Introduction. Unplanned reoperations (UROs) following corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) present significant challenges for both patients and surgeons. Understanding the specific UROs types is crucial for improving patient outcomes and refining surgical strategies in ASD correction. Method. This retrospective analysis utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database spanning from 2017 to 2021. Patient information was extracted using specific CPT codes related to posterior pedicle fixation. Result. In a cohort of 1088 patients undergoing posterior spinal deformity corrections, we examined various preoperative factors to discern their correlation with reoperation prevalence. Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in reoperation prevalence concerning gender (male: 4.0%, p=0.131) or ethnicity (Hispanic: 4.2%, p=0.192). Similarly, no notable associations were identified for diabetes mellitus, smoking status, dyspnea, history of severe COPD, hypertension, ASA classification, or functional health status before surgery, with reoperation prevalences ranging from 3.2% to 8.8% and p-values spanning from 0.146 to 0.744. Overall, the reoperation prevalence within the entire cohort stood at 5.2% (55 cases). In terms of the types of reoperations investigated, spinal-related procedures emerged as the most prevalent, accounting for 43.7% (24 cases), followed closely by wound site revisions at 23.6% (13 cases). Additionally, gastrointestinal-related procedures and various other miscellaneous interventions, such as uroscopy, demonstrated reoperation prevalences of 7.2% (4 cases) and 25.5% (14 cases), respectively. Conclusion. our findings highlight the diverse spectrum of reoperation procedures encountered following posterior spinal deformity corrections, with wound site revisions and spinal-related interventions being the most prevalent categories. These results emphasize the complexity of managing UROs in spinal surgery and the need for tailored approaches and infection/incision protocols to address the specific challenges associated with each type of reoperation

Complications after spinal fusion surgery are common, with implant loosening occurring in up to 50% of osteoporotic patients. Pedicle screw fixation strength reduces as a result of decreased trabecular bone density, whereas sublaminar wiring is less affected by these changes. Therefore, pedicle screw augmentation with radiopaque sublaminar wires (made with Dyneema Purity® Radiapque fibers, DSM Biomedical, Geleen, the Netherlands) may improve fixation strength. Furthermore, sublaminar tape could result in a gradual motion transition to distribute stress over multiple levels and thereby reduce implant loosening. The objective of this study is to test this hypothesis in a novel experimental setup in which a cantilever bending moment is applied to individual human vertebrae. Thirty-eight human cadaver vertebrae were stratified into four different groups: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sublaminar tape (ST), pedicle screw (PS), metal sublaminar wire (SW) and pedicle screw reinforced with sublaminar tape (PS+ST). The vertebrae were individually embedded in resin, and a cantilever bending moment was applied bilaterally through the spinal rods using a universal material testing machine. This cantilever bending setup closely resembles the loading of fixators at transitional levels of spinal instrumentation. The pull-out strength of the ST (3563 ± 476N) was not significantly different compared to PS, SW or PS+ST. The PS+ST group had a significantly higher pull-out strength (4522 ± 826N) compared to PS (2678 ± 292N) as well as SW (2931 ± 250N). The higher failure strength of PS + ST compared to PS indicates that PS augmentation with ST may be an effective measure to reduce the incidence of screw pullout, even in osteoporotic vertebrae. Moreover, the lower stiffness of sublaminar fixation techniques and the absence of damage to the cortices in the ST group suggest that ST as a stand-alone fixation technique in adult spinal deformity surgery may also be clinically feasible and offer clinical benefits

Distraction histogenesis (DH) techniques have been widely accepted and practiced in orthopaedics, traumatology, and craniofacial surgery over the last two decades. Using DH methods, many previously untreatable conditions have been successfully managed with outstanding clinical outcomes. The biological mechanisms underlying DH have been studied and the tension-stress principles of tissue regeneration are attributed to upregulated gene expression, enhanced cell proliferation, angiogenesis and tissue remodelling and endogenous stem cell mobilization. The new methods of enhancing bone consolidation in DH are proposed and need further clinical studies. The novel applications of DH have now been extended for the treatment of vascular diseases, cranial defect (with neuronal disorders), hip and spinal deformity corrections and soft-tissue defects in addition to various bone defects and deformities. There are more surprises and novel mechanisms yet to be discovered for these novel applications of DH