Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) – enlarged, aspherical femoral head deformity (cam-type) or retroversion/overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type) – is a leading cause for early hip osteoarthritis. Although anteverting/reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address FAI aims to preserve the native hip and restore joint function, it is still unclear how it affects joint mobility and stability. This in vitro cadaveric study examined the effects of surgical anteverting PAO on range of motion and capsular mechanics in hips with acetabular retroversion. Twelve cadaveric hips (n = 12, m:f = 9:3; age = 41 ± 9 years; BMI = 23 ± 4 kg/m2) were included in this study. Each hip was CT imaged and indicated acetabular retroversion (i.e., crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial wall sign, retroversion index > 20%, axial plane acetabular version < 15°); and showed no other abnormalities on CT data. Each hip was denuded to the bone-and-capsule and mounted onto a 6-DOF robot tester (TX90, Stäubli), equipped with a universal force-torque sensor (Omega85, ATI). The robot positioned each hip in five sagittal angles: Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°; and performed hip internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions to 5 Nm in each position. After the intact stage was tested, each hip underwent an anteverting PAO, anteverting the acetabulum and securing the fragment with long bone screws. The capsular ligaments were preserved during the surgery and each hip was retested postoperatively in the robot. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed that the acetabular fragment was properly positioned with adequate version and head coverage. Paired sample t-tests compared the differences in range of motion before and after PAO (CI = 95%; SPSS v.24, IBM). Preoperatively, the intact hips with acetabular retroversion demonstrated constrained internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions. The PAO reoriented the acetabular fragment and medialized the hip joint centre, which tightened the iliofemoral ligament and slackenend the pubofemoral ligament. Postoperatively, internal rotation increased in the deep hip flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆IR = +7°, p = 0.001) and Flexion 90° (∆IR = +8°, p = 0.001); while also demonstrating marginal decreases in external rotation in all positions. In addition, adduction increased in the deep flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆ADD = +11°, p = 0.002) and Flexion 90° (∆ADD = +12°, p = 0.001); but also showed marginal increases in abduction in all positions. The anteverting PAO restored anterosuperior acetabular clearance and increased internal rotation (28–33%) and adduction motions (29–31%) in deep hip flexion. Restricted movements and positive impingement tests typically experienced in these positions with acetabular retroversion are associated with clinical symptoms of FAI (i.e., FADIR). However, PAO altered capsular tensions by further tightening the anterolateral hip capsule which resulted in a limited external rotation and a stiffer and tighter hip. Capsular tightness may still be secondary to acetabular retroversion, thus capsular management may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. In efforts to optimize surgical management and clinical outcomes, anteverting PAO is a viable option to address FAI due to acetabular retroversion or overcoverage

Few epidemiological studies from Asian countries have addressed this issue and reported that FAI is less prevalent in Asian population. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of radiographic hip abnormalities associated with FAI in asymptomatic Korean volunteers. The authors hypothesized that the prevalence of FAI in Korean population would not be less than that in western population. Two hundred asymptomatic volunteers with no prior hip surgery or childhood hip problems underwent three-view plain radiography (pelvis anteroposterior (AP) view, Sugioka view, and 45° Dunn view) of both hips. Cam lesions were defined as the presence of the following signs on each views: pistol-grip deformity, osseous bump at the femoral head-neck junction, flattening of the femoral head-neck offset, or alpha angle >50°. Pincer lesions were determined by radiographic signs, including crossover sign, posterior wall deficient sign, or lateral center-edge (CE) angle >40°. Only positive cases agreed by both observers were defined as true FAI-related deformities. There were 146 male and 254 female hips, with a mean age of 34.7 years. On pelvis AP view, the prevalence of pistol grip deformity, bump, flattening, and alpha angle >50° was 1.3% (male 3.4%, female 0%), 0.8% (male 2.1%, female 0%), 0.8% (male 2.1%, female 0%), and 1.0% (male 2.7%, female 0%), respectively. On Sugioka view, the prevalence of bump, flattening, and alpha angle >50° was 9.8% (male 14.4%, female 7.1%), 13.5% (male 20.5%, female 9.4%), and 14.0% (male 26.7%, female 6.7%), respectively. On 45° Dunn view, the prevalence of bump, flattening, and alpha angle >50° was 8.0% (male 14.4%, female 4.3%), 17.5% (male 27.4%, female 11.8%), and 27.5% (male 44.5%, female 17.7%), respectively. The prevalence of cam lesion which was identified on at least one radiograph was 42.5% (male 62.3%, female 31.1%). The prevalence of cam lesion which was identified on ≥2 radiographs was 19.3% (male 30.8%, female 12.6%). The prevalence of cam type FAI (at least one cam lesion) was 2.0% (male 5.5%, female 0%) on pelvis AP view, 25.8% (male 37.0%, female 19.3%) on Sugioka view, and 35.8% (male 55.5%, female 24.4%) on 45° Dunn view. On pelvis AP view, the prevalence of crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and CE angle >40° was 20.0% (male 23.3%, female 18.1%), 20.8% (male 22.6%, female 19.7%), and 2.0% (male 2.7%, female 1.6%), respectively. The prevalence of pincer type of FAI (at least one pincer lesion) was 23.0% (male 27.4%, female 20.5%). In asymptomatic Korean volunteers, the prevalence of cam type FAI was low on AP pelvis radiographs, whereas the prevalence of cam type FAI on Sugioka and 45° Dunn view was found to be comparable to that previously reported in Western populations. The prevalence of pincer type FAI in asymptomatic Korean volunteers was also comparable that in Western populations and was similar in both gender. Considering the high prevalence of FAI morphologic features on plain radiographs in asymptomatic Korean populations, it is also important to determine whether FAI is a cause of hip pain when considering surgery in Asian patients

Purpose. Diagnosis of acetabular retroversion is essential in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but its assessment from radiographs is complicated by pelvic tilt and the two-dimensional nature of plain films. We performed a study to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the crossover sign (COS) and the posterior wall sign (PWS) in identifying acetabular retroversion. Method. COS and PWS were evaluated from radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans as the standard of reference in 50 hips of subjects with symptoms of FAI. A CT-based method using 3-D models was developed to measure the COS, PWS, true acetabular version and pelvic tilt relative to the anterior pelvic plane. The new CT-based method aimed to eliminate errors resulting from variations in the position and orientation of the pelvis during imaging. Results. A low level of agreement for COS and PWS was found between radiographs and CT scans. A positive COS strongly correlated with pelvic tilt. Conclusion. These results suggest that COS and PWS determined from anteroposterior (AP) radiographs are considerably limited by pelvic tilt and inherent limitations of radiographs. Their use as the sole basis for deciding whether or not surgical intervention is indicated seems questionable. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction:. Most cases of hip osteoarthritis (OA) are believed to be caused by alterations in joint contact mechanics resulting from pathomorphologies such as acetabular dysplasia and acetabular retroversion. Over the past 13 years, our research group has focused on developing approaches for patient-specific modeling of cartilage and labrum in the human hip, and applying these approaches to study hip pathomorphology. The long term objective is to improve the understanding of the etiology of OA related to hip pathomorphology, and to improve diagnosis and treatment. The objectives of this presentation are to provide a summary of our subject-specific modeling approach, and to describe the results of our analysis of hips from three populations of subjects: normal, traditional dysplastic, and retroverted. Methods:. A combined experimental and computational protocol was used to investigate contact mechanics in ten normal subjects (normal center edge angles (CEA), no history of hip pain), ten subjects with hip pain secondary to acetabular dysplasia (CEA less than 25°), and ten patients with a radiographic crossover sign, pain and clinical exams consistent with acetabular retroversion. CT arthrography was used to image cartilage and bone. Volumetric image data were segmented and discretized, and subject-specific finite element models were produced using validated methods [Fig. 1]. Boundary and loading conditions were obtained from instrumented implant and gait data. Contact mechanics were evaluated on the acetabular cartilage and labrum. Labrum contact area and peak contact stress were evaluated. Cartilage contact area, peak and average contact stress were evaluated in six anatomical regions in the acetabulum. Results:. Hip contact patterns were subject-specific, but distinct patterns emerged in the groups. Dysplastic hips had a larger contact area in the lateral region of the acetabulum, while normal hips demonstrated a more distributed contact pattern. The labrum in dysplastic hips supported significantly more load than the labrum in normal hips in all activities [Fig. 2]. Contact in retroverted hips tended to be focused medially and superiorly [Fig. 3]. Retroverted subjects had smaller contact stress and area in most regions. Discussion:. The differences in labrum mechanics between the normal and dysplastic groups provide clear support for the mechanical importance of the acetabular labrum in dysplastic hips. There were only minor differences in cartilage contact stress and area between normal and dysplastic groups, because of a lateral shift in the location of contact and subsequent loading on the acetabular labra in the dysplastic hips. The larger labrum load support and contact area in dysplastic hips indicates that the labrum compensates for the shallow acetabula. Clinically, this may account for the pattern of OA onset in dysplastic hips. The results for the retroverted group do not support the commonly held belief that concentrated posterior loading in retroverted hips leads OA because there were lower contact stresses and areas in the posterior regions of retroverted hips. Further, these results suggest that rim trimming may be appropriate for retroverted hips. The preferred surgery likely depends on subtle patient specific aspects of hip pathoanotomy in both retroverted and dysplastic hips