The treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection
(PJI) of the ankle is not standardised. It is not clear whether
an algorithm developed for hip and knee PJI can be used in the management
of PJI of the ankle. We evaluated the outcome, at two or more years
post-operatively, in 34 patients with PJI of the ankle, identified
from a cohort of 511 patients who had undergone total ankle replacement.
Their median age was 62.1 years (53.3 to 68.2), and 20 patients
were women. Infection was exogenous in 28 (82.4%) and haematogenous
in six (17.6%); 19 (55.9%) were acute infections and 15 (44.1%)
chronic. Staphylococci were the cause of 24 infections (70.6%).
Surgery with retention of one or both components was undertaken
in 21 patients (61.8%), both components were replaced in ten (29.4%),
and arthrodesis was undertaken in three (8.8%). An infection-free
outcome with satisfactory function of the ankle was obtained in
23 patients (67.6%). The best rate of cure followed the exchange
of both components (9/10, 90%). In the 21 patients in whom one or
both components were retained, four had a relapse of the same infecting organism
and three had an infection with another organism. Hence the rate
of cure was 66.7% (14 of 21). In these 21 patients, we compared
the treatment given to an algorithm developed for the treatment
of PJI of the knee and hip. In 17 (80.9%) patients, treatment was
not according to the algorithm. Most (11 of 17) had only one criterion against
retention of one or both components. In all, ten of 11 patients
with severe soft-tissue compromise as a single criterion had a relapse-free
survival. We propose that the treatment concept for PJI of the ankle
requires adaptation of the grading of quality of the soft tissues. Cite this article
