Given the high prevalence of psychiatric illness in the total joint arthroplasty (TJA) population, relatively little is known about how these two conditions affect each other. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of major psychiatric illness on patient specific outcomes after TJA. We hypothesize that patients with major psychiatric illnesses will report inferior outcomes and have more complications after TJA compared to those without any psychiatric illness. We matched and compared two cohorts of patients undergoing TJA from a prospectively collected database registry, which included those with and without a major psychiatric disorder. Major psychiatric disorder was identified in the registry database by determining if patients had been formally diagnosed with any of the following conditions: bipolar disorder, major personality disorder, chronic mental health diagnoses, depression, or schizophrenia. Primary outcomes of interest included patient specific outcomes measured using the WOMAC or EQ5D. Secondary outcomes included complications, infections, hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission rates and final discharge destination. In total we included 1828 TJAs (1000 THAs, 828 TKAs). In terms of the primary outcome, both the THA experimental group (37.80 ± 17.91 vs. 40.74 ± 19.3, p=0.023) and TKA experimental group (43.38 ± 18.41 vs 45.45 ± 20.07, p=0.050) had significantly lower preoperative WOMAC scores compared to their respective control groups. At the 3-month period both the THA experimental group (76.74 ± 16.94 vs. 79.16 ± 16.19, p=0.036) and TKA experimental group (71.09 ± 18.64 vs. 75.92 ± 16.22, p=0) again had significantly lower 3-month postoperative WOMAC score. Clinical outcomes at the 1-year mark were similar for both groups in terms of WOMAC and EQ5D. Patients with psychiatric illness were more likely to have increased LOS and non-routine discharge from hospital. In the THA subset, the experimental group had an increased LOS by 1.43 days (p=0.0028), in the TKA subset, the experimental group had an increased LOS by 0.77 days (p= 0.050). In terms of non-routine discharge, the THA experimental group was discharged home 86.9% of the time compared to the control group at 91.8% (p=0.024). In the TKA subset, the experimental group was discharged home 87.6% of the time compared to the control group at 92% (p=0.022). There were no other differences between the two subsets in regards to transfusions, 30-day readmissions, infections, mechanical adverse events, and medical complications. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that psychiatric illness can result in worse outcomes in the early perioperative period after TJA, although outcomes are equivalent 1 year postoperatively. Patients with psychiatric illness can be expected to gain significant improvements in outcome after surgery that are comparable to a baseline population without psychiatric illness. Nonetheless, patients with psychiatric illness are at increased risk of delayed discharge and non-routine discharge. As such, they may require personalized care post-operatively, and should be counseled accordingly. Based on our results, psychiatric illness should not be an impediment to proceeding with TJA

The inmate population is a unique cohort with several healthcare-related challenges. International studies have demonstrated higher rates of infectious diseases, chronic diseases and psychiatric disorders in inmates when compared to general population. However, little is known about the outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in this population. This retrospective chart review aims to outline the differences in clinical outcomes after hip and knee total joint arthroplasty in the Kingston inmate population compared to the national population standard. A list of all inmate inpatient hospital visits with diagnostic/procedure codes pertaining to total joint arthroplasty within the last ten years was obtained through a computer-based search of the Kingston General Hospital Discharge Abstract Database(DAD). The patient charts were reviewed and demographic and outcome data pertinent to our study was collected. Data was compiled using Excel and imported into IBM SPSS for descriptive analysis. Twenty male inmate patients underwent 24 primary Total Hip Arthroplasties(THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasties(TKA) and one medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from May 2003 to January 2013. The average age was 58 with mean Body Mass Index(BMI) of 34. Median American Society of Anesthesiologist(ASA) score was 3 and mean Charlston Comorbidity Index was 3.92. The rates of HCV and HIV were 35%(n=5) and 0%, respectively. Average length of stay from time of initial procedure was 4.2 days. The overall revision rate was 24% (n=6). Reasons for revision included deep prosthetic infection (50%, n=3), aseptic loosening (17%, n=1), arthrofibrosis (17%, n=1) and late periprosthetic fracture (17%, n=1). Infection rates were reported at 16% (n=4); 75% of which were deep prosthetic infections requiring revision surgery. Other complications included ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) (n=1), and postoperative knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia(MUA) (n=1). Compared to Correctional Services Canada(CSC) data on male inmate health in 2012, our study population demonstrated a higher rate of HCV (35% vs. 9.4%), diabetes (30% vs. 4.2%) and overall cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities. This may reflect the higher rate of comorbidities associated with osteoarthritis, such as BMI>25, which was evident in 95% of our study population vs. 64.5% in Canadian inmates. Total joint revision rates in our inmate study population was 24%, which is higher than the 2014 Canadian Joint Replacement Registry's yearly revision rate of 8.7% in THA and 5.2% in TKA. Our study population also demonstrated infection as the leading cause for revision at 50%, compared to 14.5% for THA and 19.6% for TKA in the general Canadian population. Further study of the complex biopsychosocial risk factors in the inmate population is warranted to better define pre-surgical risk assessment criteria

Patients with above knee amputation (AKA) often experience poor socket fit exacerbated by minor weight changes, sweating, and skin problems. A transcutaneous, press-fit distal femoral intra-medullary device was designed in 1999, such that the distal external aspect serves as a hard point for AKA prosthesis attachment. The implant is placed in a retrograde fashion, followed 6-8 weeks later by stomatisation and connected via direct extention to an AKA prosthesis. Thirty-seven patients with 39 limbs (30 males, 7 females) underwent two-stage prosthesis implantation with the Endo-Exo Femurprosthesis (EEFP) in Germany between 1999 and January 2008. Their indications for surgery were persistent AKA prosthesis socket difficulties with absence of major comorbid physical or mental illnesses. The patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 2 years. Assessments included patient satisfaction ratings, functional surveys, pain scores, and oxygen consumption. Fifty-four percent of patients needed at least one revision (20/37); 80% were minor (16/20) and 20% were major (4/20). Most of the minor revisions were due to soft tissue stomal irritation and occurred prior to a design change in the prosthesis. 2 patients sustained traumatic, peri-trochanteric fractures that were treated operatively proximal to the implant, with retention of the implant. 4 implants were explanted due to infection or prosthesis fracture and 2 of these (50%) were later reimplanted successfully. Overall, 94.9% (37/39) limbs had ultimate EEFP implant success. All functional assessments showed statistically significant improvement over baseline except oxygen consumption, which trended toward improvement. This procedure demonstrated a high degree of functional improvement for the majority of AKA patients treated. Despite an initially high revision rate, the EEFP prosthesis achieves an extremely high rate of successful reconstruction for trans-femoral amputees when more traditional options have failed and therefore warrants further scientific study

Aims

Healthcare systems have been rapidly restructured to meet COVID-19 demand. Clinicians are working to novel clinical guidelines, treating new patient cohorts and working in unfamiliar environments. Trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) has experienced cancellation of routine clinics and operating, with redistribution of the workload and human resources. To date, no studies have evaluated the mental health impact of these changes on the T&O workforce. We report the results of a novel survey on the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of our orthopaedic workforce and the contributory factors.