Aims. The incidence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) continues to increase. However, there are currently few long-term studies on the complications of AFFs and factors affecting them. Therefore, we attempted to investigate the outcomes, complications, and risk factors for complication through mid-term follow-up of more than three years. Methods. From January 2003 to January 2016, 305 patients who underwent surgery for AFFs at six hospitals were enrolled. After exclusion, a total of 147 patients were included with a mean age of 71.6 years (48 to 89) and 146 of whom were female. We retrospectively evaluated medical records, and reviewed radiographs to investigate the fracture site, femur bowing angle, presence of delayed union or nonunion, contralateral AFFs, and peri-implant fracture. A statistical analysis was performed to identify the significance of associated factors. Results. The mean follow-up period was 70.2 months (36 to 191). There were 146 AFFs (99.3%) in female patients and the mean age was 71.6 years (48 to 89). The AFFs were located in the subtrochanter and shaft in 52 cases (35.4%) and 95 (64.6%), respectively. The preoperative mean anterior/lateral femoral bowing angles were 10.5° (SD 5.7°)/6.1° (SD 6.2°). The postoperative mean anterior/lateral bowing values were changed by 8.7° (SD 5.4°)/4.6° (SD 5.9°). Bisphosphonates had been used contemporarily in 115 AFFs (78.2%) for a mean of 52.4 months (1 to 204; SD 45.5) preoperatively. Nailing was performed in 133 AFFs (90.5%), and union was obtained at a mean of 23.6 weeks (7 to 85). Delayed union occurred in 41 (27.9%), and nonunion occurred in 13 (8.8%). Contralateral AFF occurred in 79 patients (53.7%), and the use of a bisphosphonate significantly influenced the occurrence of contralateral AFFs (p = 0.019). Peri-implant fractures occurred in a total of 13 patients (8.8%), and a significant increase was observed in cases with plating (p = 0.021) and high grade of postoperative anterolateral bowing (p = 0.044). Conclusion. The use of a bisphosphonate was found to be a risk factor for contralateral AFF, and high-grade postoperative anterolateral bowing and plate fixation significantly increased the occurrence of peri-implant fractures. Long-term follow-up studies on the bilaterality of AFFs and peri-implant fractures are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1648–1655

Aims. Treatment guidelines for atypical femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonates have not been established. We conducted a systematic review of the treatment of atypical femoral fractures first, to evaluate the outcomes of surgical fixation of complete atypical fractures and secondly, to assess whether prophylactic surgery is necessary for incomplete atypical fractures. Materials and Methods. Case reports and series were identified from the PubMed database and were included if they described the treatment of atypical femoral fractures. In total, 77 publications met our inclusion criteria and 733 patients with 834 atypical complete or incomplete femoral fractures were identified. Results. For complete fractures, internal fixation was predominantly achieved by intramedullary nailing. The mean time to healing post-operatively was 7.3 months (2 to 31). Revision surgery for nonunion or implant failure was needed in 77 fractures (12.6%). A greater percentage of fractures treated with plate fixation (31.3%) required revision surgery than those treated with intramedullary nailing (12.9%) (p < 0.01). Non-operative treatment of incomplete fractures failed and surgery was eventually needed in nearly half of the patients (47%), whereas prophylactic surgery was successful and achieved a 97% rate of healing. Conclusion. Intramedullary nailing is the first-line treatment for a complete fracture, although the risk of delayed healing and revision surgery seems to be higher than with a typical femoral fracture. Non-operative treatment does not appear to be a reliable way of treating an incomplete fracture: prophylactic intramedullary nailing should be considered if the patient is in intractable pain. Radiographs of the opposite side should be obtained routinely looking for an asymptomatic fracture. Bisphosphonates must be discontinued but ongoing metabolic management in the form of calcium and/or vitamin D supplements is advisable. Teriparatide therapy can be considered as an alternative treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:295–302

Aims. Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective case control study of consecutive patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures between 2007 and 2017. Two observers identified 16 PAFF cases (mean age 73.9 years (44 to 88), 14 female patients) and 17 typical periprosthetic fractures in patients on bisphosphonate therapy as controls (mean age 80.7 years (60 to 86, 13 female patients). Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of PAFF. Management and complications were recorded. Results. Interobserver agreement for the PAFF classification was excellent (kappa = 0.944; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis compared with controls, patients with PAFFs had higher mean body mass indices (28.6 kg/m. 2. (. sd. 8.9) vs 21.5 kg/m. 2. (. sd. 3.3); p = 0.009), longer durations of bisphosphonate therapy (median 5.5 years (IQR 3.2 to 10.6) vs 2.4 years (IQR 1.0 to 6.4); p = 0.04), and were less likely to be on alendronate (50% vs 94%; p = 0.02) with an indication of secondary osteoporosis (19% vs 0%; p = 0.049). Duration of bisphosphonate therapy was an independent predictor of PAFF on multivariate analysis (R. 2. = 0.733; p = 0.05). Following primary fracture management, complication rates were higher in PAFFs (9/16, 56%) than controls (5/17, 29%; p = 0.178) with a relative risk of any complication following PAFF of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 3.8) and of reoperation 2.56 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.2). Conclusion. AFFs do occur in association with prostheses. Longer duration of bisphosphonate therapy is an independent predictor of PAFF. Complication rates are higher following PAFFs compared with typical PFFs, particularly of reoperation and infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1285–1291

An atypical femoral fracture (AFF), with a transverse fracture radiologically through the lateral cortex is a rare but serious condition. In order to improve our ability to identify patients with this condition, we retrospectively surveyed all subtrochanteric, peri-implant and diaphyseal femoral fractures in patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between 2004 and 2011. We describe the incidence of atypical fractures and their characteristics, with observational data including a review of the hospital and general practitioner records. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS) and the timed up-and-go (TUG) test. Atypical fractures only occurred in women with an incidence of 9.8 per 100 000 person-years. The incidence in those who were treated with bisphosphonates was 79.0 per 100 000 person-years; eight of 17 fractures occurred around metal implants. There was a high incidence of delayed union and revision surgery. A total of nine patients (ten AFFs) were available for review at a mean follow-up of 36.5 months (10 to 104). The clinical outcome was poor with a mean HHS of 58.9 (95% CI 47.4 to 70.4) and a mean TUG test of 25.7 s (95% CI 12.7 to 38.8). The delay in diagnosis and treatment of AFF may result from a lack of knowledge of this condition. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1035–40

Abstract. Background. Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a well known complication of Bisphosphonate therapy. Due to prolonged suppression of bone re-modelling in these fractures, surgical complications are difficult to manage. The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of surgical complications in AFF fixations and provide algorithm for management. Method. In this retrospective 10-year study (2010–2020), we identified patients surgically treated for AFF. We included patients who underwent revision surgery for any cause. Data collection included demographics, surgical complications, details of revision surgery and time to union. Result. Out of 57 patients who were operated for AFF, 17 underwent revision fixation. The average age was 69 with only 2 males. Around two-third (64%) were sub-trochanteric fractures and method of fixation in 64% cases was intra-medullary nail. The most common complication was non-union (12), followed by stress fracture and infection in 3 and 2 cases respectively. In most cases inadequate reduction and sub-optimal fixation was perceived as cause of failure except two cases which got infected. Revision fixation in all cases included improved bone contact (non-union site osteotomy), use of bone morphogenic proteins and improved fixation with augmentation device (either nail or plate). Follow up at 1 year showed fracture union in 12 cases, remaining 5 revision fixations failed, 3 of which were managed with proximal femur replacement. Conclusion. High rate of non-union after fixation in AFF. Optimizing the fixation construct results in union in most cases. However, arthroplasty should be considered in elderly patients with poor bone quality

There is strong evidence to support the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. There has, however, been growing concern that prolonged use of bisphosphonates can lead to the development of atypical femoral fractures and can protract healing time. We conducted a retrospective study looking at all femoral fractures between 2011–2013. Of 109 patients, 12 were diagnosed with atypical femoral fractures. The mean age of presentation was 69 (52–92). Five patients held no history of falls and presented with hip pain. The remaining seven sustained minor falls. Seven patients were on bisphosphonates on presentation. Bisphosphonates were discontinued in five cases and continued in two. Bisphosphonates commenced in one patient who subsequently developed second fracture. All fractures were managed with intramedullary nailing. Healing time was prolonged in all cases (mean healing time 7.3 months). Three patients needed further surgeries to achieve union. Overall, we observed that patients with prolonged bisphosphonate intake were more susceptible to atypical fractures with a delayed recovery time. Increasing awareness amongst medical professionals may aid timely diagnoses and subsequent referrals to orthopaedics. Recognition of these fractures may also permit early discontinuation of bisphosphonates, which may prevent future fractures and reduced healing times

We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to two large University Hospitals in the United Kingdom over a 24-month period from January 2008 to January 2010 to identify the incidence of atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures and their relationship to bisphosphonate treatment. Of the 3515 patients with a fracture of the proximal femur, 156 fractures were in the subtrochanteric region. There were 251 femoral shaft fractures. The atypical fracture pattern was seen in 27 patients (7%) with 29 femoral shaft or subtrochanteric fractures. A total of 22 patients with 24 atypical fractures were receiving bisphosphonate treatment at the time of fracture. Prodromal pain was present in nine patients (11 fractures); 11 (50%) of the patients on bisphosphonates suffered 12 spontaneous fractures, and healing of these fractures was delayed in a number of patients. This large dual-centre review has established the incidence of atypical femoral fractures at 7% of the study population, 81% of whom had been on bisphosphonate treatment for a mean of 4.6 years (0.04 to 12.1). This study does not advocate any change in the use of bisphosphonates to prevent fragility fractures but attempts to raise awareness of this possible problem so symptomatic patients will be appropriately investigated. However, more work is required to identify the true extent of this new and possibly increasing problem

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a salvage procedure using a 95° angled blade plate for failed osteosynthesis of atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures associated with the long-term use of bisphosphonates. These were compared with those for failed osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric fractures not associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Patients and Methods. Between October 2008 and July 2016, 14 patients with failed osteosynthesis of an atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture were treated with a blade plate (atypical group). Their mean age was 67.8 years (60 to 74); all were female. During the same period, 21 patients with failed osteosynthesis of a typical subtrochanteric fracture underwent restabilization using a blade plate (typical group). Outcome variables included the time of union, postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score, and Sanders functional rating scale. Results. In the atypical group, union was achieved in 12 patients (85.7%) at a mean of 8.4 months (4 to 12). The mean follow-up was 31.2 months (12 to 92) The plate broke in one patient requiring further stabilization with a longer plate and strut-allograft. Another patient with failure of fixation and varus angulation at the fracture site declined further surgery. In the typical group, union was achieved in 18 patients (85.7%) at a mean of 7.9 months (4 to 12). There was no difference in the mean Harris Hip Score between the two groups (83.1 points vs 86.8 points; p = 0.522) at the time of final follow-up. Sanders functional rating scores were good or excellent in 78.6% of the atypical group and in 81.0% of the typical group. Conclusion. The 95° angled blade plate was shown to be an effective fixation modality for nonunion of atypical subtrochanteric fractures with a high rate of union and functional improvement, comparable to those after fractures not associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1511–17

Introduction. Atypical femoral fracture focused on relation of bisphosphonate use, frequently. However, the mechanism of atypical femoral fracture was not yet clarified. Atypical femoral fractures have been kept femoral shaft cortical thickness and BMD, practically. We hypothesized that atypical femoral fractures were associated with impaired bone quality and curvature of femoral shaft. Materials & Methods. We experienced four atypical femoral fractures. One was subtrochanteric and three were shaft fracture. Two cases received bisphosphonate therapy for 3–5 years. BMD, bone metabolic markers, and bone quality markers were evaluated. Histomorphometry and collagen cross-link analysis were performed. Curvature of femoral shaft and 3-D finite element analysis in one incomplete fracture case were assessed. Results. BMD values were either maintained or not severely decreased. Deterioration of bone quality were verified by the results of histomorphometry, collagen cross-link analysis, and bone quality maker. Especially, homocystine values, such as one of bone quality markers, were increased in all cases. All atypical femoral shaft fractures showed outward curvature of femoral bone. In one case of incomplete atypical femoral shaft fracture, stress was concentrated at the fracture region according 3-D finite element analysis. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that atypical femoral fractures were estimated associated with deterioration of bone quality and curvature of femoral shaft

Introduction and Objective. Some periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) present history and radiographic aspect consistent with an atypical femoral fracture (AFF), fulfilling the criteria for AFF except that PFFs by themselves are excluded from the diagnosis of AFFs. The aim of this study was to evaluate in a single Institution series of PFFs if any of them could be considered a periprosthetic atypical femoral fracture (PAFF), and their prevalence. Materials and Methods. Surgical records were searched for PFFs around a primary hip stem from January 2013 to December 2019. Cases were classified according to Vancouver classification. Demographic and medical history were extracted. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results. One-hundred-fifteen PFFs were identified, 59 of them were type B1 and 16 were type C. Radiographs and medical records were available for all patients. Twenty-four patients (32%) have been treated with bisphosphonates (BPs) for longer than 4 years. Four patients presented a fracture with characteristics of PAFF. When enlarged to all PFFs of the series, no other PAFF was found: prevalence of PAFFs was 5.3% for type B1 and C cases and 3.5% for all surgically treated PFFs. Statistical significative difference between PAFFs and PFFs was found for prolonged BPs assumption and for the level of fracture clear of the stem. Conclusions. Fracture with characteristics of AFFs can also happen over a prosthetic stem, configuring themselves as PAFFs, and they are related to prolonged BPs use. As a correct diagnosis is mandatory for proper treatment, a revision of criteria for AFFs should be considered, accepting that PAFFs exist

Summary Statement. Atypical femoral fractures consist of a thin fracture line extending through the lateral cortex. The adjacent bone is undergoing resorption and mechanical abrasion and is often replaced with woven bone. The mechanical environment seems to inhibit healing. Background. The pathophysiology behind bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures remains unclear. Histological findings at the fracture site itself might provide important clues. So far only one case describing the histological appearance of the fracture has been published. Methods. Between 2008 and 2013, bone biopsies comprising the fracture site were collected from 8 patients with 4 displaced and 4 undisplaced atypical femoral fractures. Seven female patients reported continuous bisphosphonate use for an average of 9.5 years. One patient was a man, not using bisphosphonates. The bone biopsies were evaluated histologically, with Fourier transformed infrared imaging (FTIR) and micro-computed tomography. Results. The 4 undisplaced fractures engaged the whole cortical thickness and comprised a 150 to 200 µm wide, meandering fracture gap filled with amorphous necrotic material. Von Kossa staining showed occasional mineralised elements with bony structure within the amorphic material. Active resorption and remodeling was common in the close vicinity of the fracture, but seldom reached into the fracture gap. In some areas, the bone adjacent to the gap appeared to undergo fragmentation and disintegration, possibly due to abrasion. Woven bone was common adjacent to the fracture gap, and appeared to have been formed in defects caused by abrasion or where resorption cavities had reached into the fracture gap. Periosteal and endosteal callus was found in all cases. Far away from the fracture, large areas of osteonal bone with only empty osteocyte lacunae were found in some samples. In one patient, the remodeling process bridged the fracture gap at some points. The fracture was otherwise similar to the other undisplaced fractures. This patient had suffered from thigh pain since her bisphosphonate treatment was discontinued 18 months earlier, when the atypical fracture was diagnosed. Discussion. Atypical femoral fractures show signs of increased remodeling in the vicinity of the fracture gap. The narrow width of the gap and its necrotic contents suggest that micromotion leads to strains between the fracture fragments that precludes survival of ingrowing cells. Moreover, there seemed to be continuous mechanical fragmentation of the bone at the crack, and replacement of fragmented areas with woven bone. Thus, it appears that the fracture line is not static, but moves in the bone over time, like the changes in the course of a meandering river

Although there is strong evidence that bisphosphonates prevent certain types of osteoporotic fractures, there are concerns that they may be associated with rare atypical femoral fractures. 1480 patients of proximal femur and shaft fractures over a period of 2 years from Jan 2014 to Jan 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS trust. Hospital trauma database was used.195 patients had fractures in subtrochancteric and femoral shaft area. 11 patients had atypical femur fractures as defined by American society for bone and mineral research (ASBMR) task force 2013, revised criteria. Ten were female, one was male. Patients were aged from 68 to 97. In 6 patients, fractures were in the shaft, 5 in subtrochancteric area and 4 patients out of these had bilateral fractures. 10 out of 11 patients were on bisphosphonates. 4 patients had delayed diagnosis. 5 out of 11 patients did not have contralateral femoral x-rays. Treatment, 9 patients had intramedullary nail, one blade plate, and one treated conservatively. One patient in the IM group, had bilateral nailing. Average follow up was 7.6 months (range 1 to 16 months). At the end of the study, only 4 had united, 6 had not united and one not followed up. 4 out of 7 had low Vitamin D levels, 3 out of 7 had their bisphosphonate treatment stopped and 2 had histology which showed necrotic bone with trabeculae surrounded by fibrosis. Increasing number of patients are on bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Atypical femur fractures from bisphosphonates are often occult, often bilateral, with delayed healing. Patients on bisphosphonatetreatment should be advised to report any thigh or groin pain. Painful incomplete fractures need treatment with cephalomedullary nailing. Bone biology needs correcting by stopping bisphosphonatesand administering calcium & vitamin D supplements. Implications: We need to raise awareness amongst treating clinicians and have national guidelines

Atypical femoral fracture non-union (AFFNU) is both, rare (3–5 per 1000 proximal femur fractures) and difficult to treat. Lack of standardised guidelines leads to a variability in fixation constructs, use of bone grafting and restricted weight bearing protocols, which are not evidence based. We hypothesised that there is no change in union rates without the use of bone grafting and immediate weight bearing post-operatively does not lead to increased complications. Materials & Methods. A retrospective review of all consecutively treated AFFNU cases between March 2015 to December 2019 was carried out. 9 patients with a mean age of 63.87 years and M:F ratio of 7:2 met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcome variable was radiographic union at 12 months after revision surgery. All surgeries were carried out by a single surgeon. Fixation construct, neck-shaft angle, use of bone graft and immediate postoperative weight bearing protocols were recorded. Results. Radiographic union was achieved in 7 of 9 patients (78%) after first revision surgery. 1 patient achieved union after 2nd revision surgery and 1 patient died in the early post-operative period due to pulmonary embolism. No bone grafting was used in any of the patients and weight-bearing as tolerated was allowed from the first post-operative day. The mean neck-shaft angle after non-union surgery was 136 degrees. Conclusions. In this case series, the union rate was comparable to those reported in literature previously and achieved without any form of bone grafting. To our knowledge, this is the only case series where no bone grafting was used in the management of AFFNU. Limited by a small sample size and retrospective study design, still, this study brings into question the efficacy of practice of bone grafting and restricted weight-bearing in the management of AFFNU. Bone grafting is associated with the risk of infection at donor site, postoperative pain, and morbidity, while early weight bearing is critical in elderly patients. There is no evidence supporting restricted weight-bearing and it should not be adopted as the default practice as it may even be detrimental to patients

A painful “dreaded black line” (DBL) has been associated with progression to complete fractures in atypical femur fractures (AFF). Adjacent sclerosis, an unrecognized radiological finding, has been observed in relation to the DBL. We document its incidence, associated features, demographics and clinical progression. We reviewed plain radiographs of 109 incomplete AFFs between November 2006 and June 2021 for the presence of sclerosis adjacent to a DBL. Radiographs were reviewed for location of lesions, and presence of focal endosteal or periosteal thickening. We collected demographical data, type and duration of bisphosphonate therapy, and progression to fracture or need for prophylactic stabilization, with a 100% follow up of 72 months (8 – 184 months). 109 femurs in 86 patients were reviewed. Seventeen sclerotic DBLs were observed in 14 patients (3 bilateral), involving 15.6% of all femora and 29.8% of femora with DBLs. Location was mainly subtrochanteric (41.2%), proximal diaphyseal (35.3%) and mid-diaphyseal (23.5%), and were associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. All patients were female, mostly Chinese (92.9%), with a mean age of 69 years. 12 patients (85.7%) had a history of alendronate therapy, and the remaining 2 patients had zoledronate and denosumab therapy respectively. Mean duration of bisphosphonate therapy was 62 months. 4 femora (23.5%) progressed to complete fractures that were surgically managed, whilst 6 femora (35.3%) required prophylactic fixation. Peri-lesional sclerosis in DBL is a new radiological finding in AFFs, predominantly found in the proximal half of the femur, at times bilateral, and are always associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. As a high proportion of patients required surgical intervention, these lesions could suggest non-union of AFFs, similar to the sclerotic margins commonly seen in fractures with non-union. The recognition of and further research into this new feature could shed more light on the pathophysiological progression of AFFs

An 81-year-old woman presented with a fracture in the left femur. She had well-fixed bilateral hip replacements and had received long-term bisphosphonate treatment. Prolonged bisphosphonate use has been recently linked with atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures. While the current definition of an atypical fracture of the femur excludes peri-prosthetic fractures, this case suggests that they do occur and should be considered in patients with severe osteopenia. Union of the fracture followed cessation of bisphosphonates and treatment with teriparatide. Thus, this case calls into question whether prophylactic intramedullary nailing is sufficient alone to treat early or completed atypical femoral fractures

Introduction. Since the concept of severely suppressed bone turnover (SSBT) after long-term bisphosphonate (BPs) use, SSBT have been believed as the major cause of low-energy femoral fractures, which are called atypical femoral fractures. Here we present several cases of stress fractures with bowing femoral shaft deformity, which can be another cause of low-energy femoral fractures in the elderly. Materials and Methods. From 1998 to 2012, we treated thirteen cases of low-energy fractures of femoral shaft. All cases were females with an average age of 77.0 (67–88) years. Retrospectively, we assessed fracture type, X-ray of contralateral side, bowing deformity of femur, and duration of BPs use. Result. All cases were classified as simple fracture; AO/OTA type 32-A. In eleven cases, incomplete fracture of contralateral side was found by X-ray and confirmed by a bone scintigram. In twelve cases, obvious bowing deformity of the femoral shaft was noted. BPs were used only in seven cases, and the medication period was not so long. Just one case had taken Alendronate for ten years, and this case showed no bowing deformity. Discussion. Shane defined atypical femoral fracture, and indicated that the same fractures may develop even without BPs use. According to this definition, our advocating stress fractures by bowing deformity will also be included in atypical fractures. We think stress fractures by bowing deformity should be discriminated from atypical fractures by SSBT

The ageing population and an increase in both the incidence and prevalence of cancer pose a healthcare challenge, some of which is borne by the orthopaedic community in the form of osteoporotic fractures and metastatic bone disease. In recent years there has been an increasing understanding of the pathways involved in bone metabolism relevant to osteoporosis and metastases in bone. Newer therapies may aid the management of these problems. One group of drugs, the antibody mediated anti-resorptive therapies (AMARTs) use antibodies to block bone resorption pathways. This review seeks to present a synopsis of the guidelines, pharmacology and potential pathophysiology of AMARTs and other new anti-resorptive drugs. . We evaluate the literature relating to AMARTs and new anti-resorptives with special attention on those approved for use in clinical practice. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand. It is the first AMART approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the US Food and Drug Administration. Other novel anti-resorptives awaiting approval for clinical use include Odanacatib. Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of the complications of bone metastases. Recent evidence suggests, however, that denosumab may have an adverse event profile similar to bisphosphonates, including atypical femoral fractures. It is, therefore, essential that orthopaedic surgeons are conversant with these medications and their safe usage. . Take home message: Denosumab has important orthopaedic indications and has been shown to significantly reduce patient morbidity in osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:160–5

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are reported in patients taking bisphosphonates (BPs). This study aims to describe demographics, potential risk factors and outcome of fixation in AFFs. Forty-three patients with AFF were identified retrospectivity from all identified patients with subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fractures within NHS Grampian between 2008–2018. Patients were identified via hospital coding and electronic search of patients undergoing femoral fixation. AFFs were diagnosed by the 2014 American Society of Mineral and Bone Research diagnostic criteria by electronic patient record review by two investigators. Within this cohort, the incidence of AFF was 8.25% with male to female ratio of 10:1 and a mean of presentation age 73.3 years. 27.9% of AFFs occurred in the diaphysis. 22% of AFFs were bilateral. Mean follow-up was 11.5 months. 87.5% of patients had documented prodromal symptoms. 35% had proven radiological changes before fracture. All patients identified were on BPs. Duration of BPs before fracture was 5 months- 13.2 years (mean 6.3 years). Concurrent use of BPs with steroid and proton pump inhibitors was seen in 58.5%. All patients had intramedullary fixation with 8 (18.6%) requiring revision for non-union. For those that united radiologically it took on average 304 days (220–513). BPs were only stopped in 45% of patients after fixation. AFFs in this cohort appear to be associated with BP use, female sex, clinical and radiological prodrome. AFF remain a difficult clinical problem with a high revision rate. Further work is required to identify the temporal relationships and to raise awareness to improve surveillance/management

Over the last 10 years atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) have become recognised as a complication of standard-dose bisphosphonate use. In 2014 the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research published updated diagnostic criteria for AFF. We undertook a 5-year retrospective analysis of the trauma admission database at a major trauma centre to establish the incidence of this problem in our patient population. Initial screening was performed using keyword-matching methodology to produce a shortlist of patients with low-energy femoral fractures. These patients’ case notes, radiographs, and electronic discharge summaries were reviewed to discriminate AFF from typical femoral fractures. Initial filtering identified a total of 112 low energy femoral fractures. Of these, 12 were confirmed as AFFs. 58% (7/12) of the AFF group were on bisphosphonates compared to 15% (15/100) of the typical femoral fracture group. This finding was statistically significant (p = 0.0004). These data show that there is a link between bisphosphonate use and AFF. However, a causal relationship cannot be inferred. The incidence of AFF in our study is broadly in line with the published data