The primary aim was to assess patient-reported outcomes following a humeral diaphyseal fracture. The secondary aim was to compare the outcomes of patients who achieved union after initial management (operative or non-operative) with those that achieved union after nonunion surgery. From 2008–2017, 291 patients (mean age 55yrs [17–86], 58% [n=168/291] female) were retrospectively identified and available to complete a survey. Sixty-four (22%) were managed with primary surgery and 227 (78%) non-operatively. Outcomes (QuickDASH, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, SF-12) were obtained at a mean of 5.5yrs (1.2–11.0). After initial management, 229 patients (79%) united (n=62 operative, n=167 non-operative) and 62 (21%) developed a nonunion (n=2 operative, n=60 non-operative; p<0.001). Fifty-two of 56 patients (93%) achieved union after nonunion surgery. The overall mean QuickDASH was 20.8, EQ-5D 0.730, EQ-VAS 74, SF-12 PCS 44.8 and MCS 50.2. Patients who united after nonunion surgery reported a worse functional outcome (mean QuickDASH 27.9 vs. 17.6, p=0.003) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; mean EQ-5D 0.639 vs. 0.766, p=0.008; EQ-VAS 66 vs. 76, p=0.036; SF-12 PCS 41.8 vs. 46.1, p=0.036) than those who united primarily. When adjusting for confounders, union after nonunion surgery was independently associated with poorer function (difference in QuickDASH 8.1, p=0.019) and HRQoL (difference in EQ-5D -0.102, p=0.028). Humeral diaphyseal union after nonunion surgery was associated with poorer function and HRQoL compared to patients who united primarily. Targeting early operative intervention to patients at risk of nonunion may have an important role, given the potential impact of nonunion on longer-term outcome

Aims

Plate and screw fixation has been the standard treatment for painful conditions of the wrist in non-rheumatoid patients in recent decades. We investigated the complications, re-operations, and final outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent wrist arthrodesis for non-inflammatory arthritis.

We present an economic evaluation using data from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced fractures of the distal radius.

The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in 18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work and the need for additional private care.

There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires. At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to 865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first 12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires. These were greater than £30 000.

Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1082–9.