Introduction. The stability of the elbow joint following an acute elbow dislocation is dependent on associated injuries. The ability to identify these concomitant injuries correctly directs management and improves the chances of a successful outcome. Interpretation of plain radiographs in the presence of either a dislocation or post-reduction films with plaster in-situ is difficult. This study aimed to assess the ability of orthopaedic registrars to accurately identify associated bony injuries on initial plain radiographs using CT as the gold standard for comparison. Methods. Patients over the age of 16 years undergoing an elbow CT scan within one week of a documented elbow dislocation between 1st June 2010 and 1st June 2014 were included in the study. Three orthopaedic registrars independently reviewed both the initial dislocation and immediate post reduction plain radiographs to identify any associated bony injuries. This radiograph review was repeated by each registrar after two weeks. The incidence of associated injuries as well as the inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated. Results. 28 patients were included in the study. 54% of the patients were female and the mean age was 45 years (range 16 to 90 years). The incidence of a radial head fracture was 54%, coronoid fracture 43% and epicondyle avulsion 18% on CT. The inter-observer reliability was only shown to be fair amongst registrars and the intra-observer variability moderate. Conclusions. Computerised tomography is a useful adjunct in the assessment of associated osseous injuries following an elbow dislocation due to the presence of a high number of injuries. Plain radiographs alone have been shown to have only a fair and moderate inter and intra-observer variability respectively, therefore a low threshold to obtain further 3D imaging should be practised. Level of Evidence. IV

Coronoid fractures account for 2 to 15% of the cases with elbow dislocations and usually occur as part of complex injuries. Comminuted fractures and non-unions necessitate coronoid fixation, reconstruction or replacement. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the axial stability achieved via an individualized 3D printed prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem to both radial head grafted reconstruction and coronoid fixation with 2 screws. It was hypothesized that the prosthetic replacement will provide superior stability over the grafted reconstruction and screw fixation. Following CT scanning, 18 human cadaveric proximal ulnas were osteotomized at 40% of the coronoid height and randomized to 3 groups (n = 6). The specimens in Group 1 were treated with an individually designed 3D printed stainless steel coronoid prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem, individually designed based on the contralateral coronoid scan. The ulnas in Group 2 were reconstructed with an ipsilateral radial head autograft fixed with two anteroposterior screws, whereas the osteotomized coronoids in Group 3 were fixed in situ with two anteroposterior screws. All specimens were biomechanically tested under ramped quasi-static axial loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/min. Construct stiffness and failure load were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed at a level of significance set at 0.05. Prosthetic treatment (Group 1) resulted in significantly higher stiffness and failure load compared to both radial head autograft reconstruction (Group 2) and coronoid screw fixation, p ≤ 0.002. Stiffness and failure load did not reveal any significant differences between Group 2 and Group 3, p ≥ 0.846. In cases of coronoid deficiency, replacement of the coronoid process with an anatomically shaped individually designed 3D printed prosthesis with a curved cemented intramedullary stem seems to be an effective method to restore the buttress function of the coronoid under axial loading. This method provides superior stability over both radial head graft reconstruction and coronoid screw fixation, while achieving anatomical articular congruity. Therefore, better load distribution with less stress at the bone-implant interface can be anticipated. In the clinical practice, implementation of this prosthesis type could allow for early patient mobilization with better short- and long-term treatment outcomes and may be beneficial for patients with irreparable comminuted coronoid fractures, severe arthritic changes or non-unions