The systemic arterial pressure has been used as a guide for determining the susceptibility to surgical bleeding during controlled hypotensive anaesthesia. Arterial hypotension is not, however, necessarily accompanied by venous or intraosseous hypotension. The main source of bleeding during posterior spinal surgery is the bone and is venous rather than arterial. The intraoperative blood loss, the intraosseous pressure (IOP) within the first thoracic vertebral body, and the systemic arterial pressure were measured in 27 patients during cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. The intraoperative blood loss correlated significantly with the vertebral IOP (p = 0.0073, r = 0.499), but not with systemic arterial pressure, age, or body-weight. The systemic arterial pressure did not correlate with the vertebral IOP. The mean value of the mean arterial pressure throughout the operation varied between 74 and 110 mmHg. The findings suggest that the vertebral IOP parallels surgical bleeding during posterior spinal surgery under normotensive anaesthesia and that patients with a low arterial pressure do not necessarily have a low IOP

Introduction. Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) or unstable spinal lesions warrant early surgical consultation. In multiple myeloma, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have the potential to decompress the spinal canal effectively in the presence of epidural lesions. Mechanical stability conferred by bracing may potentiate intraosseous and extraosseous bone formation, thus increasing spinal stability. This study aims to review the role of non-operative management in myeloma patients with a high degree of spinal instability, in a specialist tertiary centre. Methods. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 83 patients with unstable myelomatous lesions of the spine, defined by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of 13–18. Data collected include patient demographics, systemic treatment, neurological status, radiological presence of cord compression, most unstable vertebral level and presence of intraosseous and extraosseous bone formation. Post-treatment scores were calculated based on follow-up imaging which was carried out at 2 weeks for cord compression and 12 weeks for spinal instability. A paired t-test was used to identify any significant difference between pre- and post-treatment SINS and linear regression was used to assess the association between variables and the change in SINS. Results. A significant reduction in SINS was observed from a pre-treatment average score of 14 to a score of 9, following treatment for myeloma (p<0.001). A higher initial score and a younger age were associated with a larger overall reduction in SINS (p<0.001 and p=0.02 respectively). No single variable (bisphosphates, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and steroids) had a significant association with SINS reduction. 25 (30%) patients had spinal cord compression, all of which showed radiological resolution of cord compression at 2 weeks. No patients developed neurological deterioration during treatment and all patients had an improvement in their pain scores. 64 (77%) patients had evidence of intraosseous and/or extraosseous bone formation on their follow-up scan. Conclusion. Non-operative management in the form of bracing and systemic therapy is a safe and effective treatment for spinal instability and spinal cord compression in myeloma. Treatment of unstable myelomatous lesions of the spine with or without cord compression should not follow traditional guidelines for MSCC. The decision to adopt a non-operative approach in this cohort of patients should ideally be made in a tertiary centre with expertise in multiple myeloma and in a multidisciplinary setting

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of spinal instrumentation in haemodialyzed patients with native pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Spinal instrumentation in these patients can be dangerous due to rates of complications and mortality, and biofilm formation on the instrumentation.