Introduction. Aseptic loosening is one of the highest causes for revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With growing interest in anatomically aligned (AA) TKA, it is important to understand if this surgical technique affects cemented tibial fixation any differently than mechanical alignment (MA). Previous studies have shown that lipid/marrow infiltration (LMI) during implantation may significantly reduce fixation of tibial implants to bone analogs [1]. This study aims to investigate the effect of surgical alignment on fixation failure load after physiological loading. Methods. Alignment specific physiological loading was determined using telemetric tibial implant data from Orthoload [2] and applying it to a validated finite element lower limb model developed by the University of Denver [3]. Two high demand activities were selected for the loading section of this study: step down (SD) and deep knee bend (DKB). Using the lower limb model, hip and ankle external boundary conditions were applied to the ATTUNE. ®. knee system for both MA and AA techniques. The 6 degree of freedom kinetics and kinematics for each activity were then extracted from the model for each alignment type. Mechanical alignment (MA) was considered to be neutral alignment (0° Hip Knee Ankle Angle (HKA), 0° Joint Line (JL)) and AA was chosen to be 3° varus HKA, 5° JL. It is important not to exceed the limits of safety when using AA as such it is noted that DePuy Synthes recommends staying within 3º varus HKA and 3º JL. The use of 5º JL was used in this study to account for surgical variation [Depuy-Synthes surgical technique DSUS/JRC/0617/2179]. Following a similar method described by Maag et al [1] ATTUNE tibial implants were cemented into a bone analog with 2 mL of bone marrow in the distal cavity and an additional reservoir of lipid adjacent to the posterior edge of the implant. Tibial implant constructs were then subjected to intra-operative ROM/stability evaluation, followed by a hyperextension activity until 15 minutes of cement curing time, and finally 3 additional ROM/stability evaluations were performed using an AMTI VIVO simulator. The alignment specific loading parameters were then applied to the tibial implants using an AMTI VIVO simulator. Each sample was subjected to 50,000 DKB cycles and 120,000 SD cycles at 0.8 Hz in series; approximating 2 years of physiological activity. After physiological loading the samples were tested for fixation failure load by axial pull off. Results. Following alignment specific physiological loading the average fixation pull-off load for MA was 3289 ± 400 N and for AA was 3378 ± 133 N (Figure 1). There was no statistically significant difference fixation failure load by axial pull-off between the two alignment types (p=0.740). Conclusion. This study indicated that anatomic alignment, as defined with the alignment limits of this study, does not adversely affect the fixation failure load of ATTUNE tibial implants. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Objectives. Modularity in total knee arthroplasty, particularly in revisions, is a common method to fit the implants to a patient's anatomy when additional stability or fixation is needed. In such cases, it may be necessary to employ multiple points of modularity to better match the anatomy. Taper junction strength at each of these levels is critical to maintain the mechanical stability of the implant and minimize micromotion. This effect of distributed assembly loads through multiple tapers and the resulting strength of the construct have not been previously evaluated on this revision tibial implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible dissipation of impaction force through multiple taper connections as compared to a single connection. Methods. Two different constructs representative of modular implants were studied: a construct with a single axial taper connection (Group A; representing implant-stem) was compared to a construct with an adaptor that included two, offset, modular taper connections (Group B; representing implant-adapter-stem). For Group A, the stem taper was assembled and impacted through the stem. For Group B, the two tapers of the adapter and stem were hand assembled with the mating components and impacted simultaneously through the stem. Assembly load for each construct was recorded. As shown in Figure 1, the constructs were then fixed in a mechanical test frame and an axial distraction force was applied to the end of the stem at a constant displacement rate of 0.075 mm/sec until taper separation or mechanical failure occurred. Force and displacement data were recorded at 50 Hz. Disassembly force was normalized to assembly force for each component. Minitab software was used to analyze the data using a t-test. Results. Separation occurred at the implant-stem interface for all components of Group A, without component fracture. Separation occurred at the adapter-stem interface for all components of Group B. There were neither component fractures nor separation of the implant-adapter interface. As seen in Figure 2, the disassembly force for Group A was greater than Group B (p = 0.456), likely due to the higher assembly forces. However, the ratio of these forces (disassembly/assembly) was greater for Group B than Group A, but not statistically significant (0.794 vs. 0.754 with p = 0.657). Discussion. There are no applicable standards for required taper disassembly strength. However, the results of this study indicate that the addition of a second taper connection and offset does not significantly change the static ratio of disassembly to assembly force of the studied constructs. Axial distraction forces vary with activity and constraint afforded by a particular prosthesis. Future work to further characterize the behavior of these constructs could include varying loading rate to determine if that affects the location of taper disassociation. A period of fatigue testing could also be added to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the taper connections

Aim. The osteolytic process of osteomyelitis is, according to textbooks, caused by increased osteoclast activity due to RANKL production by osteoblasts. However, recent findings contradict this theory. Therefore, the aim was to investigate, in a porcine osteomyelitis model, how osteolysis is affected by massive inflammation and RANKL blocking, respectively. In parallel, patients with chronic osteomyelitis, diabetes, foot osteomyelitis, and fracture related infections (FRI) were included for advanced histological analysis of osteolysis. Methods. In pigs, a tibial implant cavity was created and inoculated with 10. 4. CFU of Staphylococcus aureus: Group A (n=7). Group B (n=7); + 1cm. 3. spongostan into the cavity. Group C (n=4); + systemic Denosumab treatment. Spongostan was used as an avascular material to support bacterial growth and thus increase the inflammatory response. Denosumab treatment was administrated to suppress osteoclast activity by RANKL inhibition (as in osteoporotic patients). The volume of osteolysis was accessed by CT scans. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies towards Cathepsin K was used to identify osteoclasts within the bone lesions. Briefly, the number of Cathepsin K positive cells, i.e., both precursors and bone resorbing osteoclasts, respectively, were counted in 10 high power fields (400x). In total, 50 bone infection patients were included (Herlev Hospital). From each patient five parried samples were taken for histology and microbiology, respectively. Histopathology, CT osteolysis volume estimation, and molecular expression of osteoclasts and inflammatory markers are ongoing. One FRI patient was osteoporotic and treated with Denosumab for 6 years. Results. All pigs were confirmed infected in the implant cavity. The volume (2.41 ± 1.29cm. 3. ) of osteolysis was significantly increased in the spongostan group in comparison to Group A (1.24 ± 0.59 cm. 3. ) (p=0.04). Thereby, the spongostan group had bacteria deeper into the bone from the inoculation point. Sufficient Denosumab treatment, i.e. reduced serum Ca was seen in 3 pigs. None of the Denosumab treated pigs showed reduced osteolysis in comparison to Group A (1.42 ± 0.63 cm. 3. ). The Cathepsin K score of Group C was 17 (15-23 IQR) of precursor osteoclasts and 2 (0-2 IQR) of osteoclasts in Howship lacunae. The Denosumab treated patient showed substantial osteolysis and histological analysis confirmed acute inflammatory. Conclusions. Application of spongostan, i.e., bacterial host optimization and massive inflammation promotes osteolysis and local bacterial dissemination. Osteoclast blocking with Denosumab showed no impact on osteolysis. Elucidation of the pathophysiology causing bone loss in osteomyelitis is fundamental. However, the widely accepted osteoclast-based theory might not be the only relevant

Introduction. Aseptic loosening of total knee replacements is a leading cause for revision. It is known that micromotion has an influence on the loosening of cemented implants though it is not yet well understood what the effect of repeated physiological loading has on the micromotion between implants and cement mantle. This study aims to investigate effect of physiological loading on the stability of tibial implants previously subjected to simulated intra-operative lipid/marrow infiltration. Methods. Three commercially available fixed bearing tibial implant designs were investigated in this study: ATTUNE. ®. , PFC SIGMA. ®. CoCr, ATTUNE. ®. S+. The implant designs were first prepared using a LMI implantation process. Following the method described by Maag et al tibial implants were cemented in a bone analog with 2 mL of bone marrow in the distal cavity and an additional reservoir of lipid adjacent to the posterior edge of the implant. The samples were subjected to intra- operative range of motion (ROM)/stability evaluation using an AMTI VIVO simulator, then a hyperextension activity until 15 minutes of cement cure time, and finally 3 additional ROM/stability evaluations were performed. Implant specific physiological loading was determined using telemetric tibial implant data from Orthoload and applying it to a validated FE lower limb model developed by the University of Denver. Two high demand activities were selected for the loading section of this study: step down (SD) and deep knee bend (DKB). Using the above model, 6 degree of freedom kinetics and kinematics for each activity was determined for each posterior stabilized implant design. Prior to loading, the 3-D motion between tibial implant and bone analog (micromotion) was measured using an ARAMIS Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system. Measurement was taken during the simulated DKB at 0.25Hz using an AMTI VIVO simulator while the DIC system captured images at a frame rate of 10Hz. The GOM software calculated the distance between reference point markers applied to the posterior implant and foam bone. A Matlab program calculated maximum micromotion within each DKB cycle and averaged that value across five cycles. The implant specific loading parameters were then applied to the three tibial implant designs. Using an AMTI VIVO simulator each sample was subjected to 50,000 DKB and 120,000 SD cycles at 0.8Hz in series; equating to approximately 2 years of physiological activity. Following loading, micromotion was measured using the same method as above. Results. Initial micomotion measurements during DKB activity for ATTUNE. ®. , PFC SIGMA. ®. CoCr, ATTUNE. ®. S+ were 155µm, 246µm, and 104µm, respectively, and following physiological loading were 159µm, 264µm, and 112µm, respectively. While there was statistical significance between the micromotion of implant designs (p<0.05), there was no significance between before and after loading. Conclusion. This study shows there is no significant change in micromotion after approximately 2 years of physiological loading. However, there is a significant difference in micromotion between implant designs

Aim. To create a more “normal” anatomy for the repaired joint structure, which can be provided that by the following factors: (1) the available implant component require a normalized anatomical support structure, (2) the available repair components are designed and/or tested to only recreate and/or replicate more normalized anatomical structures and/or joint motion, (3) the surgeon is familiar and comfortable with more normalized joint motion and thus attempts to create such “normal” motion within the repaired anatomical structures. Methods. We could discover a method of making an implant component for a knee joint of a patient which includes deriving information regarding a first joint line of the joint based on patient-specific information. This method also includes determining a planned level of resection for a first portion of a bone of the joint based on the patient-specific information. Further, the dimension of the implant component is determined based on the derived information regarding the first joint line and the planned level of resection for the first portion of the bone. Also, we discovered an implant component for treating a patient's joint that includes a medial bone-facing surface. The medial bone-facing surface is positioned to engage a cut bone surface of a medial portion of a proximal tibia at a first level. The implant component also includes a lateral bone-facing surface. The lateral bone-facing surface is positioned to engage a cut bone surface of a lateral portion of the proximal tibia at a second level. The first level is offset from the second level. The implant component additionally includes one or more joint-facing surfaces having a curvature based on patient-specific information. Furthermore, we discovered a system for treating a joint of a patient that includes one or more patient-specific instruments. The system further includes a medial tibial implant component. The medial tibial implant component has a bone-facing surface and a joint-facing surface. The joint-facing surface has a curvature based on patient-specific information. The system also includes a lateral tibial implant component, which has a bone-facing surface and a joint-facing surface. The joint-facing surface of the lateral tibial implant has a curvature based on patient-specific information. The bone-facing surface of the medial tibial implant component is configured to engage a cut bone surface that is at a level offset from the level of a cut bone surface to which the bone-facing surface of the lateral tibial implant component is configured to engage. The system further includes a femoral implant component, which has a joint-facing surface with a curvature based on patient-specific information. Results. Patient-specific instruments that can be used for double joint line knee joint replacement surgical procedures are disclosed. Severe varus deformity has been corrected through bilateral joint replacement

OSSTEC is a pre-spin-out venture at Imperial College London seeking industry feedback on our orthopaedic implants which maintain bone quality in the long term. Existing orthopaedic implants provide successful treatment for knee osteoarthritis, however, they cause loss of bone quality over time, leading to more dangerous and expensive revision surgeries and high implant failure rates in young patients. OSSTEC tibial implants stimulate healthy bone growth allowing simple primary revision surgery which will provide value for all stakeholders. This could allow existing orthopaedics manufacturers to capture high growth in existing and emerging markets while offering hospitals and surgeons a safer revision treatment for patients and a 35% annual saving on lifetime costs. For patients, our implant technology could mean additional years of quality life by revising patients to a primary TKA before full revision surgery. Our implants use patent-filed additive manufacturing technology to restore a healthy mechanical environment in the proximal tibia; stimulating long term bone growth. Proven benefits of this technology include increased bone formation and osseointegration, shown in an animal model, and restoration of native load transfer, shown in a human cadaveric model. This technology could help capture the large annual growth (24%) currently seen in the cementless knee reconstruction market, worth $1.2B. Furthermore, analysis suggests an additional market of currently untreated younger patients exists, worth £0.8B and growing by 18% annually. Making revision surgery and therefore treatment of younger patients easier would enable access to this market. We aim to offer improved patient treatment via B2B sales of implants to existing orthopaedic manufacturer partners, who would then provide them with instrumentation to hospitals and surgeons. Existing implant materials provide good options for patient treatments, however OSSTEC's porous titanium structures offer unique competitive advantages; combining options for modular design, cementless fixation, initial bone fixation and crucially long term bone maintenance. Speaking to surgeons across global markets shows that many surgeons are keen to pursue bone preserving surgeries and the use of porous implants. Furthermore, there is a growing demand to treat young patients (with 25% growth in patients younger than 65 over the past 10 years) and to use cementless knee treatments, where patient volume has doubled in the past 4 years and is following trends in hip treatments. Our team includes engineers and consultant surgeons who have experience developing multiple orthopaedic implants which have treated over 200,000 patients. To date we have raised £175,000 for the research and development of these implants and we hope to gain insight from industry professionals before further development towards our aim to begin trials for regulatory approval in 2026. OSSTEC implants provide a way to stimulate bone growth after surgery to reduce revision risk. We hope this could allow orthopaedic manufactures to explore high growth markets while meaning surgeons can treat younger patients in a cost effective way and add quality years to patients' lives

Introduction. Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants use an interference fit to achieve fixation, which depends on the difference between the inner dimensions of the implant and outer dimensions of the bone. However, the most optimal interference fit is still unclear. A higher interference fit could lead to a superior fixation, but it could also cause bone abrasion and permanent deformation during implantation. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of increasing the interference fit from 350 µm to 700 µm on the primary stability of cementless tibial implants by measuring micromotions and gaps at the bone-implant interface when subjected to two loading conditions. Methods. Two cementless e.motion® tibial components (Total Knee System, B. Braun) with different interference fit and surface coating were implanted in six pairs of relatively young human cadaver tibias (47–60 years). The Orthoload peak loads of gait (1960N) and squat (1935N) were applied to the specimens with a custom made load applicator (Figure 1A). The micromotions (shear displacement) and opening/closing gaps (normal displacement) were measured with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) in 6 different regions of interest (ROIs - Figure 1B). Two General Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) were created with micromotions and interfacial gaps as dependent variables, bone quality, loading conditions, ROIs, and interference fit implants as independent variables, and the cadaver specimens as subject variables. Results. No significant difference was found for the micromotions between the two interference fit implants (gait p=0.755, squat p=0.232), nor for interfacial gaps (gait p=0.474, squat p=0.269). In contrast, significant differences were found for the ROIs in the two dependent variables (p < 0.001). The micromotions in the anterior ROIs (AM and AL) showed fewer micromotions for the low interference fit implant (Figure 2). More closing gaps (negative values) were seen for all ROIs (Figure 3), except in AM ROI during squat, which showed opening gaps (positive values). The posterior ROIs (PM and PL) showed more closing than seen in the anterior ROIs (AM and AL) for both loading configurations. Discussion. The results presented here demonstrate that increasing the interference fit from 350 µm to 700 µm does not affect the micromotions at the implant-bone interface of tibial TKA. While micromotions values were all below the threshold for bone ingrowth (40 µm), closing gaps were quite substantial (∼−150 µm). Since cementless e.motion® TKA components with an interference fit of 350 µm had shown a survival rate of 96.2% after 8.3 years postoperatively, interfacial gaps can be expected to be within a threshold value that can guarantee good primary stability. Moreover, increasing the interference fit to 700 µm can be considered a good range for an interference fit. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Modular knee implants are used to manage large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. These implants are confronted with varying fixation characteristics, changes in load transfer or stiffen the bone. In spite of their current clinical use, the influence of modularity on the biomechanical implant-bone behavior (e.g. implant fixation, flexibility, etc.) still is inadequately investigated. Aim of this study is to analyze, if the modularity of a tibial implant could change the biomechanical implant fixation behavior and the implant-bone flexibility. MATERIAL & METHODS. Nine different stem and sleeve combinations of the clinically used tibial revision system Sigma TC3 (DePuy) were compared, each implanted standardized with n=4 in a total of 36 synthetic tibial bones. Four additional un-implanted bones served as reference. Two different cyclic load situations were applied on the implant: 1. Axial torque of ±7Nm around the longitudinal stem axis to determine the rotational implant stability. 2. Varus-valgus-torque of ±3,5Nm to determine the bending behavior of the stem. A high precision optical 3D measurement system allowed simultaneous measuring of spatial micromotions of implant and bone. Based on these micromotions, relative motions at the implant-bone-interface and implant flexibility could be calculated. RESULTS. Lowest relative micromotions were measured along the tibial base component and the sleeve; however, these motions varied depending on the implant construct used. Maximum relative micromotions were detected at the distal end of the implant for all groups, indicating a more proximal fixation of all modular combinations. Regarding varus-valgus-torque measurement, all groups showed a deviant flexibility behavior compared to the reference group. When referred to the un-implanted bone, implants without stems revealed the highest flexibility, whereas implants with shorter stems had lowest flexibility. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION. All groups showed a more proximal fixation behavior; moreover, both extent and location of fixation could be influenced by varying the modular combination. Larger stems seemed to support a more distal fixation behavior, whereas the implant fixation moved proximal while extending the sleeve. Here the influence of the sleeve on fixation behavior seemed to be dominant compared to the influence of the stem. Concerning varus-valgus-torque, a strong connection between the used stem and implant-bone flexibility seemed to exist. In addition, the influence of the sleeve on flexibility seemed to be rather low. This study showed, that modularity can influence the biomechanical behavior of tibial implants. If these results can be transferred to other tibial implants still remains to be seen

Introduction. There are several advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of isolated compartment osteoarthritis (OA) compared to the conventional total knee arthroplasty. Although various series report similar survivorship results, the national registries tend to show higher revision rates among the UKA. Persisting, unexplainable pain is a leading cause for UKA revision surgery. Therefore it is essential to investigate the various patient specific characteristics which might influence outcome following UKA in order to minimize revision rates and optimize clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the various individual patient factors, including pre-operative radiographic parameters, on the outcome following UKA. Methods. 168 consecutive patients who underwent robot assisted UKA (MAKO Tactile Guidance System, MAKO Surgical Corporation, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA) were included. The investigated pre- and/or postoperative parameters included gender, BMI, age, type of tibial implant (inlay versus onlay), laterality, state of OA (i.e. Kellgren and Lawrence grade) of the operated and non-operated compartment and mechanical axis alignment. Pre-operatively and at a minimum of 1 year (average 1.97 years, range 1 – 4.2 years) following surgery, patients were asked to complete the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. It is subdivided in three separate scales (i.e. pain, stiffness and function). A score of 0 represents the best possible outcome and a score of 100 the worst. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. 144 (85.7%) knees underwent medial UKA and 24 (14.3%) knees underwent lateral UKA. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 63.5 years (range 43.2 – 91.1 years) old. 68.9% of patients had a BMI < 30 m. 2. /kg and 31.3% had a BMI > 30 m. 2. /kg. Tibial inlay implants were used in 40 (23.8%) cases and tibial onlay implants were used in 128 (76.2%) cases. Evaluating the separate factors, we noted no significant pre-operative WOMAC differences (figure 1). Age, KL-grade and type of tibial implant had a significant post-operative influence on outcome. Younger patients had significant inferior WOMAC scores (15.9±15.5) compared to older patients (9.9±10.4, p=0.015), including all three WOMAC domains (figure 2). Patients with an onlay implant had a significant better WOMAC score (11.8±12.1) than patients with an inlay implant (17.6±11.8, p=0.032). Furthermore, those patients experienced less pain than patients who received an inlay implant (9.5±12.6 versus 17.1±19.1, p=0.007). Patients with a more severe state of pre-operative OA of the operated compartment had significant better outcome than patients with a pre-operative mild state of OA (figure 3). All other evaluated parameters did not show any significant differences post-operatively. Conclusion. Our data suggest that pre-operative care should be taken with the significant influence of age and the state of OA on the clinical results following UKA. Furthermore our data discourages the future use of tibial inlay implants

Recent innovations in total ankle replacement (TAR) have led to improvements in implant survivorship, accuracy of component positioning and sizing, and patient outcomes. CT-generated pre-operative plans and cutting guides show promising results in terms of placement enhancement and reproducibility in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of 1) implant sizes used and 2) alignment corrections obtained intraoperatively using the cutting guides provided, compared to what was predicted in the CT generated pre-operative plans. This is a retrospective study looking at 36 patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty using a CT generated pre-operative planning system between July 2015 and December 2017. Personalized pre-operative planning data was obtained from the implant company. Two evaluators took measurements of the angle corrected using pre- and post-operative weight bearing ankle AP X-rays. All patients had a minimum three-month follow-up with weightbearing postoperative radiographs. The actual correction calculated from the radiographic assessment was compared with the predicted angles obtained from pre-operative plans. The predicted and predicted alternative component sizes and actual sizes used were also compared. If either a predicted or predicted alternative size was implanted, we considered it to be accurate. Average age for all patients was 64 years (range 40–83), with a body mass index of 28.2 ± 5.6. All surgeries were performed by two foot and ankle surgeons. The average total surgical time was 110 ± 23 minutes. Pre-operative alignment ranged from 36.7 degrees valgus to 20 degrees varus. Average predicted coronal alignment correction was 0.8 degrees varus ± 9.3 degrees (range, 18.2 degrees valgus to 29 degrees varus) and average correction obtained was 2.1 degrees valgus ± 11.1 degrees. Average post-op alignment was consistently within 5 degrees of neutral. There were no significant differences between the predicted alignments and the postoperative weightbearing alignments. The predicted tibia implant size was accurate in all cases. The predicted sizes were less accurate for talar implants and predicted the actual talar implant size used in 66% of cases. In all cases of predicted talar size mismatch, surgical plans predicted 1 implant size larger than used. Preliminary analyses of our data is comparable to previous studies looking at similar outcomes. However, our study had higher pre-operative deformities. Despite that, post-op alignments were consistently within 5 degress of neutral with no significant difference between the predicted and actual corrections. Tibial implant sizes are highly accurate while talar implant sizes had a trend of being one size smaller than predicted. Moreover, this effect seems to be more pronounced in the earlier cases likely reflective of increasing surgeon comfort with the implant with each subsequent case. These results confirm that pre-operative cutting guides are indeed helpful in intra-operative implant selection and positioning, however, there is still some room for innovation

Introduction. Surgeons performing a total knee replacement (TKR) have two available techniques available to help them achieve the proper bone resections and ligament tension – gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). GB relies on balancing ligaments prior to bony resections whereas bony resections are made based on anatomical landmarks in MR. Many studies have been done to compare the joint kinematics between the two techniques, however the results have been varied. These studies were not done with anatomically designed prostheses. The Journey II (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) is one such design which attempts to mimic the normal knee joint structure to return more natural kinematics to the joint, with emphasis on eliminating both paradoxical anterior motion and reduced posterior femoral rollback. Given the design differences between anatomical and non-anatomical prostheses, it is important to investigate whether one technique provides superior kinematics when an anatomical design is used. We hypothesize that there will be no difference between the two techniques. Methods. A total of 56 individuals were recruited to receive a Journey II prosthesis and randomized evenly to groups where the GB technique or MR technique is used. For all patients in the study, a series of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) images were acquired at 3-months post-operatively at different knee flexion angles, ranging in 20° increments from 0° to 120°. Model-based RSA software (RSACore, Leiden, Netherlands) was used to obtain the 3D positions and orientations of the femoral and tibial implant components, which were in turn used to obtain kinematic measures (contact locations and magnitude of excursion) for each condyle. Results. Preliminary results for the anterior-posterior (AP) contact locations from 33 patients (18 GB, 15 MR) are displayed in Figure 1. There were no significant differences in medial and lateral contact locations between the GB and MR groups for all angles of flexion. However, the pattern of medial contact for the MR technique displays more paradoxical anterior motion at mid-flexion (40°–60°) than the GB group. There were no significant differences in magnitude of excursion between groups on both medial (mean difference=1.96 mm, p=0.16) and lateral (mean difference=0.21 mm, p=0.79) condyles, indicating that posterior femoral rollback is similar between groups. Conclusions. Early results suggest that the MR technique is associated with slightly more abnormal kinematics than the GB technique when an anatomical prosthesis design is used for TKR. The GB technique may be more appropriate than MR technique for implanting anatomically designed knee replacements. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Objectives. Restoring more natural kinematics is crucial for the success of knee TKA. The relative size of the tibia to the femur may differ in each patient and requires the possibility to combine different tibia sizes for a given femur size. Therefore, TKA systems need to be designed to allow for different size combinations. In literature some report higher revision rates when the femoral size is greater than the tibia, while others find no impact of the size mismatch on the clinical outcome. The tibio-femoral kinematics resulting from different size combinations has not been analyzed yet. The Columbus Deep Dish implant (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) is designed to allow a full size compatibility. Therefore we hypothesized that the kinematics would not be affected by the different size combinations. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact on kinematics of different tibio-femoral size combinations with the Columbus Deep Dish implant. Methods. 6 fresh frozen cadavers were tested in a force controlled well established knee rig after implantation of a cruciate retaining, fixed bearing Columbus Deep Dish TKA (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. Specifically developed and manufactured inlays allowed simulating different tibia sizes on each bone/tibial implant. For each cadaver, a total of 4 different tibia sizes were tested (1 original size, 3 simulated different sizes). Tibio-femoral internal/external rotation and antero-posterior translation of the medial and of the lateral condyles were computed for all size combinations. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the kinematics obtained with the original inlay. For each flexion angle from 30° to 130°, the difference between the rotation (resp. translation) obtained with the original inlay was subtracted from the rotation obtained with the simulated tibia size. The mean value and standard deviation of the differences were computed. Results. Each knee showed a singular kinematic pattern. This pattern remained the same for all size combinations. However the amplitude in rotation and translation varied: The mean difference reached −0,1 ±1,2° in internal/external rotation and 1,3 ± 3,3mm in translation. There was no significant difference between the used size combinations: among all knees no size combination consistently resulted in a significantly different kinematic. Conclusion. We can conclude that with a TKA system designed to allow full size compatibility the patient specific kinematic pattern is preserved when sizing up or down the tibia component with respect to the femur. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Despite improvements in the survivorship of total knee replacements (TKR) over the years, patient satisfaction following TKR has not improved, with approximately 20% of patients recording dissatisfaction with their new knee joint. It is unclear why many patients feel this way, but it may relate in part to implant designs that do not provide a “natural” feeling knee. Implant manufacturers continue to introduce new concepts for implant design, which are essential for reaching the goal of a “normal” knee after TKR surgery. The Journey II TKR (Smith & Nephew) was developed with this goal in mind. Its anatomical design attempts to mimic the normal knee joint structure to return more natural kinematics to the joint, with emphasis on eliminating both paradoxical anterior motion and reduced posterior femoral rollback. Our objective is to examine patients receiving the Journey II TKR to measure the knee joint contact kinematics of the Journey II TKR compared to a non-anatomically designed implant by the same manufacturer. We hypothesize that the Journey II TKR will have more natural contact kinematics that differ from the non-anatomically designed implant. Methods. A total of 28 individuals were recruited to receive a Journey II TKR, matching an existing prior cohort with a non-anatomical design from the same manufacturer (Legion TKR, Smith & Nephew). For both groups, a series of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) images were acquired at different knee flexion angles, ranging in 20° increments from 0° to 120°. Model-based RSA software (RSACore, Leiden, Netherlands) was used to obtain the 3D positions and orientations of the femoral and tibial implant components, which were in turn used to obtain kinematic measures (contact locations and magnitude of excursion) for each condyle. Results from the Journey II TKR group at 3 months post-operation were compared to the 2-year post-operative measurements from the Legion TKR group. Results. Preliminary results for the anterior-posterior (AP) contact locations from 38 patients (15 Journey II TKR, 23 Legion TKR) are displayed in Figure 1. The Journey II TKR group showed more anterior contact medially and laterally relative to the Legion TKR group at many angles, however the overall pattern from 0°–120° was similar. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to magnitude of excursion on both medial (mean difference=1.29 mm, p=0.19) and lateral (mean difference=0.69 mm, p=0.60) condyles. Conclusions. Early results suggest that paradoxical anterior motion and reduced posterior femoral rollback are present in the anatomically designed Journey II TKR, suggesting that it does not provide substantially different knee kinematics compared to the non-anatomically designed Legion TKR. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Recent advances in 3D printing enable the use of custom patient-specific instruments to place drill guides and cutting slots for knee replacement surgery. However, such techniques limit the ability to intra-operatively adjust an implant plan based on soft-tissue tension and/or joint pathology observed in the operating room, e.g. cruciate ligament integrity. It is hypothesized that given the opportunity, a skilled surgeon will make intra-operative adjustments based on intra-operative information not captured by the hard tissue anatomy reconstructed from a pre-operative CT scan or standing x-ray. For example, tibiofemoral implant gaps measured intra-operatively are an indication of soft-tissue tension in the patient's knee, and may influence a surgeon to adjust implant position, orientation or size. This study investigates the frequency and magnitude of intra-operative adjustments from a single orthopedic surgeon during 38 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) cases. Methods. For each patient, a pre-operative plan was created based on the bony anatomy reconstructed from the pre-operative CT. This plan is analogous to a plan created with patient-specific cutting blocks or customized implants. With robotic technology that utilizes pre-operative imaging, intra-operative navigation and robotic execution, this “anatomic” plan can be fine-tuned and adjusted based on the soft tissue envelop measured intra-operatively. The relative positions of the femur and the tibia are measured intra-operatively under a valgus load (for medial UKA, varus load for lateral UKA) for each patient from extension to deep knee flexion and used to compute the predicted space between the implants (gaps) throughout flexion. The planned position, orientation and size of the components can then be adjusted to achieve an optimal dynamic ligament balance prior to any bony cuts. This is the plan that is then executed under robotic guidance. Intra-operative adjustments are defined as any size, position or orientation changes occurring intra-operatively to the pre-operative anatomic plan. Results. The surgeon adjusted the pre-operative implant plan in 86.8% of cases, leading to combined RMS changes of 2.0 mm and 2.1 degrees to the femoral implant, and 0.9 mm and 1.4 degrees to the tibial implant. The RMS femoral implant translations and rotations were 1.0, 1.5, 0.9 mm and 1.0, 1.0, 1.7 degrees in the medial, anterior, and superior directions, respectively. The RMS tibial implant translations and rotations were 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mm and 1.3, 0.4, 0.6 degrees in the medial, anterior, and superior directions, respectively. Implant sizes were adjusted in 36.8% of cases, with all changes occuring to the femoral implant, and 13 out of those 14 cases showing a reduction in the femoral implant size. Conclusions. These data support the hypothesis that surgical planning of UKA components based on accurate 3D dimensional reconstructions of anatomy alone is not adequate to create optimal implant gap spacing throughout flexion. Measurement and knowledge of the patient's soft tissue envelope allows for signficiant changes to the implant plan prior to any bony cuts

«Purpose». High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a useful treatment option for osteoarthritis of the knee. Closing-wedge HTO (CW-HTO) had been mostly performed previously, but the difficulties of surgical procedure when total knee arthroplasty (TKA) conversion is needed are sometimes pointed out because of the severe deformity in proximal tibia. Recently, opening-wedge HTO (OW-HTO) is becoming more popular, but the difference of the two surgical techniques about the influence on proximal tibia deformity and difficulties in TKA conversion are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of two surgical techniques with CW-HTO and OW-HTO on the tibial bone deformity using computer simulation and to assess the difficulties when TKA conversion should be required in the future. «Methods». In forty knees with medial osteoarthritis, the 3D bone models were created from the series of 1 mm slices two-dimensional contours using the 3D reconstruction algorithm. The 3-D imaging software (Mimics, materialize NV, Leuven, Belgium) was applied and simulated surgical procedure of each CW-HTO and OW-HTO were performed on the same knee models. In CWHTO, insertion level was set 2cm below the medial joint line [Fig.1]. While in OW-HTO, that was set 3.5cm below the medial joint line and passed obliquely towards the tip of the fibular head [Fig.2]. The correction angle was determined so that the postoperative tibiofemoral angle would be 170 degrees. The distance between the center of resection surface and anatomical axis, and the angle of anatomical axis and mechanical axis were measured in each procedure. Secondly, a simulated TKA conversion was operated on the each tibial bone models after HTO [Fig.3]. The distance between the nearest points of tibial implant and lateral cortical bone was assessed as the index of the bone-implant interference. «Results». The distance between the center of resection surface and anatomical axis was significantly shifted to the lateral side in CW group (0.62 ±2.95 mm lateral shift) than in OW group (0.93 ± 3.68 mm medial shift) (P<0.01). The angle of anatomical axis and mechanical axis was significantly increased in the CW group (CW: 0.77 ± 0.79 degree, OW: 0.49 ± 0.83 degree, P<0.01). In the simulation of TKA conversion, if thickness of the lateral cortical bone was 3mm, it was showed that the tibial implant was more interfered with the lateral cortical bone in CW group (2.77 ± 1.38 mm) than in OW group (4.32 ± 1.61 mm) (P<0.01). «Conclusions». The results suggested that bone deformity in proximal tibia after HTO might affect the difficulty of TKA conversion, particularly in the case of CWHTO

Background. The use of Computed Tomography (CT) as a medical imaging tool has widespread applications in the field of knee surgery. Surgeons use a CT scan in a conventional way during the pre-operative stage, to plan the position of the femoral component in the horizontal plane. In the post-operative stage, the use of a CT scan is a routine tool in the evaluation of failed TKA as rotational malalignment of the femoral component has been determined as a cause of poor clinical outcome after TKA. Aim. How accurately can we measure the different angles with importance for alignment on a 3D-image in comparison to a standard CT, 2D, image. Material and methods. This study includes patients above 55 years of age who were scheduled for a TKA at our centre and who had a pre- and postoperative full-leg length computed tomography (CT). These images were analysed using Mimics V 16.0 ® and 3-matic V 8.0 ® (Materialise, Haasrode, Belgium) to create the surface reconstruction and perform the 3D-measurements. Different angles were measured pre- and post-operatively on these images both in 2D as in 3D: condylar twist angle (CTA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibiofemoral rotation angle (TFRA), posterior tilt of the tibial implant (STPA) and the frontal plane angle of the tibial implant (FTPA). A power analysis showed a needed sample size of 18 patients. Pre-operatively 21 patients were included, 18 of them also received a post-operative full-leg CT. Three observers participated in the study and they all performed all analyses twice with a minimum interval of one week for obtaining intra-observer repeatability. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain the intra- and interobserver variability. Results. The intra-and interobserver intra-class coefficients (ICC) were evaluated using the classification of Landis&Koch (see table). Preoperative results: Rotation of femoral component in 3D: ICC CTA=0,73; ICC PCA=0,66. Rotation in 2D: ICC PCA=0,75, ICC CTA=0,84. The highest ICC was found for the HKA: ICC>0,98 both 2D and 3D. Postoperative results. All ICC's are in the highest category (‘almost perfect’) except for the intraobserver ICC PCA in 2D which was ‘substantial’. Conclusions and clinical implications. CT-evaluation is invaluable for the preoperative planning of the position of the femoral component, for the evaluation of the rotation of the femoral component and for accurate assessment of the overall knee alignment,. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter- observer variability in the CT measurement of the pre- and postoperative alignment of the knee. To determine the rotation of the femoral component preoperatively there was no advantage for 3D over 2D. Post-operatively the use of the 3D technique has a lower variability with regard to the assessment of the rotation of the femoral component

Periprosthetic infection remains a clinical challenge that may lead to revision surgeries, increased spending, disability, and mortality. The cost for treating hip and knee total joint infections is anticipated to be $1.62 billion by 2020. There is a need for implant surface modifications that simultaneously resist bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion, while promoting periprosthetic bone formation and osseointegration. In vitro research has shown that nanotextured titanium promotes osteoblast differentiation, and upregulates metabolic markers of osteoblast activity and osteoblast proliferation. In vivo rat studies confirmed increased bone-implant contact area, enhanced de novo bone formation on and adjacent to the implant, and higher pull-out forces compared to non-textured titanium. The authors have advanced a benign electrochemical anodization process based on ammonium fluoride that creates a nanotube surface in as little as 10 minutes (Fig. 1), which can also integrate antibacterial nanosilver (Fig. 2). The work reported here summarizes in vitro post-inoculation and in vivo post-implantation studies, showing inherent inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by titanium surfaces with nanotubes (TiNT), nanotubes with nanosilver (TiNT+Ag), plain (Ti), and thermal plasma sprayed (TPS) titanium. Ti6Al4V was the base material for all surfaces. In vitro studies evaluated Ti, TPS, four TiNT groups with varying nanotube diameters (60nm, 80nm, 110nm, 150nm), and TiNT+Ag. After seeding with MRSA (10. 5. , 10. 6. , and 10. 8. CFU/mL), the 110nm diameter nanotubes showed MRSA inhibition up to three-orders of magnitude lower than the Ti and TPS surfaces at 2, 6, and 48 hours. Following on the in vitro results, New Zealand White rabbits underwent a bilateral implantation of intramedullary tibial implants of the four material groups (4 mm outside diameter; 110nm NT diameter on TiNT and TiNT+Ag implants). One intramedullary canal was inoculated with clinically-derived MRSA (10. 5. CFU in broth) at the time of implantation; one canal had only culture media introduced (control). At a 2-week endpoint, limbs were harvested for analysis, including implant sonication with sonicant bacterial cultured, histology, and microcomputed chromatography. In the sonicant analysis cohort, TPS showed the lowest average MRSA count, while TiNT and TiNT+Ag were the highest. There was one sample each of TPS, TiNT and TiNT+Ag that showed no MRSA. After an additional 24-hour implant incubation, the TiNT and TiNT+Ag samples had no bacteria, but the TPS grew bacteria; therefore, the authors hypothesize that MRSA more readily releases from the TiNT and TiNT+Ag implants during sonication, indicating weaker biofilm adhesion and development. Histologic analysis is currently underway. In a therapeutic experiment, rabbits underwent bilateral implantation, followed by 1 week of infection development, and then 1 week of vancomycin treatment. At the endpoint, implants were sonicated and bacteria was quantified from the sonicant. TiNT showed viable MRSA at only 30% that of TPS-coated levels, while TiNT+Ag implants showed viable MRSA at only 5% that of TPS-coated levels (Fig. 3). These early results indicate that the TiNT and TiNT+Ag surfaces have some inherent antibacterial activity against MRSA, which may increase the efficacy of systemic antibiotic treatments in the setting of periprosthetic joint infections

Introduction. Computed tomography (CT) can be utilized to design patient specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PSI preoperative plans predict bone resection, anterior-posterior implant position, implant rotation and implant size. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperatively predicted implant sizes (tibia and femur) to the actual implanted sizes. Data were compiled from two surgeons, one in the United Kingdom (Surgeon 1, cruciate retaining) and one in the United States (Surgeon 2, posterior stabilizing). Both used the same primary TKA implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®; DePuySynthes®, Warsaw, Indiana). This is the largest comparison of CT-based PSI size accuracy between two implant systems. Methods. An international cohort of 396 CT-based PSI-TKA preoperative plans (TruMatch®)were compared to postoperative implant records. Data were retrospectively analyzed for Sigma®(n=351) and Attune® (n=45), both as separate cohorts and as a combined cohort (Sigma® + Attune®). Three analyses were performed: Tibia and femur plan accuracy, major size changes (femoral size change or tibial size change resulting in a femoral size change) and minor size changes (tibial size change not impacting femoral size). Inter-rater reliability analyses using ICC (intra-class correlation) and the Kappa statistic were performed to determine reliability and agreement among the groups. Combined TKA implant data (Sigma® + Attune®) for surgeons 1 and 2 were compared for accuracy between users utilizing different implant designs, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS). Results. In the combined system analysis (Sigma® + Attune®) femoral implant prediction was 97.0% accurate and combined tibial implant size accuracy was 79.5%. There were no significant differences between the systems for tibial or femoral accuracy. See Table 1. There were 12 major size changes, 11 downsized femoral implants and 1 upsized femoral implant (all femoral changes were with Sigma® system). There were 81 minor size changes. Per Kappa, the plans were in excellent agreement with the femoral implant size and had substantial agreement with tibial implant size (p<.01). See Table 2. Comparing size accuracy between Surgeon 1 and Surgeon 2, Surgeon 1 had significantly greater tibial accuracy (p<.01), while femoral accuracy showed no significant difference (p=0.49). See Table 3. Discussion. In this combined data set of two surgeons, we report high implant sizing accuracy overall. This accuracy was noted across implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®) and across surgeons (1 and 2) utilizing different implant designs (CR vs. PS) using TruMatch® PSI. In all cohorts, the femur was more accurately predicted than the tibia. Accurate size reconstitution and reconstruction of the femur is critical for maintenance of posterior condylar offset, avoidance of anterior compartment overstuffing and avoidance of anterior femoral cortical notching. This study demonstrates the reproducibility of CT-based PSI TKA across different implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®), implant designs (CR and PS) and different surgeons. The ability to accurately predict implant size can also contribute system efficiencies: improved implant inventory management, development of size-focused instrumentation sets and potentially reduced workload for sterile processing departments

Purpose. Tibial and femoral component overhang in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a source of pain, thus is it important to understand anatomic differences between races to minimize overhang by matching the tibial and femoral shaft axis to the knee articular surface. Thus, this study compared knee morphology between Caucasian and East Asian individuals to determine the optimal placement of tibial and femoral stems. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on a matched cohort of 50 East Asians (21F, 29M) and 50 Caucasians (21F, 29M) by age and gender. CT scans were obtained in healthy volunteers using <2mm slices. The distance from the proximal tibial diaphysis axis to the tibial plateau center was measured, and the distance from the distal femoral diaphysis axis to the center of distal femoral articular surface was measured. Tibial measurements were made using Akagi's AP axis and the widest ML diameter, and femoral measurements were based on Whiteside's line and the surgical epicondylar axis. Results. The ML distance between the tibial shaft center and Akagi line was significantly higher for Asians (9.9mm±2.7, Caucasians 7.7mm±3.1, p<0.001). The distance between the femoral shaft center and Whiteside line was lower, although not significantly different (Asians 1.9mm±1.0, Caucasians 2.2mm±1.1, p=0.11). However, there were no differences in the AP dimension for the femur or tibia comparing Asians to Caucasians. Conclusion. East Asian individuals have more offset in the ML dimension for the tibia. This should be taken into consideration when designing primary and revision TKA stemmed tibial implants for East Asian patients

It is a well-known fact that total knee arthroplasty is a soft tissue operation. Soft tissue balancing is the key to success in total knee arthroplasty. It is paramount importance to preserve the maximal amount of bone on both the femur and tibial side. In Indian scenario, majority of the patients present relatively late with varus or valgus deformity. Adding to this problem is poor bone quality due to osteoporosis. Our technique of Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining TKA with tibial end plate resection facilitates soft tissue balancing, preserves PCL and maximizes bone preservation on both tibial and femoral side achieving good results in minimum seven year follow up. We retrospectively analyzed seven year outcomes of 120 knees (110 patients), mean age was 65 years (range 55 to 75 years), who received contemporary cruciate-retaining prostheses with tibial end plate resection technique. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 96%, Rheumatoid arthritis in 2% and posttraumatic arthritis in 2% cases. There were more number of flexible varus knees as compared to flexible valgus knees. All the patients were followed up for minimum of 84 months with average follow up of 96 months. They were followed up at 3mths, 6mths, 1,3,5,7,9 and 10 years. The functional assessment was done using knee society knee and function scores. Radiographic analysis was done to rule out subsidence and aseptic loosening. The statistical significance was assessed using chi square test. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan Meier analysis with revision taken as the endpoint. The average ROM was 100 degrees preoperatively and 120 degrees at last follow-up. The average knee society knee score improved from 45 points preoperatively to 90 points at last follow-up. The average knee society functional score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 84 points at last follow-up (p<0.05). Radiolucency was observed in 20 knees but all except four were non-progressive lesions smaller than 2 mm. None of the implants were revised for subsidence or aseptic loosening of tibial component. The technique of PCL retaining total knee arthroplasty with tibial end plate resection in arthritic knees with flexible varus or valgus deformity yields good functional outcome in medium term follow up with relatively low incidence of subsidence of the tibial implant. This technique appears promising for total knee arthroplasty in osteoporotic bones where retaining the strong subchondral bone increases the longevity of the implant