Little guidance exists in the current literature regarding which patient recorded outcome measures (PROMs) are most clinically appropriate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery, and what results surgeons should expect or accept. Many PROMs have been validated, but their “ideal” results have not been published, limiting a surgeon's ability to compare their patients’ outcomes with those of their colleagues. We undertook a systematic review of PROMs for ACL to look at common usage and outcomes. After appropriate paper selection, we then undertook a pragmatic meta-analysis (i.e., including all papers that fulfilled the selection criteria, regardless of CONSORT status) and calculated weighted mean outcome scores and standard deviations for the most commonly used PROMs. A comprehensive literature search of all English articles of PubMed and other sources including search terms (‘Patient related outcome measure’ or ‘PROM’) AND ‘anterior cruciate ligament’ (limited to abstract/title) yielded 722 articles. Title review narrowed this to 268, and abstracts review to 151, of which 88 were included in our meta-analysis. Weighted mean and standard deviations were calculated for IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, Teneger and “VAS Pain” PROMs as the most commonly reported. We identified significant, novel findings relating to selected PROMs and (i) demographics including age, gender and body mass index, (ii) surgical factors including bundle count, strand count, and graft type, and (iii) post operative complications. We clarified the most commonly used PROMs for ACL, and their weighted means and standard deviations. This will allow surgeons to compare results with colleagues, ensuring they meet international levels of quality in PROMs. We have also updated which patient and operative factors have an impact on PROMs scoring to allow for population variance

Utility score is a preference-based measure of general health state – where 0 is equal to death, and 1 is equal to perfect health. To understand a patient's smallest perceptible change in utility score, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be calculated. However, there are multiple methods to calculate MCID with no consensus about which method is most appropriate. The aim of this study is to calculate MCID values for the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR12) utility score using varying methods. Our hypothesis is that different methods will yield different MCID values. A tertiary institutional registry (SMART) was used as the study cohort. Patients who underwent unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis from January 2012 to January 2020 were included. Utility score was calculated from VR12 responses using the standardised Brazier's method. Distribution and anchor methods were used for the MCID calculation. For distribution methods, 0.5 standard deviations of the baseline and change scores were used. For anchor methods, the physical and emotional anchor questions in the VR12 survey were used to benchmark utility score outcomes. Anchor methods included mean difference in change score, mean difference in 12 month score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with the Youden index. Complete case analysis of 1735 out of 1809 eligible patients was performed. Significant variation in the MCID estimates for VR12 utility score were reported dependent on the calculation method used. The MCID estimate from 0.5 standard deviations of the change score was 0.083. The MCID estimate from the ROC analysis method using physical or emotional anchor question improvement was 0.115 (CI95 0.08-0.14; AUC 0.656). Different MCID calculation methods yielded different MCID values. Our results suggest that MCID is not an umbrella concept but rather many distinct concepts. A general consensus is required to standardise how MCID is defined, calculated, and applied in clinical practice

Bone age is a radiographical assessment used in pediatric medicine due to its relative objectivity in determining biological maturity compared to chronological age and size.1 Currently, Greulich and Pyle (GP) is one of the most common methods used to determine bone age from hand radiographs.2–4 In recent years, new methods were developed to increase the efficiency in bone age analysis like the shorthand bone age (SBA) and the automated artificial intelligence algorithms. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of these two methods and examine if the reduction in analysis time compromises their accuracy. Two hundred thirteen males and 213 females were selected. Each participant had their bone age determined by two separate raters using the GP (M1) and SBA methods (M2). Three weeks later, the two raters repeated the analysis of the radiographs. The raters timed themselves using an online stopwatch while analyzing the radiograph on a computer screen. De-identified radiographs were securely uploaded to an automated algorithm developed by a group of radiologists in Toronto. The gold standard was determined to be the radiology report attached to each radiograph, written by experienced radiologists using GP (M1). For intra-rater variability, intraclass correlation analysis between trial 1 (T1) and trial 2 (T2) for each rater and method was performed. For inter-rater variability, intraclass correlation was performed between rater 1 (R1) and rater 2 (R2) for each method and trial. Intraclass correlation between each method and the gold standard fell within the 0.8–0.9 range, highlighting significant agreement. Most of the comparisons showed a statistically significant difference between the two new methods and the gold standard; however it may not be clinically significant as it ranges between 0.25–0.5 years. A bone age is considered clinically abnormal if it falls outside 2 standard deviations of the chronological age; standard deviations are calculated and provided in GP atlas.6–8 For a 10-year old female, 2 standard deviations constitute 21.6 months which far outweighs the difference reported here between SBA, automated algorithm and the gold standard. The median time for completion using the GP method was 21.83 seconds for rater 1 and 9.30 seconds for rater 2. In comparison, SBA required a median time of 7 seconds for rater 1 and 5 seconds for rater 2. The automated method had no time restraint as bone age was determined immediately upon radiograph upload. The correlation between the two trials in each method and rater (i.e. R1M1T1 vs R1M1T2) was excellent (κ= 0.9–1) confirming the reliability of the two new methods. Similarly, the correlation between the two raters in each method and trial (i.e. R1M1T1 vs R2M1T1) fell within the 0.9–1 range. This indicates a limited variability between raters who may use these two methods. The shorthand bone age method and an artificial intelligence automated algorithm produced values that are in agreement with the gold standard Greulich and Pyle, while reducing analysis time and maintaining a high inter-rater and intra-rater reliability

The functional pelvic tilt when standing and sitting forward of 7402 cases on the OPS, Optimized Ortho, Australia Data Base were reviewed. All patients had undergone lateral radiographs when standing simulating extension of the hip, and sitting forward when the hip is near full flexion. Pelvic tilt was measured as the angle of the Anterior Pelvic Plane to the vertical Sagittal Plane, rotation anteriorly being given a positive value. Pelvises that had rotated more than 13 degrees anteriorly (+ve) when sitting forward or posteriorly (-ve) when standing were considered to place the hip at increased risk of dislocation or edge loading when flexed or extending respectively. This degree of rotation has the effect of changing the acetabular version by approximately10. 0. Most safe zones that have been described have given a range of anteversion of 20. 0. as safe. A change of 10. 0. would potentially place the acetabular orientation outside this range. Further, clinical studies have supported this concept. All lateral radiographs were reviewed to confirm that 281 had undergone instrumented spinal fusion at some level between T12 and S1. There was a large variability in the number and the levels arthrodesed. The range of pelvic mobility in the non-arthrodesed group in extension was −37. 0. to 31. 0. (mean −0.9. 0. , Standard deviation 7.49) and in flexed position was −70. 0. to 49. 0. (mean −1.9. 0. , Standard deviation 14.01). For the group with any fusion the range of pelvic tilt in extension was −31. 0. to 22. 0. (mean −4. 0. , Standard deviation 8.21) and flexed −32. 0. to 46. 0. (mean 4.4. 0. , Standard deviation 13.79). Of the 7121 cases without instrumented fusion, 15.5% were considered to be at risk when in flexion and 6.1% when extended. The risk for those with any fusion was approximately doubled in both flexion and extension. Further, those with extensive arthrodesis from T12 to S1 had a range of pelvic tilts similar to the non-fused group, although they had a significantly higher percentage of cases in the ‘at risk’ zones. The proportion of the cases in the ‘at risk’ zones decreased progressively as the arthrodesed levels moved from L5/S1 to the upper lumbar spine, and with decreasing number of levels fused. Conclusion. Spinal fusion is not just one group as there are many combinations of different levels fused. Patients with instrumented spinal fusions do have a proportionately high risk of failure of their THR than the majority of cases with no instrumentation, though the risk varies significantly with the number of levels and actual levels arthrodesed. Further approximately 21% of cases with no spinal fusion have functional pelvic movements that would potentially place them ‘at risk’ of edge loading or dislocation. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Functional outcomes are commonly reported in studies of musculoskeletal oncology patients undergoing limb salvage surgery; however, interpretation requires knowledge of the smallest amount of improvement that is important to patients – the minimally important difference (MID). We established the MIDs for the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) in patients with bone tumors undergoing lower limb salvage surgery. This study was a secondary analysis of the recently completed PARITY (Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery) study. This data was used to calculate: (1) the anchor-based MIDs using an overall function scale and a receiver operating curve analysis, and (2) the distribution-based MIDs based on one-half of the standard deviation of the change scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up, for both the MSTS and TESS. There were 591 patients available for analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the association between changes in MSTS and TESS scores and changes in the external anchor scores were 0.71 and 0.57, indicating “high” and “moderate” correlation. Anchor-based MIDs were 12 points and 11 points for the MSTS and TESS, respectively. Distribution-based calculations yielded MIDs of 16-17 points for the MSTS and 14 points for the TESS. The current study proposes MID scores for both the MSTS and TESS outcome measures based on 591 patients with bone tumors undergoing lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. These thresholds will optimize interpretation of the magnitude of treatment effects, which will enable shared decision-making with patients in trading off desirable and undesirable outcomes of alternative management strategies. We recommend anchor-based MIDs as they are grounded in changes in functional status that are meaningful to patients

Introduction. Recent technological advancements have led to the introduction of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty to improve the accuracy and precision of bony resections and implant position. However, the in vivo accuracy is not widely reported. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision of a cut block positioning robotic arm. Method. Seventy-seven patients underwent total knee arthroplasty with various workflows and alignment targets by three arthroplasty-trained surgeons with previous experience using the ROSA® Knee System. Accuracy and precision were determined by measuring the difference between various workflow time points, including the final pre-operative plan, validated resection angle, and post-operative radiographs. The mean difference between the measurements determined accuracy, and the standard deviation represented precision. Results. The accuracy and precision for all angles comparing the final planned resection and validated resection angles was 0.90° ± 0.76°. The proportion within 3° ranged from 97.9% to 100%. The accuracy and precision for all angles comparing the final intra- operative plan and post-operative radiographs was 1.95 ± 1.48°. The proportion of patients within 3° was 93.2%, 95.3%, 96.6%, and 71.4% for the distal femur, proximal tibia, femoral flexion, and tibial slope angles when the final intra-operative plan was compared to post-operative radiographs. No patients had a postoperative complication requiring revision at the final follow-up. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the ROSA Knee System has accurate and precise coronal plane resections with few outliers. However, the tibial slope demonstrated decreased accuracy and precision were measured on post-operative short-leg lateral radiographs with this platform

Abstract. Background. Aim of this study is to determine the difference between re-operation rates after conventional Methods of fixation of patella fractures using Metallic implants and novel technique of all suture fixation using Ethibond or fiber tape. Methods. This is a retrospective comparative analysis involving 62 patients who had a transverse patellar fracture and underwent surgery between January 2013 to December 2021. Selected patients were divided, based on different fixation methods used, into four groups - TBW group, CC screw group, Encirclage group and Suture Fixation Group. Patients were followed till bone union was evident on radiographs. Number of patients in Metallic implant group undergoing repeat operation were compared with the patients who underwent patella fracture fixation using all suture technique. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for all continuous variables. Mean of the two groups was compared using unpaired t-test. Results. TBW was the most common method of fixation used in 41(66.1%) patients. 7 patients each underwent surgery using CC screw, Encirclage +/− TBW, and suture fixation respectively. Bone union was seen in about 85% of patients in all the groups suggesting all treatment modalities lead to good fracture healing. 15 patients(36.6%) of patients in TBW group and 3 patients(42.9%) in encirclage group had implant removal because of hardware-related complications (p<0.001). None of the patient who underwent All suture Fixation underwent re-operation. Conclusion. The results suggest that Suture fixation of patellar fractures is a valid treatment modality giving excellent results with similar bone union rates without any complications

INTRODUCTION. Determining proper joint tension in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be a challenging task for shoulder surgeons. Often, this is a subjective metric learned by feel during fellowship training with no real quantitative measures of what proper tension encompasses. Tension too high can potentially lead to scapular stress fractures and limitation of range of motion (ROM), whereas tension too low may lead to instability. New technologies that detect joint load intraoperatively create the opportunity to observe rTSA joint reaction forces in a clinical setting for the first time. The purpose of this study was to observe the differences in rTSA loads in cases that utilized two different humeral liner sizes. METHODS. Ten different surgeons performed a total of 37 rTSA cases with the same implant system. During the procedure, each surgeon reconstructed the rTSA implants to his or her own preferred tension. A wireless load sensing humeral liner trial (VERASENSE for Equinoxe, OrthoSensor, Dania Beach, FL) was used in lieu of a traditional plastic humeral liner trial to provide real-time load data to the operating surgeon during the procedure. Two humeral liner trial sizes were offered in 38mm and 42mm curvatures and were selected each case based on surgeon preference. To ensure consistent measurements between surgeons, a standardized ROM assessment consisting of four dynamic maneuvers (maximum internal to external rotation at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction, and a maximum flexion/extension maneuver) and three static maneuvers (arm overhead, across the body, and behind the back) was completed in each case. Deidentified load data in lbf was collected and sorted based on which size liner was selected. Differences in means for minimum and maximum load values for the four dynamic maneuvers and differences in means for the three static maneuvers were calculated using 2-tailed unpaired t-tests. RESULTS. No significant differences were observed for the flexion/extension maneuver between the 38mm and 42mm liner sizes, but a significant difference was observed for every internal/external rotation assessment at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction. No significant differences were observed for the across the body and overhead maneuvers, but a significant difference was observed for the behind the back maneuver (p = 0.015). Standard deviations were pronounced across all maneuvers. CONCLUSION. This study observed significant differences in intraoperative load values in rTSA when comparing different humeral liner sizes. Limitations of this study include the small sample sizes and large standard deviations observed, as well as comparing across multiple patients and multiple surgeons. Area for future work includes comparing load values with postoperative functional results and complication risks for short, midterm, and long-term outcomes in efforts to find the optimal load range for a given patient

Restoration a joint's articular surface following degenerative or traumatic pathology to the osteochondral unit pose a significant challenge. Recent advances have shown the utility of collagen-based scaffolds in the regeneration of osteochondral tissue. To provide these collagen scaffolds with the appropriate superstructure novel techniques in 3D printing have been investigated. This study investigates the use of polyɛ-caprolactone (PCL) collagen scaffolds in a porcine cadaveric model to establish the stability of the biomaterial once implanted. This study was performed in a porcine cadaveric knee model. 8mm defects were created in the medial femoral trochlea and repaired with a PCL collagen scaffold. Scaffolds were secured by one of three designs; Press Fit (PF), Press Fit with Rings (PFR), Press Fit with Fibrin Glue (PFFG). Mobilisation was simulated by mounting the pig legs on a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine for either 50 or 500 cycles. Biomechanical tensile testing was performed to examine the force required to displace the scaffold. 18 legs were used (6 PF, 6 PFR, 6 PFFG). Fixation remained intact in 17 of the cohort (94%). None of the PF or PFFG scaffolds displaced after CPM cycling. Mean peak forces required to displace the scaffold were highest in the PFFG group (3.173 Newtons, Standard deviation = 1.392N). The lowest peak forces were observed in the PFR group (0.871N, SD = 0.412N), while mean peak force observed in the PF group was 2.436N (SD = 0.768). There was a significant difference between PFFG and PFR (p = 0.005). There was no statistical significance in the relationship between the other groups. PCL reinforcement of collagen scaffolds provide an innovative solution for improving stiffness of the construct, allowing easier handling for the surgeon. Increasing the stiffness of the scaffold also allows press fit solutions for reliable fixation. Press fit PCL collagen scaffolds with and without fibrin glue provide dependable stability. Tensile testing provides an objective analysis of scaffold fixation. Further investigation of PCL collagen scaffolds in a live animal model to establish quality of osteochondral tissue regeneration are required

Background. Artificial total knee designs have revolutionized over time, yet 20% of the population still report dissatisfaction. The standard implants fail to replicate native knee kinematic functionality due to mismatch of condylar surfaces and non-anatomically placed implantation. (Daggett et al 2016; Saigo et al 2017). It is essential that the implant surface matches the native knee to prevent Instability and soft tissue impingement. Our goal is to use computational modeling to determine the ideal shapes and orientations of anatomically-shaped components and test the accuracy of fit of component surfaces. Methods. One hundred MRI scans of knees with early osteoarthritis were obtained from the NIH Osteoarthritis Initiative, converted into 3D meshes, and aligned via an anatomic coordinate system algorithm. Geomagic Design X software was used to determine the average anterior-posterior (AP) length. Each knee was then scaled in three dimensions to match the average AP length. Geomagic's least-squares algorithm was used to create an average surface model. This method was validated by generating a statistical shaped model using principal component analysis (PCA) to compare to the least square's method. The averaged knee surface was used to design component system sizing schemes of 1, 3, 5, and 7 (fig 1). A further fifty arthritic knees were modeled to test the accuracy of fit for all component sizing schemes. Standard deviation maps were created using Geomagic to analyze the error of fit of the implant surface compared to the native femur surface. Results. The average shape model derived from Principal Component Analysis had a discrepancy of 0.01mm and a standard deviation of 0.05mm when compared to Geomagic least squares. The bearing surfaces showed a very close fit within both models with minimal errors at the sides of the epicondylar line (fig 2). The surface components were lined up posteriorly and distally on the 50 femurs. Statistical Analysis of the mesh deviation maps between the femoral condylar surface and the components showed a decrease in deviation with a larger number of sizes reducing from 1.5 mm for a 1-size system to 0.88 mm for a 7-size system (table 1). The femoral components of a 5 or 7-size system showed the best fit less than 1mm. The main mismatch was on the superior patella flange, with maximum projection or undercut of 2 millimeters. Discussion and Conclusion. The study showed an approach to total knee design and technique for a more accurate reproduction of a normal knee. A 5 to 7 size system was sufficient, but with two widths for each size to avoid overhang. Components based on the average anatomic shapes were an accurate fit on the bearing surfaces, but surgery to 1-millimeter accuracy was needed. The results showed that an accurate match of the femoral bearing surfaces could be achieved to better than 1 millimeter if the component geometry was based on that of the average femur. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Achieving high flexion after total knee arthroplasty is very important for patients in Asian countries where deep flexion activities are an important part of daily life. The Bi-Surface Total Knee System (Japan Medical Material, Kyoto, Japan), which has a unique ball-and-socket mechanism in the mid-posterior portion of the femoral and tibial components, was designed to improve deep knee flexion and long-term durability after total knee arthroplasty (Figure 1). The purpose of this study was to determine the in vivo three dimensional kinematics of Bi-Surface Total Knee System in order to evaluate and analyze the performance of this system with other conventional TKA designs currently available in the market today. Materials and Methods. Three dimensional kinematics were evaluated during a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity using fluoroscopy and a 2D-to-3D registration technique for 66 TKA. Each knee was analyzed to determine femorotibial kinematics, including weight-bearing range of motion, anterior/posterior contact position, and tibio-femoral rotation. Results. The average weight-bearing range of motion for the entire group was 125.5∗∗∗∗∗. Forty three of sixty six knees had greater range of motion than 120∗∗∗∗∗. At full extension, the average contact positions were −0.5mm (range, from −12.2mm to 6.8mm; standard deviation 3.5mm), and −3.8mm (range, from −14.1mm to 6.0mm; standard deviation 4.9mm) for the medial compartment and the lateral compartment, respectively. At maximum flexion, the average contact position was −9.2mm (range, from −17.8mm to 2.4mm; standard deviation 3.7mm), and −14.8mm (range, from −20.1mm to 5.7mm; standard deviation 2.7mm) for the medial compartment and the lateral compartment, respectively (Figure 2). From full extension to maximum flexion, the average posterior femoral rollback observed was −8.7mm (range, from −22.1mm to 1.0mm; standard deviation 4.3mm) for the medial compartment, and −11.0mm (range, from −21.9mm to 6.6mm; standard deviation 5.4mm) for the lateral compartment. At full extension, the average axial orientation was 3.8∗∗∗∗∗ (range, from −5.3∗∗∗∗∗ to 26.4∗∗∗∗∗; standard deviation 5.2∗∗∗∗∗) of external femoral rotation. At maximum flexion, the average axial orientation was 9.5∗∗∗∗∗ (range, from −5.9∗∗∗∗∗ to 27.7∗∗∗∗∗; standard deviation 6.7∗∗∗∗∗). Therefore, from full extension to maximum flexion, the average amount of axial rotation was 5.7∗∗∗∗∗ (range, from −15.1∗∗∗∗∗ to 22.2∗∗∗∗∗; standard deviation 6.4∗∗∗∗∗). Discussion. The Bi-Surface Knee System was designed to accommodate the life style led by Asian populations, by aiming to improve both, knee flexion and long-term durability. Though durability of the device is beyond the scope of this study, subjects in this study did achieve high weight-bearing flexion, excellent posterior femoral rollback of both condyles and a normal axial rotation patterns, albeit, less than the normal knee. Also, this is the first in vivo study conducted to understand the kinematic patterns generated for subject implanted with this device. The amount of posterior rollback and axial rotation were found to be similar in nature to the normal knee as well as other established TKA devices available for implantation today, but again less than the normal knee

Introduction. Removal of primary components during revision TKA procedure can damage underlying bone, resulting in defects that may need filled for stability of the revision reconstruction. Special revision components including cones and/or augments are often used to compensate for the missing bones. Little work has been done to characterize metaphyseal geometry in the vicinity of the knee joint, however, in order to motivate proper size and shape of cones and augments. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modelling to evaluate variation in endosteal anatomy for revision TKA. Methods. Digital models of the femur and tibia were generated through segmentation of computed tomography scans, for the femur and the tibia (n∼500). Custom software was used to perform virtual surgery and statistical shape analysis of the metaphyseal geometry. A representative and appropriately sized revision femoral component was placed on each bone, assuming anterior referencing with an external rotation of 3 degrees from the posterior condyle axis. The outer and inner boundaries of the cortical bone were determined at the resection level and at 5 mm increments proximally, up to 40 mm. Similar analyses were performed on the tibia, using a typical revision resection (0 degrees medial and posterior slope), with outer and inner boundaries of the cortical bone were determined in 5 mm increments up to 40mm distal to the resection. Metaphyseal contours were exported relative to the central fixation feature of the implant, and average geometries were calculated based on size, and across the entire cohort. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to quantify the variability in shape, specifically to evaluate the +/− 1 and 2 standard deviation geometries at each cross section level of Principal Component 1 (PC1). Results. Representative results illustrating the effect of size for the femur at single depth and the effect of depth and PC1 for tibia are reported. The average inner metaphyseal geometry of the femur (30mm proximal to resection) varied from 25.1×47.7 mm (AP x ML) at the smallest size to 54.5×78.0 at the largest size. The overall average tibia geometry decreased from 51.5×69.5 mm at the base resection level to 33.5×31.3 mm at the most distal resection level (40mm) distal to the resection. At the 20 mm level, the average tibia contour of 45.0×47.8 mm changed to 32.2×33.4 at −2 standard deviations of PC1 and 57.9×62.4 mm at the +2 standard deviations of PC1. Discussion. The generated contours can be used as a design input to optimize the shape of cones and augments, in order to fit potential defects in the femur and tibia encountered during revision TKA while respecting the anatomical constraints of the bone. Statistical shape analysis shows that these constraints are not strictly uniform scaling, based on bone size or on location in the metaphysis, but rather reflect variations in shape that may be used to optimize fit and stability of the prostheses

The widely used Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) estimates a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) using age, sex, body mass index, and seven clinical risk factors, including prior history of fracture. Prior fracture is a binary variable in FRAX, although it is now clear that prior fractures affect future MOF risk differently depending on their recency and site. Risk of MOF is highest in the first two years following a fracture and then progressively decreases with time – this is defined as imminent risk. Therefore, the FRAX tool may underestimate true fracture risk and result in missed opportunities for earlier osteoporosis management in individuals with recent MOF. To address this, multipliers based on age, sex, and fracture type may be applied to baseline FRAX scores for patients with recent fractures, producing a more accurate prediction of both short- and long-term fracture risk. Adjusted FRAX estimates may enable earlier pharmacologic treatment and other risk reduction strategies. This study aimed to report the effect of multipliers on conventional FRAX scores in a clinical cohort of patients with recent non-hip fragility fractures. After obtaining Research Ethics Board approval, FRAX scores were calculated both before and after multiplier adjustment, for patients included in our outpatient Fracture Liaison Service who had experienced a non-hip fragility fracture between June 2020 and November 2021. Patients age 50 years or older, with recent (within 3 months) forearm (radius and/or ulna) or humerus fractures were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients under the age of 50 years or those with a hip fracture. Age- and sex-based FRAX multipliers for recent forearm and humerus fractures described by McCloskey et al. (2021) were used to adjust the conventional FRAX score. Low, intermediate and high-risk of MOF was defined as less than 10%, 10-20%, and greater than 20%, respectively. Data are reported as mean and standard deviation of the mean for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. A total of 91 patients with an average age of 64 years (range = 50-97) were included. The majority of patients were female (91.0%), with 73.6% sustaining forearm fractures and 26.4% sustaining humerus fractures. In the forearm group, the average MOF risk pre- and post-multiplier was 16.0 and 18.8, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients (n = 11) in the forearm group moved from intermediate to high 10-year fracture risk after multiplier adjustment. Average FRAX scores before and after adjustment in the humerus group were 15.7 and 22.7, respectively, with 25% (n = 6) of patients moving from an intermediate risk to a high-risk score. This study demonstrates the clinically significant impact of multipliers on conventional FRAX scores in patients with recent non-hip fractures. Twenty-five percent of patients with humerus fractures and 16% of patients with forearm fractures moved from intermediate to high-risk of MOF after application of the multiplier. Consequently, patients who were previously ineligible for pharmacologic management, now met criteria. Multiplier-adjusted FRAX scores after a recent fracture may more accurately identify patients with imminent fracture risk, facilitating earlier risk reduction interventions

Statistical shape modeling (SSM) and statistical density modeling (SDM) are tools capable of describing the main modes of deviation in the shape and density distribution of the shoulder using a set of uncorrelated variables called principal components (PCs). We hypothesize that the first PC of the SDM, which scales overall density up/down, will be inversely correlated with age and will, on average, be greater for males than females. We also hypothesize that there is a correlation between some PCs of shape and density. SSM and SDM were developed for scapulae and humeri by segmenting surface meshes from computed tomographic images of 75 cadaveric shoulders. Bones were co-registered and defined by the same surface mesh. Volumetric tetrahedral meshes were defined for one of the specimens serving as base meshes for SDM. Base meshes were morphed to each individual bone's surface and superimposed upon the corresponding CT data to determine image intensity in Hounsfield units at each node. Principal component analysis was performed on the exterior shape and internal density distribution of bones. T-tests were performed to find any differences in PC scores between males and females, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for age and PC scores. Finally, correlation coefficients between each of the PCs of the shape and density models were calculated. For the humerus, the first three PCs of the SDM were significantly correlated with age (ρ = 0.40, −0.46, and 0.36, all p ≤ 0.007). For the scapula, the first and ninth PCs showed such correlation (ρ = −0.31, and −0.32, all p ≤ 0.02). Statistically significant differences due to sex were found for the second to sixth SDM PCs of the humerus, with differences in average PC scores of 1, 1, −0.7, −0.8, and −0.6 standard deviations, respectively, for males relative to females. For the scapula, the second, fifth and seventh SDM PCs were significantly different between males and females, with average PC scores differing by 1.1, 0.7, and −0.6 standard deviations. Finally, for both bones, the first PC of SSM showed a weak but significant correlation with the second PC of the SDM (ρ = 0.47, p < 0.001 for the humerus, and ρ = 0.39, p < 0.001 for the scapula). The results of this study suggest that age has a significant influence on the first PC of the SDM, associated with scaling the density in the cortical boundary. Moreover, the negative correlation of age with the second PC of the humerus in SDM which mostly influences the thickness of the cortical boundary implies cortical thinning with age. The second PC of both bones differed significantly between males and females, implying that cortical thickness differs between sexes. Also, there was a significant correlation between the size of the bones and the thickness of the cortical boundary. These findings can help guide the designs of population-based prosthesis components

Introduction. External fixators are attached to bones with percutaneous pins and wires inserted through soft tissues and bone increasing the risk of infections. Such infections compromise patient outcomes e.g., through pin loosening or loss, failure of fixator to stabilise the fracture, additional surgery, increased pain, and delayed mobilisation. These infections also impact the healthcare system for example, increased OPD visits, hospitalisations, treatments, surgeries and costs. Nurses have a responsibility in the care and management of patients with external fixators and ultimately in the prevention of pin-site infection. Yet, evidence on best practices in the prevention of pin-site infection is limited and variation in pin-site management practices is evident. Various strategies are used for the prevention of pin-site infection including the use of different types of non-medicated and medicated wound dressings. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the use of dry gauze or iodine tulle dressings for the prevention of pin-site infections in patients with lower limb external fixators. Methodology. A retrospective study of patients with lower limb external fixators who attended the research site between 2015–2022. Setting & Sample: The setting was the outpatient's (OPD) orthopaedic clinic in a University Teaching Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Eligibility Criteria:. Over the age of 16, treated with an Ilizarov, Taylor Spatial frame (TSF) or Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) external fixators on lower limbs,. Pin-sites dressed with dry gauze or iodine tulle,. Those with pre-existing infected wounds close to the pin site and/or were on long term antibiotics were excluded. Follow Up Period: From time of external fixator application to first pin-site infection or removal of external fixator. Outcome Assessment: The primary outcome was pin-site infection, secondary outcomes included but were not limited to frequency of pin-site infection according to types of bone fixation, frequency of pin/wire removal and hospitalisation due to infection. Data analysis: IBM SPSS Version 25 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted as appropriate. Categorical data were analysed by counting the frequencies (number and percentages) of participants with an event as opposed to counting the number of episodes for each event. Differences between groups were analysed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Continuous variables were reported using mean and standard deviations and difference analysed using a two-sample independent t-test or non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney), where appropriate. Using Kaplan-Meier, survival analysis explored time to development of infection. Ethical approval: granted by local institute Research Ethics Committee on 12th March 2018. Results. During the study period, 97 lower limb external fixators were applied with 43 patients meeting the study eligibility criteria. The mean age was 38 (SD 14.1; median 37) and the majority male (n=32, 74%). At least 50% (n=25) of participants had an IIizarov fixator, with 56% (n=24) of all fixators applied to the tibia and fibula. Pin/wire sites were dressed using iodine (n=26, 61%) or dry gauze dressings (n=15, 35%). The mean age of participants in the iodine group was significantly higher than the dry gauze group (p=.012). The only significant difference between the iodine and dry gauze dressing groups at baseline was age. A total of 30 (70%) participants developed a pin-site infection with 26% (n=11) classified as grade 2 infection. Clinical presentation included redness (n=18, 42%), discharge (n=16, 37%) and pain (n=15, 35%). Over half of participants were prescribed oral antibiotics (n=28, 65%); one required intravenous antibiotics and hospitalization due to pin-site infection. Ten (23%) participants required removal of pin/wires; two due to pin-site infection. There was no association between baseline data and pin-site infection. The median time to developing an infection was 7 weeks (95%, CI 2.7 to 11.29). Overall, there were 21 (81%, n=26) pin-site infections in the iodine group and nine (60%, n=15) in the dry gauze group, difference in proportion and relative risk between the dressing groups were not statistically significant (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12; p= .272). There was no association between baseline data, pin-site infection, and type of dressing. Conclusions. At the research site, patients are referred to the OPD orthopaedic clinic from internal and external clinical sites e.g., from Hospital Consultants, General Practitioners and occasionally from multidisciplinary teams, throughout Ireland. Our retrospective observation study found that 97 lower limb external fixators were applied over a seven-year period which is lower than that reported in the literature. However, the study period included the COVID pandemic years (2020 and 2021) which saw a lower number of external fixators applied due to lack of theatre availability, cancelled admissions and social/travel restrictions that resulted in fewer accidents and lower limb trauma cases requiring external fixator application. The study highlighted a high infection rate with 70% of participants developing pin-site infection which is in keeping with findings reporting in other studies. Our study showed that neither an iodine nor dry gauze dressing was successful in preventing pin-site infection. In the iodine group 81% of participants developed infection compared to 60% in the dry gauze group. Given the lack of difference between the two groups consideration needs to be given to the continued use of iodine dressings in the prevention of pin-site infection. Pin-site infections result in a high portion of participants being prescribed antibiotics and, in an era, that stresses the importance of antimicrobial stewardship there is a need to implement effective infection prevention and control strategies that minimise infection. Further research is therefore needed to investigate more innovative medicated dressings such as those that contain anti-microbial or anti-bacterial agents

Introduction. With many stakeholders, healthcare decisions are complex. However, patient interests should be prioritized. This maximizes healthcare value (quality divided by cost), simultaneously minimizing costs (objective) and maximizing quality (subjective). Unfortunately, even ‘high value’ procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA) suffer from recovery assessment subjectivity (i.e. high assessment variability) and increasing costs. High TKA costs and utilization yield high annual expenditures (∼$22B), including postoperative physical therapy (PT) accounting for ∼10% of total costs (∼$2.3B annually). Post-TKA PT is typically homogenous across subjects ensuring most recover, however recent work shows outcomes unimpacted by PT. Accordingly, opportunities exist improving healthcare value by simultaneously reducing unnecessary PT expenditures and improving outcomes. However, discerning recovery completion relies on discrete ROM measures captured clinically and subjective clinician experience (i.e. intuition about recovery). Accordingly, our goal was developing objective post-TKA performance assessment methods utilizing gait knee ROM and statistical analyses to categorize patient recovery (‘accelerated,’ ‘delayed,’ or ‘normal’). Methods. We first established statistical reasons for current post-TKA rehabilitation including risk-reward tradeoffs between incorrectly ascribing ‘poor recovery’ to well-recovering patients (T1 error) or ‘good recovery’ to poorly-recovering patients (T2 error) using methods described by Mudge et al. and known TKA volumes/rehabilitation costs. Next, previously captured gait ROM data from well-healed patients was utilized establishing standard recovery curves. These were then utilized to assess newly captured patient recovery. Following IRB approval, we prospectively captured gait ROM from 10 TKA patients (3M, 69±13 years) 1-week pre-TKA and 6-weeks immediately post-TKA. Performance was compared to recovery curves via control charts/Shewhart rules (daily performance) as well as standard deviation thresholds (weekly performance) establishing recovery as ‘accelerated,’ ‘delayed,’ or ‘normal.’ The categorization was extrapolated to US TKA population and savings/expenses quantified. Statistical analyses were performed in Minitab with statistical significance set to α<0.05. Results. Current post-TKA approach is as much PT as possible (AMPTAP). AMPTAP was confirmed statistically. Because poor recovery costs are significant, balancing T1/T2 error minimizes risk by removing T1 error risk (α=0.00) via 27 PT sessions for equal cost to one manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). Previously captured, well-healed subject gait ROM were always normally distributed. Assessing performance via control charts showed serial ‘accelerated’/‘delayed’ recovery and would serially under/over-prescribe PT. Establishing recovery performance via ±1SD thresholds successfully evaluated 3 clinically established “poor recoverers” as ‘delayed’ and the reaming clinically established “good recoverers” as ‘normal’ or ‘accelerated’ throughout recovery. Discussion. Optimization for current AMPTAP approach, while effective reducing poor recovery risk, is a gross misuse of rehabilitation spending. Improved methods are necessary including those rooted with strong statistical foundation. Control charts are likely too fine an assessment as patient performance day-to-day is too variable resulting in clinical rehabilitation prescription over-reactions. In contrast, standard deviation thresholds likely provide a conservative approach that allows clinicians the opportunity to improve postoperative rehabilitation week-after-week throughout recovery. However, PT was not altered herein. Thus, the impact altering PT has on postoperative outcomes remains unknown. Future work should investigate how altering postoperative rehabilitation changes postoperative outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [Van der List, 2015; Dy, 2011]. Some indications for revision include mechanical failure, patellar mal-tracking, implant malalignment, disease progression and persistent pain or stiffness [Dy, 2011; Turktas, 2015]. Implant mal-positioning can lead to decreased patient satisfaction and increased revision rates [Turktas, 2015]. Morphological variability may increase the likelihood of implant mal-positioning. This study quantifies the morphological variability of the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) aspects of the patellofemoral compartment using a database of computed tomography (CT) scans. The analysis presented here used the custom CT based program SOMA (SOMA V.4.3.3, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). SOMA contains a large database of 3D models created from CT scans. Anatomic analysis and implant fitting tools are also integrated into SOMA to perform morphometric analyses. A coordinate system is established from the femoral head center, the intercondylar notch, and a morphological flexion axis (MFA). The MFA is created by iteratively fitting circles to the posterior condyles and creating and axis through the circles' centers. The sagittal plane is created normal to this axis and through the notch. A coronal plane is created from the femoral head center and the flexion axis. The AP measurement is taken normal to the coronal plane from the anterior cortex sulcus to the intercondylar notch (Figure 1). A 5°-flexed anterior resection is created to run-out at the anterior cortex sulcus. The ML measurement is taken normal to the sagittal plane from the most medial to the most lateral points of the anterior resection (Figure 1). The ML measurements are broken down into medial and lateral components divided by a sagittal plane through the trochlea. Means and standard deviations of the AP and ML measurements are calculated. The mean and standard deviation for the AP measurement are 24.9mm and 2.8mm, respectively. The data predicts that 99.7% of the population will have an AP measurement between 16.5mm and 33.3mm. The mean and standard deviation for the ML measurement are 54.6 mm and 5.5mm, respectively. The data predicts that 99.7% of the population will have an ML measurement between 38.1mm and 71.1mm A Pearson Correlation value of 0.134 was calculated for AP/ML indicating a very weak positive correlation between the measures. The correlation value and the large measurement ranges indicate that there is high variability between the AP and ML measurements. A scatterplot was created to graphically represent the high variability between the AP and ML width measurements (Figure 2). A Pearson Correlation value of −0.649 was calculated for the medial and lateral components of ML (Figure 3). The results of this study suggest that patellofemoral morphology is highly variable with respect to the AP and ML dimensions. This variability may impact implant fit and positioning and should be taken into consideration in the design and use of prostheses for PFA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

The objective of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of an X-ray based image segmentation system for patient specific instrument (PSI) design or any other surgical application that requires 3D modeling of the knee. The process requires two bilateral short film X-ray images of knee and a standing long film image of the leg including the hip and ankle. The short film images are acquired with an X-ray positioner device that is embedded with fiducial markers to correct for setup variation in source and cassette position. An automated image segmentation algorithm, based on a statistical model that couples knee bone shape and radiographic appearance, calculates 3D surface models of the knee from the bi-lateral short films (Imorphics, Manchester UK) (Figure 1). Surface silhouettes are used to inspect and refine the automatically generated segmentation; the femur and tibia mechanical axes are then calculated using automatically generated surface model landmarks combined with user-defined markups of the hip and ankle center from the standing long film (Figure 2). The accuracy of the 2D/3D segmentation system was evaluated using simulated X-ray imagery generated from one-hundred osteoarthritic, lower limb CT image samples using the Insight Toolkit (Kitware, Inc.). Random, normally distributed variations in source and cassette positions were included in the dataset. Surface accuracy was measured using root-mean-square (RMS) point-to-surface (P2S) distance calculations with respect to paired benchmark CT segmentations. Landmark accuracy was calculated by measuring angular differences between the 2D/3D generated femur and tibia mechanical tibia with respect to paired CT-generated landmark data. The paired RMS sample mean and standard deviation of femur P2S errors on the distal quarter of the femur after auto-segmentation was 1.08±0.20mm. The RMS sample mean and standard deviation of tibia P2S errors on the proximal quarter of the tibia after auto-segmentation was 1.16±0.25mm. The paired sample mean and standard deviation of the femur and tibia mechanical axis accuracy with respect to benchmark CT data landmarks were 0.02±0.42[deg] and −0.33±0.56[deg], respectively. Per surface-vertex sample RMS P2S errors are illustrated in Figure 3. Visual inspection of RMS results found the automatically segmented femur to be very accurate in the shaft, distal condyles, and posterior condyles, which are important for PSI guide fit and accurate planning. Similarly, the automatically segmented tibia was very accurate in the shaft and plateaus, which are also important for PSI guide fit. Osteophytes resulted in some RMS differences (Figure 3), as was expected due to the know limitations of osteophyte imaging with X-ray. PSI-type applications that utilize X-ray should account for osteophyte segmentation error. Overall, our results based on simulated radiographic data demonstrate that X-ray based 2D/3D segmentation is a viable tool for use in orthopaedic applications that require accurate 3D segmentations of knee bones

Aims. Accurate placement of acetabular and femoral stem components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an important factor in the success of the procedure. A variety of free hand or navigated techniques is reported. Survivorship and complications have been shown to be directly related to implant position during THA. The aim of this cadaver study was to assess the accuracy of the placement of the components in THA using patient specific instruments (PSI) in combination with a 3D planning software and the direct anterior approach. Method. Patient specific instruments (PSI) were developed to guide the surgeon during THA that were 3D printed with their bone models following a 3D software planning protocol (LPH software V2.5.1, Onefit-Medical, Eos Imaging Company, Besancon, France). Acetabular guides: cup, offset and straight reamer handle and impactor, femoral- and chisel guides were used in each THA (Fig. 1). To define anatomic bone landmarks and to generate a 3D model of each hip joint CT scans were performed preoperatively. The planning of component position was done by one surgeon (AZ) preop. Surgery was performed by two experienced surgeons (AZ, SD) on cadaver specimen with 4 hips in two separate series. A total of 8 hip replacements were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using CT-scans of each hip joint to compare planned to achieved results. Mechanical simulations of the guides were carried out to verify that there were no conflicts between the different instruments. To meet the ISO standard 16061: 2015 the compatibility of the instruments with the guides has been checked. Parameters were evaluated in 3D pelvic and femoral planes: center cup position, inclination angle, anteversion angle, cutting height and plan orientation, anteversion angle, flexion/extension angle, varus/valgus angle, anatomical and functional leg length, offset. Acceptance criteria: postop. parameters evaluated must not have a deviation of more than 5 degrees, 2,5 mm according to preop. planning. For every THA the test protocol has been completely realized. Results. The difference between the preop. and postop. measures in the first series of 4 hips revealed 2 outliers because of fractures of the acetabulum in 2 cases, related to bad cadaver quality. In the second series we found satisfactory results comparing the planned preop and postop component position (Fig. 2). For example difference of leg length showed a mean absolute of 1,58 mm, standard deviation 1,21 mm (min 0,62; max 3,34 mm). Offset revealed a mean absolute of 1,62 mm, standard deviation 0,57 mm (min 1,06; max 2,14 mm) concerning the difference between preop. planning and result postop. Conclusion. Accurate and safe placement of total hip components in THA, both acetabular cup and stem, performing the direct anterior approach can be achieved using a 3D preoperative planning along with patient specific instruments. The results of the cadaver study tests are promising and that is to be proven in the clinical setting and by application in the future

Introduction. Cup malposition in hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing is associated with instability, accelerated wear, and the need for revision. A recent study measuring cup orientation on conventional radiodiographs demonstrated an incidence of cup malpositioning of 50% according to the safe zone that they defined 1,2. A prior study of 105 conventionally placed cups using CT demonstrated a cup malpositioning incidence of 74%3. The current study similarly assesses the variation in cup position using conventional techniques as measured by CT. Methods. CT studies of 123 hips in 119 patients with total hip arthroplasties performed using conventional techniques were used for this study. The indications for the CT studies were for CT-based surgical navigation of the contralateral side or for assessment of periprosthetic osteolysis. An application specific software modules was developed to measure cup orientation using CT (HipSextant Research Application 1.0.13 Surgical Planning Associates Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). The cup orientation was determined by first identifying Anterior Pelvic Plane Coordinate system landmarks on a 3D surface model. A multiplanar reconstruction module then allowed for the creation of a plane parallel with the opening plane of the acetabulum. The orientation of the cup opening plane in the AP Plane coordinate space was calculated according to Murray's definitions of operative anteversion and operative inclination. Since these studies including images through the femoral condyles, femoral anteversion could be measured on these hips as well (Osirix v5.6, Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland). Results. Cup orientation for the 123 hips is shown in Figure 1. Operative anteversion averaged 29.7 degrees with a standard deviation of 12.2 and a range of −24.4 to 57.5. Operative inclination averaged 37.5 degrees with a standard deviation of 7.7 and a range of 18.4 to 68.2. Femoral anteversion averaged 21.1 degrees with a standard deviation of 14.0 and a range of −20.5 to 60.9. Using 25 degrees of operative anteversion and 45 degrees of operative inclination as the center of a safe zone for example, 78 of 123 (63%) were more than 10 degrees off in either anteversion and inclination and 23 of 123 (19%) were more than 10 degrees off in both anteversion and inclination. Discussion and Conclusion. Most conventionally placed acetabular components are malpositioned. While the incidence of cup malorientation using conventional techniques is quite high, the incidence in our series appears to be lower than that reported by Saxler et al. It is curious that most experienced surgeons who perform total hip arthroplasty using conventional methods of cup alignment believe that their accuracy quite good. Yet, multiple objective studies of cup alignment demonstrate that accuracy is quite poor. Since cup malposition is so closely associated with instability, impingement, wear, bearing fracture, osteolysis and loosening, questions remain as to how conventional methods of cup alignment remain an acceptable standard of care in our field