Introduction. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma (TOS) is a rare subtype of osteosarcoma. We review our experience to characterize its prevalence, treatment, relapse and survivorship at long term follow-up. Methods. Eighty-seven patients aged from 4 to 60 years (mean 20 years), were treated from 1985 to 2008. Lesions affected the femur (38), humerus (20), tibia (19), fibula (4), pelvis (3), foot (2) and radius (1). Eight patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Seventy-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three or more drugs according to different protocols, nine had surgery as first treatment. Limb salvage surgery was performed in 71 cases, amputation in 14 and rotationplasty in one. One patient died before surgery. Prognostic factors were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. At a mean follow-up of 8 years, overall survival was 81%, 65% and 65% at 2, 5 and 10 years respectively. Fifty-two patients were disease-free, three were alive with disease, twenty-nine died with disease and three died of other causes. Thirteen local recurrences were observed. Twenty-three patients developed lung (20) or bone (3) metastases. Pathologic fracture did not significantly influence survivorship. Prognostic influence of age of the patients was evaluated at three different cut-off (15, 20 and 25 years-old): younger patients had better survivorship, without statistical significance. Induced necrosis according to Huvos’ classification was significant at both univariate and multivariate regression Cox analysis (p=0.0001). Conclusion. TOS does not have a poor prognosis as previously reported in the literature. A high percentage of patients can be cured with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. In most patients, limb sparing surgery is possible and safe

Percutaneous biopsies can lead to seeding of tumour cells along the biopsy tract. Correct surgical management requires preoperative identification and excision of the biopsy tract at time of surgery. These tracts become increasingly difficult to identify with time, leading to risk of inadequate excision of the biopsy tract and recurrence of the tumour at the biopsy site. We conducted a prospective study involving 45 patients who had tissue biopsies for bone and soft tissue tumours between February and May 2008. All the biopsies were performed by consultant radiologist under ultrasound or CT guidance. Case note analysis, patient history and examination at the time of surgery were used to collect data. 23 of 45 patients had accurate identification of the biopsy tract by the surgeon at the time of excision. The mean time between biopsy and excision was 52 days (range 6–140). 22 of 45 patients had unidentifiable biopsy site, with the mean time between biopsy and excision being 98 days(range 13–164) p=0.0004(paired t test). All 4 patients who received post-biopsy radiotherapy had unidentifiable biopsy site tract (mean duration 104 days) and 11 of the 18 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy had an unidentifiable biopsy tract (mean duration 108 days). We concluded that identification of biopsy site was more difficult after 50 days, especially in patients who underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Following this study, all the patients who had biopsies of tumours had the site marked with India ink tattoo. We, then prospectively reviewed 36 patients between July and September 2010 who underwent excision of bone and soft tissue tumours and had their biopsy sites marked with India ink tattoo. After needle biopsy, one drop of the dye was applied at the site of the biopsy. This was taken up by capillary action beneath the dermis and remained present until the patient returned for their definitive surgery. The biopsy site was easily identifiable by the patients and the operating surgeon in all 36 patients. The mean time between biopsy and surgery was 77 days (range 10–299 days). Tattooing of the skin enabled the surgeon to accurately excise the biopsy tract along with the tumour. We recommend this technique of tattooing of the biopsy site with India ink, as it is safe, easily recognisable and permits accurate excision of the tract (including the tattoo), therefore preventing biopsy tract recurrence