Background: A wide variety of practitioners with different belief systems and approaches treat chronic musculoskeletal pain. In trials of treatments for musculoskeletal pain the focus has tended to be on outcome rather than on understanding the process of care of these treatments. Gaining greater understanding of the process of care in consultations for chronic musculoskeletal pain may shed light on ways to improve patient care, as despite the range of options available many patients are still dissatisfied with their treatment. Aim: To undertake a systematic review to explore how the beliefs and expectations of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and their treating primary and community care practitioners / therapists influence the process of care. Method: A comprehensive search strategy was developed. Databases including MEDLINE, PSYCHINFO, AMED, and MANTIS were searched by two members of the review group working independently. Two members of the group again working independently screened the title and abstract of each reference retrieved for inclusion. Studies were included if they Reported original research. Explored patient’s or practitioners; beliefs and expectations, or both. Studied patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, which does not have a known systemic, inflammatory or malignant origin treated in primary or community care. The full review group resolved disagreements. Full text articles meeting the inclusion criteria will be obtained and coded further into non-randomised studies, randomised studies and qualitative studies. Data abstraction forms will be developed for each type of study. Data abstraction will be undertaken by two members of the group working independently. Results: 12, 667 articles were identified from the searches of bibliographic databases. At the present time 10 papers have been identified for potential inclusion in the review. The number of full papers to be considered for the review will be reported in this presentation along with the methods for data abstraction and synthesis. This study is ongoing

Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a major and costly health problem which is difficult to treat from both patients’ and practitioners’ perspectives. Gaining a greater understanding of patients’ and practitioners’ decision making may be one way of achieving more successful chronic pain consultations. Aim: To explore the influences on patients’ decision making regarding care seeking, and practitioners’ decision making regarding care delivery for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Method: In-depth qualitative interview study of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients and of NHS and private, mainstream and CAM practitioners who treat patients. Topic guides were developed which explored, patients’ and practitioners’ beliefs about the causes of pain and expectations of treatment, and the factors influencing decision making within the consultation. All interviews were audio taped and transcribed for analysis, and data was analysed using Framework. Results: Fifteen patients and 21 practitioners (two GPs, five chiropractors, five osteopaths and 10 physiotherapists) were interviewed. Themes identified as influencing the process of care and decision making, were the level of trust within the patient-practitioner relationship, beliefs about whom should be responsible for patients’ health, the role of patients’ self identity on the management of pain, and beliefs about whom should hold the expertise within the consultation. Conclusions: To improve primary care for chronic musculoskeletal pain, the level of trust within the patient-practitioner relationship may need to be increased. This may help practitioners to recognise and accept patients’ growing expertise within the consultation, which in turn may facilitate patients in taking more responsibility for their pain

Background – Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain seek care from a wide range of practitioners, both mainstream and complementary and alternative (CAM). Previous research suggests that patients’ social class and educational level may strongly influence their consulting behaviour. The role of health outcomes in influencing patients’ consulting behaviour has been less frequently studied. Aims – To explore the relationship between health outcomes and consulting behaviour of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Method – Secondary analysis of data collected as part of a population questionnaire survey of chronic pain. Univariate and multi variate analyses were undertaken to explore the relationship between health outcomes (e.g. health related quality of life) and consulting behaviour. Results – The survey response rate was 62% and the prevalence of chronic pain was 38% (987/2504). 53% of patients had consulted mainstream practitioners only, 4% CAM practitioners only, 18% mainstream and CAM practitioners and 25% no one. Patients’ who had consulted both mainstream and CAM practitioners reported the poorest health outcomes (EQ 5D = 0.55), followed by those who consulted just mainstream practitioners (EQ 5D = 0.61), and those who had consulted no one (EQ 5D = 0.72). The best health outcomes were reported amongst those who had just consulted CAM practitioners (EQ 5D =0.78). In multivariate analyses, the most powerful predictors of consulting both mainstream and CAM practitioners were working and having high levels of pain related disability. Conclusions – This analysis suggests that poorer health outcomes may be powerful predictors of consulting CAM practitioners, in some cases, amongst those who do not have access to the financial resources to pay for such treatment

Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a major health problem for the individual and the NHS. It is important to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with it, to identify unmet need and inform the development of interventions. Purpose: To describe the prevalence of CMP in a community based sample, overall and by location; To describe the factors associated with presence of CMP. Methods: Population questionnaire survey to 4100 patients registered with 17 Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework practices. We collected questionnaire data on demographics, presence and location of pain, pain severity, health related quality of life, care seeking and beliefs about pain. We then did univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with CMP. Results: Survey response rate was 61% (2509/4100); mean age 52 years (range 18–101); 56% female. CMP prevalence was 47%. One month period prevalence by area was; Lower back 23%; Knee 19%%; Shoulder 16%; Hip/thigh 14% and Upper back 6%. The majority of sufferers consulted their GP (61%), but a large minority (21%) consulted no-one. Factors associated with presence of CMP were being older, leaving school aged 16 or less, not working, having poorer quality of life and experiencing psychological distress (P< 0.05). In a multivariate analysis no factors were independently associated with presence of CMP. Conclusion: Results demonstrate the significant burden CMP presents in the community and the need to focus interventions on those individuals who may be more likely to suffer. It may be particularly important to consider the needs of those who have not consulted anyone

Background – Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a major health problem treated by a wide range of health professionals. Complementary therapies are likely to become more readily available on the NHS. Therefore a greater understanding of current service use may be helpful in ensuring appropriate targeting of services in the future. Purpose – To describe current service use for CMP in a UK representative population. To examine predictors of CMP use. Methods – Population questionnaire survey to 4100 patients registered with 17 Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework general practices. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, presence of pain, pain location and severity, health related quality of life (HRQOL), care seeking and beliefs about pain. Univariate and multivariate analyses was undertaken to examine predictors of care seeking. Results – Response rate of 61% of whom 47% reported CMP use. 77% consulted for their CMP; 60% mainstream medicine only, 17% mainstream and / or complementary and 22% no-one. Patients who consulted complementary practitioners were more likely to be female, to be psychologically distressed, to work, to have left school aged over 16 and to have severe pain (p< 0.05 in all cases). Working was independently associated with consulting a complementary practitioner (Exp (B) = 2.0, p=0.00). Conclusion – Complementary therapies are currently only available to those patients who can afford them. If such therapies become available on the NHS it may be important to provide patients and health professionals with appropriate information to inform their choices about these care options

Background – Patients with unexplained chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) can be difficult to help, consulting a range of services before consulting specialist pain services. Conflicts between the explanatory models for illness used by patients and health professionals might contribute to this complex ‘career path’, increasing the likelihood of unsatisfactory outcomes for both practitioners and patients. Purpose – To explore the understanding of the experiences of diagnosis and management amongst patients who attended a specialist musculoskeletal pain clinic. Method – Potential participants were sent a postal questionnaire 6–20 months after their first clinic attendance. Data was collected on pain presence, severity and location, health related quality of life and care seeking behaviour. Questionnaire data was used to inform combined purposive and theoretical sampling. In-depth interviews were conducted which probed participants’ understanding of their CMP and its management. Data was analysed using FRAMEWORK. Results – 15 patients were interviewed. Four main themes were identified; a) spoiled identity – were pain limited patients activities so much that this affected their sense of self; b)Diminishing faith in medicine – Patients were disappointed with aspects of their care seeking experience; c) Making sense of pain – Patients made sense of their pain by locating their pain within the context of their lives; d) Learning to live with the pain – An issue for all patients was whether or not their pain would go. Conclusion – Developing, implementing and evaluating approaches to address patients’ spoiled identity might allow us to improve patient centred outcomes in CMP

Background

Chronic pain is a complex condition that demonstrates better outcomes in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, typically delivered to groups of patients by tertiary healthcare teams. An inter-disciplinary pain management course for individual patients was developed to increase the scope of physical therapists working in primary care by integrating osteopathic manual therapy with psychological interventions from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a form of ‘3rd wave’ Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness and feasibility of comprehensive vocational rehabilitation (C-VR) and less comprehensive vocational rehabilitation (LC-VR) for workers on sick leave due to CMP, from the perspective of patients, professionals, and managers.

This edition of the Cochrane Corner looks at the three reviews that were published in the second half of 2023: surgical versus non-surgical interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures; cryotherapy following total knee arthroplasty; and physical activity and education about physical activity for chronic musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents

Background. Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines recommend applying theory within interventions to explain how behaviour change occurs. Guidelines endorse self-management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and osteoarthritis (OA), but evidence for its effectiveness is weak. This literature review aimed to determine the use of behaviour change theory and techniques within group-based self-management randomised controlled trials for chronic musculoskeletal pain, including CLBP and OA. Methods. A two phase search strategy of electronic databases was used to identify systematic reviews and studies relevant to this area. Articles were coded independently for their use of behaviour change theory, and the number of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) was identified using a 93 item taxonomy, Taxonomy (v1). Results. 25 articles of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which only three reported having based their intervention on theory, and all used Social Cognitive Theory. A total of 29 BCTs were coded across all articles with the most commonly identified techniques being ‘instruction on how to perform the behaviour’, ‘demonstration of the behaviour’, ‘behavioural practice’, ‘credible source’, ‘graded tasks’ and ‘body changes’. Conclusion. The findings demonstrate that theoretically driven research within self- management for chronic musculoskeletal pain is lacking, or is poorly reported and may partly explain the weak evidence surrounding its effectiveness, Future research that follows MRC and CONSORT guidelines regarding the use of theory and the importance of its reporting is warranted. Programmes should be theoretically based, and focus on comprehensive reporting of all trial aspects, including the basis of technique and theory selection. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This review was conducted as part of Health Research Award HRA_HSR/2012/24 from the Health Research Board of Ireland

In the UK and USA in 2016 more than 263,000 primary knee replacements were performed. Around 20% of patients report chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) at three or more months after total knee replacement (TKR). A large proportion of adults with all types of chronic musculoskeletal pain do not use services for a number of reasons, despite being in constant or daily pain. Given the high prevalence of CPSP, there is potentially a large hidden population with an unexpressed need for care, experiencing ongoing pain and disability; understanding why they do not use health services may herald further insight into why many remain dissatisfied with knee replacement surgery. The aim of this study is to understand why some people with CPSP after TKR do not access services or make little use of healthcare. We conducted face-to-face in-depth interviews with 34 patients from 2 high-volume orthopaedic hospitals in England, to investigate their experience of long-term pain after knee replacement; their knowledge and understanding of CPSP; and their decisions about consulting for CPSP. The sample size was based on achievement of saturation and participants provided written informed consent. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach with double coding for rigor. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the West Midlands Solihull Research Ethics Committee (15/WM/0469). A core theme within the analysis suggests that participants do not seek healthcare because they believe that nothing further can be done, either by themselves or by healthcare professionals. Surgeons' satisfaction with the knee surgery and reassurances that pain would improve, left patients feeling uncertain about whether to re-consult, and some assumed that further consultation could lead to further surgery or medication, which they wish to avoid. Some participants' comorbidities took precedence over their knee pain when seeking healthcare. Others felt they had received their “share” of healthcare resources and that others were more deserving of treatment. People's descriptions of pain varied, from dull, or aching to shooting pains. Many described their pain as “discomfort” rather than pain. The majority described pain that was better than their pre-surgical pain, though others described pain that was worse, which they believed to be nerve damage. Many expressed disappointment in the outcome of their TKR. Expectations of pain varied, where most had expected some post-surgical pain, others underestimated it, and some had expected to be completely pain free following their TKR. Our analysis suggests that the reasons that some people with CPSP after TKR do not consult are varied and complex, spanning psychosocial, structural, moral, and organisational domains. There was an overriding sense that further consultation would be futile or may lead to unwanted treatment. Results suggest that improved information for patients about CPSP and appropriate post-surgical healthcare services may help patients and clinicians to manage this condition more effectively

The traditional biomedical model of managing musculoskeletal problems, such as low back pain (LBP), tends to be pathology driven, in which the aim is to locate an objectively identified disturbance. Appropriate treatment is conceptualised as a physical intervention that will compensate for or correct the identified disturbance. There is growing appreciation of the need to consider other factors, e.g. the meaning of the problem to the patient and professional, his/her experiences, cognitions, motivations and preferences. Improving the understanding about the beliefs and expectations of patients and health professionals is fundamental, since a better understanding of these factors, and any mismatch between professionals and patients, will facilitate improved management. A multidisciplinary group of researchers (chiropractor, GP, osteopath, physiotherapist, psychologist, sociologist) have developed a collaborative research programme to investigate the decision-making processes in the care of patients with musculoskeletal pain. The programme uses mixed methods, including systematic reviews, survey research, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with patients and practitioners. Three studies have already started: patient and health professional beliefs and expectations for the causes and treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. 1) Funded by the ARC, the purpose is to develop an understanding of the relationships between the different, professional and lay, theoretical frameworks used to diagnose and treat chronic musculoskeletal pain, and how these affect care. 2) Clinicians cognitions in apparently ineffective treatment of low back pain: funded by the ESRC, the purpose is to identify the reasons clinicians continue to treat LBP in the absence of improvement. Research on risk factors for the transition from acute to chronic LBP has concentrated on patient characteristics (psychological and social). It is possible that clinicians’ behaviour, advice and even treatment contribute to maintaining the problem indirectly. 3) Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice (EBP) in LBP management in the physical therapy professions; funded by the Department of Physiotherapy Studies, Keele University, this study aims to explore the perceptions of physiotherapists, chiropractors and osteopaths, about the opportunities and threats of taking an EBP approach to LBP management and identify methods by which implementation of evidence can be facilitated. This collaboration is the first of its kind and was developed through shared interests in the decision-making processes in the healthcare of people with musculoskeletal pain. We are keen to share the ideas and work in progress with the wider musculoskeletal pain research community

Purpose of Study and Background. Population ageing will facilitate an increase in health problems common in older adults, such as musculoskeletal conditions. Musculoskeletal conditions are the fourth largest contributor to disease burden in older adults; affecting quality of life, physical activity, mental wellbeing and independence. Therefore primary care health services must provide appropriate and efficacious management and treatment. However there are a number of complexities specific to older adults that are essential to address. Methods and Results. In order to identify these complexities, a review of the background literature was undertaken in addition to a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) session. The PPIE group consisted of eight older adults who experience chronic musculoskeletal pain. This session was used to discuss and explore what factors are important to consider in GP consultations for musculoskeletal pain for older adults, in addition to those identified through background literature. A number of factors were highlighted through these methods, including the difference in mood and aspirations for older adults; taking a holistic approach; the impact of comorbidities; whether the GP is listening and ‘on the same wavelength’, and older adults' expectations regarding their pain and the consultation. Conclusion. Management of musculoskeletal pain for older adults in GP consultations is complex due to a range of factors, reinforcing the importance of taking a holistic approach. The impact of these factors upon the experience and outcomes of GP consultations will be further explored through in depth interviews with older adults with musculoskeletal pain. Conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding. This PhD is funded as part of an ACORN studentship awarded by Keele University. This PhD is nested within the Treatment for Aches and Pains Study, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (grant number: RP-PG-1211-20010)

Background. Chronic musculoskeletal pain increases an individual's risk of developing many chronic diseases and the risk of all-cause early mortality. There is irrefutable evidence supporting the role of physical activity (PA) in reducing these risks. Sustaining changes to PA behaviours is challenging and efforts are needed to understand the barriers and facilitators of change. Understanding these factors is a vital step in developing behaviour change interventions. Objectives. Explore barriers and facilitators to engaging in PA in adults accessing pain services. Explore barriers and facilitators to promoting PA by healthcare professionals, exercise professionals and charity staff/expert patients. Methods. A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework (TDF). Two focus groups were conducted with service users (n=18). Three focus groups were held with; healthcare professionals (n=8); exercise professionals (n=6) and charity staff/expert patients (n=8). Two independent reviewers thematically analysed transcripts. Barriers and facilitators were subsequently coded according to the domains of the TDF. Results. For all groups barriers were frequently mapped to the domain ‘environmental context and resources’. Although there was variation across the groups, barriers were also frequently mapped to the domains of ‘knowledge’, ‘beliefs about consequences’, and ‘belief about capabilities’. For service-users' facilitators were frequently mapped to ‘social influences’. Conclusion. The TDF was used to identify deficits that are likely to influence behaviours; targeted intervention strategies have been developed to specifically target these deficits. The interventions that have been developed consider not only the behaviour of those at whom the intervention is targeted, but also those involved in its delivery. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This research was funded by the Public Health Agency, HSC R&D Division through a Doctoral Fellowship awarded to J Marle

Introduction. There has been a recent surge in the interest of the role of vitamin D in chronic musculoskeletal pain however there are limited studies that have investigated the link of vitamin D hypovitaminosis with low back pain. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of low vitamin D levels in patients who present with low back pain in an outpatient setting in the UK. Methods. Data was collected retrospectively from computerised databases of all patients who presented with low back pain from a single spinal consultant's outpatient clinic and have had serum levels of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OH vitamin D) requested. Data of these patients were collected from hospital electronic and paper records and analysed against their serum 25-OH vitamin D levels. Results. Data on 229 patients was collected over an 18 month period. 19.7% of patients presenting to the spinal outpatient clinics had severe 25-OH vitamin D deficiency (less than 15 nmol/L) compared to 2.6% of 3132 non-spinal outpatient clinic patients (p<0.001). However, the percentage of patients with deficient (15 to 30 nmol/L) but not severe deficiency was similar in both groups (37.6% versus 38.3%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of vitamin D deficiency whether a surgical or non-surgical pathology was present or not (p=0.62). Conclusion. We have found no link between vitamin D deficiency and low back pain in this study. Vitamin D deficiency is a common comorbidity in Leicester

Aims/background. Current treatment recommendations advocate various exercise modalities for people with chronic Low Back Pain (cLBP). 1. Walking appears to represent an inexpensive and readily accessible activity for a range of individuals, including those who were previously sedentary. However, the effectiveness of such interventions are uncertain in cLBP. Methods. A systematic review was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of walking interventions across a range of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions, including LBP. Six electronic databases were searched for relevant studies. Data for pain and self reported function were extracted and where appropriate, results were pooled and analysed using RevMan (v.5). Results. Twenty studies with a total of 1852 participants (Mean: 96) were included in the review. Only two provided data for cLBP, Data from one of these was not analysed as only median values were reported. The remaining study found no effect in favour of the walking intervention for pain (mean difference = −0.50 [95% confidence interval = −16.23, 17.23]) with a moderate improvement in function (−22.56 [−40.84, −4.26]). For osteoarthritis, analysis revealed small to moderate differences for both pain (−6.23 [−11.22, −1.24]; n=7) and function (−10.90 [−20.61, −1.19]; n=5). Discussion. Despite the potential benefits associated with walking, results of this systematic review found limited evidence to support the use of such interventions for people with cLBP. Further studies where walking is the predominant component of an overall intervention and which closely monitor any associated adverse events are required

Background: Mind body therapies are being used increasingly to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. We aimed to systematically review studies to explore the effectiveness of these mind-body therapies (MBTs). Method: The following databases were searched MEDLINE, Psychinfo, AMED and CINAHL. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series studying adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders were included. MBTs of interest were biofeedback, hypnosis, guided imagery, meditation, and progressive muscle relaxation. Papers of any language were included. Selection, data extraction and methodological evaluation of the studies were done independently. Narrative and meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate. Results: The search identified 766 articles, 15 were selected for review, three were before and after studies, 12 were either RCTs or clinical controlled trials. The majority of the studies were of a low quality methodologically, with few participants. Fifteen of the studies reported MBTs reduced pain, this was significant for 7 studies post treatment and for five at follow up. MBTs generally had a positive effect on depression, quality of life, acceptance of pain, use of health care and medication. MBTs were as effective as active interventions such as CBT or education and superior to passive control groups. Conclusion: MBTs may have the potential to reduce pain, depression and improve quality of life. There is not enough evidence to conclude that MBTs are more effective than standard medical care or which type of MBT is more effective. Data suggests that a bio-psychological approach may be beneficial in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Conflicts of Interest: None. Source of Funding: Queen Mary University of London

Summary Statement. The peripheral neuronal phenotype is significantly altered in rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) with a clear upregulation of the Glutaminergic system being present in disease. Introduction. Shoulder pain is the third most frequent cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the community and is usually caused by rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). The central and peripheral nervous system play an important role in both tissue homoeostasis and tendon healing. The Glutaminergic system is of key importance in driving the peripheral and central neuronal changes which increase the body's sensitivity to pain (1, 2). No study to date has investigated the role of the glutaminergic system in human RCT. We hypothesised that the peripheral neuronal phenotype would be altered in RCT, and would vary according to disease stage as measured by size of tear. The term ‘peripheral neuronal phenotype’ is used to refer to refer to specific characteristics of the peripheral nervous system, neuronal mediators and the receptors for these mediators in peripheral tissue. Methods. Rotator cuff tendon specimens were obtained from 64 patients undergoing the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears. Control supraspinatus tendon was obtained from 10 patients undergoing surgery for anterior instability using an ultrasound guided biopsy technique. Patients with rotator cuff tears were divided into 2 groups: the small/medium group (≤ 3cm size) and the large/massive group (>3cm size). The tendon tissue was histologically stained using Haematoxylin and Eosin, and immunohistochemically stained with primary antibodies visualised using 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Image analysis was performed blindly by 2 observers using Image-J to quantify the amount of DAB positive staining. Data was non-parametric in distribution and Mann-Whitney U tests were carried out using SPSS with significance levels set at a minimum of p<0.025. Results. There were significant changes in the peripheral neuronal phenotype in RCT. The Glutaminergic system was significantly up-regulated with an increase in Glutamate and changes in several related receptors in disease versus control (p<0.01). The standard deviation in nuclei count and mean cell nuclear area were both increased in disease (p<0.01) compared to controls. Tendon vascularity and cell proliferation were reduced in disease vs control (p<0.01). There were no significant correlations between pain scores and the peripheral tissue markers. Discussion/Conclusion. The peripheral neuronal phenotype is significantly altered in rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) with clear changes in the Glutaminergic system in disease. These findings are novel and improve our understanding of pain and tissue healing in RCT, potentially providing novel therapeutic targets

Background – Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a major health problem, for which patients consult a wide range of practitioners often with little success. This may be due to the sometimes different explanatory models for pain held by patients and practitioners. Gaining an understanding of these models may improve care. An area of conflict may be the identification and management of the psychological aspects of pain. Purpose – To explore patients’ and practitioners’ beliefs and expectations of treatment for CMP, in relation to the identification and management of the psychological aspects to pain. Method – In-depth qualitative interview study of 24 practitioners (osteopaths, chiropractors, physiotherapists and GPs) and 24 patients with CMP which explored their beliefs about causation and treatment of CMP. Maximum variety purposive samples of both groups were selected. All interviews were audio-taped and transcribed for analysis. Data was analysed using FRAMEWORK. Results – Patients and practitioners believed that stress influenced pain perception, however some patients believed that stress could also cause pain. In terms of the consultation, practitioners felt pressure from patients to provide them with emotional / psychological support which on the whole they felt ill-equipped to provide. Patients operated with a physical model of illness and felt dismissed if practitioners focused too much attention on the psychological aspects of their pain. Conclusion– Practitioners expressed confusion over what they were expected to provide patients in terms of psychological support. They also expressed a need for training in the management of behavioural / psychological aspects to pain. Patients may also require education to increase their awareness of the psychological aspects to their pain

Aims

This study investigated the effects of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on pain, function, and quality of life in people with early-stage symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to a sham procedure.