Our aim was to compare the one-year post-operative outcomes following retention or removal of syndesmotic screws in adult patients with a fracture of the ankle that was treated surgically. A total of 51 patients (35 males, 16 females), with a mean age of 33.5 years (16 to 62), undergoing fibular osteosynthesis and syndesmotic screw fixation, were randomly allocated to retention of the syndesmotic screw or removal at three months post-operatively. The two groups were comparable at baseline. . One year post-operatively, there was no significant difference in the mean Olerud–Molander ankle score (82.4 retention vs 86.7 removal, p = 0.367), the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (88.6 vs 90.1, p = 0.688), the mean American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons foot and ankle score (96.3 vs 94.0, p = 0.250), the mean visual analogue pain score (1.0 vs 0.7, p = 0.237), the mean active dorsiflexion (10.2° vs 13.0°, p = 0.194) and plantar flexion (33.6° vs 31.3°, p = 0.503) of the ankle, or the mean radiological tibiofibular clear space (5.0 mm vs 5.3 mm, p = 0.276) between the two groups. A total of 19 patients (76%) in the retention group had a loose and/or broken screw one year post-operatively. . We conclude that removal of a syndesmotic screw produces no significant functional, clinical or radiological benefit in adult patients who are treated surgically for a fracture of the ankle. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1699–1705

Background. Tightrope fixation has been suggested as an alternative to screw stabilisation for distal tibiofibular joint diastasis that provides stability but avoids the problems of rigid screws across the joint. Recent case series (of 6 and 16 patients) have however, reported soft tissue problems and infections in 19–33% of patients. This study aims to review treatment and complications of distal tibiofibular diastasis fixation in our unit with the use of Tightrope or diastasis screws. Methods. Retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary ankle fixation between May 2008 and October 2009. Exclusions included revision procedures, or ankle fixation prior to the current fracture. Those undergoing Tightrope or diastasis screw fixation were studied for any complications or further procedures. Clinical records and XRAYs were reviewed, family practitioners of the patients were contacted and any consultations for ankle related problems noted. Results. 187 primary ankle fixation procedures were performed. 35 ankles required stabilisation of the distal tibiofibular joint. In 12, this was achieved using the Tightrope and in 23, syndesmotic screws were used. There was no difference in the adequacy of reduction in the two groups. Of those stabilised with a Tightrope, 6 were Maisonneuve injuries, 5 Weber C and 1 Weber B. 1 was lost to followup. Of the remaining 11, none had complications attributable to the method of fixation documented in hospital or family practitioner records. One had a small stitch abscess that settled on removal of the suture material. None underwent subsequent procedures. Of 23 stabilised with screws, 4 were Weber B, 14 Weber C, 4 Maisonneuve and 1 syndesmotic injury associated with an isolated posterior malleolus fracture. In this group of patients with primary ankle fixation involving a diastasis screw there was 1 deep infection requiring removal of metalwork, 1 superficial wound infection after syndesmotic screw removal and 1 wound breakdown after syndesmotic screw removal. A patient developed superficial peroneal nerve palsy at operation and 1 syndesmotic fixation failed and underwent revision surgery. This patient subsequently developed infection and had revision to a hindfoot nail. 19 patients underwent screw removal. The 23 patients underwent 45 procedures (mean 1.96 procedures per patient). Conclusion. In a consecutive series of 187 ankle procedures, 12 had the distal tibiofibular joint stabilised with a Tightrope with no noted complications attributable to the implant and no additional procedures. 23 patients underwent diastasis screw fixation with 19 screw removal procedures and 5 complications of various severity, 2 of which were attributable to screw removal. Tightrope fixation has provided stable fixation of the injured syndesmosis in our unit and we have not to date encountered complications previously described in the literature

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with intact, broken and removed syndesmosis screws after Weber B or C ankle fracture with an associated injury to the syndesmosis. We hypothesised that there would be no difference. Of a possible 142 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria, 52 returned for clinical and radiological assessment at least one year after surgery. Of these, 27 had intact syndesmosis screws, ten had broken screws, and 15 had undergone elective removal of the screw. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score was 83.07 (. sd. 13.59) in the intact screw group, 92.40 (. sd. 12.69) in the broken screw group, and 85.80 (. sd. 11.33) in the removed screw group (p = 0.0466). There was no difference in clinical outcome of patients with intact or removed syndesmotic screws. Paradoxically, patients with a broken syndesmosis screw had the best clinical outcome. Our data do not support the removal of intact or broken syndesmosis screws, and we caution against attributing post-operative ankle pain to breakage of the syndesmosis screw

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that fracture morphology might be more important than posterior malleolar fragment size in rotational type posterior malleolar ankle fractures (PMAFs). The secondary aim was to identify clinically important predictors of outcome for each respective PMAF-type, to challenge the current dogma that surgical decision-making should be based on fragment size.

Aims

Malreduction of the syndesmosis has been reported in up to 52% of patients after fixation of ankle fractures. Multiple radiological parameters are used to define malreduction; there has been limited investigation of the accuracy of these measurements in differentiating malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles.

Our aim was to compare polylevolactic acid screws with titanium screws when used for fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis at mid-term follow-up. A total of 168 patients, with a mean age of 38.5 years (18 to 72) who were randomly allocated to receive either polylevolactic acid (n = 86) or metallic (n = 82) screws were included. The Baird scoring system was used to assess the overall satisfaction and functional recovery post-operatively. The demographic details and characteristics of the injury were similar in the two groups. The mean follow-up was 55.8 months (48 to 66). The Baird scores were similar in the two groups at the final follow-up. Patients in the polylevolactic acid group had a greater mean dorsiflexion (p = 0.011) and plantar-flexion of the injured ankles (p < 0.001). In the same group, 18 patients had a mild and eight patients had a moderate foreign body reaction. In the metallic groups eight had mild and none had a moderate foreign body reaction (p <  0.001). In total, three patients in the polylevolactic acid group and none in the metallic group had heterotopic ossification (p = 0.246).

We conclude that both screws provide adequate fixation and functional recovery, but polylevolactic acid screws are associated with a higher incidence of foreign body reactions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:548–54.