Introduction. To evaluate career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL + medial collateral ligament (MCL) and ACL +posterolateral corner (PLC) surgeries in all elite athletes. Secondly, in a subgroup of male professional footballers to determine career length and competition level after ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC reconstructions and compare this to a cohort who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) alone. Methods. A consecutive cohort of elite athletes undergoing combined ACL+MCL surgery and combined ACL+PLC surgery between February 2001 and October 2019 were analysed. A subgroup of male footballers from this population was compared to a previously identified cohort of male, professional footballers having had primary ACL reconstruction without other ligament surgery. A minimum 2-years follow-up was required. Outcome measures were career length and competition level. Results. Ninety-eight elite athletes were included, 50 had ACL+PLC and 48 had ACL+MCL surgeries. The timeline for return to play (RTP)was significantly longer for ACL+PLC injuries (12.8 months) as compared to ACL+MCL injuries (11.1 months, p=.019). On average, career length after surgery of an athlete in the ACL+PLC group was 4.8 years and for the ACL+MCL group 4.2 years (n.s.). In the subgroup analysis of footballers, a significantly lower number of players with combined ACL+PLC surgery were able to RTP (88%, p=.003) compared to 100%for ACL+MCL surgery and 97% for isolated ACL reconstruction, as well as requiring almost 3 months longer RTP timeline (12.9±4.2 months= .002) when compared to isolated ACL (10.2 ± 3.9 months) and combined ACL+MCL groups (10.0+2.4 months). However, career length and competition level were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion. The addition of MCL surgery to ACL-R did not affect RTP time and rate in elite athletes, nor competition level in male professional footballers compared to ACL-R alone. Moreover, the career length after successful RTP following combined ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC surgeries were the same. However, professional footballers with combined ACL+PLC surgery return at a lower rate and require a longer RTP time when compared to the ones with isolated ACL-R or combined ACL+MCL surgery. For the factors assessed in this study additional MCL surgery to ACL-R alone did not alter outcome from that with ACL-R in professional soccer players

Introduction. Multiple ACL revisions represent an extremely demanding surgery, due to the presence of enlarged or malpositioned tunnels, hardware, injuries to the secondary stabilizers and difficulties in retrieving autologous tendons. An anatomical ACL reconstruction is not always possible. We analyzed the results in a series of patients operated with over the top reconstruction (OTTR) and lateral extra-articular plasty to the Gerdy's tubercle (LP) using Achilles (AT) or tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) allografts. Methods. From 2002 to 2008, twenty-four male athletes with a mean age of 30.8 years were operated. 20 of the patients had two, while four patients had three previous reconstructions. IKDC score and KT evaluation were used at a mean 3.3 years follow-up (2–7 years). Results. The mean IKDC subjective score at follow-up was 81.3. The IKDC objective score rated A or B in 84% of the patients. Of the 20 good results, 17 patients resumed sport activity at the pre-injury level. KT side-to-side difference averaged 3.5 mm in the TPT, versus 3.2 mm in the AT group. No significant differences were noted between the AT and TPT group. Conclusions. Multiple ACL revision surgery is a salvage procedure, with average good results, but not equivalent to primary ACL reconstruction. Patients should be advised that a return to sports may not be feasible. OTTR+LP is an established technique that permits to overcome difficult anatomical situations, with cortical fixation providing good immediate stability and avoiding tunnel fixation and bone grafting. Long tendon grafts as AT and TPT are needed

AIM. Failure of a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is associated with poor functional outcomes even after revision surgery. The aim of this study is to identify early predictors for failure, so that it may aid in recognition of at-risk patients. METHOD. An observational study was conducted of 623 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon over a 72 month period. Patient and procedure related parameters including age, gender, BMI, time to surgery, graft size, fixation methods, meniscal and chondral injuries, meniscal surgery, radiological parameters and post-operative IKDC scores. Logistic regression modeling was employed to identify those factors which were statistically significant for failure. RESULTS. We identified 14 patients who experienced failure of their ACL graft. The causes for failure included trauma (9), infection (2), arthrofibrosis (1), biological (1) and recurrent instability (1). Univariate analysis established a significant relationship between age at time of injury (p<0.001), BMI (p=0.001), time to index procedure (p<0.001), screw length (p=0.04) and early post-operative IKDC score (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated all factors stated except screw length to be important for predicting failure for ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS. The rate of graft failure is lower than has been those quoted in the literature. We have identified those patients who are at high risk of rupturing a reconstructed primary ACL graft. Careful monitoring and functional modification of high-risk patients may be indicated to prevent failure. This study identifies predictive factors of failed ACL reconstruction. Age at time of injury, BMI, time to surgery, post-operative IKDC scores were found to be associated with failure