Current knowledge regarding upper limb myotomes is based on historic papers. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical exploration with intraoperative nerve stimulation now allow accurate identification of nerve root injuries in the brachial plexus. The aim of this study is to identify the myotome values of the upper limb associated with defined supraclvicular brachial plexus injuries. 57 patients with partial supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries were identified from the Scottish brachial plexus database. The average age was 28 years and most injuries secondary to motor cycle accidents or stabbings. The operative and MRI findings for each patient were checked to establish the root injuries and the muscle powers of the upper limb documented. The main patterns of injuries identified involved (C5,6), (C5,6,7), (C5,6,7,8) and (C8, T1). C5, 6 injuries were associated with loss of shoulder abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion. In 30% of the 16 cases showed some biceps action from the C7 root. C5,6,7 injuries showed a similar pattern of weakness with the additional loss of flexor carpi radialis and weakness but not total paralysis of triceps in 85% of cases. C5,6,7,8 injuries were characterised by loss of pectoralis major, lattisimus dorsi, triceps, wrist extension, finger extension and as well as weakness of the ulnar intrinsic muscles. We identified weakness of the flexor digitorum profundus to the ulnar sided digits in 83% of cases. T1 has a major input to innervation of flexors of the radial digits and thumb, as well as intrinsics. This is the largest study of myotome values in patients with surgically or radiologically confirmed injuries in the literature and presents information for general orthopaedic surgeons dealing with trauma patients for the differentiation of different patterns of brachial plexus injuries. In addition we have identified new anatomical relationships not previously described in upper limb myotomes

The incidence of wound complications after a hip or a knee replacement is well established, but there is no such data about foot/ankle surgery. Without this data it is difficult to compare performance between different care-providers. It is also difficult to benchmark services that could potentially be provided by a wide range of care providers (chiropodists, podiatrists, podiatric surgeons, general orthopaedic surgeons with a small foot/ankle practice, etc). Our aim was to establish the incidence of wound complications after foot/ankle surgery and provide a baseline for future comparison. Our study was done in two parts. First part was to conduct an opinion-survey of BOFAS members with a substantial foot/ankle practice, on wound complications from foot/ankle surgery in their own practice. Second part was to conduct a prospective study on the incidence of wound complications from our own foot/ankle practice. The study was registered as an audit and did not require ethical approval. All wound complications (skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infections) were recorded prospectively. Record of such data was obtained by an independent observer, and from multiple sources, to avoid under-reporting. 60 % of the responders to our survey had a predominant foot/ankle practice (exclusive or at least 75 % of their practice was foot/ankle surgery) and were included for further analysis of their responses. A large majority of these responders (64%) reported a rate of 2–5 % for superficial infection, and a significant majority (86 %) reported a deep infection rate of less than 2 %. Results from our own practice showed an incidence of superficial infection of 2.8 % and deep infection of 1.5 %. With increasing focus on clinical outcome measures as an indicator of quality, it is imperative to publish data on wound complications/ infection after foot/ankle surgery, and in the absence of such data, our two-armed study (survey-opinion and prospective audit) provides a useful benchmark for future comparisons

Objectives

To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice.