Aims. United Classification System (UCS) B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) have been commonly managed with modular tapered stems. No study has evaluated the use of monoblock fluted tapered titanium stems for this indication. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a monoblock stems on implant survivorship, postoperative outcomes, radiological outcomes, and osseointegration following treatment of THA UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures. Methods. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent revision THA (rTHA) for periprosthetic UCS B2 and B3 periprosthetic fracture who received a single design monoblock fluted tapered titanium stem at two large, tertiary care, academic hospitals. A total of 72 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (68 UCS B2, and four UCS B3 fractures). Primary outcomes of interest were radiological stem subsidence (> 5 mm), radiological osseointegration, and fracture union. Sub-analysis was also done for 46 patients with minimum one-year follow-up. Results. For the total cohort, stem osseointegration, fracture union, and stem subsidence were 98.6%, 98.6%, and 6.9%, respectively, at latest follow-up (mean follow-up 27.0 months (SD 22.4)). For patients with minimum one-year of follow-up, stem osseointegration, fracture union, and stem subsidence were 97.8%, 97.8%, and 6.5%, respectively. Conclusion. Monoblock fluted stems can be an acceptable modality for the management of UCS B2 periprosthetic fractures in rTHAs due to high rates of stem osseointegration and survival, and the low rates of stem subsidence, and revision. Further research on the use of this stem for UCS B3 periprosthetic fractures is warranted to determine if the same conclusion can be made for this fracture pattern. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):551–558

Aims. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are rising in incidence. Their management is complex and carries a high associated mortality. Unlike native hip fractures, there are no guidelines advising on time to theatre in this group. We aim to determine whether delaying surgical intervention influences morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures. Methods. We identified all periprosthetic fractures around a hip or knee arthroplasty from our prospectively collated database between 2012 and 2021. Patients were categorized into early or delayed intervention based on time from admission to surgery (early = ≤ 36 hours, delayed > 36 hours). Patient demographics, existing implants, Unified Classification System fracture subtype, acute medical issues on admission, preoperative haemoglobin, blood transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay were identified for all patients. Complication and mortality rates were compared between groups. Results. A total of 365 patients were identified: 140 in the early and 225 in the delayed intervention group. Mortality rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 19.2% at one year. There was some indication that those who had surgery within 36 hours had a higher mortality rate, but this did not reach statistical significance at 30 days (p = 0.078) or one year (p = 0.051). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, preoperative haemoglobin, acute medical issue on admission, and the presence of postoperative complications influenced 30-day and one-year mortality. Using a multivariate model, age and preoperative haemoglobin were independently predictive factors for one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.071; p < 0.001 and OR 0.980; p = 0.020). There was no association between timing of surgery and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were more likely with increasing age (OR 1.032; p = 0.001) and revision arthroplasty compared to internal fixation (OR 0.481; p = 0.001). Conclusion. While early intervention may be preferable to reduce prolonged immobilization, there is no evidence that delaying surgery beyond 36 hours increases mortality or complications in patients with a femoral periprosthetic fracture. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(6):452–456

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and to assess the uniformity of the classifications used for these fractures (including those around elbow and/or shoulder arthroplasties) by performing a systematic review of the literature. Methods. A systematic search was conducted using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Healthcare Databases Advance Search. For inclusion, studies had to report clinical outcomes following the management of periprosthetic fractures of the humerus. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database. Results. Overall, 40 studies were included, involving a total of 210 patients. The fractures were reported using very heterogeneous classification systems, as were the functional outcome scores. A total of 60 patients had nonoperative treatment with a 50% rate of nonunion. Fixation was undertaken in 99 patients; successful union was obtained in 93 (93%). Revision of either the humeral stem or the whole arthroplasty was reported in 79 patients with a high rate of union (n = 66; 84%), and a mean rate of complications of 29% (0% to 41%). Conclusion. This study highlighted a lack of uniformity in classifying these fractures and reporting the outcome of their treatment. The results may help to inform decision-making with patients, particularly about the rate of complications of nonoperative treatment. There is a need to improve the reporting of the pattern of these fractures using a uniform classification system, and the harmonization of the collection of data relating to the outcome of treatment. Based on this review, we propose a minimum dataset to be used in future studies. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):416–423

Aims. Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality. Methods. Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and treatment on mortality. Results. Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease, fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to 34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p = 0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated nonoperatively or with fixation. Conclusion. The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(2):158–165

Aims. Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade. Methods. Using a multicentre collaborative study design, independent of registry data, we identified adults from 29 centres with PPFs around the hip between January 2010 and December 2019. Radiographs were assessed for the Unified Classification System (UCS) grade. Patient and injury characteristics, management, and outcomes were compared between UCS grades. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to estimate relative risk ratios (RRR) of variables on UCS grade

The Unified Classification System (UCS), or Vancouver system, is a validated and widely used classification system to guide the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. It suggests that well-fixed stems (type B1) can be treated with fixation but that loose stems (types B2 and B3) should be revised. Determining whether a stem is loose can be difficult and some authors have questioned how to apply this classification system to polished taper slip stems which are, by definition, loose within their cement mantle. Recent evidence has challenged the common perception that revision surgery is preferable to fixation surgery for UCS-B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished taper slip stems. Indications for fixation include an anatomically reducible fracture and cement mantle, a well-fixed femoral bone-cement interface, and a well-functioning acetabular component. However, not all type B fractures can or should be managed with fixation due to the risk of early failure. This annotation details specific fracture patterns that should not be managed with fixation alone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(5):481–486

Aims

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Uncemented femoral components are widely preferred in primary THA, but are associated with higher PPF risk than cemented components. Collared components have reduced PPF rates following uncemented primary THA compared to collarless components, while maintaining similar prosthetic designs. The purpose of this study was to analyze PPF rate between collarless and collared component designs in a consecutive cohort of posterior approach THAs performed by two high-volume surgeons.

Abstract. Objective. To compare the periprosthetic fracture mechanics between a collared and collarless fully coated cementless femoral stem in a composite femur. Methods. Two groups of six composite femurs (‘Osteoporotic femur’, SawBones, WA USA) were implanted with either a collared (collared group) or collarless (collarless group) cementless femoral stem which was otherwise identical by a single experienced surgeon. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. High speed video recording was used to identify fracture mechanism. Fracture torque and angular displacement were measured and rotational work and system stiffness were estimated for each trial. Results were compared between collared and collarless group and the comparison was evaluated against previously published work using fresh frozen femurs and the same protocol. Results. In composite femur testing median fracture torque (IQR) was greater with a collared versus collarless implant (48.41 [42.60 to 50.27] Nm versus 45.12 [39.13 to 48.09] Nm, p= 0.4). Median rotational displacement (IQR) was less with a collared versus collarless implant (0.29 [0.27 to 0.31] radians versus 0.33 [0.32 to 0.34] radians, p= 0.07). Estimated rotary work was similar between groups (5.76 [4.92 to 6.64] J versus 5.21 [4.25 to 6.04] J, p= 0.4). Torsional stiffness was greater with a collared versus collarless implant (158.36 [152.61, 163.54] Nm per radian versus 138.79 [122.53, 140.59] Nm per radian, p= 0.5). Collarless stems were seen to move independently of the femur and fracture patterns originated at the calcar. Conclusions. Testing with composite femurs using an established protocol produced similar results to previously published studies using human femurs, but the difference between collared and collarless stems was smaller. The internal homogenous foam material in composite femurs does not accurately represent the heterogeneous cancellous bone which supports a femoral stem in vivo and may lead to overestimation of implant stability. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the demographic details of patients who sustain a femoral periprosthetic fracture (PPF), the epidemiology of PPFs, PPF characteristics, and the predictors of PPF types in the UK population. Methods. This is a multicentre retrospective cohort study including adult patients presenting to hospital with a new PPF between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Data collected included: patient characteristics, comorbidities, anticoagulant use, social circumstances, level of mobility, fracture characteristics, Unified Classification System (UCS) type, and details of the original implant. Descriptive analysis by fracture location was performed, and predictors of PPF type were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results. In total, 720 femoral PPFs from 27 NHS sites were included. PPF patients were typically elderly (mean 79.9 years (SD 10.6)), female (n = 455; 63.2%), had at least one comorbidity (n = 670; 93.1%), and were reliant on walking aids or bed-/chair-bound prior to admission (n = 419; 61.7%). The study population included 539 (74.9%) hip PPFs, 151 (21.0%) knee PPFs, and 30 (4.2%) dividing type PPFs. For hip (n = 407; 75.5%) and knee (n = 88; 58.3%) arthroplasty UCS B type fractures were most common. Overall, 556 (86.2%) were treated in the presenting hospital and 89 (13.8%) required transfer for treatment. Female sex was the only significant predictor of fracture type (A/B1/C type versus B2/B3) for femoral hip PPFs (odds ratio 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 0.91); p = 0.014). Sex, residence type, primary versus revision implant PPF, implant fixation, and time between arthroplasty and PPF were not found to predict fracture type for hip PPFs. Conclusion. This multicentre analysis describes patient and injury factors for patients presenting with femoral PPFs to centres across the UK. These patients are generally elderly and frail, comparable to those sustaining a hip fracture. These data can be useful in planning future services and clinical trials. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):987–996

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the management and associated outcomes of patients sustaining a femoral hip periprosthetic fracture (PPF) in the UK population. Methods. This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including adult patients who presented to 27 NHS hospitals with 539 new PPFs between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Data collected included: management strategy (operative and nonoperative), length of stay, discharge destination, and details of post-treatment outcomes (reoperation, readmission, and 30-day and 12-month mortality). Descriptive analysis by fracture type was performed, and predictors of PPF management and outcomes were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Results. In all, 417 fractures (77%) were managed operatively and 122 (23%) conservatively. The median time to surgery was four days (interquartile range (IQR) 2 to 7). Of those undergoing surgery, 246 (59%) underwent revision and/or fixation and 169 (41%) fixation alone. The surgical strategy used differed by Unified Classification System for PPF type, with the highest rate of revision in B2/B3 fractures (both 77%, 176/228 and 24/31, respectively) and the highest rate of fixation alone in B1- (55/78; 71%) and C-type (49/65; 75%) fractures. Cemented stem fixation (odds ratio (OR) 2.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 4.99); p = 0.002) and B2/B3 fracture type (OR 7.56 (95% CI 4.14 to 13.78); p < 0.001) were predictors of operative management. The median length of stay was 15 days (IQR 9 to 23), 12-month reoperation rate was 5.6% (n = 30), and 30-day readmission rate was 8.4% (n = 45). The 30-day and 12-month mortality rates were 5.2% (n = 28) and 21.0% (n = 113). Nonoperative treatment, older age, male sex, admission from residential or nursing care, and sustaining the PPF around a revision prosthesis were significant predictors of an increased 12-month mortality. Conclusion. Femoral hip PPFs have mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates comparable with hip fracture patients. However, they have a longer wait for surgery, and surgical treatment is more complex. There is a need to create a national framework for data collection for this heterogeneous group of patients in order to understand the outcomes of different approaches to treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):997–1008

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with mortality in patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic hip fracture. Methods. The electronic records of consecutive patients undergoing revision THA for periprosthetic hip fracture between December 2011 and October 2018 were reviewed. The data which were collected included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the preoperative serum level of haemoglobin, time to surgery, operating time, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and postoperative surgical and medical complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent modifiable factors associated with mortality at 90 days and one year postoperatively. Results. A total of 203 patients were identified. Their mean age was 78 years (44 to 100), and 108 (53%) were female. The median time to surgery was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 2 to 5). The mortality rate at one year was 13.8% (n = 28). The commonest surgical complication was dislocation (n = 22, 10.8%) and the commonest medical complication within 90 days of surgery was hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 25, 12%). Multivariate analysis showed that the rate of mortality one year postoperatively was five-fold higher in patients who sustained a dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 15.83); p = 0.006). The rate of mortality was also four-fold higher in patients who developed hospital-acquired pneumonia within 90 days postoperatively (OR 4.43 (95% CI 1.55 to 12.67); p = 0.005). There was no evidence that the time to surgery was a risk factor for death at one year. Conclusion. Dislocation and hospital-acquired pneumonia following revision THA for a periprosthetic fracture are potentially modifiable risk factors for mortality. This study suggests that surgeons should consider increasing constraint to reduce the risk of dislocation, and the early involvement of a multidisciplinary team to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia. We found no evidence that the time to surgery affected mortality, which may allow time for medical optimization, surgical planning, and resource allocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):580–585

Background. As the number of primary or revision TKA with stem extension cases are growing simultaneously, the number of periprosthetic fracture in these cases has also increased accordingly. However, there have been few reports on the classification and treatment of periprosthetic fracture following stemmed TKA and lack of information about the treatment outcome. The purposes of this study were 1) to demonstrate classification and management of periprosthetic fractures after stemmed TKA and 2) to report treatment outcome after the periprosthetic fractures. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 knees (15 patients) with an average age of 69.7 years. All cases were revision TKA cases, and there were 13 female and 2 male patients. The patients were treated nonoperatively or underwent operation by orthopedic principle. The period of union was evaluated by confirming the formation of callus crossing fragments in radiographs. We reviewed the complications and functional outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic fracture following revision TKA by assessing FF, FC and scoring WOMAC and KSS. Results. The classification of periprosthetic fractures of stemmed TKA was based on location of fracture and stability of implant. They were classified as follows: type I, metaphyseal fracture without loosening of implant [Fig. 1]; type II, diaphyseal fracture adjacent to stem without loosening of implant [Fig. 2]; type III, diaphyseal fracture away from stem without loosening of implant [Fig. 3]; and type IV, metaphyseal or diaphyseal fracture with loosening of implant [Fig. 4]. There were 1 case of type I, 9 cases of type II, 4 cases of type III and 3 cases of type IV fractures. The mean time for gaining radiographic union of type I was 3.3 month; type II was 4.4 month; type III was 4.6 month; and type IV was 3.9 month. Most of the metaphyseal fractures were comminuted and all cases of loosening of the femoral implant were found in the metaphyseal fractures. Nine periprosthetic fractures were fixed using locking plate (single locking plate : 4 cases, dual locking plate : 5 cases). The bone union period is much shorter in patients with dual plate fixation than single plate only. Range of motion, WOMAC and KSS were not significantly different between before fracture and after management of fracture. Complications included 1 metal failure, 2 loosening of implant and 1 postoperative infection. Conclusions. Metaphyseal fractures probably cause the collateral ligament insufficiency, and loosen the implant. Therefore, rotating hinge prosthesis should be used to stabilize the ligament of knee joint. Also, Revision TKA with longer stem should be considered if the stability of implant is not sure. When we underwent operation using plate fixation, dual plating provided better stability of fracture and shortened the union period than single plating. However, we need to approach individually depending on the patient, such as using cerclage wire, bone graft and so on. This study will help to establish appropriate treatment options according to each classification. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the ankle is increasing. However, little is known about the outcome of treatment and their management remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of periprosthetic fractures on the functional and radiological outcome of patients with a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). A total of 505 TAAs (488 patients) who underwent TAA were retrospectively evaluated for periprosthetic ankle fracture: these were then classified according to a recent classification which is orientated towards treatment. The outcome was evaluated clinically using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and a visual analogue scale for pain, and radiologically. . A total of 21 patients with a periprosthetic fracture of the ankle were identified. There were 13 women and eight men. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (48 to 74). Thus, the incidence of fracture was 4.17%. . There were 11 intra-operative and ten post-operative fractures, of which eight were stress fractures and two were traumatic. The prosthesis was stable in all patients. Five stress fractures were treated conservatively and the remaining three were treated operatively. . A total of 17 patients (81%) were examined clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (12 to 112). The mean AOFAS score at follow-up was 79.5 (21 to 100). The mean AOFAS score in those with an intra-operative fracture was 87.6 (80 to 100) and for those with a stress fracture, which were mainly because of varus malpositioning, was 67.3 (21 to 93). Periprosthetic fractures of the ankle do not necessarily adversely affect the clinical outcome, provided that a treatment algorithm is implemented with the help of a new classification system. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:950–6

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) that carries significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Currently, uncemented stems are highly preferred in primary THA, but have been associated with higher risk of PFF compared to cemented stems. The use of collared stems in uncemented primary THA has shown promise in reducing PFF rates postoperatively. This retrospective study included 2,294 uncemented primary THAs using the posterior approach performed by two attending surgeons from January 2016 to December 2022. Both surgeons switched from a collarless femoral stem design to a collared design in May 2020. Data was collected regarding stem design, frequency of PFF, and requirement for revision surgery. Periprosthetic fractures were identified and confirmed using medical records and/or radiographic imaging. Fracture rates and percentages between collared and collarless stems were then analyzed. A Fisher's Exact Test was performed to determine if there was a significant association between collared and collarless stem use on PFF rates. A total of 2,294 uncemented primary THAs performed by 2 surgeons were eligible for analysis. 903 (39.4%) patients received a collared stem, and 1,391 (60.6%) patients received a collarless stem. In total, 14 (0.6%) PFFs occurred over the study period. There was 1 fracture (0.1%) out of 903 collared stems, and 13 fractures (0.9%) out of 1,391 collarless stems (p = 0.012). Collared stems were associated with a significant decrease in PFF rate when compared to collarless stems in uncemented primary THA. Future studies are encouraged to continue to investigate PFF and other complication rates with the use of a collared stem design

Introduction: Management of periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a difficult clinical problem, requiring expertise in both trauma and revision surgery. Estimates of the prevalence of postoperative fracture range from 0.1% to 2.1%, and with rising numbers of patients in the population living with hip prostheses in situ there is evidence that their frequency is increasing. There remains a paucity of data on the functional outcome of these injuries, and the objective of this study was to analyse outcomes for revision THA following periprosthetic fracture, and compare these to elective revision surgery. Methods: 233 patients (234 hips) undergoing revision THA for femoral fracture were identified from the New Zealand National Registry, and clinical outcomes were measured using Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) completed six months post operatively. A control group of 234 patients undergoing elective revision THA was selected and matched for age, sex, and time since index operation. Results: Comparative analysis of the registry patients showed clinical outcomes were significantly worse following revision THA for fractured femur than in controls (mean OHS 28.6 vs 23.6, p=0.006), though this difference was not apparent in patients under the age of 65 years (mean OHS 26.1 vs 23.8, p =0.6). A higher mortality rate was found among fracture patients (17.1% versus 10.7 %, p=0.05), and a statistically significant higher number of periprosthetic fracture patients died within 6 months of their surgery in comparison to controls (7.3% versus 0.9%, p=0.003). A higher rate of re-revision was observed in the fracture group (7.7% versus 2.6%, p=0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge this study represents the largest comparative series of periprosthetic fractures in THA with functional outcome data yet reported. Management of patients with periprosthetic fractures requires recognition of the challenging nature of these injuries, their associated poor prognosis, and high complication rate

We are currently facing an epidemic of periprosthetic fractures around the hip. They may occur either during surgery or post-operatively. Although the acetabulum may be involved, the femur is most commonly affected. We are being presented with new, difficult fracture patterns around cemented and cementless implants, and we face the challenge of an elderly population who may have grossly deficient bone and may struggle to rehabilitate after such injuries. The correct surgical management of these fractures is challenging. This article will review the current choices of implants and techniques available to deal with periprosthetic fractures of the femur. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):48–55

The Lubinus SP II is an anatomical femoral stem with high survivorship levels notably described in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. As the clinical and economic burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) continues to increase, it has been suggested that use of anatomical stems may facilitate more uniform cement mantles and improve implant survival. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship and PPF rate of the Lubinus SP II 150mm stem in a single UK centre. Between January 2007 and April 2012, 1000 consecutive THAs were performed using the Lubinus SP II femoral stem in our institution. Patient demographics and operative details were collected in a prospective arthroplasty database. Patient records and national radiographic archives were then reviewed at a mean of 12.3 years (SD 1.3) following surgery to identify occurrence of subsequent revision surgery, dislocation or periprosthetic fracture. Mean patient age at surgery was 69.3 years (SD 10.1, 24–93 years). There were 634 women (63%). Osteoarthritis was the operative indication in 974 patients (97%). There were 13 revisions in total (4 for recurrent dislocation, 3 for infection, 6 for acetabular loosening) and 16 dislocations (1.6%). Stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.6% (95 % confidence interval [CI], 99.5%–99.7%) and at 15 years was 98.8% (98.7%–98.9%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Analysis of all cause THA failure demonstrated a survivorship of 99.1% (99.0%–99.3%) at 10 years and 98.2% (98.1%–98.3%) at 15 years. There were 4 periprosthetic fractures in total (0.4%) at mean 12.3 year follow-up. The Lubinus SP II stem demonstrated excellent survivorship, low dislocation rates and negligible PPF rates up to 15 years following primary THA. Use of anatomical stems such as the Lubinus SPII would appear to be a wise clinical and economic investment for patients and healthcare systems alike

Fractures around total knee arthroplasties pose a significant surgical challenge. Most can be managed with osteosynthesis and salvage of the replacement. The techniques of fixation of these fractures and revision surgery have evolved and so has the assessment of outcome. This specialty update summarises the current evidence for the classification, methods of fixation, revision surgery and outcomes of the management of periprosthetic fractures associated with total knee arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1489–96

Aims. Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around cemented taper-slip femoral prostheses often result in a femoral component that is loose at the prosthesis-cement interface, but where the cement-bone interface remains well-fixed and bone stock is good. We aim to understand how best to classify and manage these fractures by using a modification of the Vancouver classification. Methods. We reviewed 87 PPFs. Each was a first episode of fracture around a cemented femoral component, where surgical management consisted of revision surgery. Data regarding initial injury, intraoperative findings, and management were prospectively collected. Patient records and serial radiographs were reviewed to determine fracture classification, whether the bone cement was well fixed (B2W) or loose (B2L), and time to fracture union following treatment. Results. In total, 47 B2W fractures (54.0%) and one B3 fracture (1.1%) had cement that remained well-fixed at the cement-bone interface. These cases were treated with cement-in-cement (CinC) revision arthroplasty. Overall, 43 fractures with follow-up united, and two patients sustained further fractures secondary to nonunion and required further revision surgery. A total of 19 B2L fractures (21.8%) and 19 B3 fractures (21.8%) had cement that was loose at the cement-bone interface. These cases were managed by revision arthroplasty with either cemented or uncemented femoral components, or proximal femoral arthroplasty. One case could not be classified. Conclusion. We endorse a modification of the original Vancouver system to include a subclassification of B2 fractures around cemented femoral prostheses to include B2W (where cement is well-fixed to bone) and B2L (where the cement is loose). Fractures around taper-slip design stems are more likely to fracture in a B2W pattern compared to fractures around composite beam design stems which are more likely to fracture in a B2L pattern. B2W fractures can reliably be managed with CinC revision. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):71–78

Background. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty are relatively uncommon but are associated with significant morbidity. With an increasing number of total hip arthroplasties being carried out in an aging population we need to ensure correct implants are chosen for our patients. A recent review of NJR data suggested a significantly higher revision risk for the Zimmer CPT stems due to periprosthetic fractures when compared to the Stryker Exeter stems. Objectives. Our aim was to compare the biomechanics of periprosthetic fractures around the CPT and Exeter V40 stems in a composite saw bone model to identify if a difference in fracture risk exists between the two stems. We also compared the engineering design of the two implants in order to analyse the possible effect this may have on fracture risk. Study Design & Methods. Fourteen composite femurs were divided into two groups and cemented using Palacos R cement with either the CPT or Exeter V40 stem by a single surgeon. The implanted femurs were then mounted onto an Instron machine and were axially loaded and torqued to fracture with an axial compressive force of 2000N over 10 seconds followed by a rotation of 40 degrees applied over 1 second. A power calculation from a previous composite saw bone model study suggested that a minimum of 6 implanted femurs would be required in each group. Results. The implanted femurs invariably sustained fracture patterns similar to the Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture which are commonly seen in clinical practice. Implanted femurs with CPT stems suffered periprosthetic fractures with less rotation when compared to those femurs with the Exeter V40 stem (20.10 versus 33.60, p<0.01). We also found that CPT implanted femurs were fracturing at significantly lower torque values when compared to the Exeter V40 implanted femurs (124Nm Versus 174Nm, p<0.01). The energy release rate (G111) for CPT stems was 21.8Nm compared to 61.2Nm for Exeter V40 stems. The higher energy release with Exeter stems led to more comminuted fractures in Exeter implanted femurs when compared to the CPT femurs, which fractured earlier, but with simpler fracture patterns. Finite element method (FEM) simulation analysis showed that fractures initiated between the prosthesis and cement at the proximal end of the femur. Two dimensional sections at the same height showed a difference in bone-cement-implant geometrics at the critical point of failure suggesting that a design cause may be the reason for the higher risk of periprosthetic fractures in CPT implanted femurs. Conclusions. Our observations may explain the higher revision risk secondary to periprosthetic fractures that has been observed with the CPT stem when compared to the Exeter V40 stem