The clinical success of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be limited by
Introduction and Objective. Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, TLIF) represent the most popular techniques in performing an interbody fusion amongst spine surgeons. Pseudarthrosis, cage migration, subsidence or infection can occur, with subsequent failed surgery, persistent pain and patient’ bad quality of life. The goal of revision fusion surgery is to correct any previous technical errors avoiding surgical complications. The most safe and effective way is to choose a naive approach to the disc. Therefore, the anterior approach represents a suitable technique as a salvage operation. The aim of this study is to underline the technical advantages of the anterior retroperitoneal approach as a salvage procedure in failed PLIF/TLIF analyzing a series of 32 consecutive patients. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients’ data in patients who underwent ALIF as a salvage procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF between April 2014 to December 2019. We recorded all peri-operative data. In all patients the index level was exposed with a minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach. Results. Thirty-two patients (average age: 46.4 years, median age 46.5, ranging from 21 to 74 years hold- 16 male and 16 female) underwent salvage ALIF procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF were included in the study. A minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine was performed in all patients. In 6 cases (18.7%) (2 infection and 4
The influence of rigid fixation and permanent compression on the results, the timing of fusion and rehabilitation after fractures of the femoral neck was investigated. A hip fracture is 60–80% of all fractures of the proximal femur. Despite recent advances in the treatment of this disease, the percentage of unsatisfactory outcomes as high as 25–35%. The choice of surgical treatment in femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains as controversial as it was almost 50 years ago when Speed called him as “the unsolved fracture. Hip replacement is currently the gold standard in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. But compared with the osteosynthesis operation takes more time, is accompanied by massive blood loss, sometimes the need for transfusion and a higher risk of deep wound infection. Given these facts the best is an indoor low-traumatic method of osteosynthesis locking. Compare of the results of femoral neck fractures using of osteosynthesis 3 blade nail, spongious screws and nail for permanent compression. A retrospective analysis of treatment of 252 patients from 1982 to 2015 with subcapitale and transcervical fractures of the femoral neck on the basis “RCTO named by H.J. Makazhanova”. In the research locales patients older than 40 years. All patients were divided according to the applied method of treatment: 1 group of 95 patients operated using a 3-blade-nail, in the 2nd group of 105 patients operated on spongious screws, in the 3 group of 52 patients operated nail for the permanent compression, authoring. All patients underwent x-ray examination before and after surgery. The average period from time of injury before performing the osteosynthesis amounted to 4–7 days. The follow-up period was 6–12 months. The results obtained clinically and radiographically divided into good, satisfactory, poor. Good and satisfactory results were regarded as positive, and poor results as negative. The average age of patients was 67.5 years. Among these female patients − 174 (69%), the male − 78 (31%). Traumatization more prone to elderly accounting for 206 (81.7%) cases, and only 46 (18.3%) in the middle age group. Analysis of the results of treatment showed positive results in 1 group − 69.5 %, in group 2 − 83.8 %, in group 3 − 96.2 %. In the first group of 29 (31.5 %) and in the second group of 17 (16.2 %) patients have postoperative complications: secondary displacement, nail migration,
Summary. Human amniotic membrane has interesting properties for regenerative medicine. To use it as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product in bone surgery, we are evaluating: the necessity of its osteodifferentiation and the impact on immunogenicity; its optimal condition for storage. Introduction. The human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) is known to have a good potential to help the regeneration of tissues. It has been used for 100 years in many medical disciplines because of its properties: a flexible scaffold containing stem cells and growth factors, with low immunogenicity and anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and analgesic properties. Previous published data showed the possibility of in vitro osteodifferentiation of the whole tissue. We aim to use this «boosted membrane» as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product for bone repair to treat large defects or
Summary. Properties of human amniotic membrane are particularly interesting. To use it as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product in bone surgery, we are evaluating its association with a potentially osteoinductive scaffold. Introduction. The human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) is known to have a good potential to help the regeneration of tissues. It has been used for 100 years in many medical disciplines because of its properties: a membrane containing stem cells and growth factors, with low immunogenicity and anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and analgesic properties. Moreover, previous published data showed the possibility of in vitro osteodifferenciation of the whole tissue. We aim to use hAM as an Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Product for bone repair to treat large defects or
This review is aimed at clinicians appraising
preclinical trauma studies and researchers investigating compromised bone
healing or novel treatments for fractures. It categorises the clinical
scenarios of poor healing of fractures and attempts to match them
with the appropriate animal models in the literature. We performed an extensive literature search of animal models
of long bone fracture repair/nonunion and grouped the resulting
studies according to the clinical scenario they were attempting
to reflect; we then scrutinised them for their reliability and accuracy
in reproducing that clinical scenario. Models for normal fracture repair (primary and secondary), delayed
union, nonunion (atrophic and hypertrophic), segmental defects and
fractures at risk of impaired healing were identified. Their accuracy
in reflecting the clinical scenario ranged greatly and the reliability
of reproducing the scenario ranged from 100% to 40%. It is vital to know the limitations and success of each model
when considering its application.
The aim of our study was to investigate whether placing of the femoral component of a hip resurfacing in valgus protected against spontaneous fracture of the femoral neck. We performed a hip resurfacing in 20 pairs of embalmed femora. The femoral component was implanted at the natural neck-shaft angle in the left femur and with a 10° valgus angle on the right. The bone mineral density of each femur was measured and CT was performed. Each femur was evaluated in a materials testing machine using increasing cyclical loads. In specimens with good bone quality, the 10° valgus placement of the femoral component had a protective effect against fractures of the femoral neck. An adverse effect was detected in osteoporotic specimens. When resurfacing the hip a valgus position of the femoral component should be achieved in order to prevent fracture of the femoral neck. Patient selection remains absolutely imperative. In borderline cases, measurement of bone mineral density may be indicated.
The ability to predict load-bearing capacity during the consolidation phase in distraction osteogenesis by non-invasive means would represent a significant advance in the management of patients undergoing such treatment. Measurements of stiffness have been suggested as a promising tool for this purpose. Although the multidimensional characteristics of bone loading in compression, bending and torsion are apparent, most previous experiments have analysed only the relationship between maximum load-bearing capacity and a single type of stiffness. We have studied how compressive, bending and torsional stiffness are related to the torsional load-bearing capacity of healing callus using a common set of samples of bone regenerate from 26 sheep treated by tibial distraction osteogenesis. Our findings showed that measurements of torsional, bending and compressive stiffness were all suitable as predictors of the load-bearing capacity of healing callus. Measurements of torsional stiffness performed slightly better than those of compressive and bending stiffness.