Aims. The aims of this study were to: 1) report on a cohort of skeletally mature patients with native hip and knee septic arthritis over a 14-year period; 2) to determine the rate of joint failure in patients who had experienced an episode of hip or knee septic arthritis; and 3) to assess the outcome following septic arthritis relative to the infecting organism, whether those patients infected by Staphylococcus aureus would be more likely to have adverse outcomes than those infected by other organisms. Methods. All microbiological samples from joint aspirations between March 2000 and December 2014 at our institution were reviewed in order to identify cases of culture-proven septic arthritis. Cases in children (aged < 16 years) and prosthetic joints were excluded. Data were abstracted on age at diagnosis, sex, joint affected (hip or knee), type of organisms isolated, cause of septic arthritis, comorbidities within the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), details of treatment, and outcome. Results. A total of 142 patients were confirmed to have had an episode of septic arthritis in a native hip (n = 17) or knee joint (n = 125). S. aureus accounted for 57.7% of all hip and knee joint infections. There were 13 inpatient deaths attributed to septic arthritis. The median age of the patients who died was 77.5 (46.9 to 92.2) and their median age-adjusted CCI was 8 (6 to 12). A failure of the joint occurred in 26 knees (21%) and nine hips (53%). Of the knee joints infected by S. aureus (n = 71), 23 knees (32%) went into failure of joint, whereas of those infected by other organisms (n = 54), only three knees (6%) failed. Conclusion. Based on our study findings, hip and knee septic arthritis long-term outcomes were substantially worse than their immediate outcome suggested. Failure of knee joint is 6.1 times more likely to occur in those infected with S. aureus. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):785–792

Aims. Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of septic arthritis, and in vitro studies suggest α haemolysin (Hla) is responsible for chondrocyte death. We used an in vivo murine joint model to compare inoculation with wild type S. aureus 8325-4 with a Hla-deficient strain DU1090 on chondrocyte viability, tissue histology, and joint biomechanics. The aim was to compare the actions of S. aureus Hla alone with those of the animal’s immune response to infection. Methods. Adult male C57Bl/6 mice (n = 75) were randomized into three groups to receive 1.0 to 1.4 × 10. 7. colony-forming units (CFUs)/ml of 8325-4, DU1090, or saline into the right stifle joint. Chondrocyte death was assessed by confocal microscopy. Histological changes to inoculated joints were graded for inflammatory responses along with gait, weight changes, and limb swelling. Results. Chondrocyte death was greater with 8325-4 (96.2% (SD 5.5%); p < 0.001) than DU1090 (28.9% (SD 16.0%); p = 0.009) and both were higher than controls (3.8% (SD 1.2%)). Histology revealed cartilage/bone damage with 8325-4 or DU1090 compared to controls (p = 0.010). Both infected groups lost weight (p = 0.006 for both) and experienced limb swelling (p = 0.043 and p = 0.018, respectively). Joints inoculated with bacteria showed significant alterations in gait cycle with a decreased stance phase, increased swing phase, and a corresponding decrease in swing speed. Conclusion. Murine joints inoculated with Hla-producing 8325-4 experienced significantly more chondrocyte death than those with DU1090, which lack the toxin. This was despite similar immune responses, indicating that Hla was the major cause of chondrocyte death. Hla-deficient DU1090 also elevated chondrocyte death compared to controls, suggesting a smaller additional deleterious role of the immune system on cartilage. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):669–678

Aims. Septic arthritis of the hip often leads to irreversible osteoarthritis (OA) and the requirement for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to report the mid-term risk of any infection, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, and reoperation in patients with a past history of septic arthritis who underwent THA, compared with a control group of patients who underwent THA for OA. Methods. We retrospectively identified 256 THAs in 244 patients following septic arthritis of the native hip, which were undertaken between 1969 and 2016 at a single institution. Each case was matched 1:1, based on age, sex, BMI, and year of surgery, to a primary THA performed for OA. The mean age and BMI were 58 years (35 to 84) and 31 kg/m. 2. (18 to 48), respectively, and 100 (39%) were female. The mean follow-up was 11 years (2 to 39). Results. The ten-year survival free of any infection was 91% and 99% in the septic arthritis and OA groups, respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 13; p < 0.001). The survival free of PJI at ten years was 93% and 99% in the septic arthritis and OA groups, respectively (HR = 10; p = 0.002). There was a significantly higher rate of any infection at ten years when THA was undertaken within five years of the diagnosis of septic arthritis compared with those in whom THA was undertaken > five years after this diagnosis was made (14% vs 5%, respectively; HR = 3.1; p = 0.009), but there was no significant difference in ten-year survival free of aseptic revision (HR = 1.14; p = 0.485). The mean Harris Hip Scores at two and five years postoperatively were significantly lower in the septic arthritis group compared with the OA group (p = 0.001 for both). Conclusion. There was a ten-fold increased risk of PJI in patients with a history of septic arthritis who underwent THA compared with those who underwent THA for OA with a ten-year cumulative incidence of 7%. The risk of any infection had a strong downward trend as the time interval between the diagnosis of septic arthritis and THA increased, highlighted by a 3.1-fold higher risk when THAs were performed within five years of the diagnosis being made. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):227–234

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which patient demographics, clinical presentation, and blood parameters vary in Kingella kingae septic arthritis when compared with those of other organisms, and whether this difference needs to be considered when assessing children in whom a diagnosis of septic arthritis is suspected. Methods. A prospective case series was undertaken at a single UK paediatric institution between October 2012 and November 2018 of all patients referred with suspected septic arthritis. We recorded the clinical, biochemical, and microbiological findings in all patients. Results. A total of 160 patients underwent arthrotomy for a presumed septic arthritis. Of these, no organism was identified in 61 and only 25 of these were both culture- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative. A total of 36 patients did not undergo PCR analysis. Of the remaining 99 culture- and PCR-positive patients, K. kingae was the most commonly isolated organism (42%, n = 42). The knee (n = 21), shoulder (n = 9), and hip (n = 5) were the three most commonly affected joints. A total of 28 cases (66%) of K. kingae infection were detected only on PCR. The mean age of K. kingae-positive cases (16.1 months) was significantly lower than that of those whose septic arthitis was due to other organisms (49.4 months; p < 0.001). The mean CRP was significantly lower in the K. kingae group than in the other organism group (p < 0.001). The mean ESR/CRP ratio was significantly higher in K. kingae (2.84) than in other infections (1.55; p < 0.008). The mean ESR and ESR/CRP were not significantly different from those in the 'no organism identified' group. Conclusion. K. kingae was the most commonly isolated organism from paediatric culture- and/or PCR-positive confirmed septic arthritis, with only one third of cases detected on routine cultures. It is important to develop and maintain a clinical suspicion for K. kingae infection in young patients presenting atypically. Routine PCR testing is recommended in these patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):584–588

Aims. This study aimed to answer two questions: what are the best diagnostic methods for diagnosing bacterial arthritis of a native joint?; and what are the most commonly used definitions for bacterial arthritis of a native joint?. Methods. We performed a search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for relevant studies published between January 1980 and April 2020. Of 3,209 identified studies, we included 27 after full screening. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and Youden index of diagnostic tests were extracted from included studies. We grouped test characteristics per diagnostic modality. We extracted the definitions used to establish a definitive diagnosis of bacterial arthritis of a native joint per study. Results. Overall, 28 unique diagnostic tests for diagnosing bacterial arthritis of a native joint were identified. The following five tests were deemed most useful: serum ESR (sensitivity: 34% to 100%, specificity: 23% to 93%), serum CRP (sensitivity: 58% to 100%, specificity: 0% to 96%), serum procalcitonin (sensitivity: 0% to 100%, specificity: 68% to 100%), the proportion of synovial polymorphonuclear cells (sensitivity: 42% to 100%, specificity: 54% to 94%), and the gram stain of synovial fluid (sensitivity: 27% to 81%, specificity: 99% to 100%). Conclusion. Diagnostic methods with relatively high sensitivities, such as serum CRP, ESR, and synovial polymorphonuclear cells, are useful for screening. Diagnostic methods with a relatively high specificity, such as serum procalcitonin and synovial fluid gram stain, are useful for establishing a diagnosis of bacterial arthritis. This review helps to interpret the value of various diagnostic tests for diagnosing bacterial arthritis of a native joint in clinical practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1745–1753

Introduction and Objective. Septic arthritis is an acute infective presentation of the joint calling for urgent intervention, thus making the differential diagnosis process difficult. An increase in temperature in the area containing the suspected septic arthritis is one of the clinically important findings. In this study, it was aimed to investigate whether or not the temperature changes obtained through thermal camera can be used as a new additional diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of septic arthritis. Materials and Methods. The study was approved by the local ethics committee as a prospective cohort. A total of 49 patients, 15 septic and 34 non-septic ones, both male and female ones from all ages admitted to the emergency room or evaluated with the consultation of another clinics who were also present with a pre-diagnosis of arthritis (septic or non-septic) in the knee (with complaints of redness, swelling, pain, effusion, increased temperature, edema, and inability to walk) were included in the study. The patients with non-joint inflammatory problems and a history of surgery in the same joint were excluded from the study. The temperature increase in the joint area with suspected septic arthritis was observed, and the difference in temperature changes of this suspicious area with the joint area of the contralateral extremity was compared after which the diagnosis of septic arthritis was confirmed by taking culture with routine intra-articular fluid aspiration, which is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Results. The mean age of the patients was 39.89 ± 27.65°C. A significant difference was found between the group with and without septit arthritis in terms of ASO, sedimentation, and leukocyte increase in the analysis of joint fluid (p <0.05). When the thermal measurements were compared, the mean temperature was 37.93°C in the septic group, while it was 36.79°C in the non-septic group, which showed a significant difference (p <0.000∗). The mean temperature difference in both joints was 3.40°C in the septic group, while 0.94°C in the non-septic group (p <0.000∗). While the mean temperature was 37.10°C in the group with septit arthritis, it was measured to be 35.89 °C in the group without (p <0.020). A very strong positive correlation was found between the difference between the mean temperatures of both groups and the values of the hottest and coldest temperature points (r = 0.960, r = 0.902). Conclusions. In the diagnosis of septic arthritis, a thermal imager can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. With the help of this device, a quantitative value, in addition to palpation, can be given to the local temperature increase in the joint, which is an important finding in the clinic of septic arthritis. In future studies, specially designed thermal devices developed with special software for septic arthritis can be developed

Introduction. Septic arthritis of the native knee often results in irreversible joint damage leading to the need for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study examines the mid-term risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, any revision, and any reoperation in primary TKAs after septic arthritis of the native knee compared to a control cohort of primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis (OA). Methods. We retrospectively identified 215 primary TKAs performed between 1971 and 2016 at a single institution following septic arthritis of the native knee. Eighty-two percent (177 cases) were treated in a single setting, whereas a two-stage exchange arthroplasty protocol was utilized in 18% (39 cases) for ongoing or suspected active native knee septic arthritis. Each case was matched 1:1 based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and surgical year to a primary TKA for OA. Mean age and BMI were 63 years and 30 kg/m2, respectively. Mean follow-up was 9 years. Results. Survivorship free from any infection (inclusive of PJI and wound infections) at 10 years was 87% in the septic arthritis cohort and 98% for the OA cohort (HR=6.5, p<0.01). Survivorship free of PJI at 10 years was 90% in the septic arthritis and 99% in the OA group (HR=6; p<0.01). There was no difference in the rate of infection when TKA occurred within 5 years of a septic arthritis diagnosis compared to a diagnosis that occurred >5 years from the TKA. The survivorship free of aseptic revision at 10 years was 83% for the septic arthritis cohort and 93% for the OA cohort (HR=2.5, p<0.01). When combining the above survivorships free of aseptic and septic revisions, the survivorship free of any revision at 10 years was 78% in the septic arthritis cohort and 91% in the OA cohort (HR=3, p<0.01). The 10-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 61% in septic arthritis group and 84% in the OA group (HR=3; p<0.01). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative Knee Society scores were similar between groups (p=0.16 and p=0.19, respectively). Conclusion. There was a 6-fold increased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA with prior history of septic arthritis when compared to controls who had a TKA for OA, with a cumulative incidence of 9% at 10 years. Moreover, the 10-year survivorships free of aseptic revision, any revision, and any reoperation were significantly worse in the septic arthritis cohort. Summary. A history of septic arthritis prior to primary TKA allows for satisfactory clinical outcomes, but patients had increased risk of PJI, aseptic revision, any revision, and any reoperation compared to a control cohort

Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare and serious complication. Previous studies have shown that septic arthritis is associated with inferior outcome of ACLR. Despite that, there is no standardized treatment protocol, and the course of the disease has mainly been studied within single institutions with a small number of patients. The aim of the present study is to describe the course of septic arthritis following ACLR in a large nationwide cohort. The hypothesis was that the clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR varies according to the infectious agent. The present cohort represents patients with septic arthritis identified in a previous study that analyzed compensation claims reported to the Swedish national insurance company (Löf) in 2005–2014 (1). The diagnosis was confirmed by medical experts at Löf after review of medical records. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the medical records as well as data available from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR) for the study group. The study involved 158 patients who received compensation due to developing septic arhtirits. 94 (59.9%) patients were infected with Coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS), and 25 patients by Staphyolococcus Aureus (S.Aureus) (15.9%). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding Maximum CRP (p<0.001), and duration between ACLR and first washout operation (p<0.005). S.aureus group had the higest maximum CRP (281) and the shortest duration between ACLR and first washout operation (12 days). The Clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR can vary according to the agent causing the infection, and low virulent agents are responsible for the majority of the infections. Clinicians need to be aware of these differences and consider them when making diagnosis or treatment decisions

Aim. Synovial fluid D-lactate may be useful for diagnosing septic arthritis (SA) as this biomarker is almost exclusively produced by bacteria. We evaluated the performance of synovial fluid D-lactate and determined its optimal cut-off value for diagnosing SA. Method. Consecutive patients with suspicion of septic arthritis were prospectively included. They underwent joint aspiration and synovial fluid was collected for culture, leukocyte count and D-lactate concentration (by spectrophotometry). Youden's J statistic was used for determining optimal D-lactate cut-off value on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve by maximizing sensitivity and specificity. Results. A total of 155 patients were included. Using institutional criteria, 21 patients (14%) were diagnosed with SA and 134 (86%) patients with aseptic arthropathy, out of which 43 (27%) had osteoarthrosis, 80 (52%) had rheumatic arthropathy and 11 (7%) reactive arthritis. The optimal cut-off of synovial fluid D-lactate to differentiate SA from aseptic cases was 0,035 mmol/l. Synovial fluid D-lactate had a sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 70–99%) and specificity 87% (95% CI: 80–92%) compared to leukocyte count with sensitivity 81% (95% CI: 60–95%) and specificity 83% (95% CI: 76–90%). Culture was positive in only 17 (80%) out of 21 patients with SA. Conclusions. The synovial fluid D-lactate showed high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of SA which was higher than the current gold standard of diagnosis (culture and leukocyte count). The high sensitivity makes this biomarker useful as a point-of-care screening test for SA

A hot swollen joint is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice. With a broad range of differentials, septic arthritis (SA) is perhaps one of the most concerning. Treated by culture-specific antibiotics and arthroscopic lavage, some patients require multiple washouts. We aimed to determine:. (1) What are the risk factors for development of SA?. (2) What are the risk factors for repeat washout in SA patients?. (3) What are the important clinical differences between a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and SA cohort?. All patients presenting to the emergency department, orthopaedic, and rheumatology clinics between January 2020 to January 2021 with a hot, swollen joint were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previous trauma on the ipsilateral joint, with data missing from their medical records in any of the variables required for analysis, <24 months follow-up were excluded. Variables of interest in the three-month period preceding the diagnosis of SA were compared between SA and non-SA patients. Factors with a p-value of p<0.100 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. Similar analyses were performed to compare SA patients with multiple washouts with those needing one washout. Demographical and clinical data for PJI patients were collected to delineate important differences with SA cohort. 211 patients were included (SA:28;PJI:24;pseudogout:32;gout:26;others:101). Multivariate analysis showed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), skin infection, and liver disease were risk factors for SA. Amongst patients with septic arthritis, multivariate analysis showed that WBC levels above normal limits (3.6-10.5×109 cells/L) and RA were risk factors for multiple washouts. Between the SA and PJI cohorts, BMI (p=0.002) was significantly lower in the former, whilst WBC level (p=0.023) and CRP (p<0.0001) was significantly higher in the former. Early diagnosis of septic arthritis requires understanding the risk factors, namely RA, skin infection, and liver disease. Considering PJI and septic arthritis as the same entity can lead to wrong clinical judgement, and clinicians should be aware of important differences. We believe that the models in this study are of prognostic value to clinicians who are presented with the common presenting compliant of a hot swollen joint

Shoulder septic arthritis is uncommon and frequently misdiagnosed, resulting in severe consequences. This study evaluated the demographics, bacteriological profile, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes. This is a 10-year retrospective observational analysis of 30 patients (20 males and 10 females) who were treated for septic arthritis of the shoulder. The data collecting process utilised clinical records, laboratory archives, and x-ray archives. We gathered demographic information, pre- and post-intervention clinical data, serum biochemical markers, and the results of imaging examinations. All patients had a surgical arthrotomy and joint debridement in the operating room, and specimens were taken for culture and sensitivity testing. The specimens were cultivated for at least seventy-two hours. Shoulder joint ranges of motion, comorbidities, and the presence of osteomyelitis were assessed clinically to determine the outcome. All statistical analyses were conducted using the STATA 17 statistical software. Analysis of correlation between categorical variables was performed using the chi-squared test. The majority of the study patients were black Africans (97%). The age range of the group was from 8 days to 17 years. At presentation, 33% of patients had a low-grade fever, whereas the majority (60%) had normal body temperature. The average length of symptoms was 3.9 days (ranged from 1 day to 15 days), and the majority of patients had an increased white cell count (83%) and C-reactive protein (98%). There was accumulation of fluid in the joint of all individuals who received shoulder ultrasound imaging. We noted a significant incidence of gram-positive cocci, which were mostly susceptible to first-line antibiotics. Shoulder stiffness affected 63% of patients and chronic osteomyelitis affected 50% of individuals. Neither the severity nor the duration of the symptoms was related to an increased risk of osteomyelitis. The results of this study revealed that the clinical characteristics and bacterial profile of septic arthritis of the shoulder conform to typical patterns. The likelihood of osteomyelitis and an unfavourable prognosis is considerable

Aim. Septic arthritis is a painful infection of articular joints that is typically treated by irrigation & debridement along with antibiotic therapy. There is debate amongst the medical community whether antibiotic administration should be delayed until fluid cultures have been taken to improve culture yield. However, delaying antibiotics can also have negative consequences, including joint destruction and sepsis. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to determine: 1) whether delayed antibiotic treatment affects culture yield and prognosis and 2) if the culture yield of patients treated for septic arthritis differs for hip, knee, and shoulder based on timing of antibiotic administration. Method. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 111 patients with septic arthritis of the hip, knee, or shoulder admitted from 3/2016 to 11/2018. In patients with multiple septic joints, each joint was analyzed individually (n=122). Diagnosis was determined by the treatment of irrigation & debridement and/or a positive culture. Patients without all intervention times recorded or with periprosthetic joint infection were excluded. Demographics, laboratory tests, culture results, and intervention times were obtained through chart review. Patients were grouped based on antibiotic therapy timing: >24 hours prior to arthrocentesis (Group 1), between 24 hours and 1 hour prior (Group 2), and 1 hour prior to post-arthrocentesis (Group 3). Analysis was conducted using chi-squared tests. Results. The mean age of each group were similar: Group 1 (n=38) 55.7 years, Group 2 (n=20) 57.2 years, and Group 3 (n=64) 54.8 years. No difference was observed in culture sensitivity between groups (p=0.825) with 71.1% (27/38) positive cultures in Group 1, 75% (15/20) in Group 2, and 76.6% (49/64) in Group 3. Similarly, frequency of related readmissions within 90 days (p=0.863) did not significantly vary: 26.3% (10/38) in Group 1, 20% (4/20) in Group 2, and 25% (16/64) in Group 3. Additionally, there were no significant differences in culture sensitivity in the knee (p=0.618; Groups: 87.5%, 75%, 70.6%), shoulder (p=0.517; Groups: 77.8%, 66.7%, 90%), and hip (p=0.362; Groups: 61.9%, 80%, 80%). Conclusions. Culture sensitivities and rates of readmission were similar for all patients regardless of antibiotic administration timing. These results suggest that antibiotic administration should not be delayed in septic arthritis to improve culture yield. However, the data does not suggest that early antibiotic administration will result in better clinical outcomes by lowering readmission rates. Further research is needed to better determine the clinical benefits that early administration of antibiotics may have on patient outcomes

Aim. Prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Method. Synovial fluid samples were prospectively collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to culture-based methods as reference standard. Results. A total of 45 samples were analyzed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100%, 95% CI 73 – 100) and positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 79 – 100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 83% (95% CI 36 – 99) and 88% (95% CI 47 – 99) respectively for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis (n=12), 77% (95% CI: 46 – 94) and 63% (95% CI: 26 – 90) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI (n=14), and 27% (95% CI 7 – 61) and 27% (95% CI: 7 – 61) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI (n=19). Conclusions. The results of this pilot study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of low-grade microorganisms in the panel

Little information is available about several important aspects of the treatment of melioidosis osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. We undertook a retrospective review of 50 patients with these conditions in an attempt to determine the effect of location of the disease, type of surgical intervention and duration of antibiotic treatment on outcome, particularly complications and relapse. We found that there was a 27.5% risk of osteomyelitis of the adjacent bone in patients with septic arthritis in the lower limb. Patients with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of an adjacent bone were in hospital significantly longer (p = 0.001), needed more operations (p = 0.031) and had a significantly higher rate of complications and re-presentation (p = 0.048). More than half the patients (61%), most particularly those with multifocal bone and joint involvement, and those with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of an adjacent bone who were treated operatively, needed more visits to theatre. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:277–82

Aims. The treatment of septic arthritis of the shoulder is challenging. The infection frequently recurs and the clinical outcome can be very poor. We aimed to review the outcomes following the use of continuous negative pressure after open debridement with a large diameter drain in patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder. Patients and Methods. A total of 68 consecutive patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder underwent arthrotomy, irrigation and debridement. A small diameter suction drain was placed in the glenohumeral joint and a large diameter drain was placed in the subacromial space with continuous negative pressure of 15 cm H. 2. O. All patients received a standardised protocol of antibiotics for a mean of 5.1 weeks (two to 11.1). Results. Negative pressure was maintained for a mean of 24 days (14 to 32). A total of 67 patients (98.5%) were cured without further treatment being required. At a mean follow-up of 14 months (three to 72), the mean forward flexion was 123° (80° to 140°) and the mean external rotation was 28°(10° to 40°) in those with a rotator cuff tear, and 125° (85° to 145°) and 35° (15° to 45°) in those without a rotator cuff tear. Conclusion. Continuous negative pressure, following open arthrotomy, irrigation and debridement, was effective in treating septic arthritis of the shoulder. The rate of recurrence was significantly lower than with conventional treatment involving arthroscopic or open debridement reported in the literature. Functional outcomes, even in patients with rotator cuff tears, were excellent. Take home message: Continuous negative pressure is effective in treating septic arthritis of the shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:660–5

Aim. The diagnosis of septic arthritis mostly relies on clinical examination, several blood parameters including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, sedimentation, and the analysis of the joint aspiration. However, the diagnosis can be difficult when the symptoms are vague and the information obtained from laboratory might be insufficient for definitive diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate several ratios obtained from routine blood tests for a possible use in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Method. The adult patients who were operated in our clinic due to septic arthritis between 2014–2020 were identified and retrospectively evaluated. The patients with any blood disorders or missing file information were excluded. A total of 36 patients were found to be eligible for inclusion. The control group included 40 patients without any sign of infection who underwent total knee arthroplasty due to knee osteoarthritis. Preoperative blood tests of each patients were examined. In addition to CRP and sedimentation values, neutrophil-lymphocyte, monocyte-lymphocyte, platelet-lymphocyte, and platelet count-mean platelet volume were calculated and receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was made to determine the sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) values of these parameters. Results. The distribution of affected joint in septic arthritis group was as follow; 22 knees, 6 hips, 4 shoulders, 2 elbows, 1 wrist and 1 ankle. The cultures of joint aspiration yielded positive result in 19 patients while the cultures were negative in 17 patients. All of the analyzed parameters were significantly different between the groups (p<0.001). ROC curve analysis results are given in detail, in Table 1 and Figure 1. The AUC value was 97.3 when only CRP and sedimentation values were used but increased to 98.6 when neutrophile/ lymphocyte ratio was added and increased to 100 when all analyzed parameters were included. Conclusions. The analyzed parameters were found to increase the overall sensitivity and specificity when used together with acute phase reactants. However, when evaluated separately, CRP and sedimentation were still found as the most valuable parameters in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. In the diagnosis of septic arthritis, 35 mm/hr cut-off value for sedimentation and 10 mg/L cut-off value for CRP were found more sensitive and specific compared to standard laboratory cut-off values of 20 mm/hr and 5 mg/L. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims. This study aimed to assess the performance of an automated multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) technique for rapid diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis. Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients with suspected septic arthritis undergoing aseptic diagnostic joint aspiration were included. The aspirate was used for analysis by mPCR and conventional microbiological analysis. A joint was classed as septic according to modified Newman criteria. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the mPCR and the synovial fluid culture were compared using the z-test. A total of 72 out of 76 consecutive patients (33 women, 39 men; mean age 64 years (22 to 92)) with suspected septic arthritis were included in this study. Results. Of 72 patients, 42 (58%) were deemed to have septic joints. The sensitivity of mPCR and synovial fluid culture was 38% and 29%, respectively. No significant differences were found between the AUCs of both techniques (p = 0.138). A strong concordance of 89% (Cohen’s kappa: 0.65) was shown. The mPCR failed to detect Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 1; no primer included in the mPCR), whereas the synovial fluid culture missed six microorganisms (positive mPCR: S. aureus (n = 2), Cutibacterium acnes (n = 3), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 2)). Conclusion. The automated mPCR showed at least a similar performance to the synovial fluid culture (the current benchmark) in diagnosing septic arthritis, having the great advantage of a shorter turnaround time (within five hours). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:288–296

The crucial differentiation between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children can be difficult. In 1999, Kocher et al introduced four clinical predictors which were highly predictive (99.6%) of septic arthritis. These included fever (temperature ≥ 38.5°C), inability to bear weight, white blood-cell count > 12.0 × 10. 9. cells/L and ESR ≥ 40 mm/hr; CRP ≥ 20 mg/L was later added as a fifth predictor. We retrospectively evaluated these predictors to differentiate septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children over a four-year period in a primary referral general hospital. When all five were positive, the predicted probability of septic arthritis in this study was only 59.9%, with fever being the best predictor. When applied to low-prevalence diseases, even highly specific tests yield a high number of false positives and the predictive value is thereby diminished. Clinical predictors should be applied with caution when assessing a child with an irritable hip, and a high index of suspicion, and close observation of patients at risk should be maintained

The December 2022 Research Roundup. 360. looks at: Halicin is effective against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro; Synovial fluid and serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: useful in septic arthritis?; Transcutaneous oximetry and wound healing; Orthopaedic surgery causes gut microbiome dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction; Mortality in alcohol-related cirrhosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study; Self-reported resistance training is associated with better bone microarchitecture in vegan people

Background. Septic arthritis diagnostic is an emergency which implies a treatment with antibiotics and hospitalization. The diagnosis is based on the cytobacteriological examination of the synovial fluid (SF), but direct bacteriological examination is insensitive, and the result of the culture is obtained only after several days. Therefore, there is still a need for a rapid, simple and reliable method for the positive diagnosis of septic arthritis. Such method must allow avoiding both unrecognized septic arthritis leading to major functional consequences, and overdiagnosis that will induce unnecessary expensive hospitalization and unjustified treatment. Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy, that gives a metabolic profiling of biological fluids, has been proposed for early and fast diagnosis. Objectives. To confirm the MIR spectroscopy to discriminate SF samples from patients with septic arthritis from other causes of joint effusion. Methods. Synovial fluids from 402 patients referred for suspected arthropathies were prospectively collected in six hospitals and stored at °80°C. The infrared absorption spectrum was acquired for each of the frozen samples using a chalcogenide fiber biosensor. The most informative spectral variables were selected and then used to develop an algorithm. Then, the algorithm has been validated on independent synovial fluids collected straight after arthrocentesis from 86 patients. Results. The calibration (n=402) and validation (n=86) cohorts consists of synovial fluid samples from patients exhibiting various etiologies. These samples (n=488), by using SF bacteriological analysis and culture and 16S PCR analysis were classified as septic arthritis (n=43) or non-septic arthritis (n=443). On the calibration cohort, the performances of the algorithm show a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 90%, a NPV of 99% and a PPV of 41%, the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.95. On the validation cohort, the performances of the algorithm show a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 81%, a NPV of 98% and a PPV of 46%, the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.90. Conclusions. This study confirms the diagnostic performances of MIR spectroscopy for the discrimination between septic and non-septic synovial fluids. The high negative predictive value and the very short time (within ten minutes) required to obtain the result makes it possible to quickly rule out an infection diagnosis