In comparison with monofilament wire, multifilament cable was found to be a more suitable material for fixation of the greater trochanter. It is versatile, easy to work with and has superior mechanical properties. The "trochanter cable-grip system" was developed to exploit the use of multifilament cable as a means of reattaching the greater trochanter and experimental studies have yielded excellent results. This system was subjected to clinical trials for over four years in 321 hips and, at its present state of development, the incidence of detachment has been reduced to 1.5 per cent and that of cable breakage to 3.1 per cent

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to define and quantify three new measurements to indicate the position of the greater trochanter. Secondary aims were to define ‘functional antetorsion’ as it relates to abductor function in populations both with and without torsional abnormality. Patients and Methods. Three new measurements, functional antetorsion, posterior tilt, and posterior translation of the greater trochanter, were assessed from 61 CT scans of cadaveric femurs, and their reliability determined. These measurements and their relationships were also evaluated in three groups of patients: a control group (n = 22), a ‘high-antetorsion’ group (n = 22) and a ‘low-antetorsion’ group (n = 10). Results. In the cadaver group, the mean anatomical antetorsion was 14.7° (. sd. 8.5; 0 to 36.5) and the functional antetorsion 21.5° (. sd. 8.1; 3.6 to 44.3): the posterior tilt was 73.3° (. sd. 10.8; 46.9 to 88.7) and the posterior translation 0.59 (. sd. 0.2; 0.2 to 0.9). These measurements had excellent intra and interobserver agreement with a range from 0.93 to 0.99. When the anatomical antetorsion decreased, the greater trochanter was more tilted and translated posteriorly in relation to the axis of the femoral neck, and the difference between functional and anatomical antetorsion increased. The results the three patient groups were similar to those of the cadaver group. Conclusion. The position of the greater trochanter and functional antetorsion varied with anatomical antetorsion. In the surgical management of femoral retrotorsion, subtrochanteric osteotomy can result in an excessively posterior position of the greater trochanter and an increase in functional antetorsion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:712–19

Resection of the proximal femur raises several challenges to the orthopedic oncology surgeon. Among these is the re-establishment of the abductor mechanism that might impacts on hip function. Extent of tumor resection and surgeons’ preferences dictate the reconstruction method of the abductors. While some surgeons advocate the necessity of greater trochanter (GT) preservation whenever possible, others attempt direct soft tissues reattachment to the prosthesis. Sparse data in the literature evaluated the outcomes of greater trochanter fixation to the proximal femur megaprosthesis. This is a retrospective monocentric study. All patients who received a proximal femoral replacement after tumor resection between 2005 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of three months were included. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those with preserved GT reattached to the megaprosthesis and (2) those with direct or indirect (tenodesis to fascia lata) abductor muscles reattachment. Both groups were compared for surgical outcomes (dislocation and revision rates) and functional outcomes (Trendelenburg gait, use of walking-assistive device and abductor muscle strength). Additionally patients in group 1 were subdivided into patients who received GT reinsertion using a grip and cables and those who got direct GT reinsertion using suture materials and studied for GT displacement at three, six and 12 months. Time to cable rupture was recorded and analyzed through a survival analysis. Fifty-six patients were included in this study with a mean follow-up of 45 months (3-180). There were 23 patients with reinserted GT (group 1) and 33 patients with soft tissue repair (group 2). Revision rate was comparable between both groups(p=0.23); however, there were more dislocations in group 2 (0/23 vs 6/33; p=0.037). Functional outcomes were comparable, with 78% of patients in group 1 (18/23) and 73% of patients in group 2 (24/33) that displayed a Trendelenburg gait (p=0.76). In group 1, 70% (16/23) used walking aids compared to 79% of group 2 (27/33) (p=0.34). Mean abductor strength reached 2.7 in group 1 compared to 2.3 in group 2 (p=0.06). In group 1, 16 of the 23 patients had GT reinsertion with grip and cables. Median survival of cables for these 16 patients reached 13 months in our series. GT displacement reached a mean of two mm, three mm, and 11 mm respectively at three, six and 12 months of follow-up in patients with grip and cables compared to 12 mm, 24 mm and 26 mm respectively at the same follow-up intervals in patients with GT stand-alone suture reinsertion(p<0.05). Although GT preservation and reinsertion did not improve functional outcomes after proximal femur resection and reconstruction with a megaprosthesis, it was significantly associated with lower dislocation rate despite frequent cable failure and secondary GT migration. No cable or grip revision or removal was recorded. Significantly less displacement was observed in patients for whom GT reattachment used plate and cables rather than sutures only. Therefore we suggest that GT should be preserved and reattached whenever possible and that GT reinsertion benefits from strong materials such as grip and cables

Primary tuberculous bursitis was a relatively frequent manifestation of the disease before the antituberculosis drug era. Nowadays, it is considered a rare condition; it accounts for 1–2% of all musculoskeletal tuberculosis. The diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous bursitis may be delayed because the paucity of symptoms, its indolent clinical course and a low clinical suspicion. A 50-year-old patient with tuberculous trochanteric bursitis is reported. A 50-year-old woman was referred to our department to investigate a persistent pain in her left hip with 6 months duration. She was afebrile. The examination revealed a diffuse swelling from the buttock through the thigh, notable over the trochanter, but no sign of acute inflammation such as heat and redness. Her past medical and family histories revealed no previous tuberculosis. Plain films of the left hip showed a partial destruction of the margin of the greater trochanter, lytic foci in the underlying bone and a small focus of calcification in the adjacent soft tissues. A computed tomogram showed a soft tissue mass and demonstrated the relationship with the trochanter. We performed a needle biopsy which revealed granulomatous tissue. The patient underwent complete excision of the bursa and curettage of the surface of the trochanter. The postoperative course was uneventful. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated and definitive diagnosis of tuberculous bursitis was made. There was no evidence of concomitant tuberculosis at other musculoskeletal sites. The patient completed a treatment with rifampicin and etambutol for 6 months. There has been a complete resolution of the symptoms after 3 months and no recurrence after 4 years of follow-up. On plain radiograph the remodeling of the bone structure is clearly visible. Tuberculosis in the region of the greater trochanter is extremely rare. This rarity leads orthopedic surgeons to neglect this potential diagnosis, resulting in a delay in treatment. The pathogenesis of tuberculosis of the greater trochanteric area has not been well defined. The incidence of concomitant tuberculosis at other musculoskeletal sites, as well as the lung, is approximately 50%. Both hematogenous infection and propagation from other locations are reasonable explanations. Surgical intervention is mandatory for cure and the use of several antituberculosis agents is a standard approach

Background. Total hip arthroplasty requires proper sizing and placing of implants to ensure excellent outcomes and reduce complications. Calculation of femoral offset is an important consideration for optimal reconstruction of the hip biomechanics. Femoral offset can be measured on plain films or with flouroscopy if the x-ray beam is perpendicular to the plane determined by the angle between the neck axis and femoral shaft axis. This distance is evident only with the femur in the correct degree of rotation. Though pre-operative templating for femoral component size and offset is a regular accepted practice, a consistent method for assessing correct femoral rotation on the AP x-ray view has not been established. Purpose/Hypthesis. The purpose of the current study was to establish and validate a method for identifying radiographic landmarks on the proximal femur that would reliably indicate that the femur was in the proper degree of rotation to represent the true offset from the head center to shaft center. Methods. Lead markers were placed on areas of the greater trochanter followed by xrays. Markers placed on locations on the anterior and posterior greater trochanter duplicated reliable radiographic lines. Proximal femurs were dissected to the bone and rotated about their long axis from neutral rotation, defined at the point when the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter were aligned radiographically. Radiographs were taken at 2 degree increments in both internal and external rotation until 10 degrees, then again at 30 degrees. A custom script was used to calculate the femoral offset at these rotations at these locations. Descriptive analysis was performed to assess the relationship between rotation angle and femoral offset. Results. The mean femoral offset was observed to be 38.21 mm (SD 4.93, median 37.82, range 30.52–46.27). The mean rotation of max offset was −3.6° (SD 5.6, median −6, range −10 to +8). The average underestimation error (the difference between calculated offset at neutral rotation and observed maximum femoral offset) was 0.92 mm (median 0.74, range 0 to 2.07 mm). Conclusion. Alignment of the radiographic lines created by the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter is a reliable and accurate rotational positioning method for measuring femoral offset when using plain films or fluoroscopy. It is a feasible method that can be applied preoperatively and/or intraoperatively to optimize accuracy of femoral offset for THA procedures. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Background. Isolated fracture of the greater trochanter is an uncommon presentation of hip fracture. Traditional teaching has been to manage these injuries nonoperatively, but modern imaging techniques have made it possible to detect occult intertrochanteric extension of the fracture in up to 90% of cases. This study aims to review the investigation and management of greater trochanter fractures in a single major trauma centre. Methods. A retrospective review was completed of patients admitted with greater trochanter fractures. These were matched to cases with 2-part extracapsular fractures. Initial management and clinical outcome was established using electronic notes and radiographs. Mortality and length of stay was calculated for both groups. Results. 85 isolated greater trochanter fractures in 84 patients were identified from 2006–2017. 81/85 patients were treated non-operatively. 78 were mobilised full weight bearing. None required readmission or operation due to fracture displacement. 58 of these patients had cross-sectional imaging with MRI or CT and 15 of those scanned had intertrochanteric extension of the fracture. In the same time period, 998 2-part extra-capsular fractures were treated, using a sliding hip screw. Length of stay was shorter in patients with greater trochanter fractures than 2-part extracapsular fractures (median 7 days vs 14 days, P<0.0001). 30-day mortality was 11.9%, with no significant difference to patients with 2-part extracapsular fractures. Discussion. Cross sectional imaging rarely changed the treatment protocol for isolated greater trochanter fractures. The outcome following non-operative treatment is good even in the presence of occult fractures identified on CT or MRI. We advocate a treatment protocol that encourages early mobilisation and repeat plain radiographs if patients fail to progress. This will reduce unnecessary morbidity from fixation of stable occult fractures

Malpositioning of the trochanteric entry point during the introduction of an intramedullary nail may cause iatrogenic fracture or malreduction. Although the optimal point of insertion in the coronal plane has been well described, positioning in the sagittal plane is poorly defined. . The paired femora from 374 cadavers were placed both in the anatomical position and in internal rotation to neutralise femoral anteversion. A marker was placed at the apparent apex of the greater trochanter, and the lateral and anterior offsets from the axis of the femoral shaft were measured on anteroposterior and lateral photographs. Greater trochanteric morphology and trochanteric overhang were graded. The mean anterior offset of the apex of the trochanter relative to the axis of the femoral shaft was 5.1 mm (. sd. 4.0) and 4.6 mm (. sd. 4.2) for the anatomical and neutralised positions, respectively. The mean lateral offset of the apex was 7.1 mm (. sd. 4.6) and 6.4 mm (. sd. 4.6), respectively. Placement of the entry position at the apex of the greater trochanter in the anteroposterior view does not reliably centre an intramedullary nail in the sagittal plane. Based on our findings, the site of insertion should be about 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter to allow for its anterior offset. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1274–81

BACKGROUND. Early dislocation is a foremost complication of total hip arthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach. The extra-articular impingement of the anterior part of the great trochanter with ileum bone, with or without soft tissue interposition is a well recognized but underestimated etiopathogenetic cause reported in literature. In this retrospective study through the assessment of clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of six months, the effectiveness of an antero- longitudinal osteotomy of the great trochanter for early dislocation prevention is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 209 patients (48.3% males and 51,7% females) underwent a total hip arthroplasty from June 2011 to September 2015, with surgery being performed by the same surgeon. A modified posterolateral approach was used according to the tissue-sparing criteria, in all the cases an anterior longitudinal osteotomy of the great trochanter has been performed at 90° to the antiversion angle of the implant and aligned posteriorly with the prosthesis. All the patients underwent a clinical and radiological follow up at one, three, and six months. RESULTS. In this study, only one patient reported dislocation of THA. One patient suffered from a wound infection which was subsequently treated with antibiotics and had complete remission. All patients demonstrated a fast recovery of ROM and walking, starting from pre-op Harris Hip Score 42.24pts and obtaining a score of 81.52pts at three months, and 92.03 at six months post-op. After surgery and during the follow up period, there were no trochanteric fractures detected. DISCUSSION. The correct positioning of the implants, the head diameter, offset, soft tissues repair, absence of impingement, and patients compliance are all elements that define the prosthetic stability. Literature shows and incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty dislocation between 0.80% to 10%. The incidence of dislocation reported in a preliminary study in our Institute is 0.48%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the trochanteric osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS. The osteotomy of the great trochanter is an effective surgical technique used to decrease the anterior impingement and early dislocation incidence. It is particularly effective on patients with good compliance and correctly implanted prosthetic components

Introduction: Although Metal wires and cables are popular tools to fix greater trochanter in revision THA, non union, pain and breakage are well known. For these situations, we used polyethylene tape which is occasionally applied for the spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical result of greater trochanter fixation using polyethylene tape in revision THA cases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent revisions THA (six cases) and re-revision THA (two cases) (mean age at operation; seventy), with a minimum followup of two years. In revision cases, we attached greater trochanter to proximal femur fixing like figure eight with this tape. Migration of greater trochanter, union rate, pain and dislocation were evaluated in this study. Result: Bone union was achieved without migration and we did not experience any patients with pain. However migration of greater trochanter to cranially and anteriorly 3mm was observed in all re-revision cases. A patient dislocated twice after the re-revision. Discussion: We demonstrated that the polyethylene tape had several advantages used in greater trochanter fixation. Strength of the polyethylene tape has been reported as strong as the stainless cable. The polyethylene tape did not cause any adverse effects including pain and cheese cut phenomenon because of broad contact area with bone. The tape could be put directly on the stem, which is impossible with metal wires and cables. In addition, we do not expect any third body wear. We concluded that polyethylene tape applied for fixing greater trochanter in revision THA would be safe and effective

We present a new method of trochanter stabilisation designed for use in difficult revision hip arthroplasties. A fixator is secured to the metaphysis of the femur, and its two malleable prongs encompass the trochanter fragment and stabilise it using the tension band principle. The fixator is versatile, simple to apply and has better mechanical properties than any technique using wires. We reviewed 49 revisions after a mean follow-up of 40 months. Patients had been mobilised early, but there were no detachments or displacements from the initial postoperative position. Although 31% of patients were osteoporotic and 16% had poor trochanter fragments, there was bony union in 46 of the 49 hips, the remaining three developing stable fibrous union

Purpose: There has only been one reported series of 30 cases of greater trochanter fracture during total hip arthroplasty and 26 of these were postoperative discoveries. We evaluated the frequency of this event and its postoperative consequences. Material and methods: Among our series of 1171 total hip arthroplasties performed between 1985 and 2000, 38 patients (3.2%) with greater trochanter fracture were identified (mean age 63 years). Osteosynthesis was performed in all cases. Thirty-one fractures were observed during primary arthroplasty and seven during revision procedures. Results: Eighteen patients had a favouring condition: corti-costeroid therapy,alcoholism,osteoporosis,diabetes,Paget, ablation of trochanteric material, periprosthetic osteolysis. The anterolateral approach was used in 22 and the posterolateral approach in 16. The fracture occurred along the access route in four (material removal or prefracture situtation), at removal of a previously implanted stem in two, and during implantation in 32. Twelve different stems were involved but a screwed stem was involved in 18 cases, i.e. 10% of all implanted screwed stems, while this complication only occurred in 1.2% of other implanted stems. Immediate weight bearing was authorised in 27 patients and deferred three weeks to three months in eleven. There were two deaths, so follow-up data was available for 36 hips: we observed anatomic bone healing in 22, deformed calluses in five and nonunion in nine, including two cases with infection (three revision procedures were required). Pain persisted at two months for eleven hips and limping persisted for ten (eight nonunions). Discussion: Prostheses with a large metaphyseal component were involved in the majority of the fractures. The surgical approach was not incriminated. When well stabilised, trochanter fractures healed well. Nonunion, often announced by persistent pain, is an important risk in patients with osteoporosis and a poorly stabilised fracture. Although all cases of nonunion were observed in patients with deferred weight bearing, this criterion is simply the expression of the surgeon’s apprehension in case of less than satisfactory fixation. Conclusion: Because of the deficient bone stock, which explains the higher rate of nonunion, fracture of the greater trochanter cannot be considered in the same light as a planned osteotomy. Prevention requires choosing a less cumbersome metaphyseal component in patients with favouring conditions. Osteosynthesis must be performed with particular care in order to obtain rapid healing and good functional outcome

1. Thirty-eight cases of tuberculosis of the greater trochanter have been reviewed. 2. Classification into bursal and osseous infections is discussed, and reasons have been given for our belief that either lesion may be the primary one. 3. An attempt has been made to assess available methods of treatment. In general, conservative measures are recommended for primary lesions, and surgery for recurrences. We have the impression that chemotherapy is of definite value. 4. The incidence of spread of tuberculosis to the hip joint is discussed. In this connection, reasons have been given for condemning excision of the trochanter

1 . The results of transplanting the greater trochanter in 225 "low-friction" arthroplasties of the hip have been examined. 2. Non-union occurred in an average of 7 per cent of cases. 3. When non-union occurred the results still showed improvement. 4. Four different methods of fixation were used, of which that using two wires, crossed in the horizontal and coronal planes, never failed to secure union. 5. Transplantation of the greater trochanter to the best position is only possible if the neck of the femur is shortened or if the centre of motion of the arthroplasty is displaced medially by deepening the acetabulum, or by a combination of both. 6. In the best position the transplanted trochanter considerably improved active abduction against gravity

Greater trochanter fractures after total hip replacement have been reported in up to 5% of cases. The outcomes are generally poor. Treatment options include non-operative care or surgical treatment with cerclage wires or a claw plate. We present a simple tension band technique for acute fractures with a single bony fracture fragment. We have not used the technique for chronic or comminuted fractures. Technique: 2.5mm k-wires are passed through the fragment and anterior and posterior to the femoral implant. Eighteen-gauge wire is passed through a drill hole in the femur distal to the fracture and around the k-wires in a figure eight. The patient is kept 50% weightbearing with no active abduction for 4 weeks. In four cases the fracture has gone on to healing. Patients have had a negative Trendelenburg sign without peritrochanteric pain. The tension band technique is familiar to surgeons and has been reliable

We perfused 16 human femora with a 50% barium sulphate suspension and studied the intra-osseous vessels by microfocal radiography and histology. There were few anastomoses between the vessels of the greater trochanter and those of the adjacent cancellous bone of the shaft. Ischaemia of the trochanter may contribute to nonunion after trochanteric osteotomy

After congenital dislocation of the hip, Perthes' disease and some other conditions, the femoral neck may be short and the greater trochanter in a relatively proximal position. Distal transfer of the greater trochanter is an effective and relatively simple operation to correct this deformity. We have reviewed 26 patients (27 hips) at a mean follow-up of eight years. Pain relief and improvement in gait were maintained in 74%, and the poor results were largely due to progression of osteoarthritis. We describe a 'gear-stick' sign of trochanteric impingement, which is useful in the pre-operative assessment of patients

There is a paucity of available literature to guide the surgeon treating postoperative fractures of the greater trochanter after femoral component revision. Between 2009 and 2016, 133 patients underwent femoral component revision by the senior author utilizing a modular tapered fluted titanium stem. 17 patients died or had inadequate follow-up. Therefore, 116 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 58 males and 58 females with a mean age of 64 (range 23 to 91 years old). Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed for postoperative greater trochanteric fracture (GTfx). Mean clinical follow up was 21 months (range 3 to 77 mos). Age, BMI, preoperative diagnosis, comorbidities, reason for revision, use of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO), fixation method of ETO, presence of prior hardware, post-operative trauma (falls), femoral component size and offset, change in leg length were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for postoperative GT fracture. There were 7 postoperative greater trochanteric fractures in 7 patients (6%). Of these, 1 occurred as a result of a postoperative fall, 1 occurred after dislocation, and 1 occurred after a fall with a subsequent dislocation. The mean time to diagnosis of the fracture was 10.7 weeks postoperatively (range one day to 37.4 weeks). 52 of 116 patients had their revision performed through an ETO. Of those, 6 had a postoperative fracture of the GT. The use of an ETO significantly increased the likelihood of postoperative GT fx (p=0.035). Regarding femoral component size, use of a longer proximal body (+10 or greater) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative GT fx (p=0.07). Two fractures were minimally (<1cm) or non-displaced and were treated non-operatively. Of these fractures, 1 united. The other fracture further displaced and resulted in recurrent instability. This was treated with excision of the fragment and a constrained liner. 5 fractures were displaced and were treated with ORIF. 3 were fixed with a cable grip device, 1 was plated, and 1 was treated with a cable grip device and a constrained liner. Of those treated with some form of ORIF, all 5 healed. Of those that underwent surgical fixation initially, 3 reported residual trochanteric pain and 1 patient had their hardware removed (trochanteric claw). 2 of these patients have a residual limp and require a cane for use as a gait aid. The patient treated non-surgically required a cane as did the patient that failed non-surgical treatment. Post-operative greater trochanteric fractures are a rare complication of femoral component revision. The use of an ETO significantly increased the rate of post of GTfx. The mean time to diagnosis of was 11 weeks. Displaced fractures of the greater trochanter treated with ORIF all healed, both cable grip devices and plates were effective. Residual limp requiring gait aids and residual trochanteric pain were common outcomes after fixation of these fractures despite successful union

Background. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), preservation of the short external rotator muscles are considered to be important because they contribute to joint stability and prevent postoperative dislocation. Recently, we reported that there are bony impressions on the greater trochanter that indicate the insertions of the short external rotator tendons. In this study, we reported a method to visualize the bony impressions using preoperative CT images, and evaluate the reliability and accuracy of this method. Methods. Thirty-three hips from 24 consecutive patients undergoing THA were enrolled. The mean age was 65.3 years. Preoperative diagnoses included hip osteoarthritis in 27 hips, rheumatoid arthritis in 4 hips, idiopathic osteonecrosis in 1 hip, femoral neck fracture in 1 hip. Preoperative CT of the hip region was obtained and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the greater trochanter was performed to visualize the bony impressions, that we called the obturator tendon attachment (OTA), indicating the attachment area of the obturator internus and externus muscles. Results. 3D reconstructed images of the greater trochanter were observed from medial side at 50 degrees of external hip rotation and 20 degrees of abduction (OTA view). Using OTA view, the bony impressions indicating the attachment area of the obturator internus and externus muscles can be identified in all hips. Conclusions. The bony impressions indicating the attachment area of the obturator internus and externus muscles can be visualized using preoperative 3D-CT. We considered that the findings in the present study could be helpful for surgery because the alignment of the short external rotator muscles can be estimated preoperatively and the extent of the damage to the OA during the rasping or reaming can be estimated

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results of the Pin-Sleeve System (AI Wiring System; AIWS) with the Dall-Miles Cable Grip System (DMCGS) for reattachment after dissection of the greater trochanter in hip arthroplasty. The DMCGS was used in 33 cases 35 hips from 1994 to 1998 and AIWS in 40 cases 42 hips from 1998 to 2001. The age at operation was 61.3 years (24 to 85 years) in the DMCGS group and 67 years (24 to 86 years) in the AIWS group. The postoperative follow-up period was 24 months (4 months to 54 months) in the DMCGS group and 30 months (11 months to 42 months) in the AIWS group. Bone union failure of the great trochanter occurred in the DMCGS group eight hips (22.9%) and AIWS group five hips (11.9%). The DMCGS group four hips (11.4%) had broken cables, while not even one case of the AIWS group had them (p< 0.05). Fragments from the cable were found in the DMCGS group seven hips (20%) and AIWS group two hips (4.8%). Bone resorption around the cable, grip or sleeve occurred in the DMCGS group 19 hips (54.3%) and AIWS group five hips (11.9%) (p< 0.05). Clinically, the DMCGS group 13 hips (37.1%) and AIWS group seven hips (16.7%) had dysphoria at the greater trochanter; the DMCGS group 17 hips (48.6%) and AIWS group eight hips (19%) had pain at the greater trochanter in the recumbent position with the affected side down (p< 0.05); the DMCGS group 13 hips (37.1%) and AIWS group six hips (14.3%) had pain on exertion. The AIWS is considered to be a useful implant for reattachment of the greater trochanter compared with the DMCGS