Infections in spine surgery are relatively common and devastating complications, a significant burden to the patient and the healthcare system. Usually, the treatment of SSIs consists of aggressive and prolonged antibiotic therapy, multiple debridements, and in chronic cases, hardware removal. Infections are correlated with worse subjective outcomes and even higher mortality. Depending on the type of spine surgery, the infection rate has been reported to be as higher as 20%. Recently silver-coated implants have been introduced in spine surgery to reduce the incidence of post-operative infections and to improve implant survivorship. The aim of the present study is to evaluate complications and outcomes in patients treated with silver-coated implants because of spine infection. All consecutive patients who had spine stabilization with a silver-coated implant from 2018 to 2021 were screened for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: (1) six months of minimum follow-up; (2) previous surgical site infection; hematogenous spondylodiscitis requiring surgical stabilization. Demographic and surgical information were obtained via chart review, all the device-related complications and the reoperation rate were also reported. A total of 57 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 63.4 years, and there were 36 (63%) males and 21 (37%) females. Among the included cases, 57% were SSIs, 33% were spondylodiscitis, and 9% were hardware mobilization. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, smoke, and oncological history were significant risk factors. In addition, the organisms cultured were Staphylococcus species in most of the cases. At six months of follow-up, 40% of patients were considered free from infection, while 20% needed multiple surgeries. The present research showed satisfactory results of silver-coated implants for the treatment of spine infection

Abstract. Objectives. The objective of this proof of concept study was to explore whether some total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with well-functioning implants achieve normal sagittal plane hip kinematics during walking gait. Methods. Sagittal plane hip kinematics were recorded in eleven people with well-functioning THA (71 ± 8 years, Oxford Hip Score = 46 ± 3) and ten healthy controls (61 ± 5 years) using a three-dimensional motion capture system as they walked over-ground at a self-selected velocity. THA patients were classified as high- or low-functioning (HF and LF, respectively) depending on whether the mean absolute difference between their sagittal plane hip kinematics was within one standard deviation of the control group (5.4°) or not. Hedge's g effect size was used to compare the magnitude of the difference from the control group for the HF and LF THA groups. Results. Five THA patients were identified as HF and 6 as LF. The mean absolute difference in sagittal plane hip kinematics between the THA groups and the control group was on average 6.2° larger for the LF THA patients compared to the HF, with this difference associated with a large effect size (g = 1.84). Conclusions. The findings of this study challenge the findings of previous work which suggests THA patients do not achieve normal sagittal plane hip kinematics. Five patients were classified as HR and achieved motion patterns that were on average within the variance of the asymptomatic control group, suggesting normative sagittal plane hip kinematics. Understanding why some THA patients achieve motion patterns more comparable to healthy controls than others would help to develop means of maximising functional recovery, and potentially enhance both patient quality of life and implant survivorship through more normal loading of the implant

Abstract. Background/Objectives. The incidence of reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) implantation is increasing globally, but apprehension exists regarding complications and associated challenges. We retrospectively analysed the senior author's series of rTSR from a tertiary centre using the VAIOS shoulder system, a modular 4th generation implant. We hypothesised that the revision rTSR cohort would have less favourable outcomes and more complications. Methods. 114 patients underwent rTSR with the VAIOS system, over 7 years. The primary outcome was implant survival. Secondary outcomes were Oxford shoulder scores (OSS), radiographic analysis (scapular notching, tuberosity osteolysis, and periprosthetic radiolucent lines) and complications. Results. There were 55 Primary rTSR, 31 Revision rTSR and 28 Trauma rTSR. Implant survival: Primary rTSR- 0 revisions, average 3.35-year follow-up. Revision rTSR-1 revision (4.17%), average 3.52-year follow-up. Trauma rTSR- 1 revision (3.57%), average 4.56-year follow-up OSS: Average OSS improved from 15.39 to 33.8 (Primary rTSR) and from 15.11 to 29.1 (Revision rTSR). Average post-operative OSS for the Trauma rTSR was 31.4 Radiological analysis and complications: Low incidence of scapular notching One hairline fracture below the tip of stem, noted incidentally, which required no treatment. One periprosthetic fracture after alcohol related fall. Treated non-surgically One joint infection requiring two-stage revision to rTSR. One dislocation noted at 2 year follow up. This patient had undergone nerve grafting within 6 months of rTSR for axillary nerve injury sustained during the original fracture dislocation. One acromial fracture with tibial and distal humeral fracture after a fall. Conclusions. The 4th generation modular VAIOS implant is a reliable option for various indications. The revision rTSR cohort had favourable outcomes with low complication rates. In this series, early-to-medium term results suggest lower revision rates and good functional outcomes when compared to published reports. We plan to monitor long-term implant survivorship and patient reported outcomes. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Background. There is a paucity of long term data concerning the pre and postoperative patient reported function of total knee replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality, implant survivorship, patient reported function and satisfaction in a cohort of 114 patients, from a single centre, who received a Kinemax total knee replacement more than 15 years ago. Methods. Patients completed a questionnaire incorporating validated disease- and joint-specific scores, patient satisfaction and overall health preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and a minimum of 15 years following surgery. NHS National Strategic Tracing Service, hospital and primary care records were used to establish mortality and for implant survivorship in deceased patients. Results. 45 patients were alive at final follow up. The survivorship of the cohort with revision of the TKR as the endpoint was 84%. Four cases were revised for wear, three for loosening and one for peri-prosthetic fracture. There was a significant improvement in WOMAC Pain, Function and Stiffness Scores, Oxford Knee Score and Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale between pre-operative and all post-operative time points, although patient satisfaction had decreased significantly by the time of final follow up. Conclusion. In this cohort, the Kinemax TKR showed satisfactory long term survivorship with functional scores demonstrating a high level of patient satisfaction at all follow up time points. Level of Evidence. 2

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants have become the standard for younger patients on account of increased implant survivorship and multiple other advantages. Nevertheless, uncemented THA remains controversial in elderly patients. The evidence base for this is limited, as previous studies have compared octogenarians to a younger control group. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the outcome of octogenarian patients undergoing uncemented THA with a control group of similarly aged patients undergoing hybrid THA with a minimum 5 years follow up. Clinical outcomes including intra and postoperative complications, blood transfusion, revision rate and mortality were recorded. Radiological analysis of pre and postoperative radiograph assessed bone quality, implant fixation and any subsequent loosening. 143 patients, (mean age 86.2 yrs.) were enrolled in the study. 76 patients underwent uncemented THA and 67 underwent hybrid THA. The uncemented cohort had fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications. The uncemented cohort also had a lower transfusion rate (p=0.002). Mean hospital stay (p=0.27) was comparable between the 2 groups. Two patients underwent revision surgery in either cohort. Our study demonstrates uncemented THA is safe for the octogenarian patient and we recommend that age should be not be a barrier of choice of implant. However intraoperative assessment of bone quality should guide surgeon to the optimum decision regarding uncemented and hybrid implant

A principle of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is to achieve a neutral standing coronal alignment of the limb (Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle) to reduce risks of implant loosening, reduce polyethylene wear, and optimise patella tracking. Several long-term studies have questioned this because the relationship between alignment and implant survivorship is weaker than previously reported. We hypothesize standing HKA poorly predicts implant failure because it does not predict dynamic HKA, dynamic adduction moment, and loading of the knee during gait. Therefore, the aim of our study is to assess the relationship between the standing (or static) and the dynamic (gait activity) HKAs. We performed a prospective study on a cohort of 35 patients (35 knees) who were treated with a posterior-stabilized TKA for primary osteoarthritis between November 2012 and January 2013. Three months after surgery each patient had a standardized digital full-leg coronal radiographs and was classified as neutrally aligned TKA (17 patients), varus aligned (9 patients), and valgus aligned (4 patients). Patients then performed a gait analysis for level walking and dynamic HKA and adduction moment during the stance phase of gait were measured. We found standing HKA having a moderate correlation with the peak dynamic varus (r=0.318, p=0.001) and the mean and peak adduction moments (r=0.31 and r=-0.352 respectively). In contrast we did not find a significant correlation between standing HKA and the mean dynamic coronal alignment (r=0.14, p=0.449). No significant differences were found for dynamic frontal parameters (dynamic HKA and adduction moment) between patients defined as neutrally aligned or varus aligned. In our practice, the standing HKA after TKA was of little value to predict dynamic behaviour of the limb during gait. These results may explain why standing coronal alignment after TKA may have limited influence on long term implant fixation and wear

Recent projections expect the number of revision knee replacements performed to grow from 38,000 in 2005 to 270,000 by the year 2030. 1. Although the results of primary total knee arthroplasty are well documented, with overall implant survivorship at 15 years greater than 95%. 2. the results of revision procedures are not as well known. What if the revision TKR fails and what is the prevalence of failure of revision TKRs, the complications and re-operation rates? There are various studies which has either exclusively dealt with the causes or outcomes of revision with a particular prosthesis and survivorship analysis. The effectiveness of revision total knee replacement must be considered in the light of complications rates which could be either medical, orthopaedic surgery related complications or combination of both. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of complications, reoperation rates and outcomes in a single surgeon's series between 1984 and 2008. Ninety nine index revision cases were studied. Incidences of surgical complications were 52.5%. The total reoperation rate was 34.3% whilst single re revision accounted for 19.9% whereas multiple re-revision incidences were 4%. The mean outcome in terms of Knee Society Score, Knee Society Function, and Knee society range of motion was statistically and clinically significant between pre operative and posts operative score at one year and remained consistent with time. These results suggest that modern revision total knee replacement are satisfactory operations and the outcomes perhaps can be improved if relatively simple strategies are followed by focusing these operations to specialized that accumulate enough experience from these demanding surgeries. Overall the results asserts that even in the hands of an experienced surgeon the complications do occur which is usually multi factorial, whilst in the light of complications and reoperation incidence the patients can be counselled thoroughly before the procedure

Metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasty, including resurfacing, has become the subject of recent research and debate. There is the perceived benefit of improved wear rates of bearing surfaces leading to superior durability and performance of these types of implant. An associated feature of MOM bearing surfaces is the generation of metal ions. These can have local and systemic cytotoxic effects. An immunoloigical response has been suggested, however, metal wear debris may cause direct damage to cellular DNA. Studies have shown that release of these ions is related to bearing diameter and component alignment. However, little is known about the relationship between metal ion levels and implant survivorship. The MHRA has published guidelines on the follow-up of patients with MOM implants including measurement of serum ion levels and cross sectional imaging. Between February 2001 and November 2009, 135 patients (164 hips) had MOM resurfacing arthroplasty at our institution. We report a retrospective analysis of the data generated by review of these patients. Of the 135 patients, 91 were identified for clinical review. Each patient had serum metal ion levels measured, plain AP radiographs of the pelvis examined and, in the presence of raised metal ions, a Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI performed. 27 patients (35 hips) had raised metal ion levels (Cobalt and Chromium). Patients with raised metal ion levels had a mean acetabular cup inclination of 52.7 degrees compared with a mean inclination of 48.6 degrees in patients with normal ion levels (p<0.05). MARS MRI in the raised ion group revealed 9 patients with appearances suggestive of ALVAL. A number of these patients had hip revision surgery with the remainder awaiting potential revision. These findings reflect current evidence suggesting a relationship between sub-optimal component position and raised metal ion levels and an increased rate of ALVAL

Introduction. The treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in young and active patients remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the clinical and radiographic results of the two different hip resurfacing systems; hemi-resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients with ONFH. Methods. This study was a retrospective review of 20 patients with 30 hips who had ONFH and underwent hemi-resurfacing or total hip resurfacing between November 2002 and February 2006. We mainly performed hemi-resurfacing for early stage ONFH, and total hip resurfacing for advanced stages. Fifteen hips in 11 patients had a hemi-resurfacing component (Conserve, Wright Medical Co) with a mean age at operation of 50 years and an average follow-up of 5.5 years. Fifteen hips in 10 patients had a metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing component (Birmingham hip resurfacing, Smith & Nephew Co.) with a mean age at operation of 40 years and an average follow-up years. Results. The average postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip scores were 86 points in hemi-resurfacing and 96 points in total hip resurfacing. The difference of pain score was a main factor to explain the difference of total JOA hip score in the two groups. Both implants were radiographically stable, but radiolucent lines around the metaphyseal stem were more frequent in total hip resurfacing. In hemi-resurfacing patients, ten of 15 hips had groin pain or groin discomfort and three hips were revised to total hip arthroplasties (THA) because of femoral neck fracture, acetabular protrusio, and osteoarthritic changes, respectively. In total hip resurfacing patients, there were no revisions and no groin pain observed. Conclusion. In the prosthetic treatment of young active patients with ONFH, it is theoretically desirable to choose an implant with a conservative design in anticipation of the future revision surgery. Hemi-resurfacing hip arthroplasty is the most conservative implant for the treatment of ONFH. However, the results of hemi-resurfacing in this study have been disappointing due to high revision rates and insufficient pain relief despite of the good implant stability. However, the pain relief and implant survivorship after total hip resurfacing were superior to the results of hemi-resurfacing, although the usages of the total hip resurfacing were for more advanced cases. These results suggest that total hip resurfacing was a more valuable treatment option for active patients with ONFH than hemi-resurfacing

Objectives

This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group.