Aims. The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement. Methods. This work used data freely available from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) facilities survey in 2021, which asked 21 questions about the care of patients with PPFFs, and nine relating to clinical decision-making around a hypothetical case. Results. Of 174 centres contributing data to the NHFD, 161 provided full responses and 139 submitted data on PPFF. Lack of resources was cited as the main reason for not submitting data. Surgeon (44.6%) and theatre (29.7%) availability were reported as the primary reasons for surgical delay beyond 36 hours. Less than half had a formal process for a specialist surgeon to operate on PPFF at least every other day. The median number of specialist surgeons at each centre was four (interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 6) for PPFF around both hips and knees. Around one-third of centres reported having one dedicated theatre list per week. The routine discussion of patients with PPFF at local and regional multidisciplinary team meetings was lower than that for all-cause revision arthroplasties. Six centres reported transferring all patients with PPFF around a hip joint to another centre for surgery, and this was an occasional practice for a further 34. The management of the hypothetical clinical scenario was varied, with 75 centres proposing ORIF, 35 suggested revision surgery and 48 proposed a combination of both revision and fixation. Conclusion. There is considerable variation in both the organization of PPFF services England and Wales, and in the approach taken to an individual case. The rising incidence of PPFF and complexity of these patients highlight the need for pathway development. The adoption of networks may reduce variability and improve outcomes for patients with PPFF. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(5):378–384

Aims. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are rising in incidence. Their management is complex and carries a high associated mortality. Unlike native hip fractures, there are no guidelines advising on time to theatre in this group. We aim to determine whether delaying surgical intervention influences morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures. Methods. We identified all periprosthetic fractures around a hip or knee arthroplasty from our prospectively collated database between 2012 and 2021. Patients were categorized into early or delayed intervention based on time from admission to surgery (early = ≤ 36 hours, delayed > 36 hours). Patient demographics, existing implants, Unified Classification System fracture subtype, acute medical issues on admission, preoperative haemoglobin, blood transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay were identified for all patients. Complication and mortality rates were compared between groups. Results. A total of 365 patients were identified: 140 in the early and 225 in the delayed intervention group. Mortality rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 19.2% at one year. There was some indication that those who had surgery within 36 hours had a higher mortality rate, but this did not reach statistical significance at 30 days (p = 0.078) or one year (p = 0.051). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, preoperative haemoglobin, acute medical issue on admission, and the presence of postoperative complications influenced 30-day and one-year mortality. Using a multivariate model, age and preoperative haemoglobin were independently predictive factors for one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.071; p < 0.001 and OR 0.980; p = 0.020). There was no association between timing of surgery and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were more likely with increasing age (OR 1.032; p = 0.001) and revision arthroplasty compared to internal fixation (OR 0.481; p = 0.001). Conclusion. While early intervention may be preferable to reduce prolonged immobilization, there is no evidence that delaying surgery beyond 36 hours increases mortality or complications in patients with a femoral periprosthetic fracture. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(6):452–456

Aims. This study describes and compares the operative management and outcomes in a consecutive case series of patients with dislocated hemiarthroplasties of the hip, and compares outcomes with those of patients not sustaining a dislocation. Patients and Methods. Of 3326 consecutive patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur, 46 (1.4%) sustained dislocations. Of the 46 dislocations, there were 37 female patients (80.4%) and nine male patients (19.6%) with a mean age of 83.8 years (66 to 100). Operative intervention for each, and subsequent dislocations, were recorded. The following outcome measures were recorded: dislocation; mortality up to one-year post-injury; additional surgery; residential status; mobility; and pain score at one year. Results. Of 43 dislocations, 30 (70%) occurred within one month and 42 (98%) occurred within three months of hip fracture surgery. Seven (16%) of these patients were treated with a single closed reduction and sustained no further dislocations. Four (9%) were treated with open reduction and experienced no further dislocations. Three (7%) hips were left dislocated and the remaining 32 (74%) patients required additional surgery of further closed reduction, revision, or excision arthroplasty. The one-year mortality rates for patients treated with two or fewer reductions (open or closed), successful revision arthroplasty, and excision arthroplasty were 3/14 (21%), 1/7 (14%), and 8/14 (57%) respectively. The only statistically significant difference in mortality was the difference between patients who did not sustain a dislocation and those who did and were treated by excision arthroplasty (p = 0.03). Patients treated by excision arthroplasty had the greatest reduction in mobility scores and highest pain scores. The excision arthroplasty group also included the greatest proportion of patients not able to mobilize and the smallest proportion of patients remaining in their own home. Conclusion. Most dislocations of hemiarthroplasties of the hip occur within one month of surgery. Closed reduction is generally unsuccessful. For those patients with unsuccessful closed reduction, revision arthroplasty should be considered when possible, as this results in a better functional outcome with a lower mortality than excision arthroplasty

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade.

Aims

The aim of this study was to report the three-year follow-up for a series of 400 patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip, who were randomized to be treated with either a cemented polished tapered hemiarthroplasty or an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty.

To investigate predictors of periprosthetic fracture level (around stem (Vancouver B) or distal to stem (Vancouver C/D) in cemented polished tapered femoral stems. Retrospective cohort study of 188 patients (mean age 79 (range 30–91); 99 (53%) male) with unilateral periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with CPT stems. Medical notes were reviewed and the following recorded: patient demographics, past medical history, drug history, date of prosthesis insertion, and date of injury. Radiographs analysis included Vancouver classification, cement restrictor type, cement mantle to implant tip distance, cortical thickness, femoral diameter and DORR classification. Univariate, multivariate and ROC curve analysis was performed. Fractures occurred at mean 7.5 years following primary procedure: 152 (83%) were B fractures; and 36 (19%) C/D. On univariate analysis female gender, lower BMI, osteoporosis, NSAID use, Bisphosphonate therapy, cortical thickness, distal cement mantle length and distal cement mantle length:femoral diameter ratio were significantly associated with C level fractures (p<0.05). Distal cement mantle lengths of >19.6mm (AUC 0.688, p<0.001) were associate with C level fractures. Multivariate analysis demonstrated female gender and distal cement mantle length:femoral diameter ratio to be independent predictors of C level periprosthetic fractures. Though female sex is the largest independent predictor of periprosthetic fractures distal to a CPT femoral stem, the relationship between cortical thickness and distal cement mantle length appears significant. As fractures distal to the stem are invariably managed by ORIF, whereas fractures around the stem frequently require revision arthroplasty, this has relevance at primary surgery in osteoporotic females to reduce the need for complex revisions

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the demographic details of patients who sustain a femoral periprosthetic fracture (PPF), the epidemiology of PPFs, PPF characteristics, and the predictors of PPF types in the UK population.

Aims

There is no consensus on the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hemiarthroplasty has been widely used in patients when non-surgical treatment is not possible. There is, despite extensive use, limited information about the long-term outcome. Our primary aim was to report ten-year patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. The secondary aims were to report the cumulative revision rate and risk factors for an inferior patient-reported outcome.

Vancouver B fractures around a cemented polished tapered stem (CTPS) are often treated with revision arthroplasty. Results of osteosynthesis in these fractures are poor as per current literature. However, the available literature does not distinguish between fractures around CTPS from those around other stems. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver B fractures around CTPS using a broad non-locking plate. Patients treated with osteosynthesis between January 1997 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. All underwent direct reduction and stabilisation using cerclage wires before definitive fixation with a broad DCP. Bicortical screw fixation was obtained in the proximal and distal fragments. We defined failure of treatment as revision for any cause. 101 patients (42 men and 59 women, mean age 79) were included. 70 had minimum follow-up of 6 months. 63 of these went on to clinical and radiological union. Three developed infected non-union. 7 had failure of fixation. Lack of anatomical reduction was the commonest predictor of failure followed by inadequate proximal fragment fixation and infection. 14 patients dropped at least 1 mobility grade from their preoperative status. This is the largest series of a very specific group of periprosthetic fractures treated with osteosynthesis. Patients who develop these fractures are often frail and “high risk” for major revision surgery. We recommend osteosynthesis for patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures around CTPS provided these fractures can be anatomically reduced and adequately fixed

The cement used for hemiarthroplasties by the authors and many other surgeons in the UK is Palacos® (containing 0.5g Gentamicin). Similar cement, Copal® (containing 1g Gentamicin and 1g Clindamycin) has been used in revision arthroplasties. We aim to investigate the effect on SSI rates of doubling the gentamicin dose and adding a second antibiotic (clindamycin) to the bone cement in hip hemiarthroplasty. We randomised 848 consecutive patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured NOF into two groups: Group I, 464 patients, received standard cement (Palacos®) and Group II, 384 patients, received high dose, double antibiotic-impregnated cement (Copal®). We calculated the SSI rate for each group at 30 days post-surgery. The patients, reviewers and statistician were blinded as to treatment group. The demographics and co-morbid conditions were statistically similar between the groups. The combined superficial and deep SSI rates were 5 % (20/394) and 1.7% (6/344) for groups I and II respectively (p=0.01). Group I had a deep infection rate 3.3 %(13/394) compared to 1.16% (4/344) in group II (p=0.082). Group I had a superficial infection rate 1.7 % (7/394) compared to 0.58% (2/344) in group II (p=0.1861). 33(4%) patients were lost to follow up, and 77 (9%) patients were deceased at the 30 day end point. Using high dose double antibiotic-impregnated cement rather than standard low dose antibiotic-impregnated cement significantly reduced the SSI rate (1.7% vs 5%; p=0.01) after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in this prospective randomised controlled trial

Background. A number of studies have reported on the early failure of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, less evidence is available regarding the outcome following revision of failed unicompartmental knee prostheses to total knee arthroplasty. The aims of this study were to determine the time to failure for the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and to assess the short-term outcome following revision surgery. Methods. Details of consecutive patients undergoing revision of an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty at our centre between January 2000 and December 2009 were collected prospectively. Data was collected on patient demographics, indication for revision surgery, and time to revision from the index procedure. Clinical and radiological outcome following revision arthroplasty was also assessed. Results. During the study period 22 (4.5%) of 494 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were revised to a total knee arthroplasty. Mean age at the time of revision surgery was 61.8 yr and 13 (59%) patients were male. Mean time to revision surgery from the primary procedure was 3.0 yr (range 0.6–6.2 yr). The commonest reasons for revision were aseptic loosening of the femoral (n=9) or tibial component (n=2), and undiagnosed (n=5) or patellofemoral pain (n=2). All patients were revised to a cemented total knee arthroplasty with most not requiring bone grafts. During follow-up (range 0.5–4.5 yr) no further surgery was performed in the 22 patients. In addition, there were no major postoperative complications and no evidence of radiological failure. Discussion. The present study demonstrates most failures of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty occur within three to four years following the index procedure and are due to aseptic component loosening. These findings are consistent with other published reports regarding the early failure of this particular prosthesis. The short-term outcome following revision surgery appears to be good, however longer follow-up periods are required to determine if these good results continue

Introduction. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty THA is a major short term complication not infrequently resulting in revision arthroplasty. Malposition of the acetabular component in THA results in a higher rate of dislocation as well as increased wear and osteolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of fixation on positioning of the acetabular component. Patients, materials and methods. For all THAs performed at our hospital in 2008, angle of acetabular inclination was measured using PACS by two independent observers. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r). We determined whether the number of acetabular components outside the target angle range (eg:45±5°) was significantly different between cemented and cementless THA (chi squared test). An enquiry was made to the National Joint Registry (NJR) in respect to incidence of revision for dislocation of THA using cemented and cementless acetabular components, 2004–2009. Results. During 2008 126 THA were performed, 80 cemented and 46 cementless. There was good reliability of angle measurement (interobserver: r=0.89; intraobserver: r=0.87 and 0.97). More cemented acetabular components were within target angle range compared to cementless (cemented 32/80, cementless 29/46; chi squared=6.39, p<0.05). Using data from NJR comparing the number of primary hip replacement operations with number of revisions due to dislocation found a higher rate for cementless THA, 0.381% (266/69,822) than for cemented, 0.282% (262/92,928) (Odds ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.14–1.60; P<0.05). Conclusion. Positioning of the acetabular component is more difficult when using cementless systems as implant position is determined by orientation of reaming whereas with cement there is potential for fine implant position adjustment on insertion. The choice of a cementless acetabular component significantly increases the incidence of dislocation post THA. Acetabular component malposition is likely to be a factor in this increased incidence

Introduction. There has been renewed interest in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with reports of good long term outcomes. Advantages over a more extensive knee replacement include: preservation of bone stock, retention of both cruciate ligaments, preservation of other compartments and better knee kinematics. However, a number of authors have commented on the problem of osseous defects requiring technically difficult revision surgery. Furthermore, a number of recent national register studies have shown inferior survivorship when compared to total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to review the cases of our patients who had a revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. To determine the reason for failure, describe the technical difficulties during revision surgery and record the clinical outcomes of the revision arthroplasties. Methods. Between 2003 and 2009 our institute performed thirty three revisions of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on thirty two patients. The time to revision surgery ranged from 2 months to 159 months with a median of 19 months. Details of the operations and complications were taken form case notes. Patient assessment included range of motion, need for walking aids and the functional status of the affected knee in the form of the Oxford knee score questionnaire. Results. The reasons for failure were aseptic loosening of tibial component, persistent pain, dislocated meniscus, mal-alignment and osteoarthritis in another compartment. Of the 33 revision knee arthroplasties 18 required additional intra-operative constructs. 11 knees required a long tibial stem while 1 required a long femoral stem. 10 knees required medial wedge augmentation and bone graft was used in 6. Mean 1 year Oxford knee scores for failed unicompartmental knee replacements was 29 compared to 39 for primary total knee replacements performed at the same institute. Of the revision knee replacements 2 required further revision due to infection and loosening. Conclusion. From the evidence of our group of failed unicompartmental knee replacements, revision surgery is technically difficult and often requires intra-operative constructs. Clinical outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty following failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is not comparable to primary total knee arthroplasty

Introduction. Revision type arthroplasties for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis is an effective and secure procedure. It has different indications, but the most relevant is the revision of a failured primary arthroplasty. In our study, we reviewed the results of another indication, the implantation of a revision type arthroplasty as a primary procedure in cases of severe deformities. Objectives. To assess the radiological, clinical and functional situation and the quality of life of those patients in whom a revision knee arthroplasty had been implanted in the past years. Materials and Methods. We did a retrospective study of 108 knee arthroplasties (80% women) implanted between 1999 and 2005 with a mean follow up of 7.8 years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 75 years old (60–87). The most frequent indication for a revision type arthroplasty was an important valgum deformity osteoarthritis. We assess the functional and clinical situation using the Knee Society Score, both clinical and functional; the radiological situation using the Knee Society Roentgenographic evaluation and the quality of life using the Short Form 12 (SF12). We have analyzed the survivorship rate of our arthroplasties as well. Results. We could contact 75 patients. 20 had died in the past years without any new surgeries in the knee; we could not contact 13 patients due to lost of follow up. The survivalship rate of the arthroplasties is 91% at the time of follow up. In the cases of severe valgum or varum malalignment, a phisiological valgum angle (5.47°) was achieved in all of the patients. 77.4% of the patients declared themselves as satisfied or very satisfied in the last follow up. The results of the KSS-Clinical were excellent or good in 87.1% of the patients while in the KSS- Functional was 77.5%. The mean SF12 score was 20.68 out of 60 points. Conclusions. The clinical and functional results are overall good or very good, as well as the quality of life, in those patients in which a revision arthroplasty had been implanted instead of a conventional primary arthroplasty, when it was correctly indicated. So a revision type arthroplasty should be considered for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in cases of severe bone deformities or severe malalignment

Aim. Our goals were to minimize the invasiveness of the revision hip arthroplasty approach in order to accelerate the patient's rehabilitation, shorten the length of hospitalization and reduce the postoperative complications, especially the rate of joint dislocation. Our study aimed to prove whether and under which conditions the less invasive approach is preferable in revision arthroplasty. Material and Methods. The modified revision technique differs from the conventional approach in the following main aspects:. Oncologic: applying larger hip balls and inserts, after expanding the variety of the available articulating joint components in 4 mm steps (28–40 mm),. sparing and reconstructing the joint capsule, whereby the integrity of its acetabular origin is crucial. That procedure was combined with tissue dissection strictly parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers. The transgluteal approach after Bauer was applied. The small skin incision was closed by running subcuticular technique. The inpatient postoperative phase after revision total hip arthroplasty was evaluated in the last 6.5 years. All patients completed a questionnaire. Results. Less invasive revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 55 cases in a period of 6.5 years. No intraoperative method-specific complication was observed. Only one dislocation and one early infection, which needed surgical intervention, were recorded. The mean postoperative length of stay was 9.5 days after less invasive revision hip arthroplasty compared to an average of 20.5 days for all revisions. The duration of inpatient treatment was thus halved. This technique was mostly applied in the isolated stem exchange, followed by exchange of bearing components and complete joint exchange. The isolated socket exchange with stable stem is, however, difficult to be realized in the less invasive technique. Conclusion. The less invasive revision hip arthroplasty is associated with a low complication rate. It can be applied in about 30–50% of revision cases. Reconstructing the integrity of the capsule represents the most important modification of the operation's technique. The postoperative joint stability is on the midterm increased and the reconstruction of leg length is indirectly facilitated compared to resecting the joint capsule. Applying larger ball-insert pairs depending on the outer diameter of the socket allows a long-term increase in the joint stability and thus a reduction in the dislocation risk. Owing to its low complication rate and significant reduction of the length of stay, the less invasive revision hip arthroplasty approach is medically and economically recommended

Aim. to compare the medium term clinical and functional results of total hip arthroplasty after intertrochanteric osteotomy and primary total hip replacement. Material and methods. We compared 2 groups of patients: Group I-93 patients with total hip arthroplasty after intertrochanteric osteotomy and Group II-93 patients with primary total hip arthroplasty. The patients in the control group (Group II) were randomly chosen from the cases operated by the same surgical team using the same kind of implant like those in Group I. The osteotomies were of different types: medial displacement (27), varisation(19), valgisation (18), flexion(25), rotational (4). The demographic parameters were similar in the 2 groups. Technical intraoperative challenges were noted. The Harris Score was determined at 12 months and 3 years after surgery. Clinical and radiological check-ups were performed each year. The duration of each surgical procedure was recorded. Complications were noted during the entire follow-up. The mean follow-up was 77 months. Results. The average time interval between osteotomy and total hip replacement was 76 months. The average Harris Score (HHS) at 1 year after surgery was 88 in Group I and 93 in Group II. At 3 years, the average values of HHS were 85 in the first group and 92 in the second. After an average follow-up of 6 years, 6 patients in group I (6,45%) required revision arthroplasty, while in the second group this procedure was not necessary. The indication of revision was loosening of the femoral component in 4 cases and of both components in 2 cases. The duration of a total hip arthroplasty after an ostheotomy was almost two times longer than a primary total hip replacement. In most cases, the surgical procedure implicated removal of a blade plate or others fixation devices, reaming of the femur, osteotomies of the greater trochanter, reverse osteotomies of the intertrochanteric region and the use of special design (thin or curved) femoral stems. In group I, intraoperative complications included fractures of the femoral diaphysis, fractures of the greater trochanter, false passage for the femoral component and malposition of the femoral stem. Postoperative complications consist in dislocations, early loosening, heterotopical ossifications, wound sepsis, etc. Conclusions. Total hip arthroplasties after intertrochanteric osteotomies have clinical results a little bit inferior of those of primary total hip replacements, but the difference is not significative. The survival rate of prosthesis implanted after intertrochanteric osteotomies at 6 years is significantly inferior. Both the intraoperative and postoperative complications rates are far superior of those of the primary arthroplasties

Introduction. Total femur implantation is a rare and challenging procedure in final revision surgery of hip and knee arthroplasties. Reports of this operation technique are even rare in literature. In this study we retrospectively analyse our patients with total femur implants. Material and Methods. Between October 2002 and February 2009 we implanted 27 total femurs in hip and knee revision surgery cases. We used the modular prosthesis system–Megasystem C® by Waldemar Link–in all cases. Our 22 female and 5 male patients had a mean age of 76 years (range 45–88). Indications for the procedure were loosening of megaprosthesis of the hip in 12 cases; 2 with massive distal migration, 1 with penetration into the knee joint and 1 after two step revision procedure. In 13 cases a periprosthetic indicated a total femur implanatation due to massive bone loss; 1 breakage of a long femoral stem, 5 fracture of osteosynthesis materials, 3 after prosthesis revisions and 1 pseudoarhrosis of femur and tibia after knee arthroplasty. We analysed perioperative complications, clinical status and result and further revision within follow up time. Results. We were able to examine 16 patients at follow up time. Eight patients were lost to follow up and 2 have been died; 1 after fulminant pulmonal embolia after operation and 1 four years postoperatively. One total femur had to be exchanged due to infection after 1 year. Perioperative complications occurred as follows: 1 massive blood transfusion, 1 peroneal palsy, 1 ulcus ventriculis bleeding, 1 thrombosis of vena suclavia and vena jugularis, 1 sigmaresection due to diverticulosis, 1 luxations of the hip, and 2 wound necrosis. In 3 caese a revision operation swas performed; 1multiple luxtion of the hip and due to infection of the total femur implant. The range of motion of the hip was 85 degrees (range 30–90) and knee 92 degrees (range 30–110). In nearly all cases we found a lengthening of the revised limb. The general outcome of the patients was. Ten patient were very satisfied, 2 statisfied and 2 fair due to pain persistence. Two patient were mobile with one crutch, 3 used two crutches and one was able to walk with a rollator. One patient was unable to walk due to diplegia after spine fracture. Conclusion. Total femur procedure in final revision arthroplasty has a high potential of perioperative risks but has shown good clinical and mobility results in our patient group. With the Megasystem C® by Link we had a save and good performance while operation of this difficult patient group

Aims. Currently, the most common approach for the management of a chronic PJI is a Two-Stage Replacement; because of success rates exceeding 90% when using an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. Reliable information regarding the etiologic microorganism and its sensitivities is essential to select the antimicrobial therapy that should be used locally in the bone cement spacer during the first stage surgery as well as to select the appropriate microbiological systemic agent. Diagnostic algorithms focus to the importance of joint aspiration cultures although in the modern literature, preoperative joint aspiration has a broad range of values of sensitivity and the proportion of “dry-aspirations” is not well assessed. This low sensitivity of aspiration fluid samples in chronic-PJI is partly attributable to the fact that the majority of the microorganisms in these infections grow in biofilms attached to the implant. We have developed this biopsy technique in an effort to improve the identification rates of the causative organism. Materials and methods. A sample is harvested through a 4 mm bone trephine and the target is the bone-prosthesis gap. We have compared the results of preoperative PIB with the results of cultures from intra-operative tissue collected during the first stage surgery. In both cases a prolonged culture protocol (10 days) in enrichment media was used. On the basis of this relation, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were calculated. Results. Twenty-four PIB were done on the 24 patients (10 hips and 14 knees) who subsequently underwent two-stage revision surgery because of high suspicion of PJI between January 2007 and December 2009. A retrospective analysis was performed in these 24 patients (13 women and 11 men) in the mean age of 70 years (from 63 to 88 years old). Nineteen of the cases were primary and 5 were revision arthroplasty. Nineteen patients (79%) were positive for infection from operative tissue cultures. The sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.54–0.93); the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0,30–0.99), the positive predictive value was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.67–0.99), the negative predictive value was 0.50 (95% CI, 17.5–82.5) and the accuracy was 0.79. Conclusion. PIB is a useful test to, preoperatively, isolate the infecting bacteria. The values of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are on the average of the currently published with joint aspiration or biopsy samples cultures. Although comparative study is necessary we believe that the PIB could be useful in cases with high suspicion of PJI and negative joint aspiration cultures and in cases where no fluid is aspired from the joint, in order to preoperatively isolate the infecting bacteria

Aims

Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment.

Aims

Debate continues about whether it is better to use a cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty to treat a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The aim of this study was to attempt to resolve this issue for contemporary prostheses.