life

BACKGROUND. Osteoporosis with subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures is an increasingly important disease due not only to its significant economic impact but also to the increasing age of our population. Pain reduction and stabilization are of primary importance with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. OBJECTIVE. To compare the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. MATERIALS & METHODS. From January 2004 to December 2009, 142 patients (32 males and 110 females), from 54 to 84 years old (mean age 67.4) were treated for 185 osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine (level of fracture at Th5 or lower), with back pain for more than 8 weeks, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Twenty-two patients (29 fractures) were lost at follow-up period and excluded. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous kyphoplasty (64%) or vertebroplasty (36%). All fractures were analyzed for improvement in sagittal alignment (Cobb angle, kyphotic angle, sagittal index, vertebral height). The patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Score. Radiographs were performed postoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS. The score according to pain, the patient's ability to ambulate independently and without difficulty, and the need for medications improved significantly (P < 0.001) after kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. No significant difference could be found between both groups for the mean VAS and ODI preoperative and postoperative. Vertebral body height and kyphotic wedge angle of the T-L spine were also improved (p < 0.001); although kyphosis correction seems to be improved better in kyphoplasty than vertebroplasty. The rate of leakage was 12% for kyphoplasty and 32% for vertebroplasty; nevertheless most of the leakage was clinically asymptomatic and the rate of serious problems remained low (pulmonary embolism 0.01% kyphoplasty vs 0.6% vertebroplasty). New fractures in the next 6 months at the adjacent vertebrae were observed ∼ 15% in both groups. More PMMA was used in the kyphoplasty group than in the vertebroplasty group (5.5 +/− 0.8 vs. 4.1 +/− 0.5 mL, p < 0.001). Operation time was longer in balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty (mean time 20±5min/vertebral fracture in group B vs 30±5min in group A). CONCLUSION. Both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty provided a safe and effective treatment for pain and disability in patients with vertebral compression fractures due to trauma or osteoporosis. Balloon kyphoplasty led to an ongoing reduction of fractured vertebrae and was followed by a lower rate of cement leakage

Introduction. Pedicle screw pullout or loosening is increased in the osteoporotic spine. Recent studies showed a significant increase of pullout forces especially for PMMA-augmentation. With application of conventional viscosity PMMA the risk of cement extravasation is associated. This risk can be reduced by using radiofrequency-responsive, ultrahigh viscosity bone cement. Method. 11 fresh-frozen lumbar vertebral bodies (VB) from 5 cadavers were collected and freed from soft-tissue and ligaments. By DEXA scan (Siemens QDR 2000) 8 VB were identified as severely osteoporotic (BMD 0.8 g/cm3), 3 VB were above this level. Two screws (6×45 mm, WSI-Expertise Inject, Peter Brehm, Weisendorf, Germany) were placed in the pedicles. Through the right screw 3ml of radiofrequency-responsive bone cement (StabiliT® ER2 Bone Cement, DFine, Germany) were injected via hydraulic cement delivery system (StabiliT® Vertebral Augmentation System, DFine, Germany). As control group, left pedicle screws remained uncemented. After potting the whole VB in technical PMMA (Technovit 4004, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) axial pullout test was performed by a material testing device (Zwick-Roell, Zmart-Pro, Ulm, Germany). Results. The mean BMD of all specimen was 0.771 g/cm3 (min./max. 0.615/1.116, SD ± 0.170). Due to the definition of osteoporosis 8 specimens had a BMD lower than 0.8 g/cm3 (mean 0.677, min./max. 0.615/0,730, SD ±0.045). The non-osteoporotic group consisted of 3 specimens with a mean BMD of 1.020 g/cm3 (min/max 0.928/1.116, SD ±0.094). Overall we observed an increase in the mean axial pullout strength of 284% when using cement augmentated screws (non-cemented 385 N vs. cemented 1029 N, p 0,001). In the osteoporotic group the mean pullout force of the non-cemented screws was 407 N vs. 1022 N for the cemented screws (p 0.001). Similarly the pullout force rose in the non-osteoporotic group from 325 N for the non-cemented screws to 1048 N for the cemented screws p 0,001). All surgical procedures could be performed without technical problems. Conclusion. This cadaver study demonstrates the efficacy and effectiveness of pedicle-screw augmentation with ultra-high viscosity cement. Pullout forces are significantly increased, especially in osteoporotic bone. No complications like clogged in cannulated pedicle-screws or extravasation of bone cement were observed. In daily clinical routine radiation exposure to operator during cement delivery is reduced due to remote-controlled, automated delivery of radiofrequency-responsive bone cement. Furthermore availability of longer time to work with the cement (up to 30 min) is achieved; hectically injection or multiple-cement-mixing is not necessary anymore. The WSI-Expertise cannulated pedicle screws can be inserted and also augmented in a minimal-invasive technique. The PMMA then is injected through an extension adapter. PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws is already well established in spine surgery. With the combination of radiofrequency-responsive, ultra-high viscosity bone cement and cannulated pedicle screws this established procedure could become more controlled and safer for both patient and physician

Aims

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between transverse process (TP) fractures of the fourth (L4) and fifth (L5) lumbar vertebrae and biomechanical and haemodynamic stability in patients with a pelvic ring injury, since previous data are inconsistent.

The optimal method for the management of neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine has not been established. We treated four patients in whom the mean delay between injury and presentation was four months (1 to 5). There were two dislocations at the C5-6 level and one each at C4-5 and C3-4. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 years (27 to 60). Each patient presented with neck pain and restricted movement of the cervical spine. Three of the four had a myelopathy.

We carried out a two-stage procedure under the same anaesthetic. First, a posterior soft-tissue release and partial facetectomy were undertaken. This allowed partial reduction of the dislocation which was then supplemented by interspinous wiring and corticocancellous graft. Next, through an anterior approach, discectomy, tricortical bone grafting and anterior cervical plating were carried out.

All the patients achieved a nearly anatomical reduction and sagittal alignment. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years (1 to 4). The myelopathy settled completely in the three patients who had a pre-operative neurological deficit. There was no graft dislodgement or graft-related problems. Bony fusion occurred in all patients and a satisfactory reduction was maintained.

The posteroanterior procedure for neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine is a good method of achieving sagittal alignment with less risk of iatrogenic neurological injury, a reduced operating time, decreased blood loss, and a shorter hospital stay compared with other procedures.

We have reviewed our experience in managing 11 patients who sustained an indirect sternal fracture in combination with an upper thoracic spinal injury between 2003 and 2006. These fractures have previously been described as ‘associated’ fractures, but since the upper thorax is an anatomical entity composed of the upper thoracic spine, ribs and sternum joined together, we feel that the term ‘fractures of the upper transthoracic cage’ is a better description. These injuries are a challenge because they are unusual and easily overlooked. They require a systematic clinical and radiological examination to identify both lesions. This high-energy trauma gives severe devastating concomitant injuries and CT with contrast and reconstruction is essential after resuscitation to confirm the presence of all the lesions. The injury level occurs principally at T4–T5 and at the manubriosternal joint. These unstable fractures need early posterior stabilisation and fusion or, if treated conservatively, a very close follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of a developmental pelvic reconstruction system which extends the concept of triangular osteosynthesis with fixation anterior to the lumbosacral pivot point. An unstable Tile type-C fracture, associated with a sacral transforaminal fracture, was created in synthetic pelves. The new concept was compared with three other constructs, including bilateral iliosacral screws, a tension band plate and a combined plate with screws. The pubic symphysis was plated in all cases. The pelvic ring was loaded to simulate single-stance posture in a cyclical manner until failure, defined as a displacement of 2 mm or 2°. The screws were the weakest construct, failing with a load of 50 N after 400 cycles, with maximal translation in the craniocaudal axis of 12 mm. A tension band plate resisted greater load but failure occurred at 100 N, with maximal rotational displacement around the mediolateral axis of 2.3°.

The combination of a plate and screws led to an improvement in stability at the 100 N load level, but rotational failure still occurred around the mediolateral axis. The pelvic reconstruction system was the most stable construct, with a maximal displacement of 2.1° of rotation around the mediolateral axis at a load of 500 N.

We carried out a retrospective review over ten months of patients who had presented with a low-energy subtrochanteric fracture. We identified 13 women of whom nine were on long-term alendronate therapy and four were not. The patients treated with alendronate were younger, with a mean age of 66.9 years (55 to 82) vs 80.3 years (64 to 92) and were more socially active. The fractures sustained by the patients in the alendronate group were mainly at the femoral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction and many had occurred after minimal trauma. Five of these patients had prodromal pain in the affected hip in the months preceding the fall, and three demonstrated a stress reaction in the cortex in the contralateral femur.

Our study suggests that prolonged suppression of bone remodelling with alendronate may be associated with a new form of insufficiency fracture of the femur. We believe that this finding is important and indicates the need for caution in the long-term use of alendronate in the treatment of osteoporosis.