Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 16 of 16
Results per page:

Background. Foraminal stenosis is often encountered in patients undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis. Given the increased resection of facets and the presence of the more sensitive dorsal root ganglion, it is hypothesized that patients with foraminal stenosis have poorer postoperative outcomes. Methods. Thirty-one patients undergoing decompression without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated. The degree of foraminal stenosis was determined by 2 independent reviewers for absence of fat around the nerve roots. ImageJ digital imaging software was also used to evaluate the foraminal area. Patients with foraminal stenosis were compared with those without using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical pain scale for back and leg pain at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Results. Twenty patients in the foraminal stenosis group were compared with 11 without foraminal stenosis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, number of levels operated on, preoperative ODI, back pain or leg pain scores. The foraminal area was significantly smaller in the foraminal stenosis group. Patients without foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 26.0), back pain (mean 3.1) and leg pain scores (mean 5.5). Patients with foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 18.8) and leg pain (mean 2.5) but not in back pain (mean 0.3). Comparing the 2 groups, the patients with foraminal stenosis had significantly less improvement in back pain (p = 0.02) and leg pain (p = 0.02). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that presence of foraminal stenosis is a negative predictor for successful outcome following decompression surgery. This may be related to the increased instability that occurs when a foraminotomy is required. Spinal fusion may reduce this effect, and further study is required. NO DISCLOSURES


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Dec 2022
Eltit F Wang Q Xu S Satra M Liu D Wang R Charest-Morin R Cox M
Full Access

One out of nine Canadian males would suffer prostate cancer (PC) during his lifetime. Life expectancy of males with PC has increased with modern therapy and 90% live >10 years. However, 20% of PC-affected males would develop incurable metastatic diseases. Bone metastases (BM) are present in ~80% of metastatic PC patients, and are the most severe complication of PC, generating severe pain, fractures, spinal cord compression, and death. Interestingly, PC-BMs are mostly osteoblastic. However, the structure of this newly formed bone and how it relates to pain and fracture are unknown. Due to androgen antagonist treatment, different PC phenotypes develop with differential dependency on androgen receptor (AR) signaling: androgen-dependent (AR+), double negative (AR-) and neuroendocrine. How these phenotypes are related to changes in bone structure has not been studied. Here we show a state-of-the-art structural characterization of PCBM and how PC phenotypes are associated to abnormal bone formation in PCBM. Cadaveric samples (n=14) obtained from metastases of PC in thoracic or lumbar vertebrae (mean age 74yo) were used to analyze bone structure. We used micro-computed tomography (mCT) to analyze the three-dimensional structure of the bone samples. After imaging, the samples were sectioned and one 3mm thick section was embedded in epoxy-resin, ground and polished. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and quantitative backscattering electron (qBSE) imaging were used to determine mineral morphology and composition. Another section was used for histological analysis of the PC-affected bone. Collagen structure, fibril orientation and extracellular matrix composition were characterized using histochemistry. Additionally, we obtained biopsies of 3 PCBM patients undergoing emergency decompression surgery following vertebral fracture and used them for immunohistological characterization. By using mCT, we observed three dysmorphic bone patterns: osteolytic pattern with thinned trabecula of otherwise well-organized structures, osteoblastic pattern defined as accumulation of disorganized matrix deposited on pre-existing trabecula, and osteoblastic pattern with minimum residual trabecula and bone space dominated by accumulation of disorganized mineralized matrix. Comparing mCT data with patho/clinical parameters revealed a trend for higher bone density in males with larger PSA increase. Through histological sections, we observed that PC-affected bone, lacks collagen alignment structure, have a higher number of lacunae and increased amount of proteoglycans as decorin. Immunohistochemistry of biopsies revealed that PC-cells inside bone organize into two manners: i) glandular-like structures where cells maintain their polarization in the expression of prostate markers, ii) diffuse infiltrate that spreads along bone surfaces, with loss of cell polarity. These cells take direct contact with osteoblasts in the surface of trabecula. We define that PCBM are mostly composed by AR+ with some double negative cells. We did not observe neuroendocrine phenotype cells. PCBMs generate predominantly osteoblastic lesions that are characterized by high lacunar density, lack of collagen organization and elevated proteoglycan content. These structural changes are associated with the infiltration of PC cells that are mostly androgen-dependent but have lost their polarization and contact directly with osteoblasts, perhaps altering their function. These changes could be associated with lower mechanical properties that led to fracture and weakness of the PCBM affected bone


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 65 - 65
1 Jul 2020
Sahak H Hardisty M Finkelstein J Whyne C
Full Access

Spinal stenosis is a condition resulting in the compression of the neural elements due to narrowing of the spinal canal. Anatomical factors including enlargement of the facet joints, thickening of the ligaments, and bulging or collapse of the intervertebral discs contribute to the compression. Decompression surgery alleviates spinal stenosis through a laminectomy involving the resection of bone and ligament. Spinal decompression surgery requires appropriate planning and variable strategies depending on the specific situation. Given the potential for neural complications, there exist significant barriers to residents and fellows obtaining adequate experience performing spinal decompression in the operating room. Virtual teaching tools exist for learning instrumentation which can enhance the quality of orthopaedic training, building competency and procedural understanding. However, virtual simulation tools are lacking for decompression surgery. The aim of this work was to develop an open-source 3D virtual simulator as a teaching tool to improve orthopaedic training in spinal decompression. A custom step-wise spinal decompression simulator workflow was built using 3D Slicer, an open-source software development platform for medical image visualization and processing. The procedural steps include multimodal patient-specific loading and fusion of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data, bone threshold-based segmentation, soft tissue segmentation, surgical planning, and a laminectomy and spinal decompression simulation. Fusion of CT and MRI elements was achieved using Fiducial-Based Registration which aligned the scans based on manually placed points allowing for the identification of the relative position of soft and hard tissues. Soft tissue segmentation of the spinal cord, the cerebrospinal fluid, the cauda equina, and the ligamentum flavum was performed using Simple Region Growing Segmentation (with manual adjustment allowed) involving the selection of structures on T1 and/or T2-weighted scans. A high-fidelity 3D model of the bony and soft tissue anatomy was generated with the resulting surgical exposure defined by labeled vertebrae simulating the central surgical incision. Bone and soft tissue resecting tools were developed by customizing manual 3D segmentation tools. Simulating a laminectomy was enabled through bone and ligamentum flavum resection at the site of compression. Elimination of the stenosis enabled decompression of the neural elements simulated by interpolation of the undeformed anatomy above and below the site of compression using Fill Between Slices to reestablish pre-compression neural tissue anatomy. The completed workflow allows patient specific simulation of decompression procedures by staff surgeons, fellows and residents. Qualitatively, good visualization was achieved of merged soft tissue and bony anatomy. Procedural accuracy, the design of resecting tools, and modeling of the impact of bone and ligament removal was found to adequately encompass important challenges in decompression surgery. This software development project has resulted in a well-characterized freely accessible tool for simulating spinal decompression surgery. Future work will integrate and evaluate the simulator within existing orthopaedic resident competency-based curriculum and fellowship training instruction. Best practices for effectively teaching decompression in tight areas of spinal stenosis using virtual simulation will also be investigated in future work


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Dec 2014
Viljoen J Ngcelwane M Kruger T
Full Access

Introduction:. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative condition that results in a non-traumatic, progressive and chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord. Surgery is indicated for patients with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive myelopathy. Literature shows that decompressive surgery halts progression of the condition. We undertook this study to see if there is a worthwhile improvement in function in patients who had spine decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Material and Method:. From a retrospective review of our medical records, a total of 61 patients had decompressive surgery for cervical myelopathy during the period between January 2008 and January 2014. 11 Patients were excluded because their cervical myelopathy was due to compression from tuberculosis or a tumour. 33 patients had incomplete records. We are reporting on the 17 patients who had complete records. From the patients' notes we recorded the detailed preoperative neurologic examination usually done for these patients in our clinic. This was compared to the neurological examination done at 6 months, 12 months and at more than 2 years follow-up. Where this examination was not adequate, patients were called in for the neurologic examination. Results:. 13 Patients had a Nurick grading of 3 and above pre-operatively and 16 had a Ranawat classification of IIIA and above preoperatively. Post-operatively 14 patients had a Nurick grading of 1 or 0 and 15 had a Ranawat classification of II or I. There was also improvement of the physical signs that are diagnostic of myelopathy. The results were subjected to statistical analysis, but this was not conclusive because of the small numbers. Conclusion:. Decompressive surgery in this small series does not only stop progression of the myelopathy, but also improves neurologic function


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_29 | Pages 81 - 81
1 Aug 2013
du Plessis L le Roux T Becker P
Full Access

Purpose of the study:. Improved technology, increasing experience and techniques warrant an analysis of cost effective ways of medical management in general and shoulder decompression specifically. The question raised was whether a less invasive technique is necessarily the most cost effective way or merely the surgeons' preferred technique. This is a retrospective study of patients at Tertiary Academic Institution who underwent an open or arthroscopic shoulder decompression in the past 3 years. The aim of the study is to do a cost analysis of shoulder surgery as private health care (medical aid) is demanding more cost effective procedures and we have limited funds in the Government setting. Methods:. We focused on the following: the surgeon; the procedure; operating time; inpatient time; intraoperative block; physiotherapy costs, time off work and the cost of instrumentation used. Patients had to comply with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion: All patients that had shoulder decompression surgery in the past three years by a qualified orthopaedic surgeon; Exclusion: sepsis, tumours, rotator cuff tears, conversion of an arthroscopic procedure to an open procedure intraoperatively, inadequate notes, multiple surgical procedure under the same anaesthetic (e.g. scope with a trapezium excision). Results:. We evaluated 260 patients. Only 147 complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 54 were open decompressions and 73 were arthroscopic decompressions. Arthroscopic surgery was significantly more expensive than open surgery (p<0.0001). Conclusion:. With a 95% confidence level, we concluded that the total cost of an arthroscopic decompression can be between 257.5% and 285.0% higher than that of an open decompression. The outcome of this study has proven that we need to take the cost of every procedure into consideration as our patients can benefit more by the redistribution of funds for other possible procedures. Level of evidence:. Level III


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 109 - 109
1 Jan 2016
Kitahata S Rickers K Orias AE Ringgaard S Andersson G Bunger C Peterson J Robie B Inoue N
Full Access

Introduction. Kinematics analyses of the spine have been recognized as an effective method for functional analysis of the spine. CT is suitable for obtaining bony geometry of the vertebrae but radiation is a clinical concern. MRI is noninvasive but it is difficult to detect bone edges especially at endplates and processes where soft tissues attach. Kinematics analyses require tracking of solid bodies; therefore, bony geometry is not always necessary for kinematics analysis of the spine. This study aimed to develop a reliable and robust method for kinematics analysis of the spine using an innovative MRI-based 3D bone-marrow model. Materials and Methods. This IRB-approved study recruited 17 patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery to treat a single-level symptomatic herniation as part of a clinical trial for a new dynamic stabilization device. T1 & T2 sagittal MRI scans were acquired as part of the pre-operative evaluation in three positions: supine and with the shoulders rotated 45° to the left and right to induce torsion of the lumbar spine. 3D bone-marrow models of L5 and S1 at the neutral and rotated positions were created by selecting a threshold level of the bone-marrow intensity at bone-marrow/bone interface. Validated 3D-3D registration techniques were used to track movements of L5 and S1. Segmental movements at L5/S1 during torsion were calculated. Results. Bone-marrow models were created not only in the vertebral body but also in superior/inferior, transverse and spinous processes, pedicles and laminae. Segmental rotation (mean±SD) at L5/S1 was shown to be symmetric for both left and right motions (p=0.149; Left: 1.04°±0.93° and Right: 1.33°±0.80°). The range of motion recorded was: left [0.05°-3.70°] and right [0.35°-3.25°]. These values were equivalent to previously reported values of axial lumbar rotation measured by 3D CT lumbar models. Conclusions. This study demonstrated feasibility of kinematic analyses using the 3D bone-marrow model created with clinical MRI. The bone-marrow model shows the bone-marrow/bone interface geometry –the internal structure of the vertebra rather than outside geometry usually used for kinematic analyses– that is easily and consistently detected due to its high-contrast interface MRI intensity, which does not require lengthy manual tracing of the bony contour. The bone-marrow model includes key elements of the vertebra including posterior elements and the 3D-3D registration technique used for 3D-CT model can be applied (Fig.1). This type of methodology can be used in the clinic to evaluate with sufficient accuracy subject-specific spinal kinematics without exposure to additional radiation. The MRI-based 3D bone-marrow model may also be useful for kinematic analyses of other major joints such as hip, knee, ankle and shoulder joints


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_20 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Apr 2013
Shelton J Bansal N Kulshreshtha R Wigderowitz C Jariwala A
Full Access

Introduction. Only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression, most comparing various forms of decompression. A review of the case notes of patients undergone ulnar nerve decompressions was undertaken looking at the pre-op symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures and the post-operative outcomes. Material/methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. The significance level was set at 5%. Results. A total of 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Numbness and paraesthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). Majority (68%) had symptoms for over a year before surgery. Simple decompression was done in 110 extremities and rest of the cases required additional anterior subcutaneous transposition. The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Struthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusions. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Apr 2013
Bindra R
Full Access

Introduction. Management of painful scarring of a nerve after surgery or trauma is challenging. Wrapping with a vein or adhesion barriers such as silicone have been reported with some success. This is a retrospective review of application of a xenograft collagen wrap around a peripheral nerve following neurolysis. There is no report in English literature of use of a collagen wrap for this purpose. Materials/Methods. 12 patients underwent use of the Neuragen™ bovine collagen nerve conduit or NeuraWrap™ (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro, NJ) over a 6 year period. The causes were, scarring after carpal tunnel (n=5) or cubital tunnel release (n=3) or partial nerve injury (n=4, radial, median, dorsal ulnar, digital nerves). Follow up ranged from 6–12 months. Outcome was assessed by VAS or functional improvement. Results. No patient developed adverse reaction to the xenograft conduit. All 10 patients with painful scarring reported improvement of pain with reduction in mean VAS from 7 to 2 at final follow-up. The patient with radial palsy with scarring of the nerve had full recovery of radial nerve function by 6 months. The partially injured sensory branch of median nerve and digital nerve regained normal 2PD. The patients with scarring after decompression surgery had improvement in pain and range of motion of adjacent joints but did not show any change in clinical neurological status. Conclusions. A collagen conduit wrapped around a partially injured or scarred nerve is safe and associated with clinical improvement in pain and nerve function


Purpose of study. This RCT is to determine whether or not there is a clinical benefit from inserting a dynamic stabilising implant such as the Wallis ligament on the functional recovery of patients who have undergone lumbar decompression surgery. This Interspinous implant was developed as an anatomically conserving procedure without recourse to lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The biomechanical studies have shown that unloading the disc and facet joints reduces intradiscal pressures at same and adjacent levels. The aim of this study was to identify a patential Wallis affect. Methods. Ethicallly approved. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, decompression alone or decompression with wallis interspinous ligament stabilisation. Patients were assessed pre operatively and post operatively every 6 months by VAS pain score and Oswestry Disability Index. Summary of findings. A total of 60 patients were recriuted the study from October 2005. Equal number had been randomized into two groups. The mean age of 54 (24–85) and the average follow is 36 months (6–48). The results were significantly better in decompression plus Wallis group compared to decompression alone, showing a minimal clinical difference compared to the control group. Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: Our results deomonstrate that clincial outcomes are significantly better when a Wallis implant was used in lumbar deompression. Patients experienced less back pain. Overall significance of findings: The Wallis implant represents a successful non fusion stabilisation device in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease with canal stenosis. Minimal soft tissue dissection, quick rehabilitation, low morbidity. The Wallis ligament sucessfully treats spinal stenosis by reducing pain score, preserving mobility, and function


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLI | Pages 60 - 60
1 Sep 2012
Melloh M Barz T Staub L Lord S Merk H Theis J
Full Access

The Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in transverse magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to discriminate well between selected patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but the performance of this new test, when used in a broad patient population, is not yet known (Barz et al. 2010). We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients with suspected LSS from 2004–2006, before the sign had been described, to assess its association with health outcomes. Based on clinical and radiological diagnostics, patients had been treated with decompression surgery or conservative treatment (physical therapy, oral pain medication). Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 24 month follow-up were compared between Sedimentation Sign positives and negatives in both treatment arms. Of the 146 included patients (52% female, mean age 59 yrs), 71 underwent surgery. Baseline ODI in this treatment arm was 52%, the sign was positive in 44 patients (mean ODI improvement 25 points) and negative in 27 (ODI improvement 24), with no significant difference between groups. In the 75 patients of the conservative treatment arm, baseline ODI was 44%, the sign was negative in 45 (ODI improvement 17), and positive in 30 (ODI improvement 5). Here a positive sign was associated with a smaller ODI improvement compared with sign negatives (t-test, p=0.003). This study allowed an unbiased clinical validation of the Sedimentation Sign by avoiding it influencing treatment selection. In the conservative treatment arm a positive sign identifies a group of patients who are less likely to benefit. In these cases, surgery might be effective; however, this needs confirmation in prospective studies


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 21 - 21
1 Mar 2012
Alvi F Williamson J Dashti H Mohammad S Ross E Oxborrow N
Full Access

Introduction. Many journals require outcome data at 2 years post-operative for the assessment of operative procedures in spinal surgery. This study seeks to clarify the timescale of improvement after surgery to see if a shorter period of assessment will indicate the final outcome. Methods. Outcome data for 185 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery was analysed. All were given a global outcome assessment questionnaire (as used in the Swedish Spinal Fusion study) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following surgery. Results were analysed according to the type of spinal surgery undertaken. Results. Six patients had incomplete data and were excluded. 124 of 179 patients were ‘much better’ or ‘better’ at 6 months. There was no significant change in the outcome of this group at 2 years (p<0.05). Only 18 showed any deterioration at 1 year and 2 years post surgery. Conclusion. Of the 55 patients who were ‘same’ or ‘worse’ at 6 months, most had no significant improvement in outcome at 2 years. Only 6 showed any significant improvement. Sixty four patients underwent disc replacement or spinal fusion. Of these, 19 patients improved between 6 months and 2 years follow-up. Eight patients got worse during the same period. Fifty eight patients underwent decompressive surgery. Of these 12 had a better outcome at 2 years than 6 months, and 17 had a worse outcome. Data from the remaining 57 patients was too heterogenous to analyse by subgroup


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 45 - 45
1 Jan 2013
Kulshreshtha R Jariwala A Bansal N Smeaton J Wigderowitz C
Full Access

Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%. Results. 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Minimum follow-up was three months. Numbness and paresthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Stuthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusion. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) of ulnar nerve decompression at elbow in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 4 - 4
1 Mar 2012
Chinwalla F Shafafy M Nagaria J Grevitt M
Full Access

Aim. To evaluate morbidity and outcome associated with lumbar spine decompression for central spinal stenosis in the elderly compared with younger age groups. Patients & methods. Case notes review of patients with symptomatic and MRI proven central lumber canal stenosis, under the care of a single surgeon. The study population was 3 age groups: patients < 60 year of age (Group 1, n=21), patients between 60 and 79 years (Group 2, n=54), and > age of 80 years (Group 3, n=15). Data with regard to intra- and post-operative complications and subjective outcome variables were collected. These included pain (VAS), walking distance, Oswestry Disability score (ODI) and patient satisfaction scores. Results. There was a statistically significant improvement in VAS score for leg pain (p<0.05) and back pain (p<0.05) after surgery for each group. All three groups reported improvement in their walking distance. The average walking distance improved by factor 5 in groups 1 and 2 and by factor 2.5 in group 3 (p< 0.05). However the improvement in group 3 was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant improvement in ODI for all three groups (mean ODI improvement in Group 1, 16 points, Group 2, 23 points and Group 3, 15 points). Overall 96% of patients were satisfied and would consider the same treatment again under similar circumstances. The overall complication was 19% in group 1, 18% in group 2, and 33% in group 3. Conclusions. Surgery for neurogenic claudication in the octogenarian is associated with a higher complication rate. The outcomes however in this patient group are comparable to younger patients. Lumbar decompression surgery in octogenarians is a worthwhile procedure


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 3 - 3
1 Mar 2012
Higgins G Philips J Iqbal S Kwong H Grainger M
Full Access

We reported the first single surgeon series comparing outcome of microscopic and open primary single level unilateral lumbar decompression or discectomy. We aimed to determine any difference in outcomes between the two techniques. Forty-six decompressions were performed with use of an operating microscope (microscopic), and forty without (open) at two different hospitals. All procedures were performed by the senior author. Information was obtained by analysis of the patients' notes. The average age of the patients in both groups was comparable. Operating time was shorter in the microscopic group (68min, range 30-130) compared to the open group (83 mins, range 30-180). Dural tear rate was 4.3% with use of a microscope (0% symptomatic dural tear rate) and 7.5% without (2.5% symptomatic dural tear rate). Nerve damage incidence was 0% with use of a microscope and 5% (two patients) without. One of these was a neurapraxia and the patient made a full recovery. Wound infection rates, diagnosed on grounds of clinical suspicion, were 4.3% and 2.5% for microscopic and open respectively. There were no incidences of deep infection or post-operative discitis. Average inpatient stay was under 48 hours in both groups. Using the modified Macnab criteria, results using the microscope were 0% poor, 14% fair, 32% good, and 55% excellent. The results for the open group were 0% poor, 10% fair, 37% good and 53% excellent. Average follow-up was six months (1-19) for the microscope group, and seven months (2-16) for the open group. We conclude that primary single level unilateral lumbar decompressive surgery, performed without the use of a microscope, has a higher dural tear rate than the same surgery performed with the benefit of an operating microscope. Surgical time and incidence of nerve damage are also reduced by use of the microscope


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVII | Pages 47 - 47
1 May 2012
McDonald K O'Donnell M Verzin E Nolan P
Full Access

Objectives. Neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis is a posture dependant complaint typically affecting patients aged 50 years or older. Various treatment options exist for the management of this potentially debilitating condition. Non-surgical treatments: activity modification, exercise, NSAIDs, epidural injections. Surgical treatment options include decompression surgery and interspinous process device surgery. Interspinous process decompression is a relatively new, minimally invasive, stand-alone alternative to conservative and standard surgical decompressive treatments. The aim of this review is to evaluate the use of the X-Stop interspinous implant in all patients with spinal stenosis who were managed using the device in Northern Ireland up to June 2009. Method. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had the X-Stop device inserted for spinal stenosis by all consultant spinal surgeons in Northern Ireland. Patient demographics, clinical symptomatology, investigative modality, post-operative quality of life, cost effectiveness, complications and long-term outcomes were assessed. Information was collected from patients using a questionnaire which was posted to them, containing the SF-36 generic questionnaire and some additional questions. Results. A total of 23 patients underwent X-stop insertion in Northern Ireland at the time of this review, 19 patients returned their questionnaires and of these 17 were completed in full and therefore included. The mean age of the study population was 60.1 years and all patients included in the study had symptoms of neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed on MRI scan. The average hospital stay was 1.5 days compared to 7.5 days for decompressive laminectomy patients. Also, at a mean follow-up of 17.8 months, 2 patients suffered direct complications of device insertion requiring removal of the implant both of these patients agreed that they would undergo the operation again in the future. SF-36 scores indicate a quality of life improvement which equates to that of other popular orthopaedic operations such as total hip and total knee replacement. X-stop insertion has been shown to be much more cost-effective than decompressive laminectomy in previous studies. Conclusion. Decompression of the lumbar spine with the X-stop interspinous implant device is safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive, and at least as effective at improving symptomatology from lumbar spinal stenosis. It is obviously more invasive than non-surgical techniques, but is less invasive than lumbar decompression procedures, is less destructive to surrounding tissues and if it fails to produce the desired results can be removed easily and the option remains for the patient to under decompression


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 2 | Pages 134 - 140
24 Feb 2021
Logishetty K Edwards TC Subbiah Ponniah H Ahmed M Liddle AD Cobb J Clark C

Aims

Restarting planned surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is a clinical and societal priority, but it is unknown whether it can be done safely and include high-risk or complex cases. We developed a Surgical Prioritization and Allocation Guide (SPAG). Here, we validate its effectiveness and safety in COVID-free sites.

Methods

A multidisciplinary surgical prioritization committee developed the SPAG, incorporating procedural urgency, shared decision-making, patient safety, and biopsychosocial factors; and applied it to 1,142 adult patients awaiting orthopaedic surgery. Patients were stratified into four priority groups and underwent surgery at three COVID-free sites, including one with access to a high dependency unit (HDU) or intensive care unit (ICU) and specialist resources. Safety was assessed by the number of patients requiring inpatient postoperative HDU/ICU admission, contracting COVID-19 within 14 days postoperatively, and mortality within 30 days postoperatively.