A retrospective analysis was performed of eight patients with an open
Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs. This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional
and oncological outcome of extracorporeally irradiated autografts
used to reconstruct the pelvis after a P1/2 internal hemipelvectomy. The study included 18 patients with a primary malignant bone
tumour of the pelvis. There were 13 males and five females with
a mean age of 24.8 years (8 to 62). Of these, seven had an osteogenic
sarcoma, six a Ewing’s sarcoma, and five a chondrosarcoma. At a
mean follow-up of 51.6 months (4 to 185), nine patients had died
with metastatic disease while nine were free from disease. Local
recurrence occurred in three patients all of whom eventually died of
their disease. Deep infection occurred in three patients and required
removal of their graft in two while the third underwent a hindquarter
amputation for extensive flap necrosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score of the
16 patients who could be followed-up for at least 12 months was
77% (50 to 90). Those 15 patients who completed the Toronto Extremity
Salvage Score questionnaire had a mean score of 71% (53 to 85). Extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone is a valid
method of reconstruction after an internal hemipelvectomy. It has
an acceptable morbidity and a functional outcome that compares favourably
with other available reconstructive techniques. Cite this article:
We review the treatment of pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma by the implantation of extracorporeally-irradiated (ECI) autografts and compare the outcome with that of other reported methods. We treated 13 patients with ECI autografts between 1994 and 2004. There were seven males and six females with a median age of 15.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 12.2 to 21.7). At a median follow-up of five years (IQR 1.8 to 7.4), the disease-free survival was 69% overall, and 75% if one patient with local recurrence after initial treatment elsewhere was excluded. Four patients died from distant metastases at a mean of 17 months (13 to 23). There were three complications which required operative intervention; one was a deep infection which required removal of the graft. The functional results gave a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 85% (60% to 97%), a mean Toronto extremity salvage score of 86% (69% to 100%) and a mean Harris hip score of 92 (67 to 100). We conclude that ECI grafting is a suitable form of treatment for localised and resectable pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma.