The lateral compartment is predominantly affected
in approximately 10% of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The
anatomy, kinematics and loading during movement differ considerably
between medial and lateral compartments of the knee. This in the
main explains the relative protection of the lateral compartment
compared with the medial compartment in the development of osteoarthritis.
The aetiology of lateral compartment osteoarthritis can be idiopathic,
usually affecting the femur, or secondary to trauma commonly affecting
the tibia. Surgical management of lateral compartment osteoarthritis
can include osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement and total
knee replacement. This review discusses the biomechanics, pathogenesis
and development of lateral compartment osteoarthritis and its management. Cite this article:
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
Patients with skeletal dysplasia are prone to
developing advanced osteoarthritis of the knee requiring total knee replacement
(TKR) at a younger age than the general population. TKR in this
unique group of patients is a technically demanding procedure owing
to the deformity, flexion contracture, generalised hypotonia and ligamentous
laxity. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 11 TKRs performed
in eight patients with skeletal dysplasia at our institution using
the Stanmore Modular Individualised Lower Extremity System (SMILES)
custom-made rotating-hinge TKR. There were three men and five women
with mean age of 57 years (41 to 79). Patients were followed clinically
and radiologically for a mean of seven years (3 to 11.5). The mean
Knee Society clinical and function scores improved from 24 (14 to
36) and 20 (5 to 40) pre-operatively, respectively, to 68 (28 to
80) and 50 (22 to 74), respectively, at final follow-up. Four complications
were recorded, including a patellar fracture following a fall, a
tibial peri-prosthetic fracture, persistent anterior knee pain,
and aseptic loosening of a femoral component requiring revision.
Our results demonstrate that custom primary rotating-hinge TKR in
patients with skeletal dysplasia is effective at relieving pain,
with a satisfactory range of movement and improved function. It compensates
for bony deformity and ligament deficiency and reduces the likelihood
of corrective osteotomy. Patellofemoral joint complications are
frequent and functional outcome is worse than with primary TKR in
the general population.
This study validates the short-form WOMAC function scale for assessment of conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Data were collected before treatment and six and nine months later, from 100 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee to determine the validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and responsiveness of the short-form WOMAC function scale. The scale showed high correlation with the traditional WOMAC and other measures. The internal consistency was good (Cronbach α: 0.88 to 0.95) and an excellent test-retest reliability was found (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (ρc): 0.85 to 0.94). The responsiveness was adequate and comparable to that of the traditional WOMAC (standardised response mean 0.56 to 0.44 and effect size 0.64 to 0.57) and appeared not to be significantly affected by floor or ceiling effects (0% and 7%, respectively). The short-form WOMAC function scale is a valid, reliable and responsive alternative to the traditional WOMAC in the evaluation of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee managed conservatively. It is simple to use in daily practice and is therefore less of a burden for patients in clinical trials.
