Aims

Patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are often multimorbid, thus unplanned readmissions following surgery are common. We therefore aimed to analyze 30-day and one-year readmission rates, reasons for, and factors associated with, readmission risk in a cohort of patients with surgically treated PFFs across Austria.

Quality of cementation in the early postoperative period has been proven to be an indicator of long-term survival of the total hip arthroplasty. Cementation grading described by Barrack et al is widely used but has certain limitations. It is based upon second-generation cementation technique and has unacceptably high inter- and intra-observer variability due to its subjective evaluation method. We are introducing a new grading system of quality of femoral cementation. It is based upon the ratio of the length of radiological lucency to the total length of cement-bone interface on both antero-posterior and lateral views. Because of its objective nature, it is likely to show reproducible results. We recruited five observers of various grades of surgical experience (trainees to consultant). Each observer graded the quality of femoral cementation on immediate postop xrays twice (gap of atleast two weeks) of 30 primary hip arthroplasties, using Barrack's grading and a new cementation index measured by dividing the ength of Radiolucency along CBI by the total Length of CBI. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS v17.0. Inter-observer and Intra-observer variability was determined by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for a two way mixed model. New cementation index showed excellent agreement for both inter and intra-observer reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.79 and 0.82 respectively. On contrary, results of inter-observer reliability for Barrack's grading were poor with value of 0.20. intra-observer reliability was found to be fair with 0.55. As evident from this study, it is a more reliable way of assessing the quality of cementation, with excellent agreement in both inter and intra-observer categories

Aims

Patients receiving cemented hemiarthroplasties after hip fracture have a significant risk of deep surgical site infection (SSI). Standard UK practice to minimize the risk of SSI includes the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement with no consensus regarding type, dose, or antibiotic content of the cement. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of high dose dual antibiotic-loaded cement in comparison to low dose single antibiotic-loaded cement in patients 60 years and over receiving a cemented hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular hip fracture.

Aims

Complex displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Surgical options include either open reduction and internal fixation alone, or combined with total hip arthroplasty (THA). There remains a cohort of severely comorbid patients who are deemed unfit for extensive surgical reconstruction and are treated conservatively. We describe the results of a coned hemipelvis reconstruction and THA inserted via a posterior approach to the hip as the primary treatment for this severely high-risk cohort.

Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. The National Hip Fracture Audit currently provides a framework for service evaluation. This evaluation is based upon the assessment of process rather than assessment of patient-centred outcome and therefore it fails to provide meaningful data regarding the clinical effectiveness of treatments. This study aims to capture data from the cohort of patients who present with a fracture of the proximal femur at a single United Kingdom Major Trauma Centre. Patient-centred outcomes will be recorded and provide a baseline cohort within which to test the clinical effectiveness of experimental interventions.