Distal femoral physeal fractures can cause of growth distrurbance which frequently requires further surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to determine if tibial tuberosity ossification at the time of injury can predict further surgery in patients who have sustained a physeal fracture of the distal femur. We retrospectively investigated all patients who had operative treatment for a distal femoral physeal fracture at a paediatric level one trauma center over a 17 year period. Logistic regression analysis was performed investigating associations between the need for further surgery to treat growth disturbance and tibial tuberosity ossification, age, Salter Harris grade, mode of fixation or mechanism of injury. 74 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 57 boys (77%) and 17 girls (23%). The average age at time of injury was 13.1 years (range 2.-17.1 years). Following fixation, 30 patients (41%) underwent further surgery to treat growth disturbance. Absence of tibial tuberosity fusion to the metaphysis was significantly associated with need for further surgery (p = < 0 .001). Odds of requiring secondary surgery after tibial tuberosity fusion to metaphysis posteriorly (compared with not fused) were 0.12, 95% CI (0.04, 0.34). The estimate of effect of tibial tuberosity ossification on reoperation rates did not vary when adjusted for gender, mechanism, fixation and Salter Harris grade. When accounting for age, the odds of further operation if the tibial tuberosity is fused to the metaphysis posteriorly (compared with not fused) were 0.28, 95% CI (0.08, 0.94). Tibial tuberosity ossification stage at time of injury is a predictor of further surgery to treat growth disturbance in paediatric distal femoral fractures. Children with distal femoral physeal fractures whose tibial tuberosity was not fused to the metaphysis posteriorly were 8.3 times more likely to require further surgery

Introduction. Aneurysmal bone cysts commonly found in lower limbs are locally aggressive masses that can lead to bony erosion, instability and fractures. This has major implications in the lower limbs especially in paediatric patients, with potential growth disturbance and deformity. In this case series we describe radical aneurysmal bone cyst resection and lower limb reconstruction using cable transport and syndesmosis preservation. Materials & Methods. Case 1 - A 12-year-old boy presented with a two-week history of atraumatic right ankle pain. An X-ray demonstrated a distal tibia metaphyseal cyst confirmed on biopsy as an aneurysmal bone cyst. The cyst expanded on interval X-rays from 5.5cm to 8.5cm in 9 weeks. A wide-margin en-bloc resection was performed leaving a 13.8cm tibial defect. A cable transport hexapod frame and a proximal tibial osteotomy was performed, with syndesmosis screw fixation. The transport phase lasted 11 months. While in frame, the boy sustained a distal femur fracture from a fall. The femur and the docking site were plated at the same sitting and frame removed. At one-year post-frame removal he is pain-free, with full ankle dorsiflexion but plantarflexion limited to 25 degrees. He has begun graduated return to sport. Results. Case 2 - A 12-year-old girl was referred with a three-month history of lateral left ankle swelling. X-ray demonstrated an aneurysmal bone cyst in the distal fibula metaphysis. The cyst grew from 4.2 × 2.3cm to 5.2 × 3.32cm in 2 months. A distal fibula resection (6.2cm) with syndesmosis fixation and hexapod cable transport frame were undertaken. The frame was in situ for 13 weeks and during this time she required an additional osteotomy for premature consolidation and had one pin site infection. After 13 weeks a second syndesmosis screw was placed, frame removed, and a cast applied. 3 months later she had fibular plating, BMAC and autologous iliac crest bone graft for slow union. At 3 years post-operative she has no evidence of recurrence, is pain-free and has no functional limitation. Conclusions. We describe two cases of ankle syndesmosis preservation using cable transport for juxta-articular aneurysmal bone cysts. This allows wide resection to prevent recurrence while also preserving primary ankle stability and leg length in children. Both children had a minor complication, but both had an excellent final outcome. Cable bone transport and prophylactic syndesmosis stabilization allows treatment of challenging juxta-articular aneurysmal bone cysts about the ankle. These techniques are especially useful in large bone defects

Introduction. Fibrous dysplasia is a pathological condition, where normal medullary bone is replaced by fibrous tissue and small, woven specules of bone. Fibrous dysplasia can occur in epiphysis, metaphysis or diaphysis. Occationally, biopsy is necessary to establish the diagnosis. We present a review of operative treatment using the Ilizarov technique. The management of tibial fibrous dysplasia in children are curettage or subperiosteal resection to extra periosteal wide resection followed by bone transport. Materials and Methods. A total of 18 patients were treated between 2010 – 2020; 12 patients came with pain and 6 with pain and deformity. All patients were treated by Ilizarov technique. Age ranges from 4–14 years. 12 patients by enbloc excision and bone transportation and 6 patients were treated by osteotomy at the true apex of the deformity by introducing the k/wires in the medullary cavity with stable fixation by Ilizarov device. The longest duration for bone transport was 16 weeks (14–20 weeks) for application, after deformity correction was 20 weeks. We have never used any kind of bone grafts. Results. All the 18 patients were treated successfully by Ilizarov compression distraction device. The patients with localized tibial pathology with deformity had the shortest period on the Ilizarov apparatus, 14 weeks. Conclusions. Preservation and bone regeneration by distraction histogenesis constitutes a highly conservative limb saving surgery. Patients with bone defects of <10 cm, a great deal of preserved healthy tissue and good prognosis are good candidates for these methods

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. It is estimated that 183,000 total hip replacements were performed in the United States in the year 2000 and that 31,000 of these (17%) were revision procedures. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in preoperative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. A classification of femoral deficiency has been developed and an algorithmic approach to femoral reconstruction is presented. An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliably achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs. The surgical technique is straightforward and we continue to use this type of device in the majority of our revision total hip arthroplasties. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results. Based on our results, the following reconstructive algorithm is recommended for femoral reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Type I: In a Type I femur, there is minimal loss of cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Cemented or cementless fixation can be utilised. If cemented fixation is selected, great care must be taken in removing the neo-cortex often encountered to allow for appropriate cement intrusion into the remaining cancellous bone. Type II: In a Type II femur, there is extensive loss of the metaphyseal cancellous bone and thus, fixation with cement is unreliable. In this cohort of patients, successful fixation was achieved using a diaphyseal fitting, extensively porous coated implant. However, as the metaphysis is supportive, a cementless implant that achieves primary fixation in the metaphysis can be utilised. Type IIIA: In a Type IIIA femur, the metaphysis is non-supportive and an extensively coated stem of adequate length is utilised to ensure that more than 4cm of scratch fit is obtained in the diaphysis. Type IIIB: Based on the poor results obtained with a cylindrical, extensively porous coated implant (with 4 of 8 reconstructions failing), our present preference is a modular, cementless, tapered stem with flutes for obtaining rotational stability. Type IV: The isthmus is completely non-supportive and the femoral canal is widened. Cementless fixation cannot be reliably used in our experience, as it is difficult to obtain adequate initial implant stability that is required for osseointegration. Reconstruction can be performed with impaction grafting if the cortical tube of the proximal femur is intact. However, this technique can be technically difficult to perform, time consuming and costly given the amount of bone graft that is often required. Although implant subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures have been associated with this technique, it can provide an excellent solution for the difficult revision femur where cementless fixation cannot be utilised. Alternatively, an allograft-prosthesis composite can be utilised for younger patients in an attempt to reconstitute bone stock and a proximal femoral replacing endoprosthesis used for more elderly patients

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in pre-operative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. Type I: Minimal loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often seen when conversion of a cementless femoral component without biological ingrowth surface requires revision. Type II: Extensive loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often encountered after the removal of a cemented femoral component. Type IIIA: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with more than 4 cm of intact diaphyseal bone for distal fixation. This type of defect is commonly seen after removal of grossly loose femoral components inserted with first generation cementing techniques. Type IIIB: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with less than 4 cm of diaphyseal bone available for distal fixation. This type of defect is often seen following failure of a cemented femoral component that was inserted with a cement restrictor and cementless femoral components associated with significant distal osteolysis. Type IV: Extensive meta-diaphyseal damage in conjunction with a widened femoral canal. The isthmus is non-supportive. Based on our results, the following reconstructive algorithm is recommended for femoral reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliably achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs and the surgical technique is straightforward. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results. Type I: Cemented or cementless fixation can be utilised. If cemented fixation is selected, great care must be taken in removing the neo-cortex often encountered to allow for appropriate cement intrusion into the remaining cancellous bone. Type II: In this cohort of patients, successful fixation was achieved using a diaphyseal fitting, extensively porous coated implant. However, as the metaphysis is supportive, a cementless implant that achieves primary fixation in the metaphysis can be utilised. Type IIIA: An extensively coated stem of adequate length is utilised to ensure that more than 4 cm of scratch fit is obtained in the diaphysis. Type IIIB: Our present preference is a modular, cementless, tapered stem with flutes for obtaining rotational stability. Type IV: Cementless fixation cannot be reliably used in our experience, as it is difficult to obtain adequate initial implant stability that is required for osseointegration. Reconstruction can be performed with impaction grafting if the cortical tube of the proximal femur is intact. However, this technique can be technically difficult to perform, time consuming and costly given the amount of bone graft that is often required. Although implant subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures (both intra-operatively and post-operatively) have been associated with this technique, it can provide an excellent solution for the difficult revision femur where cementless fixation cannot be utilised. Alternatively, an allograft-prosthesis composite can be utilised for younger patients in an attempt to reconstitute bone stock and a proximal femoral replacing endoprosthesis used for more elderly patients

There is no mathematical relationship between the internal diameter of the femoral metaphysis and diaphysis. Unless an infinite number of monolithic stems are available with variable metaphyseal and diaphyseal diameters, which is not economically possible, even in virgin cases, the surgeon has to decide if the stem is going to fit in the metaphysis or the diaphysis. It is not possible to match both. In revision cases with a hollowed out metaphysis, the situation is much worse. As it is obviously easier to fit the diaphysis, this is what stems such as the AML and Wagner stem have done. They completely ignore the metaphysis and obtain fixation in the diaphysis. This is all well and good, but it means that the proximal femur is unloaded, like an astronaut in space. While, there will be some recovery due to removal of the toxins and local muscle pull, it will be incomplete. Furthermore, should sepsis occur, one is faced with the horror of removing a distally fixed implant. Clearly, if proximal fixation, i.e. above the level of lesser trochanter could reliably be achieved, this would be preferable in terms of proximal loading leading to bone recovery and ease of removal should it be required. The only way that proximal loading can be achieved is if the metaphyseal and diaphyseal parts of the component can be varied infinitely. This clearly can only be achieved by using a modular stem. The concern with modularity always has been fretting at the sleeve-stem locking mechanism with release of metal ions. The stem, which I have been using for the last 25 years, is the SROM stem. Fretting and ion release had never been an issue. As the components are made of a relatively soft titanium alloy, it is likely that the sleeve and the stem cold weld, thus, eliminating any movement and eliminating friction. I have a follow-up of roughly 120 revision cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and a maximum follow-up of 22 years. I have no loosening in easy revision cases where a primary stem was used. I have had some loosenings in extremely difficult revision situations where a long bowed stem was required, but even then, the loosening rate is less than 3%. I use this stem in primary situations, i.e. in about 80% of all the primaries I have done. This means I have done roughly 1500 cases or more. Other than some late infections, I have never, ever had any stem loosening in a simple case. Obviously, I have had loosenings in some cases, where we have been doing fancy shortening or de-rotation osteotomies, but none in simple primary cases. I would, therefore, suggest that the surgeon, if he wishes to use this stem, please try it out on some simple primary cases. The ability to vary distal and proximal internal diameters and proximal geometry makes for easy surgery. I have been using this stem for 25 years and continue to use it in all my primary noncemented cases. I believe in the adage of “train hard and fight easy.” I think that surgeons should not get themselves into a situation where they are forced in a difficult case to use something they have never seen before

INTRODUCTION:. Modular femoral stems of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) have been designed to fit the metaphysis and diaphysis separately. Clinical results with modular femoral stems are reported to be satisfactory, but there exists several concerns with modular implant connections, including fretting corrosion, fracture of implant, and dissociation the stem from the proximal sleeve. Recently, we have become aware of another potential consequence of the modular design: sleeve deformation secondary to forces encountered during insertion. In our patients, we noted that the stems would not fully seat in the machined taper of the sleeve, indicating that some type deformation to the sleeve had occurred. We began an in vivo study to characterize this phenomenon. The objectives of this study were (1) Does deformation occur by impacting the sleeve into the metaphysis? (2) If so, quantify the sleeve deformation in hip arthroplasty patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS:. One man and 7 women undergoing primary THA were enrolled. This project was approved by IRB. This modular system (4-U CLS; Nakashima Medical Co., Japan) consists of a metaphyseal sleeve that connects with the diaphyseal stem via a Morse taper. The sleeve was impacted into the metaphysis first, followed by the stem. A custom taper gauge for each size of sleeve (Figure 1A) was inserted into the sleeve before and after impacting the sleeve into the metaphysis, and the distance between the top of the sleeve and the top of the gauge was measured using a caliper (* in Figure 1B). Deformation was defined as the difference in distance between the before and the after impacted dimensions. Preoperative femoral morphology, assessed using Dorr classification system, was type A in 2 hips, type B in 5 hips, and type C in 1 hip. RESULTS:. Intraoperatively, all sleeves had measurable deformity. Deformation ranged from 0.1 to 3.2 mm and averaged 1.18 ± 1.11 mm. Deformation was marginally related to bone type. Sleeve implanted into type A bone experienced 2.45 mm deformation, sleeve implanted into type B bone experienced 0.88 mm deformation, and sleeve implanted into type C bone experienced 0.1 mm deformation (Figure 2). And the largest deformation was observed at 51 years youngest male patient. DISCUSSION:. The small number studied in this study is a limitation. And we are not certain how long the deformation of the sleeve lasts. Despite the limitations, this study showed that deformation of sleeve occurred by impacting the sleeve into the metaphysis, and sleeves implanted into harder bone experienced larger mean deformation than sleeves implanted into less dense bone. This phenomenon may not have been a relevant issue in the past, but recent studies have reported the deformation of metal acetabular cup. The deformation can affect the torsional stability of modular implant connection and fretting corrosion, so further investigation will be needed. The modular femoral stem with sleeve remains an excellent design, providing good initial stability and long-term results. However, greater understanding of sleeve is important to orthopaedic surgeons

Introduction. Circumferential periosteal release is a rarely reported procedure for paediatric limb lengthening. The technique involves circumferential excision of a strip of periosteum from the metaphysis of the distal femur, tibia and fibula. This study aims to determine the mid to long-term effectiveness of this technique. Materials and Methods. A retrospective case series was performed of all patients undergoing circumferential periosteal release of the distal femur and/or tibia between 2006 and 2017. Data collected included demographics, surgical indication, post-operative limb-lengths and complications. Data collection was stopped if a further procedure was performed that may affect limb-length (except a further release). Leg-length discrepancies were calculated as absolute values and as percentages of the longer limb-length. Final absolute and percentage discrepancies were compared to initial discrepancies using a paired t-test. Results. Eighteen patients (11 males) were identified, who underwent 25 procedures. The mean age at first surgery was 5.83 (SD 3.49). The commonest indication was congenital limb deficiency (13 patients). In 23 procedures the periosteum was released in two limb segments (distal femur and distal tibia), whereas in two patients it was released in a single limb segment. Five patients underwent repeat periosteal release, and one patient had three periosteal releases. Mean follow-up was 63.1 months (SD 33.9). Fifteen patients had sufficient data for statistical analysis. The mean initial absolute discrepancy was 2.01cm (SD 1.13), and the mean initial percentage discrepancy was 4.09% (SD 2.76). The mean final absolute discrepancy was 1.00cm (SD 1.62), and the mean percentage final discrepancy was 1.37% (SD 2.42). The mean reduction in absolute discrepancy was 0.52 cm (95%CI −0.04–1.08; p=0.068, paired t-test), and the mean reduction in percentage discrepancy was 2.00% (95% CI 1.02–2.98, p=<0.001 paired t-test). In five patients the operated limb overgrew the shorter limb. Conclusions. Circumferential periosteal release produces a modest decrease in both absolute and percentage limb-length discrepancy, although the outcome is variable and some patients may experience overgrowth of the operated limb

INTRODUCTION. Wedge femoral stems used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have evolved with modifications including shorter lengths, reduced distal geometries, and modular necks. Unlike fit and fill stems which contact most of the metaphysis, tapered wedge femoral stems are designed to achieve proximal medial/lateral fixation. These single taper, wedge stems have demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. The tapered wedge stem evaluated in this study has further reduced distal geometry to provide a wedge-fit within the metaphysis of the proximal femoral canal for all femur types (Dorr A, B, C). The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes, including femoral stem subsidence, of a tapered wedge femoral stem. METHODS. Fifty subjects (28 males, 22 females; mean age: 64.7±9.7 years; mean BMI: 29.6±4.6) underwent primary THA with a tapered wedge femoral stem. IRB approval was received prior to conducting the study and all participants signed the informed consent. Clinical data outcomes for this study included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), revisions, and subsidence at the 6-week, 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative time points. Femoral stem subsidence was measured by an independent third party. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences between genders (p<0.05). RESULTS. For patients returning for their 2-year post- operative visit (n=42), the HHS improved by 40.7 points to 91.9 from 51.2 and the OHS improved by 23.5 points to 44.6 from 21.1. There was no significant difference between genders with regard to age, BMI, or HHS scores. However, the males had significantly higher pre-operative OHS scores (23.4 vs. 18.2) and 3-month post-operative OHS scores (43.7 vs. 40.3). There were no revisions. There were no observations of femoral stem subsidence at 1 year (n=45) or 2 years (n=40). DISCUSSION. The tapered wedge femoral stem exhibited positive early clinical results as demonstrated by the significant improvement in functional outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to 2-years post-operative. These 2-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Functional outcomes scores continued to improve at the 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year post-operative visits. The 1-year and 2-year outcomes were not significantly different. Additionally, the implant was well fixated as there were no reports of femoral stem subsidence 2 years post-operative. SIGNIFICANCE. The tapered wedge femoral stem evaluated in this study demonstrated positive early clinical performance with no reports of femoral stem subsidence or revisions. This tapered wedge stem design is a promising alternative to conventional femoral stems

Revision of the failed femoral component can be challenging. Multiple reconstructive options are available and the procedure is technically difficult and thus meticulous pre-operative planning is required. The Paprosky Femoral Classification is useful as it helps the surgeon determine what bone stock is available for fixation and hence, which type of femoral reconstruction is most appropriate. Type 1 Defect: This is essentially a normal femur and reconstruction can proceed as the surgeon would with a primary femur. Type 2 Defect: The metaphysis is damaged but still supportive and hence a stem that gains primary fixation in the metaphysis can be used. Type 3 Defect: The metaphysis is damaged and non-supportive and hence a stem that gains primary fixation in the diaphysis is required. Broken down into types “A” and “B” based on the amount of intact isthmus available for distal fixation. Type 3A Defect: >4 cm of intact femoral isthmus is present. Can be managed with a fully porous coated stem, so long as the diameter is <18 mm and torsional remodeling is not present. Type 3B Defect: There is < 4 cm of intact femoral isthmus and based on lower rates of osseointegration if a fully porous coated stem is used, a modular titanium tapered stem is recommended. Type 4 Defect: The most challenging to manage as there is no isthmus available for distal fixation. Can be managed with proximal femoral replacement if uncontained and impaction grafting if contained. We have also successfully used modular titanium tapered stems that appear to gain “3-point fixation” in this type of defect

INTRODUCTION: As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. It is estimated that 183,000 total hip replacements were performed in the United States in the year 2000 and that 31,000 of these (17%) were revision procedures. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in pre-operative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. DISCUSSION: An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliably achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs. The surgical technique is straightforward and we continue to use this type of device in the majority of our revision total hip arthroplasties. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results. Based on our results, the following reconstructive algorithm is recommended for femoral reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: TYPE I: In a Type I femur, there is minimal loss of cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Cemented or cementless fixation can be utilised. If cemented fixation is selected, great care must be taken in removing the neo-cortex often encountered to allow for appropriate cement intrusion into the remaining cancellous bone. TYPE II: In a Type II femur, there is extensive loss of the metaphyseal cancellous bone and thus fixation with cement is unreliable. In this cohort of patients, successful fixation was achieved using a diaphyseal fitting, extensively porous coated implant in 26 of 29 cases (90%) However, as the metaphysis is supportive, a cementless implant that achieves primary fixation in the metaphysis can be utilized. TYPE III A: In a Type IIIA femur, the metaphysis is non-supportive and an extensively coated stem of adequate length is utilised to ensure that more than 4 cm of scratch fit is obtained in the diaphysis. TYPE III B: Based on the poor results obtained with a cylindrical, extensively porous coated implant, our present preference is a modular, cementless, tapered stem with flutes for obtaining rotational stability. Excellent results have been reported with this type of implant and by virtue of its tapered design, excellent initial axial stability can be obtained even in femurs with a very short isthmus. Subsidence has been reported as a potential problem with this type of implant and they can be difficult to insert. However, with the addition of modularity to many systems that employ this concept of fixation, improved stability can be obtained by impacting the femoral component as far distally as needed while then building up the proximal segment to restore appropriate leg length. TYPE IV: In a Type IV femur, the isthmus is completely non-supportive and the femoral canal is widened. Cementless fixation cannot be reliably used in our experience, as it is difficult to obtain adequate initial implant stability that is required for osseointegration. Reconstruction can be performed with impaction grafting if the cortical tube of the proximal femur is intact. However, this technique can be technically difficult to perform, time consuming and costly given the amount of bone graft that is often required. Although implant subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures have been associated with this technique, it can provide an excellent solution for the difficult revision femur where cementless fixation cannot be utilised. Alternatively, an allograft-prosthesis composite can be utilised for younger patients in an attempt to reconstitute bone stock and a proximal femoral replacing endoprosthesis used for more elderly patients

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most prevalent bone tumor in children and young adults. Most tumors arise from the metaphysis of the long bones and easily metastasize to the lungs. Current therapeutic strategies of osteosarcoma are routinely surgical resection and chemotherapy, which are limited to the patients suffering from metastatic recurrence. Therefore, to investigate molecular mechanisms that contribute to osteosarcoma progression is very important and may shed light on targeted therapeutic approach to improve the survival of patients with this disease. Several miRNAs have been found expressed differentially in osteosarcoma (OS), In this study, we found that miR-144 significantly suppresses osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration andinvasion ability in vitro, and inhibited tumor growth and metastasisin vivo. The function and molecular mechanism of miR-144 in Osteosarcoma was further investigated. Tissue samples from fifty-one osteosarcoma patients were obtained from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. The in vitro function of miR-144 in Osteosarcoma was investigated by cell viability assay, wound healing assay, invasion assay, the molecular mechanism was identified by Biotin-coupled miRNA capture, Dual-luciferase reporter assays, etc. the in vivo function of miR-144 in osteosarcoma was confirmed by osteosarcoma animal model and miR-144−/− zebrafish model. Mechanically, we demonstrated that Ras homolog family member A (RhoA) and its pivotal downstream effector Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) were both identified as direct targets of miR-144. Moreover, the negative co-relation between downregulated miR-144 and upregulated ROCK1/RhoA was verified both in the osteosarcoma cell lines and clinical patients' specimens. Functionally, RhoA with or without ROCK1 co-overexpression resulted a rescue phenotype on the miR-144 inhibited cell growth, migration and invasion abilities, while individual overexpression of ROCK1 had no statistical significance compared with control in miR-144 transfected SAOS2 and U2-OS cells. This study demonstrates that miR-144 inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in osteosarcoma via dual-suppressing of RhoA and ROCK1, which could be a new therapeutic approach for the treatment ofosteosarcoma

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in preoperative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. We have developed a classification of femoral deficiency and an algorithmic approach to femoral reconstruction is presented. Type I: Minimal loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often seen when conversion of a cementless femoral component without biological ingrowth surface requires revision. Type II: Extensive loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often encountered after the removal of a cemented femoral component. Type IIIA: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with more than four centimeters of intact diaphyseal bone for distal fixation. This type of defect is commonly seen after removal of grossly loose femoral components inserted with first generation cementing techniques. Type IIIB: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with less than four centimeters of diaphyseal bone available for distal fixation. This type of defect is often seen following failure of a cemented femoral component that was inserted with a cement restrictor and cementless femoral components associated with significant distal osteolysis. Type IV: Extensive meta-diaphyseal damage in conjunction with a widened femoral canal. The isthmus is non-supportive

Distal neck modularity places a modular connection at a mechanically critical location, which is also the location that confers perhaps the greatest clinical utility. The benefits of increased clinical options at that location must be weighed against the potential risks of adding an additional junction to the construct. Those risks include prosthetic neck fracture, taper corrosion, metal hypersensitivity, and adverse local tissue reaction. Further, in-vitro testing of ultimate or fatigue strength of femoral component designs has repeatedly failed to predict behavior in-vivo, raising questions about the utility of in-vitro testing that does not incorporate the effect of mechanically assisted crevice corrosion into the test design. The material properties of Ti alloy and CoCr alloy place limits on design considerations in the proximal femur. The smaller taper junctions that are necessary for primary reconstruction are particularly vulnerable to failure whereas larger taper junctions commonly used in revision modular femoral component designs have greater opportunity for success. Modular junctions of CoCr alloy on conventional Ti alloy have been shown to have a greater incidence of clinically significant mechanically assisted crevice corrosion and adverse reaction. Designs that have proven clinical strength and utility universally have larger, more robust junctions, that extend into the metaphysis of the femur. While these designs are primarily designed for revision total hip replacement (THR), they are occasionally indicated for primary THR. Overall, however, while design options at the neck-stem junction have unmatched clinical utility, no design that does not extend into the metaphysis has proven to be universally reliable. While routine use of modular neck components for primary THR does not appear to be clinically indicated based on current evidence, modular designs with proven successful proximal junctions appear to be indicated for revision THR and rare primary THR with extreme version or other anatomical circumstances

Femoral stress shielding in cementless THA is a potential complication commonly observed in cementless distally loading press-fit stems. Long-term metaphyseal fixation and proximal load transfer is desired. Is routine autologous metaphyseal bone impaction and proximal primary stability an answer to this goal?. This prospective study describes long-term femoral bone remodeling and load transfer in cementless THA at a mean of 17 years (range: 15 to 20 years) in 208 consecutive fully HA-coated stems (Corail). All primary THA were performed by one group of surgeons between 1986 and 1991. The concept of surgical technique included impaction of autologous metaphyseal bone using bland femoral broaches until primary stability was achieved without distal press-fit. Radiographic evaluation revealed a total of five (2.4%) stems with periprosthetic osteolysis, which were associated with eccentric polyethylene wear. They were either revised or awaiting revision. The remaining 97.6% stems revealed desired proximal load transfer in the metaphysis (52%) or in both metaphysis and diaphysis (48%). Distal stress shielding was not observed and was considered to be related to: impaction of metaphyseal bone, bland broaches, HA coating, and prosthetic design. Biological autologous bone impaction of the metaphysis provides both primary stem stability and successful longterm osteointegration with the Corail stem after 20 years. The surgical technique of proximal autologous bone impaction rather than extraction of cancellous bone material and the use of a fully HA coated stem without distal press-fit show encouraging longterm results in THA

Distal neck modularity places a modular connection at a mechanically critical location which is also the location that confers perhaps the greatest clinical utility. Assessment of femoral anteversion in 342 of our total hip replacement (THR) patients by CT showed a range from −24 to 61 degrees. The use of monoblock stems in some of these deformed femurs therefore must result in a failure to appropriately reconstruct the hip and have increased risks of impingement, instability, accelerated bearing wear or fracture, and adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR). However, the risks of failing to properly reconstruct the hip without neck modularity must be weighed against the additional risks introduced by neck modularity. There are several critical design, material, and technique variables that are directly associated with higher or lower incidences of problems associated with modular neck femoral components. Unfortunately, in vitro testing of the fatigue strength of these constructs has failed to predict their behavior in vivo. Designs predicted to tolerate loads that far exceed those experienced in vivo still fail at unacceptably high rates. Titanium alloy neck components subjected to the stresses at the neck-stem junction continue to fail at an unacceptable incidence. CoCr alloy neck components, while theoretically stronger, still fracture and are further compromised by mechanically assisted crevice corrosion, metal hypersensitivity, and rarely, adverse tissue reaction. Designs that have proven clinical strength and utility universally have larger, more robust junctions that extend into the metaphysis of the femur. While these designs are primarily designed for revision THR, they are occasionally indicated for primary THR. Overall, however, while design options at the neck-stem junction have unmatched clinical utility, no design that does not extend into the metaphysis has proven to be universally reliable. While routine use for primary THR does not appear clinically indicated based on current evidence, modular designs with proven successful proximal junctions appear to be indicated for extreme version or anatomical circumstances

The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications. A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 8 (26.7%) and postoperative radiotherapy in 17 (56.7%) patients. The mean clinical follow-up was 25.2±26.3 months and the mean radiographical follow-up was 24.8±26 months. The mean ISOLS score for both reviewers was found to be 89±6.5% and 86.5±6.1%, respectively. Additionally, the first reviewer found two patients to be possibly loos (6.7%) compared to one (3.3%) patient for the second reviewer. No components scored as probably or definitely loose and non-required revision for either loosening or metal failure. Furthermore, both reviewers showed no acetabular erosion in 25 (83.3%) and 24 (80%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, the overall rate of complications was 36.6% with 11 complications reported in 30 patients. Local recurrence occurred in five (16.6%) patients. Prosthetic Dislocation was the most frequent complications with eight dislocations in four patients. Despite complications, our results showed no radiographic evidence of stem loosening. Cementing proximal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term

The use of shorter humeral stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been reported as safe and effective. Shorter stems are purported to be bone preserving, easy to revise, and have reduced surgical time. However, a frequent radiographic finding with the use of uncemented short stems is stress shielding. Smaller stem diameters reduce stress shielding, however, carry the risk of varus or valgus malalignment in the metadiaphyseal region of the proximal humerus. The aim of this retrospective radiographic study was to measure the true post-operative neck-shaft (N-S) angle of a curved short stem with a recommended implantation angle of 145°. True anteroposterior radiographs of patients who received RTSA using an Ascend Flex short stem at three specialized shoulder centres (London, ON, Canada, Lyon, France, Munich, Germany) were reviewed. Radiographs that showed the uncemented stem and humeral tray in orthogonal view without rotation were included. Sixteen patients with proximal humeral fractures or revision surgeries were excluded. This yielded a cohort of 124 implant cases for analysis (122 patients, 42 male, 80 female) at a mean age of 74 years (range, 48 – 91 years). The indications for RTSA were rotator cuff deficient shoulders (cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tears, osteoarthritis with cuff insufficiency) in 78 patients (63%), primary osteoarthritis in 41 (33%), and rheumatoid arthritis in 5 (4%). The humeral component longitudinal axis was measured in degrees and defined as neutral if the value fell within ±5° of the humeral axis. Angle values >5° and < 5 ° were defined as valgus and varus, respectively. The filling-ratio of the implant within the humeral shaft was measured at the level of the metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia). Measurements were conducted by two independent examiners (SA and TW). To test for conformity of observers, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.911– 0.986). The average difference between the humeral shaft axis and the humeral component longitudinal axis was 3.8° ± 2.8° (range, 0.2° – 13.2°) corresponding to a true mean N-S angle of 149° ± 3° in valgus. Stem axis was neutral in 70% (n=90) of implants. Of the 34 malaligned implants, 82% (n=28) were in valgus (mean N-S angle 153° ± 2°) and 18% (n=6) in varus position (mean N-S angle 139° ± 1°). The average FRmet and FRdiawere 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.72 ± 0.11, respectively. No association was found between stem diameter and filling ratios (FRmet, FRdia) or cortical contact with the stem (r = 0.39). Operative technique and implant design affect the ultimate positioning of the implant in the proximal humerus. This study has shown, that in uncemented short stem implants, neutral axial alignment was achieved in 70% of cases, while the majority of malaligned humeral components (86%) were implanted in valgus, corresponding to a greater than 145° neck shaft angle of the implant. It is important for surgeons to understand that axial malalignment of a short stem implant does influence the true neck shaft angle

Over the past several decades, cementless femoral fixation for primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) has become more common in North America. It is estimated that nearly 90% of all primary THAs completed in the United States are cementless. In the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry, the use of cementless fixation has increased from 51.3% in 2003 to 63.3% in 2015. During the same time period, cemented fixation declined from 13.9% to 3.7%, but hybrid fixation was relatively stable at about 33%. This is likely related to the fact that multiple institutional and national registries have shown a higher rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures with the use of cementless femoral components in certain patient populations. Those risk factors include patients greater than 65 years of age, female patients, and those with significant osteoporosis and Dorr C canals. However, it is important to note that not all cementless femoral components are similar. In fact, there is great variation in not only the geometry of cementless femoral components, but also in the type and extent of the biologic ingrowth surfaces. Each design has unique advantages and disadvantages. While some cementless femoral components are indicated for the general population, some are more specific and tailored to complex primary THAs (such as developmental dysplasia of the hip or post-traumatic arthritis with intra-operative concern for femoral version and thus hip stability) or revision procedures where distal fixation is needed (such as those with periprosthetic fractures or lack of proximal metaphyseal bony support). In 2000, Berry first described the evolution of cementless femoral components based upon distinct geometries that govern where fixation is obtained. This was modified in 2011 by Khanuja et al. to include six general types of cementless femoral components based upon shape. These include the following: Type 1: Single wedge; Type 2: Double edge with metaphyseal filling; Type 3: Tapered - A: Tapered round, B: Tapered spline/cone, C: Tapered rectangle; Type 4: Cylindrical fully coated; Type 5: Modular; Type 6: Anatomic. Type 1, 2, and 6 cementless femoral components obtain fixation in the metaphysis, whereas Type 3 stems obtain fixation in the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Type 4 stems obtain fixation in the diaphysis. Type 5 stems can obtain fixation in either the metaphysis or the diaphysis. Within each type of stem, specific implant designs have had excellent long-term survivorship, while other specific implant designs have had higher than expected failure rates. Type 1 stems have the most published reports, and most contemporary reports indicate a stem survivorship greater than 95% at 15–20 years. Similar findings have been documented with specific implants from other types of stems when appropriate indications and surgical technique are utilised. Of note, one class of stems that has shown early failures due to adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) is that of dual-modular necks. On the other hand, modular fluted tapered stems continue to produce excellent long-term data in complex primary THAs, as well as difficult revision THAs

Introduction. Many uncemented femoral implant designs have had successful outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different uncemented stem designs achieve initial and long term stability through shape, size, coating and fit. There is increasing emphasis on bone preservation, particularly in younger and more active patients. The desire to optimize load transfer has led to the development of short stems that seek to achieve fixation in the proximal femur. Short stems designed to achieve stability by engaging the metaphysis or the proximal femoral necks are currently in clinical use. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which five stems designed to achieve proximal fixation contact the bone in the proximal femur. Using three-dimensional CT models of 30 femurs, we assessed the fit, fill and contact of each of the five different implants. Methods. Using three-dimensional computerized templating software designed to navigate robotic surgery, pre-operative CT scans of 30 patients were analyzed. Each of five femoral implant designs (TRILOCK, ARC, ABGII, CITATION, ACCOLADE) was then optimized for size and fit based on manufacturer technique guide and design rationale. The proximal femoral metaphysis was divided into four zones in the axial plane. Five contact points were determined on the frontal plane using anatomical landmarks. Each zone was assessed for cortical contact and fill of the bone-implant interface. We graded contact from 1 to 5, with 5 being 100% contact. Results. In the 150 different templates analyzed significant variability existed in contact areas of the proximal femur depending on implant design and femoral morphology. High femoral neck resection design (ARC) had the greatest contact area in the most proximal zones (Figure 1). The ABG II and Trilock stems had comparable contact in the antero-medial zones, while the ABG II had greater fill in the sagittal plane (Figures 2 & 3). The Trilock was the only stem that consistently achieved lateral cortical contact at the distal landmarks. All stems showed a pattern of mostly posteromedial contact proximally and mostly anteromedial distally. Discussion. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the contact points of metaphyseal engaging stems in the proximal femur. By directly comparing implant contact points in the same femur we found significant variability in the extent of fit, fill and contact of the metaphysis. These differences in proximal femoral contact are like to have implications for fixation in bone of varying quality and for long term proximal bone remodeling