Background. Foraminal stenosis is often encountered in patients undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis. Given the increased resection of facets and the presence of the more sensitive dorsal root ganglion, it is hypothesized that patients with foraminal stenosis have poorer postoperative outcomes. Methods. Thirty-one patients undergoing decompression without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated. The degree of foraminal stenosis was determined by 2 independent reviewers for absence of fat around the nerve roots. ImageJ digital imaging software was also used to evaluate the foraminal area. Patients with foraminal stenosis were compared with those without using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical pain scale for back and leg pain at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Results. Twenty patients in the foraminal stenosis group were compared with 11 without foraminal stenosis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, number of levels operated on, preoperative ODI, back pain or leg pain scores. The foraminal area was significantly smaller in the foraminal stenosis group. Patients without foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 26.0), back pain (mean 3.1) and leg pain scores (mean 5.5). Patients with foraminal stenosis reported significant improvements in ODI (mean 18.8) and leg pain (mean 2.5) but not in back pain (mean 0.3). Comparing the 2 groups, the patients with foraminal stenosis had significantly less improvement in back pain (p = 0.02) and leg pain (p = 0.02). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that presence of foraminal stenosis is a negative predictor for successful outcome following
One out of nine Canadian males would suffer prostate cancer (PC) during his lifetime. Life expectancy of males with PC has increased with modern therapy and 90% live >10 years. However, 20% of PC-affected males would develop incurable metastatic diseases. Bone metastases (BM) are present in ~80% of metastatic PC patients, and are the most severe complication of PC, generating severe pain, fractures, spinal cord compression, and death. Interestingly, PC-BMs are mostly osteoblastic. However, the structure of this newly formed bone and how it relates to pain and fracture are unknown. Due to androgen antagonist treatment, different PC phenotypes develop with differential dependency on androgen receptor (AR) signaling: androgen-dependent (AR+), double negative (AR-) and neuroendocrine. How these phenotypes are related to changes in bone structure has not been studied. Here we show a state-of-the-art structural characterization of PCBM and how PC phenotypes are associated to abnormal bone formation in PCBM. Cadaveric samples (n=14) obtained from metastases of PC in thoracic or lumbar vertebrae (mean age 74yo) were used to analyze bone structure. We used micro-computed tomography (mCT) to analyze the three-dimensional structure of the bone samples. After imaging, the samples were sectioned and one 3mm thick section was embedded in epoxy-resin, ground and polished. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and quantitative backscattering electron (qBSE) imaging were used to determine mineral morphology and composition. Another section was used for histological analysis of the PC-affected bone. Collagen structure, fibril orientation and extracellular matrix composition were characterized using histochemistry. Additionally, we obtained biopsies of 3 PCBM patients undergoing emergency
Spinal stenosis is a condition resulting in the compression of the neural elements due to narrowing of the spinal canal. Anatomical factors including enlargement of the facet joints, thickening of the ligaments, and bulging or collapse of the intervertebral discs contribute to the compression. Decompression surgery alleviates spinal stenosis through a laminectomy involving the resection of bone and ligament. Spinal decompression surgery requires appropriate planning and variable strategies depending on the specific situation. Given the potential for neural complications, there exist significant barriers to residents and fellows obtaining adequate experience performing spinal decompression in the operating room. Virtual teaching tools exist for learning instrumentation which can enhance the quality of orthopaedic training, building competency and procedural understanding. However, virtual simulation tools are lacking for
Introduction:. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative condition that results in a non-traumatic, progressive and chronic compression of the cervical spinal cord. Surgery is indicated for patients with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive myelopathy. Literature shows that
Purpose of the study:. Improved technology, increasing experience and techniques warrant an analysis of cost effective ways of medical management in general and shoulder decompression specifically. The question raised was whether a less invasive technique is necessarily the most cost effective way or merely the surgeons' preferred technique. This is a retrospective study of patients at Tertiary Academic Institution who underwent an open or arthroscopic shoulder decompression in the past 3 years. The aim of the study is to do a cost analysis of shoulder surgery as private health care (medical aid) is demanding more cost effective procedures and we have limited funds in the Government setting. Methods:. We focused on the following: the surgeon; the procedure; operating time; inpatient time; intraoperative block; physiotherapy costs, time off work and the cost of instrumentation used. Patients had to comply with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion: All patients that had shoulder
Introduction. Kinematics analyses of the spine have been recognized as an effective method for functional analysis of the spine. CT is suitable for obtaining bony geometry of the vertebrae but radiation is a clinical concern. MRI is noninvasive but it is difficult to detect bone edges especially at endplates and processes where soft tissues attach. Kinematics analyses require tracking of solid bodies; therefore, bony geometry is not always necessary for kinematics analysis of the spine. This study aimed to develop a reliable and robust method for kinematics analysis of the spine using an innovative MRI-based 3D bone-marrow model. Materials and Methods. This IRB-approved study recruited 17 patients undergoing lumbar
Introduction. Only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression, most comparing various forms of decompression. A review of the case notes of patients undergone ulnar nerve decompressions was undertaken looking at the pre-op symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures and the post-operative outcomes. Material/methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve
Introduction. Management of painful scarring of a nerve after surgery or trauma is challenging. Wrapping with a vein or adhesion barriers such as silicone have been reported with some success. This is a retrospective review of application of a xenograft collagen wrap around a peripheral nerve following neurolysis. There is no report in English literature of use of a collagen wrap for this purpose. Materials/Methods. 12 patients underwent use of the Neuragen™ bovine collagen nerve conduit or NeuraWrap™ (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro, NJ) over a 6 year period. The causes were, scarring after carpal tunnel (n=5) or cubital tunnel release (n=3) or partial nerve injury (n=4, radial, median, dorsal ulnar, digital nerves). Follow up ranged from 6–12 months. Outcome was assessed by VAS or functional improvement. Results. No patient developed adverse reaction to the xenograft conduit. All 10 patients with painful scarring reported improvement of pain with reduction in mean VAS from 7 to 2 at final follow-up. The patient with radial palsy with scarring of the nerve had full recovery of radial nerve function by 6 months. The partially injured sensory branch of median nerve and digital nerve regained normal 2PD. The patients with scarring after
Purpose of study. This RCT is to determine whether or not there is a clinical benefit from inserting a dynamic stabilising implant such as the Wallis ligament on the functional recovery of patients who have undergone lumbar
The Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign in transverse magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to discriminate well between selected patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but the performance of this new test, when used in a broad patient population, is not yet known (Barz et al. 2010). We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients with suspected LSS from 2004–2006, before the sign had been described, to assess its association with health outcomes. Based on clinical and radiological diagnostics, patients had been treated with
Introduction. Many journals require outcome data at 2 years post-operative for the assessment of operative procedures in spinal surgery. This study seeks to clarify the timescale of improvement after surgery to see if a shorter period of assessment will indicate the final outcome. Methods. Outcome data for 185 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery was analysed. All were given a global outcome assessment questionnaire (as used in the Swedish Spinal Fusion study) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following surgery. Results were analysed according to the type of spinal surgery undertaken. Results. Six patients had incomplete data and were excluded. 124 of 179 patients were ‘much better’ or ‘better’ at 6 months. There was no significant change in the outcome of this group at 2 years (p<0.05). Only 18 showed any deterioration at 1 year and 2 years post surgery. Conclusion. Of the 55 patients who were ‘same’ or ‘worse’ at 6 months, most had no significant improvement in outcome at 2 years. Only 6 showed any significant improvement. Sixty four patients underwent disc replacement or spinal fusion. Of these, 19 patients improved between 6 months and 2 years follow-up. Eight patients got worse during the same period. Fifty eight patients underwent
Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve
Aim. To evaluate morbidity and outcome associated with lumbar spine decompression for central spinal stenosis in the elderly compared with younger age groups. Patients & methods. Case notes review of patients with symptomatic and MRI proven central lumber canal stenosis, under the care of a single surgeon. The study population was 3 age groups: patients < 60 year of age (Group 1, n=21), patients between 60 and 79 years (Group 2, n=54), and > age of 80 years (Group 3, n=15). Data with regard to intra- and post-operative complications and subjective outcome variables were collected. These included pain (VAS), walking distance, Oswestry Disability score (ODI) and patient satisfaction scores. Results. There was a statistically significant improvement in VAS score for leg pain (p<0.05) and back pain (p<0.05) after surgery for each group. All three groups reported improvement in their walking distance. The average walking distance improved by factor 5 in groups 1 and 2 and by factor 2.5 in group 3 (p< 0.05). However the improvement in group 3 was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant improvement in ODI for all three groups (mean ODI improvement in Group 1, 16 points, Group 2, 23 points and Group 3, 15 points). Overall 96% of patients were satisfied and would consider the same treatment again under similar circumstances. The overall complication was 19% in group 1, 18% in group 2, and 33% in group 3. Conclusions. Surgery for neurogenic claudication in the octogenarian is associated with a higher complication rate. The outcomes however in this patient group are comparable to younger patients. Lumbar
We reported the first single surgeon series comparing outcome of microscopic and open primary single level unilateral lumbar decompression or discectomy. We aimed to determine any difference in outcomes between the two techniques. Forty-six decompressions were performed with use of an operating microscope (microscopic), and forty without (open) at two different hospitals. All procedures were performed by the senior author. Information was obtained by analysis of the patients' notes. The average age of the patients in both groups was comparable. Operating time was shorter in the microscopic group (68min, range 30-130) compared to the open group (83 mins, range 30-180). Dural tear rate was 4.3% with use of a microscope (0% symptomatic dural tear rate) and 7.5% without (2.5% symptomatic dural tear rate). Nerve damage incidence was 0% with use of a microscope and 5% (two patients) without. One of these was a neurapraxia and the patient made a full recovery. Wound infection rates, diagnosed on grounds of clinical suspicion, were 4.3% and 2.5% for microscopic and open respectively. There were no incidences of deep infection or post-operative discitis. Average inpatient stay was under 48 hours in both groups. Using the modified Macnab criteria, results using the microscope were 0% poor, 14% fair, 32% good, and 55% excellent. The results for the open group were 0% poor, 10% fair, 37% good and 53% excellent. Average follow-up was six months (1-19) for the microscope group, and seven months (2-16) for the open group. We conclude that primary single level unilateral lumbar
Objectives. Neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis is a posture dependant complaint typically affecting patients aged 50 years or older. Various treatment options exist for the management of this potentially debilitating condition. Non-surgical treatments: activity modification, exercise, NSAIDs, epidural injections. Surgical treatment options include
Restarting planned surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is a clinical and societal priority, but it is unknown whether it can be done safely and include high-risk or complex cases. We developed a Surgical Prioritization and Allocation Guide (SPAG). Here, we validate its effectiveness and safety in COVID-free sites. A multidisciplinary surgical prioritization committee developed the SPAG, incorporating procedural urgency, shared decision-making, patient safety, and biopsychosocial factors; and applied it to 1,142 adult patients awaiting orthopaedic surgery. Patients were stratified into four priority groups and underwent surgery at three COVID-free sites, including one with access to a high dependency unit (HDU) or intensive care unit (ICU) and specialist resources. Safety was assessed by the number of patients requiring inpatient postoperative HDU/ICU admission, contracting COVID-19 within 14 days postoperatively, and mortality within 30 days postoperatively.Aims
Methods