Aims. The risk of mechanical failure of modular revision hip stems is frequently mentioned in the literature, but little is currently known about the actual clinical failure rates of this type of prosthesis. The current retrospective long-term analysis examines the distal and modular failure patterns of the Prevision hip stem from 18 years of clinical use. A design improvement of the modular
Introduction. Hip stem
Aims. Head-taper corrosion is a cause of failure in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent reports have described an increasing number of V40
Aims. We sought to determine whether cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr) femoral
stem
Introduction.
Introduction. Previous studies of retrieved CoCr alloy femoral heads have identified imprinting of the stem
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the
Introduction. The femoral head/stem
Background. Complications of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, leading to implant failure, include femoral notching, neck fracture, and avascular necrosis. Revision arthroplasty options include femoral-only revision with a head, however mis-matching radial clearance could accelerate metal ion release. Alternatively, revision of a well-fixed acetabular component could lead to further bone loss, complicating revision surgery. We have developed a ceramic hip resurfacing system with a titanium-ceramic
Aims. United Classification System (UCS) B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) have been commonly managed with modular
Aims. This study investigates head-neck
Aims. When performing revision total hip arthroplasty using diaphyseal-engaging titanium
Aims. There are limited published data detailing the volumetric material loss from
Aims. Uncemented implants are now commonly used at reimplantation of a two-stage revision total hip arthoplasty (THA) following periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is a paucity of data on the performance of the most commonly used uncemented femoral implants – modular fluted
Aims. The aim of this study was to develop a novel computational model for estimating head/stem
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) remain a major concern following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the association between different types of cementless
Aims. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with Vancouver type B3 fractures with Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV femoral defects are difficult to treat. One option for Paprovsky type IIIB and IV defects involves modular cementless,
The Unified Classification System (UCS), or Vancouver system, is a validated and widely used classification system to guide the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. It suggests that well-fixed stems (type B1) can be treated with fixation but that loose stems (types B2 and B3) should be revised. Determining whether a stem is loose can be difficult and some authors have questioned how to apply this classification system to polished
If a surgeon is faced with altered lesser trochanter
anatomy when revising the femoral component in revision total hip
replacement, a peri-prosthetic fracture, or Paprosky type IIIb or
type IV femoral bone loss, a modular