Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) improves the quality of life of osteoarthritic and rheumatoid arthritis patients, however, is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. There are multiple methods of managing postoperative pain that include epidural anesthesia but it prevents early mobilization and results in postoperative hypotension and spinal infection. Controlling local pain pathways through intra-articular administration of analgesics is a novel method and is inexpensive and simple. Hence, we assess the effects of postoperative epidural bupivacaine injection along with intra-articular injection in total knee replacement patients. The methodology included 100 patients undergoing TKA randomly divided into two groups, one administered with only epidural bupivacaine injection and the other with intra-articular cocktail injection. The results were measured based on a 10-point pain assessment scale, knee's range of motion (ROM), and Lysholm knee score. The VAS score was lower in the intra-articular cocktail group compared to the bupivacaine injection group until the end of 1-week post-administration (p<0.01). Among inter-group comparisons, we observed that the range of motion was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Lysholm's score was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Our study showed that both epidural bupivacaine injection and intra-articular injection were effective in reducing pain after TKA and have a comparable functional outcome at the end of 4 weeks follow up. However, the pain relief was faster in cases with intra-articular injection, providing the opportunity for early rehabilitation. Thus, we recommend the use of intra-articular cocktail injection for postoperative management of pain after total knee arthroplasty, which enables early rehabilitation and faster functional recovery of these patients

Introduction and Objective

Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit.

Background. Acute pain following total knee replacements (TKRs) is associated with higher peri-operative opiate requirements and their side effects, longer hospital stay and lower patient satisfaction (Petersen 2014). It may also be associated with higher rates of chronic pain at 1 and 5 years (Beswick 2012). We present a novel technique using combination of Local Infiltration Anaesthesia (LIA) with PainKwell infusion system (Bupivacaine 0.5 @ 4mls and 6mls/hr) to improve pain management following TKRs. Methods. Between October 2015 and March 2016. 110 patients undergoing primary TKR were prospectively studied. All patients studied had spinal anaesthesia (SA) with diamorphine. Demographics between the two groups were similar. Group 1. SA plus LIA plus traditional multimodal analgesia. 32 patients. Group 2. SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours rate 4mls. 38 patients. Group 3. SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours rate 6mls. 40 patients. Results. Visual analogue pain scores demonstrated a significant difference at 8hrs, 12hrs, 24hrs and 48hrs between group 1 and 3; p<0.05. There was also a statistical difference in opiate usage at 24 hours between the three groups with group 3 using significantly less opiates compared to group 1. There was least consumption of opiates in group 3 patients across all study periods. Conclusions. This study reported that SA plus LIA and PainKwell system was effective in reducing pain following TKRs. It also demonstrated that the technique of SA plus LIA plus PainKwell for 48 hours at a rate 6mls/hr reduced opiate usage by 50% and pain by 30% for these patients. Implications. This technique may help improve rehabilitation and shorten hospital stay following total knee arthroplasties

Background. Narcotics are commonly prescribed for pain control of orthopedic trauma but injury pattern and severity, in addition to patient factors, result in varying dosing requirements. These factors, coupled with increasing pressure to reduce narcotic consumption, highlight the importance of narcotic stewardship and comprehension of patient factors leading to higher pain control demands. The purpose of this study is to understand whether or not narcotic consumption is greater in patients who present to the emergency department with positive drug screen (utox) for illicit substances. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of 300 consecutive trauma activations during the 2015 calendar year. Of the patient cohort, 226 patients received a utox screen which represents the cohort for this study. Utox screen included amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, ethanol, methadone, phencyclidine, and tetrahydrocannabinol. Opioids given hospital stay were converted to oral morphine equivalents using ratios available in the current literature. The average daily equivalent was calculated for their total hospital stay and recorded. Patient injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, length of stay, readmission rates were also recorded. Statistical comparisons were made using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Data distributions were examined with the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality between group comparisons were made with Mann Whitney U tests. Chi squared test was used to evaluate categorical data. Significance was set at p=0.05. Results. There were 108 (48%) positive utox tests of the 226 that received a utox test. There was no difference in gender distribution or age between the 2 groups. The calculated morphine equivalent consumption of the positive utox patient cohort was compared against the negative utox group. The median daily oral morphine equivalents in the positive utox group was 23.85 versus 12.05 for those with a negative utox screen. This was found to be statistically significant with a p value of 0.014. The average length of stay for the positive utox group was 3 days versus 2 days for the negative utox group. This also was statistically significant with a p value of 0.009. There was no statistical significance for ISS (5 in utox positive versus 5 in utox negative patients) nor was there any significance found in the rate of readmissions. Discussion. Our study shows that infividuals found to have positive utox screening for illicit drug use require more opioids for pain control and have longer hospital stays. These increased resource requirements exist despite no statistically significant difference in ISS. The high rate of positive findings and differences in patient clinical course support continued utox screening in trauma activation patients. When treating these patients, physicians should be aware of potential differences in pain management strategies and would likely benefit from multimodal pain control progam

Background. Although the aetiology of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is unknown, it is suggested that several subgroups among CLBP-patients might be identified who are likely to benefit from different interventions. The results of these interventions might be improved by matching interventions to patient characteristics. Purpose. The purpose of this longitudinal study is to determine which subgroup of CLBP-patients benefits most from the short, intensive pain management program of RealHealth_NL. Methods. A prospective cohort of 524 selected consecutive CLBP-patients was followed. Potential predictive indicators included demographic characteristics, functional disability, experienced pain and cognitive behavioural factors as measured at pre-treatment assessment. The outcome is defined as one year improvement in functional disability. A successful outcome is a value as seen in healthy populations. The two-week residential program is in line with recommendations in international guidelines, based on cognitive behavioural principles and delivered in collaboration with orthopedic spine surgeons. Results. Multivariate logistic regression revealed pre-treatment being employed (OR 3.609 [95%CI 1.795–7.256]), and functional disability (OR 0.943 [95%CI 0.921–0.965]) as significant predictive factors of a successful outcome in functional disability at one year follow-up. Conclusion. The results imply that CLBP-patients, who are employed, and less disabled at pre-treatment assessment, who participated in the RealHealth_NL program, are consistently associated with one year follow-up improvement of functional disability toward normal values. A small set of indicators is more easily identified and addressed and CLBP-patients who are more likely to benefit from the program could be given a higher entry priority. Conflict of Interest: J O'Dowd owns shares in RealHealth_NL; Research Development & Education independent research organisation; Sint Maartenskliniek health care provider and referral organisation. Source of funding: None. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

The goals of perioperative management are to relieve pain, achieve early mobilization after surgery, reduce length of hospital stay, and obtain adequate patient satisfaction. Several treatment options combining systemic analgesics and/or regional analgesia with or without opioids are available for postoperative pain; however, a gold standard has not been established although there is a progressive shift towards multimodal approaches to improve analgesia while minimizing opioid-related side effects.

EX-TRA-05 (DAVID-ART) was a randomised, double-blind, parallel, pivotal study, evaluating the analgesic efficacy and safety of the innovative oral combination of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg in comparison with the individual components (tramadol given at the higher dose of 100mg) on moderate to severe acute pain after total hip replacement. Repeated doses of study drug were administered every 8 hours and pain intensity (PI) was to be scored according to a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) on a programmed e-diary every 2 hours over a 56-hour period (i.e. along 7 repeated doses). A placebo arm was included at the first administration to validate the pain model. Rescue medication, metamizole 500mg, was available during the treatment period. The study primary endpoint was the mean sum of the pain intensity difference values throughout the first 8 hours (SPID₈), which considered the 3 active treatment arms and placebo (ITT population; N=641). In this phase, a clear superiority of the combination over the single agents was demonstrated (p<0.05). An additional analysis was performed during the entire 0–56h repeated-dose period excluding those patients who had received placebo at the first dose (N=161). The estimated mean (SE) differences on PI-VAS over 24, 32 and 56 hours post first dose (0–24h, 0–32h, and 0–56h) between the combination and each single agent were evaluated.

Patients who received active analgesic from the first dose (mITT population; N=480) were aged 29–80 years (42% were ≥65 years). At randomisation, pain was moderate (≥40–60mm) in 51% patients and severe (>60mm) in 49%. For dexketoprofen/tramadol, mean (SD) PI-VAS values were 22 (4.0) over 24 hours; 21 (4.1) over 32 hours; and 19 (3.8) over 56 hours. The estimated differences versus dexketoprofen 25mg and tramadol 100mg were respectively 10 (0.7) and 7.6 (0.7) over 24 hours; 9.8 (0.6) and 7.2 (0.6) over 32 hours; and 8.1 (0.5) and 6.3 (0.5) over 56 hours (p<0.0001 for all comparisons), which confirmed the superiority of the combination versus both single agents throughout the periods analysed.

This significant higher decrease of PI favouring dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg over dexketoprofen 25mg and tramadol 100mg, all given every 8 hours, during the first 56 hours post dose confirmed the superior analgesia shown after the first 0–8h post-dose period. The combination of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg is able to provide a level of analgesia above that achievable by each component alone, with a sustained effect when used as a multiple-dose regimen. The addition of this new combo to the analgesic armamentarium may contribute to facilitate early mobilization after surgery, thus positively impacting perioperative co-morbidities and length of in-hospital stay.

Low back pain affects 80% of the population with half of cases attributed to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. However, the majority of treatments focus on pain management, with none targeting the underlying pathophysiological causes. PCRX-201 presents a novel gene therapy approach that addresses this issue. PCRX-201 codes for interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), the natural inhibitor of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1, which orchestrates the catabolic degeneration of the IVD. Our objective here is to determine the ability of PCRX-201 to infect human nucleus pulposus (NP) cells and tissue to increase the production of IL-1Ra and assess downstream effects on catabolic protein production. Degenerate human NP cells and tissue explants were infected with PCRX-201 at 0 or 3000 multiplicities of infection (MOI) and subsequently cultured for 5 days in monolayer (n=7), 21 days in alginate beads (n=6) and 14 days in tissue explants (n=5). Cell culture supernatant was collected throughout culture duration and downstream targets associated with pain and degeneration were assessed using ELISA. IL-1Ra production was increased in NP cells and tissue infected with PCRX-201. The production of downstream catabolic proteins such as IL-1β, IL-6, MMP3, ADAMTS4 and VEGF was decreased in both 3D-cultured NP cells and tissue explants. Here, we have demonstrated that a novel gene therapy, PCRX-201, is able to infect and increase the production of IL-1Ra in degenerate NP cells and tissue in vitro. The increase of IL-1Ra also resulted in a decrease in the production of a number of pro-inflammatory and catabolic proteins, suggesting PCRX-201 enables the inhibition of IL-1-driven IVD degeneration. At present, no treatments for IVD degeneration target the underlying pathology. The ability of FX201 to elicit anti-catabolic responses is promising and warrants further investigation in vitro and in vivo, to determine the efficacy of this exciting, novel gene therapy

Introduction. Previous studies have shown the potential for virtual reality (VR) immersion as a promising technique for pain and anxiety management. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of VR in the management of pain and anxiety during post-op external fixator care procedures. Method. This study involved patients aged 5-21 years following limb lengthening/reconstruction surgery with an external fixator. Aqua VR application from the KindVR® was utilized for this study. Subjects were seen during the first four postoperative visits and assigned to a ‘VR-first’ or ‘no-VR-first’ group. Visits alternated between VR immersion and no VR immersion during care procedures. The study endpoints (pain and anxiety levels) were assessed before, during, and after procedures using the Wong-Baker Faces (FACES) and Children's Fear Scale, respectively. Proxy scores for pain and anxiety were also obtained from parents or legal guardians and providers. Result. A total of 29 patients (16 male and 13 female) were evaluated. The mean age at enrollment was 14.4 ± 2.2 years for group 1 and 14.7 ± 4.0 years for group 2. The median number of pin sites was 7. Anxiety scores were consistently higher during the non-VR immersion experience compared to the VR immersion visits. The pain and anxiety scores were significantly lower in the ‘VR-first’ group during the non-VR immersion study visits compared to patients in the ‘no-VR-first’ group. This observation was also consistent with survey findings among the parent proxies and providers. Conclusion. VR immersion is associated with lower anxiety scores for pin-site care procedures. VR immersion at the first post-operative visit following limb reconstruction surgery was also associated with lower pain and anxiety scores during subsequent non-VR immersion visits

Introduction and Objective. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNBs) have shown good results in pain management after orthopedic surgeries. However, the variation of performance between different subspecialities is unknown. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with cPNBs after lower limb orthopedic surgeries in different subspecialties. Materials and Methods. This prospective cohort study was performed on collected data from cPNBs after orthopedic surgeries in lower limbs. Catheters were placed by experienced anesthesiologists using sterile technique. After catheterization, the patients were examined daily, by specially educated acute pain service nurses. The characteristics of the patients, duration of catheterization, severity of the post-operative pain, need for additional opioids, and possible complications were registered. Results. We included 246 patients (=547 catheters). 115 (21%) femoral, 162 (30%) saphenous, 66 (12%) sciatic, and 204 (37%) popliteal sciatic nerve catheter were used. The median duration of a catheter was 3 days [IQR = 2 – 5]. The proportion of femoral, sciatic, saphenous, and popliteal nerve catheters with duration of more than two days was 81%, 79%, 73%, and 71% for, respectively. This proportion varied also between different subspecialties. 91% of the catheters remained in place for more than two days in amputations (n=56), 89% in pediatric surgery (n=79), 76% in trauma (n=217), 64% in foot and ankle surgery (n=129), and 59% in limb reconstructive surgery (n=66). The proportion of pain-free patients were 77 – 95% at rest, 63 – 88% at mobilization. 79 – 92% did not need increased opioid doses, and 50 – 67% did not require PRN opioid. 443 catheters (81%) were removed as planned. The cause of unplanned catheter removal was loss of efficacy in 69 (13%), dislodgement in 23 (4.2%), leakage in 8 (1.5%), and erythema in 4 catheters (0.73%). No major complication occurred. Conclusions. 81% of catheters remained in place until planned removal and opioid usage after surgery was lower than expected. Catheters were efficient in both adult and pediatric surgery; however, a variation was seen between orthopaedic subspecialities regarding duration of nerve catheter usage

For decades, universities and research centers have been applying modeling and simulation (M&S) to problems involving health and medicine, coining the expression in silico clinical trials. However, its use is still limited to a restricted pool of specialists. It is here proposed an easy-to-use cloud-based platform that aims to create a collaborative marketplace for M&S in orthopedics, where developers and model creators are able to capitalize on their work while protecting their intellectual property (IP), and researcher, surgeons and medical device companies can use M&S to accelerate time and to reduce costs of their research and development (R&D) processes. Digital libraries on . InSilicoTrials.com. are built on collaborations among first-rate research center, model developers, software, and cloud providers (partners). Their access is provided to life science and healthcare companies, clinical centers, and research institutes (users), offering them with several solutions for the different steps of the orthopedics and medical devices R&D process. The platform is built using the Microsoft Azure cloud services, conforming to global standards of security and privacy for healthcare, ensuring that clinical data is properly managed, protected, and kept private. The environment protects the IP of partners against the downloading, copying, and changing of their M&S solutions; while providing a safe environment for users to seamlessly upload their own data, set up and run simulations, analyze results, and produce reports in conformity with regulatory requirements. The proposed platform allows exploitation of M&S through a Software-as-a-Service delivery model. The pay-per-use pricing: 1. provide partners with a strong incentive to commercialize their high-quality M&S solutions; 2. enable users with limited budget, such as small companies, research centers and hospitals, to use advanced M&S solutions. Pricing of the M&S tools is based on specific aspects, such as particular features and computational power required, in agreement with the developing partner, and is distinct for different types of customers (i.e., academia or industry). The first medical devices application hosted on . InSilicoTrials.com. is NuMRis (Numerical Magnetic Resonance Implant Safety), implemented in collaboration with the U.S. F.D.A. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, and ANSYS, Inc. The automatic tool allows the investigation of radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating of passive medical implants, such as orthopedic devices (e.g., rods and screws), pain management devices (e.g., leads), and cardiovascular devices (e.g., stents), following the ASTM F2182-19e2 Standard Test Method. NuMRis promotes the broader adoption of digital evidence in preclinical trials for RF safety analysis, supporting the device submission process and pre-market regulatory evaluation. InSilicoTrials.com. aims at defining a new collaborative framework in healthcare, engaging research centers to safely commercialize their IP, i.e., model templates, simulation tools and virtual patients, by helping clinicians and healthcare companies to significantly expedite the pre-clinical and clinical development phases, and to move across the regulatory approval and HTA processes

Background. Adequate pain management is mandatory for patients' early rehabilitation and improvement of outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conventional pain management, consisted of mainly opioids, has some adverse effects such as dizziness and nausea. Motor blockade occasionally resulted from epidural analgesics. A novel multimodal analgesic strategy with peripheral nerve block, peri-articular injection (PAI) and intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA) were utilized for our patients receiving TKA. In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects in the group of multimodal analgesia (MA) or epidural analgesia alone. Methods. One hundred and eighteen patients undergoing TKA with spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients of TKA received either our protocol of multimodal analgesia or patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) alone. MA included ultrasound guided nerve block in femoral and obturator nerves before spinal anesthesia, and PAI mixed with NSAID, morphine, ropivacaine and epinephrine, as well as IVPCA after surgeries. The analgesic effect with numeric rating scale (NRS) and occurrence of adverse effects, including motor blockade, numbness, postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), and dizziness were recorded for all patients. Results. Thirty-one patients received MA, and eighty-seven patients received PCEA. No significant difference of NRS in MA and PCEA group within 24 hours after surgery either in rest (0.2 ± 1 compared with 0.22 ± 0.98; p = 0.930) or motion (0.40 ± 1.56 compared with 0.31± 1.23; p = 0.764). MA group sustained lesser motor blockade than PCEA (6.45% compared with 22.98%; p = 0.028) beyond 24 hours after surgery. The occurrence of numbness is lower in MA group (18.52%) compared with PCEA group(43.33%) (p=0.031). No statistic difference of PONV and dizziness is noted between two groups. However, there is a trend that lesser PONV and dizziness occurred in MA group than PCEA group. Conclusion. TKA patients receiving either MA or PCEA have adequate analgesic efficacy after surgeries. MA group has a lower incidence of motor blockade and PONV than PCEA. This multimodal analgesia proposed here has shown patients' safety and improved pain control after TKA, decreased narcotics use and their associated side effects. Besides, lesser motor blockade and adequate pain relief may encourage patient's early rehabilitation

Robust evidence on the effectiveness of peri-operative local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) is required before it is incorporated into the pain management regimen for patients receiving total knee replacement (TKR). To assess the effectiveness of peri-operative LAI for pain management in patients receiving TKR we conducted a systematic review, fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for RCTs of peri-operative LAI in patients receiving TKR. Two reviewers screened abstracts and extracted data. Outcomes were pain, opioid use, mobilisation, hospital stay and complications. Authors were contacted if required. When feasible, we conducted meta-analysis with studies analysed separately if a femoral nerve block (FNB) was provided. In the APEX RCT, we randomised 316 patients awaiting TKR to standard anaesthesia which included FNB, or to the same regimen with additional peri-operative LAI (60mls 0.25% bupivacaine plus adrenaline). Post-operatively, all patients received patient-controlled morphine. The primary outcome was joint pain severity (WOMAC-Pain) at 12 months. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to allocation. Within APEX, cost-effectiveness was assessed from the health and social-care perspective in relation to quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and WOMAC-Pain at 12-months. Resource use was collected from hospital records and patient questionnaires. In the systematic review, 23 studies including 1,439 patients were identified. Compared with patients receiving no intervention, LAI reduced WOMAC-Pain by standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.40 (95%CI −0.58, −0.22; p<0.001) at 24 hours at rest and by SMD −0.27 (95%CI −0.50, −0.05; p=0.018) at 48 hours during activity. In three studies there was no difference in pain at any time point between randomised groups where all patients received FNB. Patients receiving LAI spent fewer days in hospital, used less opioids and mobilised earlier. Complications were similar between groups. Few studies reported long-term outcomes. In the APEX RCT, pain levels in hospital were broadly similar between groups. Overall opioid use was similar between groups. Time to mobilisation and discharge were largely dependent on local protocols and did not differ between groups. There were no differences in pain outcomes between groups at 12 months. In the economic evaluation, LAI was marginally associated with lower costs. Using the NICE £20,000 per QALY threshold, the incremental net monetary benefit was £264 (95%CI, −£710, £1,238) and the probability of being cost-effective was 62%. Although LAI appeared to have some benefit for reduced pain in hospital after TKR there was no evidence of pain control additional to that provided by femoral nerve block, however it would be cost-effective at the current NICE thresholds

Background. In 2009, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced the guidance: Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain aimed at general practitioners (GPs), consultants, and manual therapists in order to ensure all involved in the care of this complex and often debilitating condition are aware of the options most likely to yield a positive outcome. Two years since the publication of the clinical guidance, services have had ample time to adapt and overcome early teething issues in order to deliver these guidelines. Methods. A retrospective audit was carried out at an out-patient physiotherapy department. One-hundred notes were randomly selected from those who meet the NICE criteria, i.e. non-specific low back pain for six weeks to 12 months in duration. A questionnaire was developed to target National Health Service (NHS) musculoskeletal physiotherapists using electronic media, mail shot and professional networking (clinical interest) groups within the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP). Sixty-one completed questionnaires were returned detailing the barriers for implementation. The results show that 75% of patients received NICE recommended care, and they improved by numerical rating scale (NRS) −3.89, while those who did not, improved by NRS −1.24 producing a significant difference of 2.654 (95% Confidence Interval 1.008–4.300), p≤0.002. The main perceived barriers were too few follow-up slots, local policy, managerial demands, and inadequate training. Conclusions. The conclusions are that while three-quarters of patients are receiving and benefiting from NICE recommended care, many practitioners feel departmental policy and procedures reduce compliance. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. Poster funding via the University of Leicester. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or in part; nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Background. Orthopedic trauma patients can have significant pain management requirements. Patient satisfaction has been associated with pain control and narcotic use in previous studies. Due to the multifactorial nature of pain, various injury patterns, and differences in pain tolerances the relationship between patient factors and narcotic requirements are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to compare patient demographics for trauma patients requiring high doses of narcotics for pain control versus those with more minimal requirements. Methods. Our study sample included 300 consecutive trauma activations who presented to our emergency department during the 2015 calendar year. Opioids given to the patients during their hospital stay were converted to oral morphine equivalents using ratios available from the current literature. Patients were placed into two groups including those who were in the top 10% for average daily inpatient oral morphine equivalents and the other group was composed of the remaining patients. In addition to morphine equivalents, patient age, gender, injury severity score, length of stay, number of readmissions and urine toxicology results were also recorded. Injury severity score (ISS), morphine equivalents, and patient age were evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Between group comparisons for positive urine toxicology screen and gender were performed with Chi square and Fisher exact test. Pearson correlations were calculated between injury severity score, average daily oral morphine equivalents, and length of stay. P-value of 0.05 was used to represent significance. Statistical comparisons were made using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Results. Median average daily morphine equivalents in the 10% of patients receiving the highest doses was 86.30 and 12.95 for the bottom 90%. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The median ISS between the 2 groups was significant (p=0.018). There was no significant difference in age, readmission rate, and urine toxicology results. Patients in the top 10% were more likely to be male (p=0.003). Median length of stay for the top 10% group and bottom 90% group was 4 days and 2 days, respectively (p=0.005). No correlation between injury severity score and length of stay was found (p=0.475). A weak correlation of 0.115 was found between morphine equivalents and length of stay (p=0.047). Discussion. Our study shows male gender and ISS were correlated with higher oral morphine equivalents for the 10% of patients receiving the highest daily amounts when compared to the reaminder of the cohort. There was a significantly increased length of stay in the patients receiving higher narcotic doses. Whether this is due to ISS or increase in narcotics is unclear. However, positive correlation was not found between ISS and length of stay

Robust evidence on the effectiveness of peri-operative local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) is required before it is incorporated into the pain management regimen for patients receiving total hip replacement (THR). We assessed the effectiveness of LAI using a systematic review and a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) with economic evaluation. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for RCTs of peri-operative LAI in patients receiving THR. Two reviewers screened abstracts, extracted data, and liaised with authors. Outcomes were pain, opioid use, mobilisation, hospital stay and complications. If feasible, we conducted meta-analysis. In the APEX RCT, we randomised 322 patients awaiting THR to receive additional peri-operative LAI (60mls 0.25% bupivacaine plus adrenaline) or standard anaesthesia alone. Post-operatively, all patients received patient-controlled morphine. The primary outcome was joint pain severity (WOMAC-Pain) at 12 months. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to allocation. Within APEX, cost-effectiveness was assessed from the health and social-care perspective in relation to quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and WOMAC-Pain at 12-months. Resource use was collected from hospital records and patient questionnaires. In the systematic review, we identified 13 studies (909 patients). Patients undergoing THR receiving LAI experienced greater pain reduction at 24 hours at rest, standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.61 (95%CI −1.05, −0.16; p=0.008) and at 48 hours during activity, SMD −0.43 (95%CI −0.78, −0.09; p=0.014). Patients receiving LAI spent fewer days in hospital, used less opioids and mobilised earlier. Complications were similar between groups. Long-term outcomes were not a focus of these studies. In the APEX RCT, pain levels in hospital were broadly similar between groups, probably due to patient-controlled analgesia. Opioid use was similar between groups. Time to mobilisation and discharge were largely dependent on local protocols and did not differ between groups. Patients receiving LAI were less likely to report severe pain at 12 months than those receiving standard care, odds ratio 10.2 (95%CI 2.1, 49.6; p=0.004). Complications were similar between groups. In the economic evaluation, LAI was associated with lower costs and greater cost-effectiveness than standard care. Using a £20,000 per QALY threshold, the incremental net monetary benefit was £1,125 (95%CI £183, £2,067) and the probability of being cost-effective was greater than 98 %. The evidence suggests that peri-operative LAI is a cost-effective intervention for reducing acute and chronic post-surgical pain after THR

Background. Individual illness perceptions have been shown to be important influences on both clinical and work outcomes for those with back pain, yet the influence of ‘significant others’ (spouse/partner/close family member) illness perceptions is rarely explored, particularly in relation to work participation. Method. Semi-structured interviews based on the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire were conducted with two purposive samples of chronic back pain patients (working and work disabled), along with their significant others (n=28). Data were analysed using template analysis. Results. The significant others of patients who were work disabled tended to reinforce the patients' limitations and negative consequences of the back pain condition on every aspect of their lives. They believed that patients needed to be pain-free in order to resume work, and equated treatment success with complete removal of pain. Overall, they perceived patients to be blameless victims. In contrast, the significant others of patients who had managed to remain at work despite persistent back pain focused instead on what the patient could still do, were more accepting of treatment as providing pain management rather than a cure, and tended to describe patients as being stoical and heroic. Conclusions. This exploratory in-depth research reveals novel and interesting insights about the illness beliefs of significant others in relation to persistent back pain, and highlights the wider social circumstances that may act as barriers/facilitators to work participation. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: BackCare and the BUPA foundation. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting

The type, duration and intensity of exercise required to induce mechanical hypoalgesia is poorly defined. We are interested in identifying the exercise parameters required to induce raised pressure pain thresholds. This pilot study investigates the effect of indoor rowing on pressure pain threshold (PPT) in high performance rowers. Our ultimate aim is to investigate the potential of utilising exercise in the treatment of chronic pain and specifically in relation to the management of knee osteoarthritis. 20 high performance rowers (13M:7F; Mean Age 20.8 years; SD 1.74) were recruited from the University of Nottingham and Nottingham Boat Club high performance rowing teams under a research protocol approved by the University of Nottingham Ethics Committee. PPT measurements were made in triplicate using an algometer (SOMEDIC, Sweden) at the medial knee joint line, anterior tibia and sternum, pre- and post-exercise. Anthropomorphic and rowing ergometer power output data were also recorded. There was significant increase in PPT values at all sites following exercise (Medial joint line: 127.6Nm-2, 26%, p=0.001; Tibia: 110.8Nm-2, 24.7%, p<0.001; Sternum: 48.9Nm-2, 11.7%, p=0.005 – Wilcoxon Signed Rank) statistical power was 97.1%, 100% and 88.1%, respectively. PPT was greater at baseline at the medial joint line compared to other sites, reaching highly significant relative to the sternum (p<0.001). We determined that ten minutes of high intensity indoor rowing induced hypoalgesia in high performance rowers. Further research is required to investigate the detailed interplay between exercise and hypoalgesia, including its duration post exercise, to identify suitability for use in pain management strategies

We aimed to determine the impact of anaesthetic techniques on post-operative analgesic utilisation in people undergoing total knee arthroplasty. We conducted a prospective study at a district general hospital to assess post-operative analgesia use via patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing a elective total knee arthroplasty. Subjects were divided into three groups; group 1 (general anaesthetic and local nerve block, n = 39), group 2 (spinal only, n= 39) and group 3 (general anaesthetic only, n = 38). The primary outcome measure was post-operative morphine consumption through a PCA within the first 24 hours. All subjects were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated pain control nurse. Data was analysed using SPSS version 17 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Results are reported as mean (SD) unless stated otherwise. No significant difference in the age or sex distribution between groups was demonstrable. There was no statistical difference in the average usage of morphine when comparing Group 1 compared to group 2, (77.57 (49.56) vs 65.80 (44.71), p=0.27), group 1 compared to group 3, (77.57 (49.56) vs 77.80 (45.52) p=0.98) and finally group 2 compared to group 3, (65.80 (44.71) vs 77.80 (45.52), p=0.25). In this cohort of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty the anaesthetic technique used does not appear to have an influence on the post-operative pain management

Summary. Timing for the application and use of fentanyl patches for pre-emptive analgesia and sedation is crucial to obtain good clinical outcomes. Placement and timing is important to maximise clinical effect and apparent levels of analgesia. Introduction. The use of sheep as preclinical models for the investigation of orthopaedic conditions is gaining momentum, the control of their pain is a significant ethical issue. The daily need for injecting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or the shorter acting opioids increases the demand for handling post-operatively which can increase animal distress and risk of human injury. NSAIDs can have a negative effect on bone healing, complicating results. Opioid analgesics have no impact on bone healing. Fentanyl patches have become another option for use in pain management. Pre-emptive analgesia helps reduce the demand on post-operative analgesic use. Fentanyl has the added benefit of producing mild sedation. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl patches in sheep in an effort to maximise pre and post-surgical analgesia. Methods. Eight sheep were divided into 2 groups of 4. Both groups had a 100µg/kg/hr fentanyl patch (Durogesic – Janssen, Sydney, Australia) applied to the clipped and cleaned skin of the antebrachium and were held in place with a light bandage. (A dose rate range of 1- 1.6µg/kg/hr was achieved). Group 1 had a second patch applied after 72 hours and group 2 had a second patch applied after 24 hours. Blood samples were taken at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post patch application. The blood was immediately spun down and the serum drawn off and frozen. Serum levels for fentanyl were measured using commercial ELISA kits and read using a spectrophotometer. Animal behaviour throughout the study was observed and recorded by trained staff (CC, JR). Results. Six hours after the patch application, the sheep were relaxed and easily approachable. They stood calmly while blood was being drawn. This behaviour remained up to the 48 hour time point at which time cornering them in their pen became marginally more difficult, however they still stood calmly for the blood collection. By 72 hours, all sheep co-operation had dissipated. Peak blood levels of Fentanyl were reached by 12 hours post patch application. These levels were maintained with a relatively flat drug plateau for the prescribed 72 hours post application. No difference was found in the peak drug levels post application of the second patch between the two groups. There was no second higher peak in blood levels attained. Discussion. This study quantified the drug absorption and elimination curves of fentanyl using a controlled application method in an effort to better apply and manage post-surgical analgesia in sheep used for orthopaedic studies. The results indicate that the application of fentanyl for pre-emptive surgical analgesia can be applied for the full duration of 72 hours prior to the application of the second patch at the time of surgery. No benefit regarding analgesia appears to be gained from changing the first patch after 24 hours as peak serum levels are not affected. However for peak sedation the second patch can be applied anytime from 6 to 48 hours. This analgesic regime is beneficial to the animal as well as its handling and management