Cementing in arthroplasty for hip fracture is associated with improved postoperative function, but may have an increased risk of early mortality compared to uncemented fixation. Quantifying this mortality risk is important in providing safe patient care. This study investigated the association between cement use in arthroplasty and mortality at 30 days and one year in patients aged 50 years and over with hip fracture. This retrospective cohort study used linked data from the Australian Hip Fracture Registry and the National Death Index. Descriptive analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves tested the unadjusted association of mortality between cemented and uncemented procedures. Multilevel logistic regression, adjusted for covariates, tested the association between cement use and 30-day mortality following arthroplasty. Given the known institutional variation in preference for cemented fixation, an instrumental variable analysis was also performed to minimize the effect of unknown confounders. Adjusted Cox modelling analyzed the association between cement use and mortality at 30 days and one year following surgery.Aims
Methods
Aims. Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in
Ceramic-on-metal (CoM) is a relatively new bearing
combination for
Version of the femoral stem is an important factor
influencing the risk of dislocation after
Aims. The primary objective of this study was to develop a validated classification system for assessing iatrogenic bone trauma and soft-tissue injury during
Aims. Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing
Aims.
Aims. In 2015, we published the results of our ceramic-on-metal (CoM)
This meta analysis address the relationship between infection developing after
Aims. Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during
Aims. A significant reduction in wear at five and ten years was previously reported when comparing Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene with nitrogen-sterilized Sulene polyethylene in
Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the functional results in a fitter subgroup of participants in the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of
Aims. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common pre- and postoperative issue in
Aims. Implant waste during
Surgical management of acetabular fractures in older patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of primary THA with outcomes after THA for acute acetabular fractures (aTHA) as well as outcomes following delayed THA (dTHA) following prior acetabular fracture. We analyzed data from a large, national administrative claims database containing diagnostic, procedural, and demographic records from over 157 million patients. We identified all patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty THA continuously enrolled in the database at least 2 years prior and after the index procedure. Patients with an initial diagnostic code for acetabular fracture occurring the same day as the THA were classified as acute acetabular fractures. Patients with an initial acetabular fracture diagnostic code occurring at least 6 months before THA were classified as chronic acetabular fractures. The comparator group was patients undergoing THA with no history of acetabular fracture. There were 426,734 patients undergoing primary THA, 235 patients undergoing aTHA and 1,255 patients undergoing dTHA. Patients with an aTHA had higher complication rates, including revisions (9.8% vs 5.6%,), dislocations (8.9% vs 6.4%), and periprosthetic fracture (5.1% vs 2.3%) compared to dTHA. After adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities, receiving an aTHA increased the odds of revision (OR = 3.65 [95% CI: 2.30–5.49]), dislocation (OR = 4.09 [95% CI: 2.53–6.27]), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 4.29 [95% CI: 2.26–7.36]) compared to primary THA. Receiving a dTHA significantly increased the odds of revision (adjusted OR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.40–2.27]), dislocation (adjusted OR = 2.50 [95% CI: 1.97–3.13]), and periprosthetic fracture (adjusted OR = 1.99 [95% CI: 1.34–2.83]) compared to primary THA. Patients undergoing aTHA in the treatment of an acetabular fracture have significantly increased rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation compared to dTHA and primary THA.
Obesity is a known risk factor for developing osteoarthritis and is also associated with an increased risk of developing complications post
Aims. Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning software has the potential to improve postoperative stability in
Aims. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with
Aims. Young adults undergoing