In many papers, the diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is attributed to the presence of coxa profunda. However, little is known about the prevalence of coxa profunda in the general population and its clinical relevance. In order to ascertain its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects and whether it is a reliable indicator of pincer-type FAI, we undertook a cross-sectional study between July and December 2013. A total of 226 subjects (452 hips) were initially screened. According to strict inclusion criteria, 129 asymptomatic patients (257 hips) were included in the study. The coxa profunda sign, the crossover sign, the acetabular index (AI) and lateral centre–edge (LCE) angle were measured on the radiographs. The median age of the patients was 36.5 years (28 to 50) and 138 (53.7%) were women. Coxa profunda was present in 199 hips (77.4%). There was a significantly increased prevalence of coxa profunda in women (p < 0.05) and a significant association between coxa profunda and female gender (p < 0.001) (92% vs 60.5%). The crossover sign was seen in 36 hips (14%), an LCE > 40° in 28 hips (10.9%) and an AI < 0º in 79 hips (30.7%). A total of 221 normal hips (79.2%) (normal considering the crossover) had coxa profunda, a total of 229 normal hips (75.5%) (normal considering the LCE) had coxa profunda and a total of 178 normal hips (75.3%) (normal considering AI) had coxa profunda. When the presence of all radiological signs in the same subject was considered, pincer-type FAI was found in only two hips (one subject). We therefore consider that the coxa profunda sign should not be used as a radiological indicator of pincer-type FAI. We consider profunda to be a benign alteration in the morphology of the hip with low prevalence and a lack of association with other radiological markers of FAI. We suggest that the diagnosis of pincer-type FAI should be based on objective measures, in association with clinical findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:478–83

Purpose: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has recently been described as a cause of adult hip pain and a precursor of hip osteoarthritis. Pincer type is secondary to acetabular retroversion or coxa profunda and Cam type is secondary to lack of concavity/offset of the antero-lateral femoral head-neck junction. Purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of bilateral deformity in patients with cam type FAI as well as the presence of associated acetabular abnormalities. Method: One hundred and thirteen patients with symptomatic cam impingement (alpha (α) angle of Notzli > 55.5°) of at least one hip were evaluated. Eighty-two males, 31 females with an average age of 37.9 yrs (16–55). Standardized AP pelvis and bilateral Dunn views were reviewed. Alpha angle of Notzli was measured on Dunn views. Cam impingement was defined by α angle > 55.5 on the Dunn view and Pincer impingement was defined by the presence of either acetabular retroversion or coxa profunda. Statistical analysis was done using the two tailed paired t-test, chi-square test and intra-class correlation coefficient. Odds Ratios were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Results: Eighty-eight patients (77.8%) had bilateral deformity and 27% had symptoms in both hips. Mean α angles were higher for bilateral impingement deformity than for the impingement side only when unilateral deformity was present (72.10 versus 64.50, p< 0.001). Forty-four percent of hips with an impingement deformity also had a pincer deformity, either acetabular retroversion or coxa profunda. Painful hips had a statistically significant higher mean alpha angle than asymptomatic ones (69.70 versus 63.10, p< 0.001)). Comparing hips with α angles of 61–70 with those < 60 found an odds ratio of being painful of 2.59 (95% CI: 1.32–5.08, p=0.006). Hips with α angles > 71 had an odds ratio of being painful of 2.54 (95% CI: 1.3–4.96, p=0.007). Conclusion: The majority of patients with cam type FAI have bilateral deformities and an associated acetabular deformity less commonly. The severity of the deformity at the femoral head neck junction is a significant determining factor for the development of hip symptoms. This information is important as we better define the natural history of this deformity as well as devise effective treatment strategies

We examined the morphology of mammalian hips asking whether evolution can explain the morphology of impingement in human hips. We describe two stereotypical mammalian hips, coxa recta and coxa rotunda. Coxa recta is characterised by a straight or aspherical section on the femoral head or head-neck junction. It is a sturdy hip seen mostly in runners and jumpers. Coxa rotunda has a round femoral head with ample head-neck offset, and is seen mostly in climbers and swimmers. Hominid evolution offers an explanation for the variants in hip morphology associated with impingement. The evolutionary conflict between upright gait and the birth of a large-brained fetus is expressed in the female pelvis and hip, and can explain pincer impingement in a coxa profunda. In the male hip, evolution can explain cam impingement in coxa recta as an adaptation for running

Osteoarthritis is extremely common and many different causes for it have been described. One such cause is abnormal morphology of the affected joint, the hip being a good example of this. For those joints with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), a link with subsequent osteoarthritis seems clear. However, far from being abnormal, these variants may be explained by evolution, certainly so for FAI, and may actually be normal rather than representing deformity or disease. The animal equivalent of FAI is coxa recta, commonly found in species that run and jump. It is rarely found in animals that climb and swim. In contrast are the animals with coxa rotunda, a perfectly spherical femoral head, and more in keeping with the coxa profunda of mankind. This article describes the evolutionary process of the human hip and its link to FAI and DDH. Do we need to worry after all?

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. The earlier PAO series show 20 year survivorship of 81% and 65% in Tonnis Grade 0 and 1 hips. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-operatively whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Preoperative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctible problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Pre-existing hip pathology such as femoroacetabular impingement is believed by some, to have a direct causal relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. The strength of this relationship remains unknown. We investigate the prevalence of abnormal bone morphology in the symptomatic hip on the pre-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph of consecutive patients undergoing hip resurfacing. Rotated radiographs were excluded. One hundred patients, of mean age 53.5 years were included (range 33.4–71.4 years, 32% female). We examined the films for evidence of a cam-type impingement lesion (alpha angle >50.5°, a pistol grip, Pitt's pits, a medial hook, an os acetabuli and rim ossification), signs of acetabular retroversion or a pincer-type impingement lesion (crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial sign, coxa profunda, protrusio, coxa vara, Tonnis angle < 5°), and hip dysplasia (a Tonnis acetabular angle >14° and a lateral centre-edge angle of Wiberg <20°). Pre-existing radiographic signs of pathology were present in a large proportion of hips with low grade (Tonnis grade 1–2) arthritis. There is a group of patients who presented with more advanced osteoarthritis in which we suspect abnormal bone morphology to be a causative factor but, for example, neck osteophytes obscure the diagnosis of a primary cam lesion. Our findings corroborate those of Harris and Ganz. Impingement is radiographically detectable in a large proportion of patients who present with early arthritis of the hip, and therefore we agree that it is a likely pre-cursor for osteoarthritis. Treatments directed at reducing hip impingement may stifle the progression of osteoarthritis

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Surgical invention to preserve the native hip joint remains a preferred treatment option for hips in young patients with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The two most common pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement, if present. Correction of deformities on the femoral side is now less common and reserved for only the more severe combined femoral and acetabular dysplasias or the rare isolated femoral dysplasia. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-op whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with the onset of instability in the absence of significant secondary arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Introduction. Ectopic ossification (EO) at the acetabular rim has been suggested to be associated with pincer impingement and to lead to ossification of the labrum. However, this has never been substantiated with histological, radiographic and MRI findings in large cohorts of patients. We hypothesized that it is more a bone apposition of the acetabular rim and that it occurs more frequently in coxa profunda (CP) hips. Materials and Methods. In the first part, a cohort of 20 hips with this suspected ectopic rim ossification (EO) pattern were identified. The radiographic features that could be associated with this ossification pattern were described and evaluated by a histologic examination of intra-operative samples taken from the rim trimming. In the second part, we assessed the prevalence of this ectopic ossification process in a cohort of 203 patients treated for FAI. Results. Histologic examination revealed that new acetabular bone formation was either overgrowing the non-ossified labrum or moving it away from the native rim. Radiologically, this was associated with an “indentation sign” and/or a “double line sign”. There were no specimens that had shown any evidence of labral ossification. EO was found in 26 hips (18%) of the second cohort. Twenty of 26 hips (77%) with EO had CP morphology and 29% of CP hips had EO signs. In contrast, only 6 non-profunda hips (8%) were associated with EO. There was a high correlation between XR and MRI findings as >80% of XR findings were confirmed on MRI. Sixty-nine hips had CP morphology. The double line sign (N = 13), the indentation sign (N = 12) and a prominent lateral rim (N = 11) were found. Hips with an EO pattern were found in patients that were significantly older than those without EO (p = 0.01). The acetabular characteristics of the EO groups were not significantly different from the CP hips without EO. The femoral characteristics were significantly different between groups with lower neck shaft angles (128° vs 134°;p = 0,0002) and shorter femoral necks lengths (62mm vs 65mm; p = 0,04)) in the EO group. The mean Tonnis classification was not significantly different (p = 0,18). In addition, the mean acetabular cartilage degeneration status was not different between both groups (p = 0,9). Rim trimming down to the native acetabular bone was done in all cases either by arthroscopy (N = 40) or open surgical dislocation (N = 17). Discussion. Ectopic ossification of the acetabular rim predominantly occurs in CP and is associated with specific anatomic features of the proximal femur. This type of impingement seems to be different and less aggressive than other described impingement processes. The double line sign and indentation sign are highly indicative for this EO process and are indicative for a longstanding impingement problem. Trimming of the acetabular rim should be conducted

Summary Statement. Pincer deformities are involved in the genesis of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographic patterns suggestive of pincer deformities are common among general population. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered. Background. Pincer deformities (coxa profunda, protrusio acetabuli, global retroversion, isolated cranial over-coverage) have been advocated as a cause of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and early hip osteoarthritis (OA). Different radiographic patterns may advocate the presence of a pincer deformity. The prevalence of these radiographic patterns among general adult population, as their role in early hip OA, is poorly defined. Methods. From a database of 40.351 pelvic radiograms and CT collected at our institution between 2005 and 2010, we selected 118 caucasian individuals (56 females, 62 males), aged between 15 and 60 years, who underwent both plain radiographs and CT of the pelvis. A series of exclusion criteria were strictly applied to achieve a sample of adult general population as more representative as possible. In particular patients with presence of any disease involving hip joint, including: advanced hip OA (grade II or III of Tonnis scale), head necrosis, fractures, heterotopic ossifications, bone and soft tissue tumors, rheumatic pathologies, classic hip dysplasia with lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA) less than 20°, clinical diagnosis of FAI or hip pain, were excluded from the present study. We also excluded patients in which open growth plates, osteopenia, hardware or evidence of prior surgery were present. Radiographs were investigated for pelvic tilt, signs of retroversion, lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA), presence of coxa profunda or protrusio acetabuli. EAV was measured on CT scans at the equatorial plane of the acetabulum passing by the 3 o'clock position, while CAV was calculated at a more cranial level corresponding to the 1 o'clock position EAV and CAV were obtained in the axial plane by measuring the angle made by a line connecting the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum and a line perpendicular to the line connecting the ischial spines. A new parameter, Acetabular torsion (AT), has been introduced in order to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. AT was defined as the difference between EAV and CAV. Cam deformity was assessed by calculating the alpha angle on the femoral side; an alpha angle > 55° was considered abnormal and suggestive of cam deformity. Radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration were noticed. Results. Mean EAV and mean CAV were higher in females, mean AA was higher in males. L-CEA, EAV and CAV increased with age. Mean AT was 8.8±6.3. AT was inversely related to CAV (r=−0.799; p<0.0005) but independent from EAV (r=−0.076; p=0.244). EAV≤10.2° was defined as the marker of global retroversion, while AT≥21.2° was defined as the marker of isolated cranial over-coverage. Overall prevalence of pincer deformities was 21.6% (> females; p=0.02). Early OA changes were related to age (p<0.0005) and AA (p<0.0005), but not to pincer deformities (p=0.96). Radiological signs of retroversion showed good or excellent negative predictability but poor positive predictability. Conclusions. Radiographic patterns of pincer deformities are common among general population. Relationship with radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration is poor. CT allows to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered

Aims

It has been well documented in the arthroplasty literature that lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) contributes to abnormal spinopelvic motion. However, the relationship between the severity or pattern of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as measured on an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic view and spinopelvic biomechanics has not been well investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study is to examine the association between the severity and pattern of hip OA and spinopelvic motion.

Aims

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients report exacerbation of hip pain in deep flexion. However, the exact impingement location in deep flexion is unknown. The aim was to investigate impingement-free maximal flexion, impingement location, and if cam deformity causes hip impingement in flexion in FAI patients.

Aims

This study aims to assess the relationship between history of pseudotumour formation secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) implants and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate, as well as establish ESR and CRP thresholds that are suggestive of infection in these patients. We hypothesized that patients with a pseudotumour were at increased risk of infection.

Aims

Pelvic tilt is believed to affect the symptomology of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip by alterations in joint movement, dysplasia of the hip by modification of acetabular cover, and femoroacetabular impingement by influencing the impingement-free range of motion. While the apparent role of pelvic tilt in hip pathology has been reported, the exact effects of many forms of treatment on pelvic tilt are unknown. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of surgery on pelvic tilt in these three groups of patients.

As our understanding of hip function and disease improves, it is evident that the acetabular fossa has received little attention, despite it comprising over half of the acetabulum’s surface area and showing the first signs of degeneration. The fossa’s function is expected to be more than augmenting static stability with the ligamentum teres and being a templating landmark in arthroplasty. Indeed, the fossa, which is almost mature at 16 weeks of intrauterine development, plays a key role in hip development, enabling its nutrition through vascularization and synovial fluid, as well as the influx of chondrogenic stem/progenitor cells that build articular cartilage. The pulvinar, a fibrofatty tissue in the fossa, has the same developmental origin as the synovium and articular cartilage and is a biologically active area. Its unique anatomy allows for homogeneous distribution of the axial loads into the joint. It is composed of intra-articular adipose tissue (IAAT), which has adipocytes, fibroblasts, leucocytes, and abundant mast cells, which participate in the inflammatory cascade after an insult to the joint. Hence, the fossa and pulvinar should be considered in decision-making and surgical outcomes in hip preservation surgery, not only for their size, shape, and extent, but also for their biological capacity as a source of cytokines, immune cells, and chondrogenic stem cells.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(12):857–869.

Aims

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements.

Aims

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) describes abnormal bony contact of the proximal femur against the acetabulum. The term was first coined in 1999; however what is often overlooked is that descriptions of the morphology have existed in the literature for centuries. The aim of this paper is to delineate its origins and provide further clarity on FAI to shape future research.

Aims

The aim of the study was to compare two methods of calculating pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT), either by using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to determine the bicoxofemoral axis, in patients with unilateral or bilateral primary hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Aims

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for acetabular dysplasia. It has also been proposed as a treatment for patients with acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to test whether outcome is equivalent for both types of morphology and identify factors that influenced outcome.