Introduction. Hip abductor tendon tears have been referred to as “rotator cuff tears of the hip,” and are a recognized etiology for persistent, often progressive, lateral hip pain, weakness, and limp. Multiple repair techniques and salvage procedures for abductor tendon tears have been reported in the literature; however, re-tear remains a frequent complication following surgical repair. This study compares the short-term outcomes of open abductor tendon repairs with decortication and suture fixation (DSF) compared to a modified technique repair into a bone trough (BT), to determine best surgical results for large abductor tendon avulsions. Additionally, surgical treatment of small tears versus large tears was examined. Methods. The outcomes of 37 consecutive hip abductor tendon repairs treated between January 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Large tears were defined as detachment of 33–100% of the gluteus medius insertion. There were 15 DSF and 10 BT cases. Postoperative pain, ability to perform single leg stance, hip abduction, and Trendelenburg lurch, were examined. Small tears (12 cases) were defined as having no gluteus medius avulsion from the trochanteric insertion and were comprised of longitudinal tears (repaired side-by-side) and isolated gluteus minimus tears (repaired by tenodesis to the overlying gluteus medius). Standard statistical analyses were utilized. Type I error for all analyses was set at α=0.05. Results. When comparing large tear repair outcomes, repairs into a BT had superior outcomes to repairs with DSF: 0 (BT) versus 6 (DSF, 40%) failure rate (p<0.05), and greater reductions in pain at one-year post surgery (Δ VAS: BT, −5.70±0.97 | DSF: −2.73±0.69; p<0.01), ability to perform a single leg stance and hip abduction (90% and 100% vs 47% and 73%) (p<0.05). Clinical strength ratings were higher for repairs into a BT, but this did not reach statistical significance. When comparing large to small tear repair outcomes, small tears were found to have lower VAS pain scores and higher clinical strength ratings during both the pre-op and 1-year post-op time points (p<0.05). A higher percentage of those with small tears were able to perform a single leg stance and hip abduction (100%) compared to those with large tears (64% and 78% respectively) (p<0.05). A significantly higher frequency of residual lurch was also observed for those with large tears; 56% compared to small tears at 0%. Conclusions. Utilizing a BT repair significantly improved surgical results for large abductor tendon avulsions. Level of evidence: Therapeutic level IV case series

This study reports the clinical outcome of reconstruction of deficient abductor muscles following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), using a fresh–frozen allograft of the extensor mechanism of the knee. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 11 consecutive patients with a severe limp because of abductor deficiency which was confirmed on MRI scans. The mean age of the patients (three men and eight women) was 66.7 years (52 to 84), with a mean follow-up of 33 months (24 to 41).

Following surgery, two patients had no limp, seven had a mild limp, and two had a persistent severe limp (p = 0.004). The mean power of the abductors improved on the Medical Research Council scale from 2.15 to 3.8 (p < 0.001). Pre-operatively, all patients required a stick or walking frame; post-operatively, four patients were able to walk without an aid. Overall, nine patients had severe or moderate pain pre-operatively; ten patients had no or mild pain post-operatively.

At final review, the Harris hip score was good in five patients, fair in two and poor in four.

We conclude that using an extensor mechanism allograft is relatively effective in the treatment of chronic abductor deficiency of the hip after THA when techniques such as local tissue transfer are not possible.

Longer-term follow-up is necessary before the technique can be broadly applied.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1050–5.

The aim of this review is to evaluate the current available literature evidencing on peri-articular hip endoscopy (the third compartment). A comprehensive approach has been set on reports dealing with endoscopic surgery for recalcitrant trochanteric bursitis, snapping hip (or coxa-saltans; external and internal), gluteus medius and minimus tears and endoscopy (or arthroscopy) after total hip arthroplasty. This information can be used to trigger further research, innovation and education in extra-articular hip endoscopy.